Whhooaa - Commencal Supreme DH WC Ltd Edition!!

Jan 9, 2009

HOT!?

I nearly burned my fingers typing this one up, in celebration Gee and Rach’s outstanding double win at last summer’s UCI World Championships in Val di Sole Italy. Commencal set the gears in motion to do produce something very special indeed...

Collaborating with Animal Commencal co-sponsors Shimano, Fox, DT Swiss, Chris King, Sunline, E13 and Maxxis, Commencal set to work on producing an ‘all-singing, all-dancing’ replica of the Atherton’s World Championship winning Supreme DH complete with illustrious rainbow stripe paintjob. As close to the Atherton’s race winning setup as is feasibly possible, with no cutting of corners, the spec list is enviable to say the least! Landing in March 2009 (in limited numbers), both as the pictured complete bike and a frameset, Commencal are proud to present the Supreme DH World Championship Ltd Edition.’

£/$ TBC
Sizes: S/M (42/16.5) L/XL (44/17.3)


Spec:
Frame – New Supreme DH
Rear Shock – Fox DHX 5.0 (Atherton Setting)
Fork – Fox 40 RC2
Headset – Chris King 1” 1/8
Stem – Sunline V1DH Direct Mount
Bars – Sunline V1 Low
Grips – Sunline Logo Lock-on
Brakes – Shimano Saint 203mm/203mm
Shifter – Shimano Saint r/h
Chain Device – E13 LG1
Rear Derailleur – Shimano Saint short cage
Bottom Bracket – Shimano Saint
Crankset – Shimano Saint
Pedals - FLATS.
Chain – Shimano
Cassette – Shimano 12-25T
Wheels – DT Swiss EX1750
Tyres – Maxxis High Roller 26 x 2.5”
Seatpost – Thomson Elite
Saddle – SDG Fly RL Titanium

Stay Unclipped.

Si Paton
www.Descent-Gear.com
Troy Lee XC Gloves £19.99
Share on Twitter, Facebook, Email

| More

Link to News Story
Must Read This Week

171 Comments

  • + 7
flag fantaman (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:33)
that is one sweet bike,looks amazing
  • + 6
flag brooce (Jan 9, 2009 at 12:43)
You're so BEAUTIFUL!
  • - 30
flag fortbill (Jan 9, 2009 at 13:08) (Below Threshold) show comment
looks a bit like a slimmed down racing version of the session 10
  • + 0
flag mooseman414 (Jan 9, 2009 at 16:45)
No, this bike is way better than the session 10.
  • + 8
flag allenrotstein (Jan 9, 2009 at 19:22)
No it's not.. The contact system is excellent but Trek has got their act together with that custom damped Fox DHX5.. Besides, Gee's bike weights at 42pounds, and the Trek off the shelf weights at 37pounds with room to shed some more pounds off!! and also the Trek is cheaper than this supreme DH..

You're just blowing away your hard earned money to get a nice paint job, but im sure you can get a better bike for less money with better specs.

Just my 2 cents.
  • + 5
flag time-bomb (Jan 9, 2009 at 19:56)
what? allenrotstein, i think you are confusing the new session 8 DH and the Session 10. The 8 is light but the 10 isn't. Trek isn't making the 10 anymore either, unfortunately.....it was a great frame but too heavy for racing. I can see where fortbill is coming from except for one major factor, the pivot location. The Session 10 has a much higher pivot location which gives the bike a different wheelpath and therefore responds to the terrain in a different manner.
  • - 3
flag bigburd (Jan 10, 2009 at 4:08)
I wonder what the weight of it is?
  • + 46
flag huckoveraduck (Jan 10, 2009 at 5:45)
ahhhh why is everyone obsessed with weight like some kind of neo-nazi cult following that must be adheared to in order to be a super amazing bonafied rider?

Like woaaaah sonny I spent five million pounds on new carbon spokes and saved 50 grams - I'm off the hoook bitches!!!!!!!!!!!!!

whooptedoo Trek session custom damped dhx5 *insert boners here* shock?
My Van R works fine!

