Pinkbike First Look: Acros A-GE Hydraulic Shifting

Apr 11, 2011 at 9:00
Apr 11, 2011
by Richard Cunningham
 
You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login

Acros is an elite German components maker that offers an index-shifting derailleur system actuated by a pair of slim hydraulic lines that reportedly weighs only 426.4 grams ready to rock. Yes; you heard it correctly—front and rear derailleurs, right and left shift levers and all hoses filled with mineral fluid. The Acros A-GE system isn’t a prototype pipe dream either. Acros has 250 sets boxed and ready for sale at a surely-not-for-everyone projected retail price of $2306 US dollars.

The Acros front derailleur: note how compact the hydraulic mechanism is barely the size of the adjusting screws on a conventional changer
The Acros front derailleur: note how compact the hydraulic mechanism is barely the size of the adjusting screws on a conventional changer

Acros A-GE Hydraulic Shifting Basics

Beautifully machined from aluminum, the Acros A-GE transmission promises to either set a new standard, or hearken to the mid-1990s when a half-dozen North American machine shops took a crack at Shimano with expensive, multi-colored copies of existing gear-changers. Potentially, the Acros A.GE 1.1 hydraulic transmission has some unique features that cannot be attained using cables. Time will tell, but if it operates as advertized, the Acros system may be the first exception to the, nobody-can-beat-Shimano’s derailleur technology rule. Pinkbike grilled Acros about the benefits of its hydraulic shifting system and prepared this special report to introduce the concept.


Acros reinvented handlebar shift lever. Pressing the paddle shifter at a slight angle, up or down, determines the direction of the gear change.
Acros reinvented handlebar shift lever. Pressing the paddle shifter at a slight angle, up or down, determines the direction of the gear change.

What is the major benefit that A-GE brings to the table?

Acros says that the primary reason they produced a hydraulic shifting system was that it offered the least amount of friction. The A-GE shifting lever actuates the derailleur with a “UNI-FORCE” two-line, push-pull design that nearly eliminates the need for stiff return springs. Shifting feels light and consistent across the entire range of gears.


Are the shift levers conventional?

No. A-GE Shifters have a single thumb paddle that shifts up or down the gearing range. Pushing the lever upwards shifts to a taller gear and pushing the lever downwards downshifts. One to three shifts can be managed with a single push. Switching the hydraulic lines allows the user to reverse the shifting from “top-normal” to “low-normal” as wished.


Can the shift levers be used with any brake levers?

Yes. Acros’ MY-MOVE lever mounts allow the levers to be positioned in a number of ergonomic locations, and both ahead or behind the brake lever.


How can Acros derailleurs and shifters be lighter than SRAM or Shimano and still be strong?

We will address the durability issue when Pinkbike gives the A-GE a thorough test. Acros states that much of the weight savings are derived from the elimination of steel cables and steel-wrapped cable housing, which add up quickly. In addition, push-pull hydraulics eliminates the need for steel return springs on both derailleurs. Acros makes extensive use of alloy Torx hardware to shave off a few more grams as well.


Will I be stuck buying an Acros-compatible crankset, chain and cassette?

Acros A-GE uses a timing device called a Raster Rod which can be switched out to adapt the derailleur shifting to all conventional eight, nine and ten-speed cassettes and chains.


What happens if I get air in the hydraulic line?

Air must be bled from the system like a hydraulic brake. This is unlikely to happen, however, because Acros hydraulic shifting is a closed system and is not exposed to excessive heat, nor is it required to compensate for pad wear like a hydraulic brake. Should the Acros system be compromised, its front and rear derailleurs can be positioned by hand to adjust for an acceptable gear and will remain there until you get back to the trailhead.


Will it survive a crash?

We have learned that hydraulic brake lines are far tougher than first anticipated—it’s rare that anyone damages one in a crash. Acros’ shift lines are smaller and we assume, more fragile than a brake hose, but it should be noted that a hydraulic hose will still shift properly when badly kinked, as long as fluid can pass through the damaged area. For a downhiller, being able to shift after a crash mangled the derailleur cable could mean a podium finish.


Can I get a short-cage rear derailleur for my DH ride?

The first 250 systems were made with medium cages, but Acros will make long and short-cage versions as well.


Evidence of intensive machining is obvious on every piece of the Acros rear derailleur this is the medium-cage version
Evidence of intensive machining is obvious on every piece of the Acros rear derailleur this is the medium-cage version


Mechanically, are there any compelling reasons to switch from a perfectly great working SRAM X.0 or Shimano XTR to an Acros hydraulic system?

Riders who live in extreme cold have all suffered failures when water freezes inside the housing and the cables simply won’t budge, and a sealed hydraulic system will operate happily in muddy, sloppy conditions that can make shifting cable-actuated systems a wrestling match. The single-paddle shifter could offer an advantage. SRAM experimented with its push-push single-lever road system when it developed XX, but abandoned it because of the excessive lever pressure required to push against the derailleurs return springs. The hydraulic action of Acros A-GE does not require return springs, so it could be an improvement.


Is the Acros A-GE the first hydraulic shifting system?

No, but it may be the first complete hydraulic derailleur transmission. California downhill racer Scott Fyfe designed and marketed a hydraulic shifting system under the S.A.F.E brand in the mid 1990s. The S.A.F.E shifter operated a piston and cylinder that fit into the rear derailleur housing stop and pulled a conventional changer with a short wire link.


Is the Acros the inventor of the system?

NO. We asked Acros' Marius Wrede and he said: "Christoph Muthers invented the system and presented it at the Eurobike 2006. In that moment we saw the potential of the system and that it fits to Acros. We stayed contact ever since and helped in little sourcings. In 2009 Christoph asked us if we are still interested in continuing the project. We did not hesitate and said YES! Christoph is now in our R&D team and we have modified the hydraulic gear to meet industrial standards as well as keeping up with the new “standards” in mountain biking."


What does Pinkbike think about Acros hydraulic shifting?

Anyone who rides hard is going to tear up equipment, and 2300 dollars is a lot of money to spend on shifters and derailleurs that probably will have to be replaced in a few years. That said, racers and anyone who rides in extreme weather or terrain could benefit from a shifting system that has the potential to shrug off nature’s fury or survive a serious crash.


Acros A-GE transmission by the numbers:

Shifter (each): 64.85g
Rear derailleur: 159.84g
Front Derailleur: 79.15g
Hydraulic line (R): 24.26g
Hydraulic line (F): 17.16g
Fluid (R): 9.00g
Fluid (F): 7.25g


Price: $2306 USD (est)
Contact Acros about the availability of the A-GE transmission


Give us your opinion about the future of hydraulic shifting.
Must Read This Week









297 Comments

  • + 125
flag kbrock (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:02)
 Cool.

