Interbike 2008 - GT Force Pro Carbon

Sep 26, 2008

Over a pound lighter than last years aluminum version, the new GT Force Carbon features some striking and very unique lines. We took a closer look at GT's 6" travel 26lb flyer.

HD Video's Inside!

This bike is one bike that will never blend in with the rest. It's like GT traveled to the future and brought the Force Carbon Pro as a souvenir of their travels. I have a feeling that riders are either going to love the look, or hate it. After seeing the bike in person I'd have to say that I'm a fan of it's unique stance. You'll have to make up your mind for yourself!

2009 GT Force Carbon

2009 GT Force Carbon




Watch the video to see the Force Pro Carbon in detail!




GT's Independent Drivetrain system has been fully proven over time and is a great all around design, perfect for this platform of bike. The finished weight is more than competitive, it's class leading for a bike with 6" of travel. It's slightly steeper than all-mountain geometry should suit the rider that leans more towards XC than aggressive AM riding.

The ID system

The ID system


Frame and SizeGT Force Carbon
•6" of travel
Rear ShockFox Float RP23
ForkFox TALAS 32 RL
•15 mm Tool less removal
•110-150mm Travel
HeadsetFSA integrated
CrankarmsShimano XTR
ChainringsShimano XTR 44/32/22
Bottom BracketShimano XTR Outboard
ChainShimano HG73
CassetteShimano XT 11-34
Front DerailleurShimano XTR
Rear DerailleurShimano XTR Shadow
Shifter PodsShimano XTR
HandlebarRitchey Carbon WCF(31.8mm)
•Low rise
StemThompson Elte X4(31.8mm)
GripsGT Lock Down
BrakesShimano XTR
Front WheelMavic CrossMax ST
Rear WheelMavic CrossMax ST
TiresKenda Nevegal, 2.3 front, 2.1 rear, w/Kevlar Bead
SaddleFizik Gobi XM
SeatpostThompson Elite




The Force's appearance isn't exactly conventional by any means. Think of all those cool concept car designs that you see...Well the Force Carbon Pro is like one of those that actually made it through to production. Being familiar with how carbon performs I don't have a doubt in my mind that the Force Carbon Pro is ready for whatever you throw at it, and then some.

Loving the clear coat over carbon look

Loving the clear coat over carbon look

Tidy forward shock mount

Tidy forward shock mount




The story up front? Flowing lines and an Integrated headset

The story up front? Flowing lines and an Integrated headset




Need even more carbon? Ritchey WCS bar

Need even more carbon? Ritchey WCS bar




This long legged XC flier is GT's top of the line mountainbike and the price reflects that. Fortunately it's top end components are hung from a state of the art frame with a proven suspension platform. If your wife/girlfriend/mom would skin you alive if you came home with the Pro model, GT also has the Expert that retails for $1700 less but still sports dialed Fox suspension and the same carbon frame.

Like the look of the Force Carbon and want more info? GT's website is the answer then!

-Mike "Kakah" Levy
Share on Twitter, Facebook, Email

| More

Link to News Story
Must Read This Week

68 Comments

  • + 19
flag cubsrtbest99 (Sep 26, 2008 at 17:01)
haha wow thats a light fully. sick bike but i think il stick with transition =P
  • + 2
flag merkel (Sep 28, 2008 at 9:17)
hahaha amen to that
[Reply]
  • - 79
flag mrmars (Sep 26, 2008 at 17:03) (Below Threshold) show comment
HEY an IBIS MOJO but made by a shit company awsome.
  • + 15
flag kakah (Sep 26, 2008 at 17:47)
Massive difference in design, about the only similarities is the use of carbon and even that means nothing. Compare the rear suspension from a Mojo and the Force, different in design and how they perform. Google DW-Link and Independent Drivetrain. Awesome.
  • + 14
flag mattraffnix (Sep 27, 2008 at 5:33)
Mr Mars = owned.
  • + 7
flag tomcaffry (Sep 27, 2008 at 10:52)
MR mars is wrong dude they are completely different, yeh you might see the front triangle and the carbon and say its the same bike, but seeing past that must be above your mental capabilites!
  • - 4
flag bikemaniac1993 (Sep 27, 2008 at 17:21) (Below Threshold) show comment
mrmars if its such a shit company how do more people know of gt than kona or santa cruz there two massive bike manufavtures but more people still know about gt!!!! (what a willy) lol
  • - 11
flag ad-game (Sep 28, 2008 at 5:47) (Below Threshold) show comment
ya Gt is a sucked compagnie
  • + 1
flag Abrams (Feb 25, 2009 at 13:04)
and you have what to base that on? lol, you cant even spell company.
[Reply]
  • + 11
flag downhiller4eva (Sep 26, 2008 at 17:10)
NICE BIKE AND SOLID FRAME!
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag sebsta (Sep 26, 2008 at 17:35)
Looks awesome!
[Reply]
  • + 7
flag luke-miller (Sep 26, 2008 at 17:39)
pretty sick bike with all that carbon, its the way of the future
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag Squampton-is-the-Shat (Sep 26, 2008 at 17:42)
that is a sweet bike!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag leavenamehere (Sep 26, 2008 at 17:45)
love the carbon, next thing we know we will all be riding these frames
  • + 2
flag kakah (Sep 26, 2008 at 17:50)
It makes a lot of sense, the stuff is so damn strong it's incredible. I think as price comes down and availability goes up we'll see a lot more of it.
  • + 1
flag bradownie (Sep 26, 2008 at 21:04)
Despite what anyone tells you, dings and nicks can happen though, and it sucks. It's the only single damn disadvantage of the stuff. Small deflector plates mounted on the carbon do wonders for that though, so it barely begins to be an issue.