Yeah I'll just go eat some cereal and stop talking crap now, is that okay with everyone?

You know, my cereal box is exactly 4g lighter than last years model. It means my cereal taste so much better I can't even explain!

Goodbye citizens.
  • + 11
flag curlxupxandxdle (Jan 10, 2009 at 6:03)
hahaha ^^^^ you made my morning
  • + 0
flag gustofwind (Jan 10, 2009 at 6:31)
mine too
  • + 6
flag vppbikedeefer (Jan 10, 2009 at 8:40)
Ahahahahaha nice rant son! It's funny cause it's true. 7 or 8 years ago nobody cared how heavy their DH bike was it was all about rippin' and having fun. Now everybody is as weight conscious as a spandex wearing Rodie or XC racer....Why?
  • + 2
flag tomer4eva (Jan 10, 2009 at 10:01)
'whoa'
that is the word that discride this bike !! WHOA
  • + 3
flag artifact (Jan 10, 2009 at 13:32)
not a huge fan to be honest
  • + 0
flag bkbroiler (Jan 10, 2009 at 13:46)
Very funny and so true
  • - 12
flag ganstask8er (Jan 10, 2009 at 14:00) (Below Threshold) show comment
so ugly. the welds on commencals aren't ever heat treated. the company tries to rip you off becasue they snap every year of riding. and f*gs like cedric gracia ride for them
  • - 14
flag skinsuitssuck (Jan 10, 2009 at 14:36) (Below Threshold) show comment
huckoveraduck

yeah your a f*ckin wanker
  • + 3
flag blantokles (Jan 10, 2009 at 17:28)
huckoveraduck

i love you, would you be my bridesman?
  • + 5
flag jamminginger (Jan 11, 2009 at 7:34)
huckoveraduck, what a legend
  • + 0
flag raveglia (Jan 11, 2009 at 9:13)
seems skinsuiit didn't really catch onto the general vibe....
  • + 0
flag raveglia (Jan 11, 2009 at 9:16)
I refuse to agree that this weighs 42lbs. just...nahh.
  • + 0
flag elcripple (Jan 11, 2009 at 11:40)
meh to be honest 2lbs here and there isnt important unless you actally ride in the world cup! I ride a 46lb demo 9 and wouldnt have it any other way! unless i could actually afford to put it on a diet..............
  • - 1
flag TJ-downhill (Jan 11, 2009 at 12:40)
That's a really sick looking bike even though I have not really been an avid fan of Commencal. It's looks ready to pinn the DH.
  • + 0
flag skinsuitssuck (Jan 13, 2009 at 9:09)
ive always loved commencal bikes i think their great and by the way raveglia i did catch onto the general vibe i just thought huckoveraduck was being a twat
  • + 1
flag huckoveraduck (Jan 13, 2009 at 11:23)
^^ hahahaha stop trying to un 'owned' yourself. Yes your right, Im a twat. Self admittedy too. The worst kind in my opinion.
  • + 0
flag almightybenners (Jan 14, 2009 at 11:29)
maybe racers are getting obsessed with weight like spandex wearing roadies and xc racers becuse the prize purses for races are starting to get as big as the ones from road racing and xc so theres more to play for now so you have to take racing more seriously if your in it to win the cash/gear. and as losing weight off your bike is a fairly easy to give your self an advantage it kind of makes sense
  • + 0
flag jamminginger (Jan 14, 2009 at 12:06)
thats so completely true....
  • + 0
flag skinsuitssuck (Jan 15, 2009 at 9:17)
^^ finaly someone sees sence
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag whitetux (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:34)
i like the graphics
[Reply]
  • + 43
flag teagues (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:35)
*yawn*

The special colors will have you winning WC races, as well...
  • - 7
flag willsoffe (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:08) (Below Threshold) show comment
Well no. Obviously they won't.

However the custom damping and custom geometry may help a bit more...
  • - 2
flag teagues (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:45)
I'm pretty sure you don't turn into an Atherton when you sit on it...you just look like those chumps who buy the Trek Madone in full Armstrong-livery...and dress the part as well when they ride.

