It's a wet bank holiday, my bike is clean and set up properly, I have nothing else to do at the moment so I have a question for the stat geeks out there.
Is DH at the pro level getting quicker?
The tracks that I know that are ridden at that level (fort bill, Pearce series tracks etc.) have all changed a lot over the years so side by side comparisons of time are difficult.
Has all the research and development that's gone into the sport made a difference? Sam Hill just won Meribel on a £4k bike, beating Gwin and Miami on their £8k bikes (admittedly they've been set up by experts). I'm considering splashing out on a new bike (currently ride an 08 glory) but I'm thinking, why bother? doubt it'll make me any quicker.
What needs to happen is for some one to make a track that can be repaired back to exactly how it was before to make a comparison , f*ck knows how you would do that but there has gotta be a way.
What needs to happen is for some one to make a track that can be repaired back to exactly how it was before to make a comparison , f*ck knows how you would do that but there has gotta be a way.
Wow everyone is hyped that diamondback came out with a $2000 dh sled with domain and derore. Where as that Nukeproof is waaaaay more desirable frame and build.
fast groomed trails are okay but i much prefer extremely technical terrain like steep, rocks, and whatnot. Some resorts have all these perfectly smooth groomed trails and i hate that. to me, downhill is about tackling extremely rough terrain that most would be hesitant to ride...not something you could do on an xc bike.
well overall, of course it is getting quicker. just like any sport, as the years go by everyones skills improve and the bar is set higher and higher. And with better suspension designs, lighter weight parts, and bigger wheels (for some) it will get even faster.