For those with $2306.
  • + 161
flag jhowlett (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:04)
 you can replace alot of snapped gear cables for $2306
  • + 122
flag WestCoastRider7 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:08)
 I could get a whole bike for that price
  • + 70
flag rick101 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:13)
 For $2300, I can think of a lot more things to spend on, rather than a Shifter/Derailleur . My SRAM X9 setup has done me well, and I'm sticking with it.
  • + 86
flag carbonlite (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:14)
 imagine clipping a rock...
  • - 47
flag pperini (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:27) (Below Threshold) show comment
 one question: why? whyyyyy??? people!!! stop doing unecessary things! specialy when they cost ur life!
  • + 46
flag drewstinky (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:29)
 yeah mountain biking is expensive, and most parts well worth it. but that price is just ripping the piss!
  • + 48
flag RaleighVoid (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:32)
 id sooner get saint, but lets face it, its got time to grow and maybe become cheaper. that mech is sexy!
  • + 9
flag RaleighVoid (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:36)
 i want hydraulic actuated suspension linkage. Big Grin
  • + 53
flag combee (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:37)
 It is not unecessary at all, it is evolution..
  • - 17
flag frreride4life420 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:41) (Below Threshold) show comment
 yoooo i hope thats i typo couse $2,306 thats f*ckinn stupppppidly expesnive WTFFFFFFFFFFF...............
  • + 24
flag chazdog (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:45)
 agreed combee, this will get cheaper over time, like hydraulic seatposts, adjustable geometry, and every other single innovation. it has to start expensive because of the small scale they start on!
  • + 21
flag kevinseven (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:48)
 yeah its really expensive but its a great concept. if it proves to work well and comes down in price i could see this becoming more popular in the future. innovation like this is what keeps our sport advancing
  • + 19
flag billyjack (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51)
 Wait. Is it still April fool's???
  • + 53
flag gazmataz (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:01)
 If they looked at doing this but within a gearbox, they'd make a killing. People are looking beyond rear mech's and hangers these days. if they can create a gearbox that is small and light enough to go onto/into a Dh frame and not upset the suspension set up, Then and only then could they say they've found the next step in Mountain biking's evolution.

Great Idea but it has massive potential else where.
  • + 7
flag collin7 (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:07)
 I have been waiting for something like this for a long time! It looks sexy and should have the performance to back it. For those of you whining about the price, I guarantee Akros didn't design this for everyone. It's for those with the spare $$ and want to try out the future of mountain biking now! I see this catching on and sram and shimano following suit in a few years. Who knows... in 5 years this system could cost as much as running full saint!
  • + 2
flag RaleighVoid (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:25)
 i agree with gazmataz, but the painful truth is that gearboxes are a lonngg way off, simply because shimano dont want to do it yet.
edit: (sure, you can get a gearbox bike, but its not the accepted norm.)
  • + 2
flag MeAlex (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:37)
 I think this is an awesome idea, sure it costs now and will only be available to the lucky few who can afford it but technology trickles down and hopefully before ever the rest of us will be able to afford it, besause, for one i am fed up of w**key shifting from mud clogged cables.
  • + 2
flag RaleighVoid (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:52)
 "Can the shift levers be used with any brake levers?" haha i thought it meant 'instead of' for a second, come on now, dont be silly...
  • + 0
flag DARKSTAR63 (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:03)
 Little too exotic. I mean, does every single piece have to be machined? Im sure we could bring the price on this system back down to earth if some of the parts were not.
  • + 7
flag joefromthesoo (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:08)
 still cheaper than Di2
  • + 3
flag stompeinator (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:15)
 It's an awesome concept (minus the shifter, i could see having to push up or push down at an angle while riding being kind of a burden, and lead to a lot of upshifts when you actually want a downshift.) That being said, $2300? If they put these in the same price point as xtr it would kill, but who can afford to drop that much coin on a drivetrain?
  • + 4
flag DARKSTAR63 (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:19)
 Its really trick, but Its a solution to a problem nobody had. I mean, an XTR level drivetrain with nice fresh cables shifts pretty damn good.
  • + 4
flag stefan-ram (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:52)
 Better they made hydro steering
  • + 9
flag ninjatarian (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:56)
 I'll make sure I pick up a set right after I get some $800 Magura MT-Eight brakes and Easton Haven wheels... Oh wait, maybe I can put that money toward a house instead.
  • + 8
flag iceman8 (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:57)
 Yeah but if people always said that technology would never advance; people said that when the first 8 + 9 speed cassettes came in and they are the standard now.

Currently yes, it's a bit pointless for that kind of price tag but give it time to come down in price I wouldn't be surprised if 10 years on from now hydraulic shifting is standard; similar to v-brakes and hydraulic brakes now.
  • + 2
flag nason222 (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:00)
 a bit pricey?
  • + 11
flag DARKSTAR63 (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:01)
 See I dont think its like v-brakesdisc brakes. Its more like hydraulic rim brakes. Hydraulic, yes. Powerful, you betcha. But still a rim brake just like this is still a derailleur.
  • + 1
flag Downhill340 (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:01)
 @Iceman You have a point,Lets just hope it gets cheaper.
  • + 3
flag ninjatarian (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:02)
 When super high tech hydraulic brakes and nice shifters came out, they didn't cost the equivalent to 2300 bucks. They were expensive but obtainable to a good handful, trickled down used, and caught on. I don't know a single person who could approach buying these, I will never personally see a set on the trail, they will as a result never trickle down in the used market and catch on.
  • + 0
flag Varaxis (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:17)
 If I had that much money to burn, I'd consider a Rolf wheelset.
  • + 4
flag iceman8 (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:19)
 Yeah I see where you are coming from but then again the same could be said for the hammerschmidt and I've seen a fair few of them around now? Either way I have a suspicion by the time these come down in price someone may have developed a light gearbox; zerode seem well on their way....
  • + 1
flag ninjatarian (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:30)
 Hammershmidts price doesn't even approach the price of these, and Hammerschmidt is something totally unique, like DARKSTAR63 said, these are still just dérailleurs.
  • + 3
flag radatabs (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:40)
 fanta should buy them
  • + 4
flag suicidedownhiller (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:43)
 You're all missing the point. Next year this will probably cost $200 for the rear set up...Everything starts out expensive and drops in price over time.
  • + 2
flag DARKSTAR63 (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:46)
 Its definatly cool, Im not going to deny that. And Im glad people are developing these things. I just dont think its the future of bicycle shifting. A hydraulically controlled gearbox............that would be something a bit more revolutionary.
  • - 1
flag ninjatarian (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:48)
 @suicidedownhiller I hope you are exaggerating a TON on purpose.
  • + 0
flag goosh (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:54)
 I don't see the reason for hydraulic shifting. I think I'd put my trust into a good old fashion XTR or XX or XO or anything but this. + i would save a lot of money. Not saying their bad, but there is really no need for them.
  • + 0
flag suicidedownhiller (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:55)
 No, I wouldn't be surprised at all if it's that cheap next year.
  • - 1
flag ninjatarian (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:01)
 Wow, just wow. The price of these is not going to over 500% less next year.
  • + 35
flag SHARK555 (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:03)
 i'd have no problem payin $2300, but whats with the $6? trying to rip me off?
  • + 1
flag Downhill340 (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:08)
 ^^ hahahahaha
  • + 4
flag rydindirty (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:19)
 Suddenly, XO seems cheap.
  • + 1
flag N-Wheelie (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:19)
 haha if pperini only thinks his life is worth $2300 then he can be feeling to great about his life hahaha
  • + 4
flag ninjatarian (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:27)
 Pinkbike screwed up. They only include the weight of 1 shifter, total weight for an entire setup is 426.35g. This is about the same weight as the 5ROT system in 2007... which is what this is. http://www.light-bikes.de/eng/2007/03/02/5rot-hydraulic-shifting/
  • + 2
flag DARKSTAR63 (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:29)
 Its the very same system. Just re-branded.
  • + 1
flag jaketinnelly (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:06)
 This IS the near future of Mountain Bikes. Except it'll be a tenth of the price in 5 years.
  • + 1
flag JokerMachine (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:18)
 I was just about to mention the Rot5 (or 5Rot) system, because the article clearly states that this is the first all-hydraulic shifting system... and the 5Rot was exactly that, and it's not even mentioned in passing in the article.
  • - 3
flag derekr (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:27)
 This is like putting hydraulic brakes on a horse drawn carriage. I go through four or five rear deraileurs a year and I would consider myself a fairly modest rider. And at a price that is fit for a gear box... let's see some innovation! Good luck with the market on this one.
  • + 10
flag stompeinator (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:36)
 you go through 5 or 6 rear derailleurs a year? Either you don't take care of your stuff or you're buying crappy parts, because that's not normal dude...
  • + 1
flag B-STOCK (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:39)
 have they sold 1 set with that price
  • + 1
flag derekr (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:44)
 Just me I guess? I find deraileurs are rock magnets. Perhaps depends where and how often you ride??
  • + 2
flag KevSong (Apr 11, 2011 at 15:33)
 if bleeding brakes were hard enough!
  • + 1
flag over9000ninja (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:18)
 RaleighVoid, i think scott already made one!
  • + 1
flag SpruceRipper (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:24)
 prices will probably come down a lot in the next few years....hopefully
  • + 2
flag matt-bike-baha (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:32)
 "ahh man i gota bleed my gears"