This thing is perfect for giving all the fifteen year-olds here boners while they fantasize about wasting the cash so they can impress their peers...
  • + 10
flag ScottHill22 (Jan 9, 2009 at 15:05)
Well, if you can afford it why not?
  • + 4
flag fall0ut (Jan 9, 2009 at 15:20)
teagues ur an idiot
  • + 2
flag teagues (Jan 9, 2009 at 15:46)
Like I says, if it gives you a boner, and you can afford it, by all means...
  • - 4
flag fall0ut (Jan 9, 2009 at 16:14) (Below Threshold) show comment
it doesnt its heavy and ugly
  • + 8
flag FrankCastle (Jan 9, 2009 at 16:32)
your name is danielBIGHIT the model bike for heavy and ugly.
  • + 10
flag teagues (Jan 9, 2009 at 17:02)
Danielbighit's last comment was a "Your Mom" joke waiting to happen...
  • - 1
flag fatbrett3 (Jan 9, 2009 at 17:16)
wow teagues how did you get neg propped your absolutely right in your first comment. i hate that damn madone that uses really old layup schedule that actually creates voids in the carbon.
  • + 0
flag industrymike (Jan 9, 2009 at 18:36)
At $8500 I would hope it would get yuor on the podium, colours or not haha.
  • - 3
flag fall0ut (Jan 10, 2009 at 9:33)
FrankCastle my bighit is 40.5 pounds much lighter than this
  • - 1
flag fugrus (Jan 10, 2009 at 11:43)
fatbrett clearly knows his roadie talk pity he will nevr know wat a girl with out clothes on looks like
  • - 3
flag konaracer91 (Jan 10, 2009 at 19:30)
frank castle do this 8======) 0:

^^you ^^me
my bighit weighs 39 pounds
  • - 3
flag fall0ut (Jan 10, 2009 at 19:56)
cool
  • + 1
flag almightybenners (Jan 14, 2009 at 11:35)
yeah but danielbighit you still ride a bighit sooo....
and fugrus wtf is wrong with roadbikes? we wouldnt even have a sport if it wasn't for them and its a great way to train your legs and build stamina
  • - 1
flag thatdownhillkid (Jan 14, 2009 at 18:28)
all i'm gonna say is this. theres a bunch of 15 year old boners out there that'll whoop your ass down any track any time. theres a bunch of 15 year olds out there that would use this bike to its full potential. check the junior ex times to the pros. you'd be surprised.
  • + 0
flag bigburd (Jan 15, 2009 at 3:31)
And wtf is wrong with bighits? Ah thats it they are cheaper then most bikes so they must be bad right?
  • - 1
flag willsoffe (Jan 15, 2009 at 5:00)
To be honest you lot.

