For a while now I've been looking to modify my bike to new school geometry (longer and lower) and after comparing lots of brands with 160mm travel I found the Yeti SB66 had similar geometry to my bike but also had the two features I needed to copy: a longer TT and lower BB. The longer front end would give me the room to use an inline seat post instead of the set back and get me more in the centre of the bike while seated. In the standing/descending position the low BB and longer wheelbase would give me more stability and confidence at speed. I put my ideas to my steel frame builder friend at Manufactured by Grelck (a home based hobby business). He took on the the project and produced the new front end in 4130 CrMo. Final figures are: TT 23mm longer / BB 15mm lower than the standard Coiler 2007 Med. We lowered the BB more than the Yeti. It's more in line with the current crop of bikes with low BB such as the Santa Cruz Nomad, Orbea Rallon (low setting), GT Sanction etc.. I love the result. Feels perfect.
Hey guys, usually in here as mtbrider71. If you have any input on this I would love to hear it: https://www.pinkbike.com/forum/listcomments/?threadid=165510&pagenum=1#commentid5683541
I have all my base geometry down for my DH bike design and Im going to start the 3D modeling. I'm debating whether I should use Solidworks or Inventor for the 3d model...I have some good experience with inventor but a lot of people are telling me SW is better. Whats the best for bike design? Cost doesnt matter
I have all my base geometry down for my DH bike design and Im going to start the 3D modeling. I'm debating whether I should use Solidworks or Inventor for the 3d model...I have some good experience with inventor but a lot of people are telling me SW is better. Whats the best for bike design? Cost doesnt matter
I made the switch to solid works recently from inventor. Most of the commands are the same but the layout is a little different. Overall I've found solidworks to be easier to work with especially for the engineering based tools. I'm still quicker in inventor because I'm used to it but I find solidworks to be more intuitive as well as having a more tangible link to production methods. Solidworks also runs faster for me and with less issues. My cousin who engineers turbines has similar issues as I do with inventor crashing, not willing to make seemingly basic chamfers, etc. which I encounter less of with solidworks.