doesn't sound right does it?
  • + 2
flag RichardCunningham Mod Plus (Apr 11, 2011 at 17:13)
 Thanks Ninjatarian for catching that shifter weight. I made the correction.
  • + 3
flag archi-magus (Apr 11, 2011 at 20:18)
 I can't wait for the day that we actually get to use what is best, rather than what is shoved down our throats and we get to pay tons of money for. Does anyone REALLY think this is necessary? Does anyone REALLY think that any derailleur in the world is better than a gear box? Funny how money can either propel a sport forward, (or in this case) slow it way, way, way down.
  • + 1
flag Bjammin (Apr 11, 2011 at 20:34)
 At least its cheaper than a Carbon V-10 Smile
  • + 1
flag jhb11 (Apr 11, 2011 at 21:18)
 i wonder how much it actually costs to make one under 100 im guessing
  • + 1
flag dhabartrider11 (Apr 11, 2011 at 21:33)
 Bad move on acros to set the price so high when sram or shimano will come out with something next year for less than half the price
  • + 1
flag craig7 (Apr 11, 2011 at 22:00)
 I is however about $2.7k cheaper than the Shinamo Dura- Ace Di2 electronic shifting set up. However with that you get all that is offered here plus BB, crankset, chain, cassette and brakes. But it is a roadie groupo
  • + 0
flag JokerMachine (Apr 11, 2011 at 23:29)
 JHB - yeah, my ass it costs under 100... did you factor design work, prototypes, machining and everything else into your projected cost per unit of 100 dollars?

Kids that have no idea how the industry works piss me off.
  • + 1
flag ziggyzuggy (Apr 12, 2011 at 2:44)
 i need 2300 so could buy a new frame
  • + 1
flag gripe (Apr 12, 2011 at 7:26)
 sarcasm>@SHARK555 the way things are going $6 is most likely the dealer margin!/sarcasm>
  • + 1
flag derekr (Apr 12, 2011 at 7:47)
 I'm surprised how many people don't blow through rear deraileurs?? Anyone who rides the north shore and whistler have the same problem? Have wrecked an SLX shadow (first ride) and a Tiagra already this year. I have found Tiagras to be best strength for the price (~$45). I take great care of my stuff... have been maintaining my own bike for 15 years.
  • + 1
flag stompeinator (Apr 12, 2011 at 8:31)
 what are you recking them on? I rode an xt for 3-4 years, even slammed it on the edge of a ladder a couple times, and it always worked great. Only reason i replaced it is because the barrel adjust thread stripped out, so now im coming up on year one of riding an x9
  • + 1
flag stompeinator (Apr 12, 2011 at 8:31)
 wrecking*
  • + 1
flag matt-bike-baha (Apr 12, 2011 at 10:02)
 hahahahaha i snapped my derailuer today! wheeey, x.5+boom=gone plus 3 snapped spokes!
  • + 1
flag Philler (Apr 12, 2011 at 12:32)
 I bet most of you didn`t remember the Shimano Airlines from the Year 2000? That was an Pneumatic Shifting System for 1000 $... There was no Market for such stuff and i think today there is also no market...
  • + 2
flag ninjatarian (Apr 12, 2011 at 12:38)
 When you spend a ton of money on a frame or suspension, you actively enjoy that part the entire time you ride. I don't really spend more than 1 minute total shifting during a ride so I don't need a shifter that will make it more pleasurable. And once its in gear, as long as it stays in gear, there is zero different between this and a $100 shift system besides a few grams and looks.
  • + 4
flag hodges (Apr 12, 2011 at 13:34)
 @philler

i think a fair few people would remember airlines
  • + 1
flag ninjatarian (Apr 12, 2011 at 13:37)
 I hear them brought up quite often as a unique but failed product in MTB history. Apparently Acros never got the memo though.
  • + 1
flag JokerMachine (Apr 12, 2011 at 13:47)
 I'd ride Airlines... they look dope and they probably sound badass when you shift.
  • + 1
flag chazdog (Apr 12, 2011 at 14:08)
 +1 If you fitted a smaller air can than the stock airlines used, so it'd last a few dh runs worth of shifts, it would be amazing and easily do me a days riding. Just finding a set of airlines now is near impossible Frown
  • + 1
flag Philler (Apr 12, 2011 at 14:30)
 @hodges sorry, my bad but sometimes i think that the most users of pinkbike where a sort of mutant kids which where throw down threes after one hour of riding :-)
[Reply]
  • + 28
flag pletsch1 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:02)
 now thats just bad ass
  • + 7
flag stp-0 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:06)
 maybe at half the price!
  • + 25
flag RomoStills23 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:08)
 I'd rather buy anouther bike for $2306... cool though. would have to bring the price down at leaste 2 grand for me to consider though.
  • + 9
flag destri (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:09)
 If the price could be lowered anywhere from $1000-$1500, I'm sure a lot more people would consider it.
  • + 12
flag Downhill340 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:10)
 2306? I could get a pair of 40s for that and have money left over,Not a great to bring out in a recession.
  • - 2
flag crazyrob (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:15)
 $2300 for a set of front and rear shifters isn't out of line with other high end solutions. Shimano's Airlines were over a grand at launch and it was only for the rear. And they had to be refilled every couple hundred shifts.
  • + 4
flag allenrotstein (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:18)
 Yup, no wonder they failed big time (the airline model).
  • + 13
flag rifrafi (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:27)
 Acros didnt inventor design this im sure... it looks exactly like the 5rot system from a few years ago
www.5rot.com/schaltwerk.html
  • + 4
flag RaleighVoid (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:38)
 maybe its the same company/owner? and you're right its identical. perhaps they bought the designs? so many possibilities.
  • + 1
flag rifrafi (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:57)
 also it doesnt mention here on PB that all the pivots/moving parts use cartridge bearings
  • + 8
flag funkymonkey144 (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15)
 Hang on a second? This is 5-rot stuff just with a different label???
  • + 3
flag RichardCunningham Mod Plus (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:25)
 Acros said up front that the A.GE 1.1 system was not its own invention. They partnered with its inventor to get it ready for production and bring it to the market.
  • + 1
flag deadatbirth (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:18)
 the Airlines usually failed because of user error
  • + 0
flag Zane92651 (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:04)
 is this one of those late april fools jokes
  • + 5
flag TGDownHiller (Apr 11, 2011 at 15:00)
 If it is to shifting what hydralic brakes were to braking then it will be the new norm, the price is only that huge because the first run that is started with is the top of the line model, there were none of the SRAM XX innovations in the lower groupsets until XX had been on the shelves for a year, if the difference between this and cable shifting is as good as the difference between hydraulic brakes and cable brakes then it will soon be made in much larger quantity and the price will come down alot, and heavier versions with not as many features will be made, for example Deore is a hell of a lot cheaper than XTR, but it still works on the same principal it is just heavier and has less features. So give it time, if it as good as it has the potential to be then it will catch on, and come down in price.
  • + 2
flag ridesanoldskool (Apr 11, 2011 at 21:28)
 it a great idea till you spend 2306 dollars then you first ride smash it on a rock and f the whole deruiller ill wait a couple years till the price drops a little
  • + 2
flag i-ride-on-dirt (Apr 11, 2011 at 21:53)
 this is what i hate about biking, it is sooo expensive! $2306, belated april fools?
  • + 1
flag shijinkamisai (Apr 11, 2011 at 22:47)
 i ride through some pretty jacked up rock gardens and i have destroyed 2 slx's by bashing them up and i just cant see ever paying that much for a part that could be gone in half a second .
  • + 2
flag Z-WAAAAAZ (Apr 12, 2011 at 17:35)
 Haha what a joke i can buy 15 sram shifters and deraileurs for that price. seriously what can you gain from a hydraulic shifter/deraileur? all you need is to be able to shift up and down
  • + 1
flag WolfRidge08 (Apr 18, 2011 at 12:07)
 This isnt going to take off seeing as shimano are starting to make their electronic shifters for the saint range, and for cheaper prices.
[Reply]
  • + 11
flag fantaman (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:14)
 Richard Cunningham this isn't a realy a Acros product,the matter of fact is that Acros bought 5ROT and this is exact the same hydraulic system of the 5ROT.Only Acros made it more expensive
  • + 2
flag RobbyBriers (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:38)
 Yes. And they didn't change the looks of it... I still looks like an old derailleur from the 90's.