If you can't see what difference geometry and damping set up makes, then this is not the bike for you anyway. So go jerk off over some ugly freeride rigs...
  • - 1
flag thatdownhillkid (Jan 15, 2009 at 6:17)
bighits are great bikes. set it up with a DHX 5, and it can compete with alot of bikes with a much bigger price tag. and they're really light too.
  • + 0
flag fall0ut (Jan 15, 2009 at 20:50)
yea but except for the weight part... ive gotten lots of upgraded parts on mine and 40.5 lbs is kinda heavy to me. when i get a boxxer race its goin down to 39.5
  • + 0
flag thatdownhillkid (Jan 15, 2009 at 21:06)
i got mine to 36 with folding bead tires, and 39 with DH tires. what wheels do you have?
  • + 0
flag konaracer91 (Jan 16, 2009 at 12:13)
i have wtb dual duty tirres laced to hadley hubs with specialized s-works chunders. they are strong
  • + 0
flag fall0ut (Jan 16, 2009 at 15:24)
shitty alex rims but im going to upgrade to deemaxs, avid codes, thomsen elite post, minions, and other stuff
[Reply]
  • + 11
flag blaisepage (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:37)
unreal, too bad ppl that drive ferrari's around are the only ones that will be able to afford this.......
  • + 22
flag enduro06 (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:40)
Half of the people who own Ferrari's don't know how to drive em either!!Wink
  • + 33
flag Cosmossss (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:48)
you talking about ronaldo?
  • + 6
flag nosh-heart-mtb (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:48)
ahaha
  • + 5
flag yakobitz (Jan 9, 2009 at 11:25)
what is the actual price?
  • + 12
flag marangerrmx (Jan 9, 2009 at 12:10)
a f*ck load
  • + 2
flag bigal243 (Jan 9, 2009 at 13:43)
Seeing as the Supreme DH Team retails for $8000, with an 888 and RocoWC, i would guess the ltd edition to be at least $10,000
  • + 0
flag bkbroiler (Jan 10, 2009 at 13:51)
Oh and the proto dhx 10 rc 20 and fox 40 rc 18 won't be on this bike I'm sure
  • + 1
flag bkbroiler (Jan 10, 2009 at 13:53)
You wear or have the ioc colours anywhere on you and you are just askin for a slap
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag hendu (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:38)
lovin the paint job
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Carl08 (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:38)
that`s crazy
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag Taylormade (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:39)
sweet bike
[Reply]
  • - 13
flag nishnash (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:44) (Below Threshold) show comment
Finally now do people believe me? I'm glad they finally released this to the public. I love the look of it!
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag joelromeira (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:45)
just sexy
[Reply]
  • + 8
flag snook (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:46)
The specs are amazing but I'm not really a fan of the paint job, I prefer the normal Commencals.

And Pedals - FLATS lol...
  • + 2
flag variiis (Jan 9, 2009 at 12:27)
yh flats all the way.
  • + 1
flag snook (Jan 9, 2009 at 13:24)
I would disagree with that but...
  • + 3
flag sykesy (Jan 9, 2009 at 13:29)
that's only because you ride 4x snook, flats ftw!
  • + 1
flag skinsuitssuck (Jan 10, 2009 at 14:39)
flats all the way and i dont really like the paintjob either but thats the only thing wrong
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag monster-10 (Jan 9, 2009 at 10:48)
soloe
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag dhzac (Jan 9, 2009 at 11:05)
wonder wat bike dan will hav cus they are onlie for rachel and gee aint they?
[Reply]
  • + 12
flag dabeno (Jan 9, 2009 at 11:15)
Well known FACT - World champ stripes make you 5 seconds faster!

Looks lovely, not for the money though!
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag iambike4lyf (Jan 9, 2009 at 11:26)
i like mine better...
.... ok i lied, that ones buff Frown
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag thomasowen (Jan 9, 2009 at 11:38)
That looks horrible, like all commencals.
  • + 0
flag timmyelle (Jan 9, 2009 at 12:14)
top tube looks like it may be a bit high. like myself
  • + 0
flag iambike4lyf (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:22)
looks can be decieving
but yh its quite high (personal experiance)
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag lewdelaney (Jan 9, 2009 at 11:54)
that bike is soooo nice
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag dillonchamberlain (Jan 9, 2009 at 11:56)
and here i was bein all like "omg!"!
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag vazpinto (Jan 9, 2009 at 12:02)
there is only one thing missing.... the FOX 40 championship ltd edition.
But it´s super super nice like this
I must.... see one of this
  • + 0
flag willsoffe (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:09)
Too right. And the Fox RC4 shock...
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag jondurham (Jan 9, 2009 at 12:04)
I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say the frameset will cost around $4000 CAD and the whole bike around $8000 CAD considering a normal supreme frame costs around $3300 with a normal DHX 5
  • + 0
flag sirbikealot (Jan 9, 2009 at 18:18)
2009 Supreme DH frame only is $2699CDN
This Atherton world cup frame comes as a kit with many parts (guide, hub, seatpost, etc) and will cost around $3899cdn
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag nlitworld (Jan 9, 2009 at 12:23)
Any word on if it's coming with their special frame geo? Cause a special paintjob and nice parts list doesn't make it super special at all.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag a-l-e-x (Jan 9, 2009 at 12:23)
"HOT!?"