It still wins the light and strong battle; and with modern techniques, flex is barely an issue anymore.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag DHR4C3R (Sep 26, 2008 at 17:49)
Yeahhhh dude sweet bike!
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag mickeydesadist2 (Sep 26, 2008 at 18:01)
if the frame is made in china and not North America, give it to us for $2G's less.
  • + 0
flag MTB35 (Sep 27, 2008 at 6:26)
yes it would be cheaper but do u really want a carbon bike made in china
??????
  • + 1
flag bikerpocok (Sep 28, 2008 at 4:27)
I think it doesn't where it's produced, but! i wouldn't ride that bike after a bigger bail or crash, i broke too much carbon stuff...and if "plastic" cracks...it's doin it well..and that can hurt
  • + 0
flag bikerpocok (Sep 28, 2008 at 4:27)
doesn't **matter***
[Reply]
  • - 10
flag dueck (Sep 26, 2008 at 18:01) (Below Threshold) show comment
That looks terrible!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Graphxxx (Sep 26, 2008 at 19:45)
Sorry, not liking it much.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag godfried (Sep 26, 2008 at 20:18)
carbon is IN for all categories.
  • + 1
flag eatyapeas (Mar 4, 2009 at 15:37)
Hell yeah it is!

Carbon technology has come a long, long way and most new carbon frames on the market (new GT's and Speciallized in particular) are stronger than the aluminum versions in testing.

I've ridden the Force Carbon and it is off tap!!! Yeah the angles are a little steeper than most might be used to but the thing absolutley rips. The bike belongs to my boss who punishes it every night of the week and this thing just takes the abuse and loves it!

Look out for the new DH bike too. Called the Fury it's already winning races under Eric Carter and Kevin Aiello. You're gonna see a lot more big things from GT this year!!!
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag ajo2248 (Sep 26, 2008 at 21:15)
Looks like an android and it is light as a feather. I wouldnt mind taking it for a spin before saying anything more than that.
[Reply]
  • - 5
flag Philly-bnb (Sep 26, 2008 at 21:43) (Below Threshold) show comment
when will people learn carbon is not something you make shit out of
  • + 7
flag redline-45 (Sep 27, 2008 at 7:23)
since f*cking when??? carbon fibre is way stronger than steel, and incredibly light. lots of companies use carbon fibre, like hayes in the carbon stroker levers, lots of companies make handle bars out of carbon fibre. so unless your some kind of genius who knows something that hundreds of tech guys from countless mtb component companies don't....shut the f*cking hell up jackass!
  • + 0
flag Philly-bnb (Sep 27, 2008 at 14:07)
you can talk to me after youve ridden a carbon frame down the road only to have it snap in half and drag you across the ground only to be hit by a car

ill stick with my steel thank you very much
  • + 0
flag bikerpocok (Sep 28, 2008 at 4:30)
why have Armstrong never ridden the carbon trek?..schould ask yourself, or..just read a bit around
  • + 0
flag PissedOffCil (Sep 29, 2008 at 13:07)
bikepocok... http://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/lance-armstrongs-leadville-weapon-17885