If it would look any better, I would still buy XTR Wink
  • + 1
flag bungalowbill (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:27)
 Fanta you will probably remember this, back in 2005/6 wasn't there a guy at Nicoli who worked on a wireless electric shifting system? I think it was in dirt mag....
[Reply]
  • + 8
flag WAKIdesigns (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:22)
 This is how much production in EU costs. I won't go into it. Anyone interested why is it so expensive youtube for raj patel. Value of nothing. When u produce 250 it surely costs more than 25 000 XX. But i do agree, it is ridiculosly expensive. I thought that sram X.0 was bonkers, then XX came, now this. Saudis started biking or what?
[Reply]
  • + 8
flag impkiller143 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:52)
 I was afraid this would happen......... Sometimes I just want the world to stop evolving, why do we need this?? Seriously we have been shifting using cables for hundreds of years and ppl just want shifting to be easier or more efficient when we all know shifting is one of the last things to be upgraded on a mtb because it already is efficient. Some may say this is more environmentally friendly but you know that's bs b/c it costs more to make these parts then it is to make steel cables.We all know that this will revolutionize and will eventually be stock on all mountain bikes in idk maybe 30, 40 years?? Just look at cars, they parallel park themselves now, humans have the brain capacity to do that themselves but people want less work. I truly believe that the world is going to end up like Wall E. Where were all sitting on chairs that float around doing shit all.. Sorry, I just had to let this out XD
  • + 2
flag WAKIdesigns (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:24)
 That sounds hmmm... Convenient? :d
[Reply]
  • + 8
flag carbonlite (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:17)
 Awesome! this is totally the answer to wanting a light shifting system, that I won't have replace cables/ housing on every month... oh wait... that costs too much for me right now...

that said last spring I bought a carbon santa cruz with XT, in the fall I upgraded the cranks, bars, seat post. This spring I upgraded wheels... maybe this fall??? and then if i get some nice magura carbon brakes I'll have the sickest bike ever...

OR

I could pay tuition... it is sad bikes cost that much.
  • + 2
flag dill (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:59)
 Then try powercordz, a Kelvar cable system that will not stretch.... only downside is the cables are $12 a pop. I have have the same deraileur cable on my transition double for 1-1/2 seasons, haven't had to touch it once!

Did i mention that the cable system is 75% lighter to (20-25 grams). www.powercordz.com
  • - 2
flag dmadness (Apr 11, 2011 at 17:51)
 yeah or you could just Run a steel braided cabe and Never have flex issues or Need to replace.
  • + 3
flag dill (Apr 11, 2011 at 21:05)
 you always need to replace steel
  • + 1
flag dmadness (Apr 12, 2011 at 17:03)
 Really?, when.. I have had the same braided cable for 4 years and I ride almost everyday .
[Reply]
  • + 11
flag derekvineyard (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:20)
 price aside, this is an awesome creation.
  • + 2
flag samsquamsh (Apr 12, 2011 at 0:20)
 agreed man, I'm totally impressed with this system, if it proves to be working in reallife it's gonna be amazing news for all of us, and then we just have to wait for the trickle down of the technology. new stuff like that makes working in the bicycle trade very interesting, you always have to adopt to it and learn about it...awesome!
[Reply]
  • + 8
flag grahamc (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:56)
 They look stunning, but get real, the future is in gearboxs. Closed, low maintainance, out the way of damage and shifting without pedaling.
  • + 4
flag bradwalton Plus (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:38)
 Agreed.
  • + 1
flag boo86 (Apr 12, 2011 at 0:28)
 seconded.
  • + 2
flag bigburd (Apr 12, 2011 at 2:27)
 I concur , think how big a gear box is on a super biker with 200 bhp going through it , now think how small it would need to be to handle the 1/2 BHP our legs can dish out , sort it out some body!!
[Reply]
  • + 9
flag alabamafreeride (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:03)
 whats wrong with good ole cable deraileurs?...
  • + 10
flag DH-Til-I-Die (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:08)
 Let's wait til the bigger companies like shimano and Sram pick it up so you don't have that stupid price!
  • + 6
flag mrbrett (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:13)
 Because XX and XTR are totally reasonable prices ...
  • + 1
flag allenrotstein (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:17)
 A XTR rear mech is $150.. That's reasonable!
  • + 2
flag MatthewCarpenter (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:20)
 Well, Acros somehow has to compensate for the development costs. It seems they want to have that done with 250 very high priced sets, that will probably be worth even more to collectors if the system proves to be revolutionizing high-end shifting.

The important question is: how expensive is the production really? I could imagine that the first "real" series will sell for prices like XTR or XX.