No, not really.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag c2crider (Jan 9, 2009 at 12:37)
That bike is going to cost a bomb! Great spec though.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Jean-dirt (Jan 9, 2009 at 13:03)
like it
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag mattus-au (Jan 9, 2009 at 13:12)
thats a f***ing cool bike
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag rollinwith26s (Jan 9, 2009 at 13:20)
HOT...
not really.
To tell you the truth I don't see what the big deal is. I have never heard anything good about DT Swiss rims or this 1600 dollar fork on it which is said to need constant maintenance. Just seems like a big gimmick to get me to buy a bike. Just because a couple of professional mountain bikers had success on this rig doesn't mean it's good....
  • + 0
flag willsoffe (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:11)
I agree. Apart from the fact that Fox 40's are the best 8" fork money can buy...
  • - 1
flag iambike4lyf (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:23)
yh, all he mentioned was the maintencance, which is true they need to be maintained to remain the best 8" fork, if not my 888 would beat em
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag freeridejamie (Jan 9, 2009 at 13:26)
HOT? i think your looking for the word SEXY!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag kontraa (Jan 9, 2009 at 13:45)
Look at the front brake ^^ HOT?! definitely not!
  • + 0
flag willsoffe (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:12)
I see where you're going with that my friend! Very observant.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag jamiecuthill (Jan 9, 2009 at 13:49)
I like the green of the VIP supreme more than this stripy one.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag MooMoo2323 (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:13)
what's up w/ the "stay unclipped" at the bottom of the ad? Gee rides clips a lot of the time. sweet bike though, for sure.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag JK-Wang (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:27)
Love at first sight!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag c-v-tich (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:40)
weight?
  • + 1
flag stryke (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:43)
42-43lbs, like gees world champ bike
  • + 1
flag c-v-tich (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:55)
weighty, i tought it would be less with those wheels and bars-stem-seat-seatpost
  • + 2
flag stryke (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:56)
the frame is pretty heavy by itself

i just think people need to get over the idea that bikes need to be sub 40lbs
  • + 1
flag c-v-tich (Jan 9, 2009 at 15:02)
yeah, lighter frame will last shorter, anyway i thought it was around 40, not more....
  • + 0
flag caleb-doane (Jan 10, 2009 at 13:30)
lighter bikes also get bucked around more. right around 41 - 42 pounds is a good weight. its still light enough to be fast but will feel much more stable than a 36-35 pound bike in the rough stuff.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag purplegreen (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:40)
OMG THAT BIKES DOPE!!!!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag BryanMTBiker (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:45)
how much ??
  • + 0
flag skinsuitssuck (Jan 10, 2009 at 14:45)
alot of f*ckin money
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag sharpbrick (Jan 9, 2009 at 14:52)
wooooooooooooooow!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag mellon305 (Jan 9, 2009 at 15:07)
id give it a months riding before the headtube starts tearing off.
  • + 0
flag stryke (Jan 10, 2009 at 1:27)
2009's are holding up alot better then the 2006-2008 versions
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag fall0ut (Jan 9, 2009 at 15:24)
i could get a 32 pound session 88 setup and be even happier thatn having this
  • + 3
flag stryke (Jan 10, 2009 at 1:26)
so do it
  • + 0
flag fall0ut (Jan 10, 2009 at 9:34)
dont have the money lol
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag ciszewski (Jan 9, 2009 at 15:44)
Sweet, comes with the best kept secret in DH racing...The front brake that doesn't work!!! No wonder gee won, he had no brakes.