I recon this is a carbon Trek MTB that Lance rode and finished 2nd in Leadville and 1st in the 12H of Snowmass
  • + 0
flag redline-45 (Oct 2, 2008 at 17:55)
it is, i read it right on the trek website. its the trek equinox ttx, which is a carbon bike, he's riden it for a few years, but hasn't raced it until recently. i mean he's won 7 tour de frances on an aluminium trek, why f*ck with perfection?
[Reply]
  • + 6
flag Hombre3000 (Sep 26, 2008 at 22:15)
Check it out . . . at around 160 in the video, everyone is riding backwards because they reversed the clip.
  • + 0
flag minimole (Sep 28, 2008 at 14:00)
Lmao, thats quality Smile
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag vestermk (Sep 27, 2008 at 0:44)
nice GT carbon very nice
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag nothingbetter (Sep 27, 2008 at 0:52)
the whole frame looks really smooth. it all just seems to fit together. now only the test of time will tell if it's a good idea
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag wildman (Sep 27, 2008 at 3:20)
Anyone remember the Trek Super-Lite Y w/carbon frame, full XTR and Cane Creek Ti wheelset. Just under 26lbs FS XC. It too had mixed reviews and they were absolutely indestructable! I bought one used from a friend that set it up for FR and beat the shit out of it. No issues! Hell, my Aircooled VW Bug has lots of CF parts, it's all around you.......
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag kickerofelves (Sep 27, 2008 at 7:51)
How many owners has GT had?
  • + 0
flag sprockets (Sep 28, 2008 at 21:09)
The current owner (Canadian company Dorel) hasn't sold off a division in over 30 years as I understand it. They are more stable hands than ever before..as are Cannondale, Mongoose, and Schwinn.
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag jonnymac282 (Sep 27, 2008 at 8:21)
too XC for mee
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag greaseball (Sep 27, 2008 at 9:21)
naaaaaaaaaaawwwwwccce bike dude!!! thats pretty insane
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag TheBikeNurse (Sep 27, 2008 at 11:04)
floating drivetrain, boo
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag joshy69 (Sep 27, 2008 at 12:12)
honestly i dont like it... it's nice dont get me wrong but it aint big enaught and it's not a hard core DH... sorry but i like hard core big ass bike's and i like them painted si carbon is not for me... it's a nice bike but i would not like to have one.
[Reply]
  • - 5
flag eddie1170 (Sep 27, 2008 at 12:19) (Below Threshold) show comment
theres no way that bastard is gonna fall apart lol
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag extremechilo (Sep 27, 2008 at 12:46)
looks cool lets see...
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag philipstonier (Sep 27, 2008 at 14:07)
what was the wieght?
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag Nikola-ABT (Sep 27, 2008 at 16:15)
what is the weight?
  • - 4
flag wearerider (Sep 27, 2008 at 17:57) (Below Threshold) show comment
26 pounds
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag djjumper13 (Sep 27, 2008 at 16:30)
i thinkits dope that now mtbs are gettin integrated headsets, for weight and durability issues
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag bigspeacializedhit (Sep 27, 2008 at 16:33)
Over a pound lighter than last years aluminum version, the new GT Force Carbon features some striking and very unique lines. We took a closer look at GT's 6" travel 26lb flyer.
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag nishnash (Sep 27, 2008 at 18:42)
nice, i need more interbike
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag bmxer24 (Sep 27, 2008 at 19:48)
ill stick to aluminum bikes i dont think id feel safe on that
[Reply]
  • - 4
flag kickerofelves (Sep 28, 2008 at 7:16) (Below Threshold) show comment
How can something stronger be easier to break? If it's easier to brake, that would be nice. Freakin nice.
  • + 1
flag llessurretneprac (Sep 28, 2008 at 15:23)
Carbon has directional strength. Say you crash and your bike slams into a rock sideways, then the frame will get totaled.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag gotlost (Sep 28, 2008 at 13:22)
6500€ in EU for the expert... amm thnx, keep it to yourself
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag hondaman (Sep 28, 2008 at 13:29)
Love the handle bars/ bike. Sick!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag szfetbb (Sep 28, 2008 at 13:32)
heh, the guy didn't mention one important failure of Carbon Fiber... it is not resistant against hits... the frame might hold up some serious drops, jumps and rockgardens BUT! some bigger stone choked from under the front wheel will crush the downtube into pieces...
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag kyle6969 (Sep 28, 2008 at 18:45)
where the f*ck does it say the weight
  • + 0
flag nfstreet4life (Sep 29, 2008 at 7:15)
it says the weight in like the second sentance
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag radam (Sep 29, 2008 at 7:27)
Nice looking but I just don't like the I-drive.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag niick9944 (Sep 29, 2008 at 9:23)
pretty shitty bike...
  • + 0
flag niick9944 (Oct 1, 2008 at 8:39)
j/k i just wanted to see how many negative props i'd get in one day its actually pretty sweet
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag nobody-jr (Sep 30, 2008 at 8:01)
carbon fiber melt easy ... dont come to az!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag mtbdriver (Oct 1, 2008 at 4:51)
it is god damn ugly, don't like the looks of it at all.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag brnters (Oct 2, 2008 at 17:49)
moto carbon is nicer and better
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag brucethomson (Oct 3, 2008 at 8:09)
very nice light carbon bike ...it would last 10 mins in my hands ..lol
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag akademyx (Feb 26, 2009 at 15:26)
i'll trade my girlfriend for that gt bike! lol.. very nice..
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Radsrider (May 15, 2009 at 10:05)
I've been riding a Carbon Force Pro since last November and it's been amazing. I built it from the frame up so I changed the spec to my style of riding here in Laguna Beach. I have a Fox 36 VAN and DHX Air to make it more of a trail bike and dh friendly. I put an '09 Saint derailleur (amazing!) on the back and replaced the big ring with a bash guard. 8" Juicy 7's with Dangerboy levers are fantastic brakes on the local downhills.
The head angle is spec'd at 69 degrees with a 140mm fork, but with the taller 36 VAN it brings it to 68 degrees. It now has a great balance of snappy handling and dh stability. I absolutely love the bike and it fits like a glove - I'm 6' tall, 180 lbs and it's staying nice and tight after 7 months of hammering. At 31 lbs, it's not XC light but can still ride it on longer adventure rides.
[Reply]

Post A New Comment
Why was a comment deleted?

1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
Bold Italic Link