Anyways, congratulations for their engineering ingenuity. Having experienced the superb quality of earlier Acros products, I guess they are here to stay.
  • + 1
flag mrbrett (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:29)
 These prices are likely list prices, not street prices. In Canada the list price for an XTR derailleur is something like $260, an XX power dome cassette is $550, etc.
  • - 10
flag allenrotstein (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:35) (Below Threshold) show comment
 Be smart and buy at Chain reaction or PricePoint... Smart people don't buy overpriced LBS stuff..
  • + 5
flag WAKIdesigns (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:55)
 Sorry Allen rotstein but what you call smart is closer to cunning and selfish... It's alright for you and only you. Then You sound like u shared something like discovery of a Pink planet behind the moon. Just sayin' wha'eva
  • + 2
flag Balakeka (Apr 11, 2011 at 15:29)
 Hey these were available on www.5rot.com and look exactly the same.
Besides that the idea is very good but with too many lines to manage
  • + 0
flag mountguitars (Apr 11, 2011 at 21:01)
 chainreactioncycles for the win!
[Reply]
  • + 6
flag bawzofsteel (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:19)
 Shimano seriously need to consider producing an mtb version of their di2 electronic groupset, now that would be badass! This is pretty neat too, although a 'little' over priced.....
  • + 1
flag grahamc (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:52)
 I would never run an electric system, how annoying would it be when the batteries ran out mid run.
  • + 2
flag bawzofsteel (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:49)
 Boss at work ran the Di2 for over 6 months, only fully charged it 3 times, they last a lot longer than you'd expect....
  • + 1
flag grahamc (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:20)
 Guess how many times my x0 needs charged in 6 months?
  • + 7
flag thecarpy (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:05)
 i think that we shouldnt introduce anything electronic to bikes ever. add ons like lights and computers are fine, but a bike should be 100% self sustaining with mechanics.
  • + 2
flag bawzofsteel (Apr 12, 2011 at 4:10)
 Being a bike mechanic myself i know that mechanical system's will, for the most part, be more reliable, however, cables can fail. Also have you ever tried the Di2? it's pretty freeking perfect as far as shifting goes, and doesn't actually weigh any more than a regular set up. They're both crazy money for sure though, that's always going to be the major downfall with alternative system's like these. Unless your're doing a lake jump, or something that completely immerses Di2 in water, then they are surprisingly robust and water tight, being in scotland, It's seen it's fair share of torrential downpours and never had a problem!
  • + 2
flag thecarpy (Apr 12, 2011 at 7:31)
 my reasoning isnt about failure, its about how electronics destroy the basic idea of a bike: It is powered by you.
[Reply]
  • + 5
flag dirtdoctor (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:48)
 IMO this is a move in the wrong direction. We need to eliminate rear mechs, not improve them! And at this price point, who can afford to replace 2 or 3 of them a year, like I do. Not to mention the cable/hose nightmare, if you have a dropper post that means there are 6 hoses running along your top tube.... no thanks.
  • + 3
flag dwdw (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:43)
 I agree. I am still longing for an internal system like the Rohloff that works well.
  • + 1
flag bigburd (Apr 12, 2011 at 2:24)
 Yep you are right , we need to ditch the mech , it's an old awkward and weak point on every mountain bike , what we need is some thing like a rohloff hub but a bit lighter.
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag marin-fan (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:02)
 First really light and working hydraulic brakes were very expensive too. So I wouldn't worry about the price - that's not the point. The point is, that we see something what will be a standard in future - I bet. Good work, guys!
[Reply]
  • + 5
flag mongoose85 (Apr 11, 2011 at 19:36)
 Intense 951 FRO frame set: $2800
DeeMax Ultimate $2300
Fox40RC2 $1800
My new Acros A-GE shifting: $2306

Cobalt Bolt Cutters: $30

Losing your bike while eating a cheesburger at Mikky D's: Infuriating
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag ali-chapple (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:34)
 i'm sorry but when i'm flying down a hill at speed, i don't have the precise ability to make sure my finger is perfectly situated on the shifter to determine the gear change as this lot have suggested. the whole thing is over engineered, over priced and unnecessary....
[Reply]
  • + 6
flag danchaz29 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:16)
 expensive now but could be the future. love seeing the skeptics. remember canti brakes? 7speed? times change and stuff startes expensive.
  • + 2
flag cdbfree (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:56)
 thank you danchaz, exactly what i was thinking. bikes evolve faster than humans do, this could be the standard in the next 10-15 years.
  • - 8
flag WAKIdesigns (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:33) (Below Threshold) show comment
 Buaha "love the sceptics" I'm sure sceptics were bitched too when Hitler was giving speeches on better, more efficient race and getting rid of undeveloped ones. Then he was gasing disabled and mentally Ill to reduce the costs of running a country and get rid of weaker individuals. I'm sure going forward and Darwins stuff was on his lips quite often.

Dude! There is way not enough ACTIVE Scepticism in our world so back off. Humans evolve buahaha, into sales bullshitters and overweight diabetics buahaha Big Grin as for nature we devolve, or retardate. Keeping stuff simple didn't kill anybody, I run saint brakes on my am bike and v brakes on my HT. They have their charm. And they weigh nothing Big Grin
  • + 4
flag collin7 (Apr 11, 2011 at 20:35)
 Yeah, saint brakes have been around forever and are definitely not an evolution of previous brake designs. You don't run v brakes on your AM bike do you? No, because someone came up with something better... and it caught on.

And what were you getting at with the Hitler reference??? I didn't know Glen Beck was on Pinkbike!
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag togood2die (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:22)
 The idea is sound, the concept was always available, and a better technology than cable-actuated shifting, BUT...
That price will keep it off all our "working-man" bikes, for dang sure.
Get it comparable to even XX or XTR, and maybe...
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag olivierc (Apr 11, 2011 at 18:17)
 It should not be that expensive...it's not much more complicated than a full cnc brake set. It should at least be in the price range of a hope brakeset in my opinion and not to forget that a hit on a rock and you need to replace and bleen your 1000+$ derailler haha wtf...
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag Nobble (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:03)
 A great idea, and all the haters need to accept it... However it is incredibly overpriced, i can see them gaining some popularity of they come close to the pricing of other groups such as XTR, XX, and X.0
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag dmadness (Apr 11, 2011 at 17:45)
 BWWWAAAAAHAHAHAA Over 2 G's LOL, really, you could have all the peices milled and make your own system for that price. THIS is for suckers. ..And not needed.... Absolutely retarded, and not even CLOSE to being a competative Price.
  • + 1
flag Rasterman (Apr 12, 2011 at 9:23)
 i think you could hire a graduate mechanical engineer to design it, a tech student to mill it and build it for the same price, ridiculous, even if they are hand made in the US they shouldn't be this much. if the technology is truly great and useful, and a step up from cables, someone will be coming out with a cheaper version very soon so no worries.
  • + 1
flag dmadness (Apr 12, 2011 at 17:02)
 No worrys at all, I would have to agree.. for that price I could hire a guy to scrape this break out of a Solid peice of metal. As A plumber And hydraulics mechanic I find this quite entertaining.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag lucas668 (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:25)
 beautiful ... really
and i would spend the money on it, maybe ... but it would need to come with something like a 10 year warranty for everything
if it breaks ... if i crash and break it ... any thing any thing any thing ... i want to go the next 10 years never having to worry about buying a new shifter or derailleur

lets face it ladies and gents ... this is the way of the future ... no choice about it ...
5 years ago it was 8 speed cassette now 9's and the 10's are being phased in forcing you to get new shifters, chain, cassette, derailleur and 10sp chain rings // not like you can just put the new 10sp sram derailleur on a 9 speed cassette (ive tried with sram X9 10speed on a 9speed cassette - its a no go :-/ )

AND AFTER 90% OF bikes run a 10 speed they have to create the new and improved product so we keep buying new stuff
low and behold ... the new stuff ... at least it looks good
and with prices like that Acros is going to be the ferrari of the bike world
  • - 3
flag dmadness (Apr 11, 2011 at 17:49)
 No, They're going be be Broke and pennyless if they try to Sell shit like this... They are the laughing stock so far... have you been reading the comments... if they made the price 500 or less then I'd say they may have smething here but No bodys gonna touch this crap for the price, and Saint or similar will still kick the hell outta it.