And i though that this was supposed to come with the RC4 and custom valved 40, not stock stuff.
  • + 0
flag sirbikealot (Jan 9, 2009 at 18:19)
it will have the RC4
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag konakid8 (Jan 9, 2009 at 15:54)
nice Wink
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag keepitup (Jan 9, 2009 at 16:17)
all of you kids trying to sound like you know what your talking about. and putting this bike down, simply on the fact that you dont like the paint job. or that the "top tube is too high".
go get hit by a bus.

and always clip in.
  • + 0
flag caleb-doane (Jan 10, 2009 at 13:31)
amen... clips are the way to go!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag flatlineA5 (Jan 9, 2009 at 16:29)
nice looking bike but who ever came up with that paint job needs shooting...lol
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag wyldeman1 (Jan 9, 2009 at 16:57)
yes, nice ...but very 80,s........clip in? NAW- hang loose, you moose...lol
[Reply]
  • + 7
flag Gsnickets (Jan 9, 2009 at 17:28)
only the World Champ should run the rainbow, end of story.
  • + 0
flag gustofwind (Jan 10, 2009 at 6:40)
soooo agreed. now some 12 yr old kid is gunna buy it and call himself a champ
  • + 0
flag gustofwind (Jan 10, 2009 at 6:43)
however, i just took another look at it, and the wc scheme is different from what the "champs" ride. this is just lined squares that are coloured accordingly.
  • + 0
flag Gsnickets (Jan 10, 2009 at 6:46)
It would be cool if it were JUST for the champ, but the common man should not, under any circumstances, have a bike with the world champion colors. Only the champ runs those colors for a reason, because they earned it.
  • + 0
flag Gsnickets (Jan 10, 2009 at 6:55)
it's still got the rainbow though.
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag jaque-17 (Jan 9, 2009 at 17:30)
nice! this is one of the dh bikes out there that i actually like!!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag commencel (Jan 9, 2009 at 17:39)
i would ride that crap out of that bike...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag foreplayfirst (Jan 9, 2009 at 18:08)
One Word, Stunning,
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Colin994 (Jan 9, 2009 at 19:05)
i need to know the price!!!
  • + 0
flag llessurretneprac (Jan 9, 2009 at 20:03)
Between $8500 and $10000
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag Ipoddragon (Jan 9, 2009 at 20:22)
I WANTSmile
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag GordonShread (Jan 9, 2009 at 21:45)
I know this is a bike that world champions ride, but as far as the look of this bike... it does nothing for me. Perfomance is the only important thing.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag CrayC (Jan 9, 2009 at 23:04)
UUUuh! One of the most ugly graphics i´ve ever seen! What a crap!!!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag maxeponken (Jan 9, 2009 at 23:57)
This bike will look so dirty on a muddy day Razz why do you even paint stuff for dh in white?!?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag luke-c (Jan 10, 2009 at 0:33)
question here, which atherton setup will it be? becasue in the last decline there was an article about athertons and leovs setups. and both the athertons run completely different setups. will it very by the frame size? i wonder....
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag brucethomson (Jan 10, 2009 at 0:35)
looks ok ...thats bout it . same old same old
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag benchwarmer (Jan 10, 2009 at 1:41)
Nah , not what I call a beatiful bike , but hey , opinions may differ
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag jayharse (Jan 10, 2009 at 3:27)
Im my opininion, only world champions deserve the rainbow paint job
  • + 0
flag bkbroiler (Jan 10, 2009 at 13:59)
no shit right?!
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag hardtaildh08 (Jan 10, 2009 at 5:04)
thats hotter than racheal atherton in a oven i want it !
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag jonmosh (Jan 10, 2009 at 5:05)
rainbow stripes are also the gay pride colours...
  • - 1
flag gustofwind (Jan 10, 2009 at 6:41)
hahahahah
  • + 1
flag bkbroiler (Jan 10, 2009 at 14:00)
Bahahahahahha! That's why the IOC wants you in tights now!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag oggiekl (Jan 10, 2009 at 6:26)
HOT!!!! Big Grin
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag sxman (Jan 10, 2009 at 7:46)
if they wanted it like his rig why didnt they put the fox dhx and 40 world cup stuff on....fox made it for the win they had and it is also limited edition....they shoulda done that and it would be even sweeter then it is now
  • + 0
flag sirbikealot (Jan 10, 2009 at 8:57)
it comes with the RC4 rear shock set to Gee Atherton's custom settings, it has more range and adjustability than a DHX5
  • + 0
flag bkbroiler (Jan 10, 2009 at 14:02)
I stand corrected...and the 40?
  • - 1
flag sxman (Jan 11, 2009 at 10:31)
sorry thAT was one of my brothers stupid friends on my comp. idk what the f*ck he was talking about. ha
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag speedy27 (Jan 10, 2009 at 10:03)
rainbow stripes are also the gay pride colours hehe agree whit jonmosh
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag D-H-K (Jan 10, 2009 at 10:07)
gay gemeotry not chill
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag dh-man (Jan 10, 2009 at 11:33)
too much white for my taste but ill be selling my m6 for a commencal this year. why does everyone put the world cup colors on everything Frown owell im giving it a shot
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag snowtrooperjr (Jan 10, 2009 at 12:42)
to:sirbikealot
yes but fox has the 40 with the nickel stanctions and better adjustments they should have thrown that on
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag skinsuitssuck (Jan 10, 2009 at 14:50)
well that bike would cost between $8500 and $10000 do you think my mum and dad would mind me selling the car, tv and the cd player to get it haha lol
  • - 1
flag Downhiller-13 (Jan 10, 2009 at 16:38)
that bike is cool but waaayy to much money. I can barely afford a 1300 demo!!, And people r going to be buying that bike. Not right man.
  • + 1
flag skinsuitssuck (Jan 11, 2009 at 7:08)
i cant afford that really im just getting money together for my bike im 16 and i get $13.28 a week