Salute
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag Willie1 (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:04)
 How many of you are willing to go back to cable brakes from your current hydro's? Check out the price of Shimano's electric road shifting. Being first is costly. 2-3 years from now, and it will be $1000.00.

Warren
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag craigmclennaghan (Apr 12, 2011 at 7:00)
 Considering its almost brand new hopefully the price will be brought down over time as more companies jump on the bandwagon making more competition for pricing , i think its a great piece of engineering but to be honest surely the reinvention is more needed in something to change the gears itself rather than what it is shifted by .
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag balfa-man (Apr 20, 2011 at 9:53)
 As a system its been in development for over 5 years and at 175g lighter than XTR there is already a lot of retail interest. In the UK, we've already taken orders for a handful of sets.

Acros are a high end German manufacturer and the production will not move from in house. Break the set down, there are 248 individual parts at a cost of $2300, that works out at just $9 per part. To machine in house, anodise, laser etch etc etc, its not all that bad. Dont forget about all the small pistons etc that are super expensive to machine.

The whole system is fully rebuildable. Trash a mech and you can completely rebuild it at home. By the time you bought a XX gruppo, trashed 2 mechs, you'll only be a few hundred $ away from this system.

The original concept was realised by Christian Muthers under the 5Rot brand. This never made production due to the development and manufacture costs, not to mention the logistics! Christian now works for Acros as a top designer and sold the designs to them. They had the power and funding to turn 5Rot into a reality. Its taken 5 years of development, even from the point Christian had it to get it to market!

It runs on a fully sealed system which is dead easy to bleed. You simply remove 2 bleed screws from the shifter and push fluid all the way down and round the whole system. It is adjustable both at the mech and shifter if you get issues on the trail, simply by adjusting the piston screws.

Production versions will house the 2 smaller cables into one so you wont end up with more cables than at the moment.

J
  • + 1
flag cyberhawk (Feb 27, 2012 at 2:24)
 i bought my rear mech from christoph a few years ago, before it went to acros,,, rode it for several years till it needed bleeding and a slightly longer hose.. for the rest it took some hits and so,.. but its still running smooth.. i say a win.. if your doing it for the weight and looks.. overal it does perform a little better than conventional mechs.. but since the shadow mech came out.. i'd say you have to love it to buy it.. i did and i still do..
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag evergreentrls (Apr 12, 2011 at 3:45)
 what a joke, I would love to see the look on someones face who has just paid all that money for a mech to smash the shit out of it off a rock.... priceless! I for one will keep riding my 9 year old M1 with cables and a solid stainless steel axle, bollox to all this light-weight stuff that companies think its ok to charge a fortune for!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mrmars (Apr 11, 2011 at 15:19)
 I dunno why they are wasting their time with a front derailleur and shifter. soon that will be come a thing of the past. i even want to run XC bikes 1x10 and its only going to get better with smaller cogs coming in the future.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag cydaps (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:09)
 I'd rather focus was given to lightweight, space efficient gearboxes rather than overly priced hydraulic shifting that costs as much as a frame... Looks beautifully engineered and executed but I had to double take with the price that i thought was a typo at first!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag YetiMong (Apr 13, 2011 at 5:00)
 The product looks beautiful but like others obove have said, it's just flogging a dead horse really. The future is internal gear hubs (you could buy 2 of them for this price!!) or gearbox's.

And what happens when you stack it 25km into a ride and tear one of your hoses out?? You're f*cked, that what happens. Even the current system can be bodged into a usable gear in an emergency and only costs a few quid to fix.
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag robicycle (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:53)
 This is great - love to see where future is going, and for all of you whining about price.... no worries, China will make it for you cheaper soon
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Doranimal (Apr 20, 2011 at 8:06)
 Saw this a few years ago and looked into why no one else (Shimano Sram) was doing the same. From a quick scan around the net, it seems that Shimano hold patients for hydraulic shifting. Does this have something to do with the price perhaps? Either way it's been a long time coming, so let's have a few more players in the market. Well done Acros, I'm sure it will be made beautifully like their other products.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag RvaMtb1290 (Apr 11, 2011 at 15:22)
 great idea n everything but far too pricey.. I think companies should try to focus more on better alternatives to top quality components (and frames) that dont cost you an arm and a leg - many people would love to see mountain biking become a well known sport across the world but one of the things preventing that is the money you have to invest just to really even start, that is all.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag TTTean (Apr 13, 2011 at 9:57)
 If they looked at doing this but within a gearbox, they'd make a killing. People are looking beyond rear mech's and hangers these days. if they can create a gearbox that is small and light enough to go onto/into a Dh frame and not upset the suspension set up, Then and only then could they say they've found the next step in Mountain biking's evolution.

Great Idea but it has massive potential else where.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag chuck271 (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:08)
 I have been wondering when something like this was going to hit the market. without a doubt it has a great design and i'm sure it works like butter.... but when your derailleur setup cost is more than a pair of FOX 40's??? Wow.. i think we all may just wait a couple years until the price comes down.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag nicolais2000 (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:16)
 Acros makes some really impressive parts. I am confident that this stuff works great, but I think the same as many other´s here... it is for the regular rider just too expensive... but probably they are not interested at the regular rider :-)
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag nojzilla (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:43)
 regardless of the rediculous price
what are the benifits of hydraulic over cable in a gear system? sure in brakes its pure power but, in gears?
easier up shifts..........
yea thanx, cos my weedy wimpy little thumbs are having soooo much trouble not being strong enough to up'shift against those oh so powerfull return springs..................................(sarcasm btw)
  • + 1
flag PlumStick13-Magnus (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:04)
 i guess no maintanence, no cable stretch issues, no annoying frayyed cabled cutting up your legs. and i rekon its only been done just to prove it can be done
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mountguitars (Apr 11, 2011 at 20:58)
 i guess this idea is better than having electronic shifters like shimano's dura ace but the price is just out of reach for many of us. if they can make this affordable, im pretty sure sram and shimano will be a bit concerned.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag fullbug (Apr 12, 2011 at 7:52)
 i agree with the posts that getting rid of the rear mech is the next actual "leap" forward.
hydraulic, electric, pneumatic(shimano airlines!). Same horse different cart. it's still a r. mech waiting to get ripped off the hangar.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag absolutally (Apr 12, 2011 at 11:28)
 people pay 2k on forks, and more to get them tuned!! more and more car gearboxs have hydraulic clutch release bearings, so it makes sense that other industries are going to look at adopting these technologies. very expensive though!! i'm sure in a few years this will be the norm, and the prices will plummet...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag thebigschott (Apr 11, 2011 at 19:45)
 Radical!!! I'll wait 'til the price "trickels down" though

Everyone cries about new and really out there technology at first; and then sooner than later everyone is rocking it. When suspension was first introduced, or when the jump from 8spds to 9 happened, linear pull brakes to disc brakes....wah!!! None of it was initially widely accepted.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag brodieFreerider (Apr 12, 2011 at 17:55)
 well I think 2300 is a little crazy. but it is good for the pro DH racers where fast shifting is a must and weight is key, but that 2300 is just unpracticle for us who cant afford it and unsponsored. cool idea and im sure itd be awesome but I wont be purchasing it anytime soon. thats my 2 cents
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag lightningskull (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:16)
 That's a really great idea. Looking forward to running a similar set-up in 5-7 yrs when the prices are reasonable. Mechanically it checks all the right boxes. Now you rich guys buy em up and then the prices will creep down slowly.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag baca262 (Apr 11, 2011 at 17:06)
 awesome, but much too expensive. i bet my ass they make like 900% profit with that price. go make a gearbox and a shaft driven rear end that is equivalent to standard gear weight wise, then you might have an excuse to charge it this much.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag charvey9 (Apr 11, 2011 at 17:48)
 Expensive, but very cool. I was just wondering the other day what the next big technological advance in MTBing would be. I never thought of hydraulic shifting. I'm sure if it works we'll see mass production and affordable prices in the next few years.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag jgottya1 (Apr 12, 2011 at 19:52)
 Beautiful work. Yes please ! The front link reminds me of the mavic front derailleur from the first generation electric gruppo. Rear reminds me of the old Paul's cnc billet rears..without the rainbow of color... Really nice concept, hopefully it will be the next level for us !!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag NicholasCasswell (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:22)
 This would be a great product if it shifts flawlessly. There's no doubt that it does this, but I think they should market towards us 'regular' bikers who have to juggle costs of everyday things. There is no way me, or any of my friends or many people at all would think of spending 2g + on a shifting system, in all honesty its outrageous.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag sortafast (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:57)
 probably could have saved a few hundred off the retail if they would have used forgings instead of having to machine the parts on really expensive CNC machines (would have been stronger too). But they're German, so I guess thats how its gots to be. Looks nice though. I want my Air Lines back.
  • + 1
flag jesusrendon (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:02)
 the problem with forging would be the tolerances, probably forging and then machine the low tolerance parts of the system
  • + 2
flag sortafast (Apr 11, 2011 at 19:34)
 that is how its done. Get the complex curves done in the forging process, then tidy everything up on the CNC mill. Doing it that way would make a stronger part (on paper anyway), and make the lines smoother. but then again some people see some sort of cool factor in machine lines.
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag focofox37 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:39)
 This is awesome, too expensive for us, for now... but pros can finally use this with the atomlab hydraulic gyro to do multi-speed bar spins.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag taletotell (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:01)
 I'm always pretty skeptical of this new stuff. Seems like higher performance only really helps when the current performance is holding you back.
Cable disk brakes where holding me back. I love my hydros.
My shifter-derailleur combo only holds me back when I don't plan my shift or my hanger is bent. Only having 9 cogs on my cassette doesn't hold me back so I don't need 10. In fact 8 would probably be good enough for me. (Freeride doesn't require a regular cadence.)

If your shifter-derailleur combo is holding you back and it's not just a lack of shifting skill then you need something better. Start saving for the hydro-shifters. The rest of us are probably good for now and will switch when the industry stops making parts for the old style.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag bungalowbill (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:28)
 For that kind of money I would rather buy a X0 set, take the GF out to dinner and fly to whistler...... No way I would pay that for something that is the most replaced piece of hardware on my rides..
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag livetoride27 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:28)
 For 2300 I would buy the Saint groupset and some Fox's, however, this is for pro cross-country racers and the like, who are looking to make their bikes as light as possible, in 2-3 years time, everyone will have copied the design and made it better and for a cheaper price. Still an awesome product though
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag migkab (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:36)
 Have 2 bikes. Can you send me 2 sets please? Send the bill to CR7 (aka C. Ronaldo)!
Looking forward to test these babies!!!!!
C'mon, today is the 11th April, not the 1st!!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag wickrider (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:25)
 i have always been 100% for innovation , new concepts and progression but facing this , i cant get over the fact that ;
most rider ahave fixed derailler problems , on the trails , in races , whit anything to could get their hands on.
shifter , deraillers and cables are changed in parking lots in minutes for a couple of bucks (ok , maybe $50-$75 for rear SLX of X7 that can get you going)
i dont see that hapenning whit these hydrualics , regardless of their price.
that's a major setback.

it's the same whit hydro brakes , i know. but the performance from hydro brakes makes the trouble (when compared to machanical disk brakes) worth it.
i dont see that benefit for running a hydraulic transmission setup.

only time will tell i guess.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mbjz (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:41)
 jeez obviously the price is going to be ridiculous but so was all the other big inventions when they first came out. Disk brakes were hugely expensive when they first came out and now they are on almost all mountain bikes. if this system truly works well and offers a big advantage over the traditional shifting then the price will go down and I could see this being standard on lots of mountain bikes. but i doubt that will happen for another 10 years or so
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag betsie Plus (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:52)
 Cables are so limited and require a spring to operate.
So why when you have the power of hydraulics continue to use a spring and not a closed system?
Seems a very small step to a long term solution. Cables will be like they are with brakes at some point, but I feel not with this solution.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag tyrel27 (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:15)
 Its a bad ass idea, and sweet looking product but until the price comes down they wont be able to compete with the rest of the market. I am ok with my sram xo setup for a fraction of the cost and is plenty reliable. I could see $700 for the complete setup and than your hobby bikers would be ready to buy! I like the innovation. Keep up the great work!
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag JRoe (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:35)
 I'm sure shimano already do somin like this only the shimano one self rights so the chain dosnt rub on the mech. I think the shimano one is road only and it's electric.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag boo86 (Apr 12, 2011 at 0:27)
 Necessity is the mother of invention, but this is not necessary. Maybe if cable shifters were shit, but they're not, they work fine. However I'm all down for pushing the envelope !!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag haydendmorrison (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:15)
 Looks like a bigger pain in the tits than it's worth imo, waste of time. As for it being evolution, it's not, it's over engineering. This might take off in a few years but it best be damn good for that kind of money!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag neex (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:12)
 If you look at the DH spec'd Shimano air driven system that would give you one run of shifts (maybe) for $10k (Air Lines??), this is a bargain... Seriously though... X9 for me also.

A
  • + 1
flag seraph (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:48)
 MSRP on AirLines was $1600.
  • + 1
flag neex (Apr 11, 2011 at 19:33)
 I could have sworn that they were $10K pre-production but that sounds more reasonable. Thx for the correction. I will still stick with my X9. That DA servo controlled stuff ain't cheap either Wink
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag fooby (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:14)
 Seems like a really great idea that will make things allot smoother, is the insanely high price tag mainly because it's new technology? As you can get hydraulic brakes for not much more than cable brakes these days.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag ThePurplePeopleEater (Apr 11, 2011 at 19:16)
 I heard of these before, In my thoughts its one of the mos stupid things I have ever heard. Unless you are XC and need to down shift, at high rates of speed. This is a useless piece of junk.
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag nicklouse (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:08)
 so have Acros bought out the 5 Rot design? or just licensed it?

www.5rot.com/schalthebel.html
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag TheGoose (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:44)
 surely people can look past the fact that it cost a lot and see that this is the only product on the market of its kind and has potential to become the future of MTB technology Smile
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag nrossow (Apr 11, 2011 at 20:28)
 To everyone saying "I would buy if it cost (value around $500)"