this may take a while
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag bowersy (Jan 11, 2009 at 1:35)
very nice bike.
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag joedaho (Jan 11, 2009 at 7:53)
Nice to see a Comical without those appalling 888s on the front. They ruined the feel of the test bike I rode.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag jinx (Jan 11, 2009 at 8:11)
That bike is so gnarly!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag mtnbker395 (Jan 11, 2009 at 10:08)
I love it.
saints are definitely one of my favorite brakes.
and you can't go wrong with the dhx.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag gromhit (Jan 11, 2009 at 10:11)
sick bike!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag badgermeister (Jan 11, 2009 at 11:17)
gotta admit, this is some damn fine bike porn. now where are those tissues? lol
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag duir (Jan 11, 2009 at 16:09)
"Stay Unclipped.".....after an article about an Atherton replica bike, all of whom ride clipped in.....Genius!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag bmxisbest (Jan 11, 2009 at 18:30)
sick shitt
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag giantfaith4567 (Jan 11, 2009 at 19:00)
i think they should make a version with a really low top tube for ss or just shore fr
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag jumphilo (Jan 12, 2009 at 7:05)
Don't like the paint job.... bikes is good
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag sprose (Jan 12, 2009 at 10:46)
commencals all suck they all snap!! surprised the athertons didnt snap em half way down the track!! They went through about 3 in that year! ... each!!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag giantfaith4567 (Jan 13, 2009 at 18:07)
i just think that suspension is perfect for a low top tube bike
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag freeride-maverick (Jan 16, 2009 at 1:15)
i want one Smile
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag crashmeister (Jan 16, 2009 at 20:54)
would ya if they weren't brits? they are brits aren't they? what matters is that we're all riding right? they'll have to peel my cold dead fingers from my grips to get me into the oven. or use a pizza oven. Wink bike and all.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag patryka (Feb 9, 2009 at 8:10)
I will have the bike in April and only Wink)))) because of that I will be much faster. Of course not but you know It is so nice when you buy such beauty and ride it Smile)
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag matt333 (May 30, 2009 at 16:25)
That bike is a waste. The main difference is the paint job. In a year or so it will be standard. It weighs to much. My Session 10 weighs 37.92 pounds.
The people buying that bike will end up sucking because their posers who spend their parents money on the best and cant ride at all.
[Reply]

Post A New Comment
Why was a comment deleted?

1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
Bold Italic Link