An XTR set has an MSRP of over $700. As a brand new technology claiming to be the best, it should cost at least more than $1000 (maybe not $2300, though).
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag SupremeDork (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:37)
 Why not just make this work with a belt drive tranny and charge OVER $9000 for it? Silence is golden, if you have gold to spare.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag odin333 (Apr 11, 2011 at 18:33)
 jeez $2300? even the best disc brakes sets rarely break $1000 a set. its not like its very new technology either, they have just replaced a cable with a hydraulic system. Red 5 did it like 5+ years ago.
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag freeride-shawn (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:04)
 $2306!?!?!?!?!?!? WTF MAING!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag eightyonespices (Apr 12, 2011 at 3:18)
 Guy's that is innovation. It is not new, Chistopgh has been working on it for several years, but good for Acros for picking it up! I would love to run a set... these are the companies that keep innovation going...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag dom69foco (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:20)
 forget the price- it's still a bad idea! Why not just run a fully sealed cable? There, no weather problems, much easier to adjust, and much easier and cheaper to replace when damaged
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag thekettle (Apr 12, 2011 at 2:56)
 I can deffo see the benefit of these, tho i think it'll be a while before you start seeing them on the trails, they need to prove them selves mountain proof and the price needs to come down ALLOT!!
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag dirtydroog (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:36)
 If NASA ever send bikes to Mars these'd be good
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag starcbiker (Apr 11, 2011 at 17:03)
 really great idea now just get the price into the XO and XTR range and i think you will have a winner
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag zombiemtb661 (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:07)
 its just a fad like the shimano air gears from back in the day. it will only take off if you guys can get its price to match xo or xtr kit. this is not for me thats for sure.
  • + 1
flag sortafast (Apr 11, 2011 at 19:41)
 Dude Shimano Airlines were rad.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag DH-Til-I-Die (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:44)
 and if your pressure drops and goes sqwishy like a brake? no as easy as tightening a cable.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag pbuser102331 (Apr 11, 2011 at 15:26)
 All this time and effort put into a design that is still flawwed,wish they would just make a main stream gear box already.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag BlackFerret (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:13)
 all new ideas have a hefty price tag give it time to develop and change like hydraulic brakes and it will soon start dropping in price!
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag craig7 (Apr 11, 2011 at 21:52)
 I i had this and fell and broke it I think id start crying right there on the side of the trail
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag Smallbright (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:20)
 Too much money, they don't cost that much to make. $200 to $350 range would be consumer friendly.
  • + 4
flag sortafast (Apr 11, 2011 at 19:38)
 they probably do cost a lot to make. My guess is that they were done on some sort of half million dollar machine with another 200k in tooling. Operating on of those is not very cheap nor is the design nor the set up. And since there is a bunch of parts made with complex geometries plus the limited run part of the deal and yeah, $2300 is not that surprising. If they were to have forged the parts, then machined them and made 25000 units I am sure it would have been under a grand. But then it wouldn't have garnered nearly as much attention.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mattsavage (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:52)
 I just put a deposit down on this setup! I found an agent in the Ukraine who accepts kidneys... I Acros' hydro system is better than mine, I can't seem to stop bleeding...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag DHwanaBE (Apr 14, 2011 at 1:52)
 People that have big sponsors are gonna be loving this, they'll just be given it! lol. This makes the price seem even more unreasonable, no??
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag ninjea (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:49)
 just purchased a pair, can't wait, hope they come before the Bently Continental GT i also orderd today after winning the lotto....
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag drewadcock (Apr 12, 2011 at 9:38)
 whats next... a hydraulic drive train??
for $10,000
dont get me wrong, im impressed! but way out of the average consumers budget
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mindthegap (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:11)
 LOL, This is beyond absurd. That is more expensive than a bullet proof race transmission for my SUBARU STi.... Get real and fire whoever came up with this cockamamee idea.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag david-hill (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:19)
 YES!! finally a hydraulic system that might actually work. but holy balls that's a lot of cash!! sick idea though Smile
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag lubotk (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:43)
 They are goddamn pioneers - what do u expect. In time this will start becoming a standard. Just like hydraulic brakes are atm. Give it time.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag konabrother1 (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:44)
 what the? thats cool! but who the heck would pay over 2000 for this. the max i would pay is $500. its awesome design though
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag metalmike (Apr 11, 2011 at 22:05)
 Very cool theoretically but the price tag is ridiculous and will be because this will never be manufactured at a scale which can bring it to a reasonable price-point.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag xtr3m3 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:45)
 for what you need a sh*t like that? much complicated sistem that a usualy cable sistem......
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag sethius (Apr 11, 2011 at 17:49)
 purchase Rot5 and relabelled?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag luigi (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:40)
 for $2306, this product will crash and burn just like the last over complicated shifter they tried to make.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag AsbjrnRytter (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:45)
 Haha, you got to be kidding me man! Guess it wont make it very far, Reminds me of electric gears, they are alomost only seen on timetrial bikes....
  • + 0
flag JRoe (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:50)
 That's exactly my point. You can buy a full brand new DH bike for that. It's over engineered as well
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag bmxxican (Apr 11, 2011 at 17:47)
 sounds cool but its not worth it in the slightest like at my local you can get a brand new big hit for 1500$ plus tax
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag kalaguda (Apr 11, 2011 at 18:33)
 I have seen this many years ago, Named "5-rot" :http://www.light-bikes.de/eng/2007/03/02/5rot-hydraulic-shifting/
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag jcinkits (Apr 11, 2011 at 23:13)
 rather feed a starving family in Ethiopia for a year than spend 2 + grand on his piece of corporate 'kaching!' fluff...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag justincs (Apr 11, 2011 at 20:58)
 2300......i paid 2650.00 for my new bike 2010........i'll wait a couple of decades!!!!!!!!!!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag macroman (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:35)
 It needs to be priced at about $1200 to be competitive. Definitely has some advantages over XTR and XX but not at $2300.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag bigdood (Apr 11, 2011 at 23:25)
 All they need to do is market it to roadies and say it saves 1 watt and they'll sell a ton of 'em at that price
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Matt-W (Apr 12, 2011 at 1:20)
 give me a 3 or 4 speed shifter already. i don't need all these extra gears!
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag mindthegap (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:24)
 oooooooo....its made of adamantium
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag austens (Apr 11, 2011 at 21:50)
 ......for those with a disposable income
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mickeydesadist2 (Apr 11, 2011 at 18:55)
 to be worth that price it needs more tacky acronyms and a late nite infomercial!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag taps (Apr 12, 2011 at 15:56)
 that's more expensive than both of my bikes ;( and both bikes are 1x9. i need $4612 for 2 of those LOL
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag colin-s (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:20)
 For 2300, you could buy everything you needed about 20 times over. Great idea, but definitely not practical.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag marvelus10 (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:49)
 They should probably stop making anymore till the first 250 sell, if they ever do.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag OllyJ (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:25)
 What a piece of overpriced shit Smile
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag DownhillBro (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:56)
 German engineering, must be good!
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag irishbiker10 (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:25)
 that is retardely expensive
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Jamesb-uk (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:45)
 Tbh the sort of people that would consider buying this probably arn't even members on pinkbike
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag louie15 (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:49)
 the price is definatley steep but it's really for the rider that has everything and a tone of money
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag superdanu (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:41)
 nifty! cash aside, its an elegant approach.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag pokalface (Apr 11, 2011 at 15:40)
 a drivetrain cost of specialized frame,if i'm a billionaire!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag jawzzy3 (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:48)
 $2300 and 4 lines just for shifting your gears? April fools was 2 weeks ago.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag mudd (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:52)
 When I win the Lottery, I'll consider buying this.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag cofattire (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:47)
 2,300 for a shifting system wins the WAY overpriced what the hell are these companies thinking trophy.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag tsimpson1993 (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:45)
 if it were 2300, i'd buy it, for sure. i just can't afford 2306.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag theoneatsang (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:42)
 I'd get this...

if I won the lottery :p
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag wadeo4 (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:03)
 this will only be like $300 in 5 years... i can wait
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag ziggyzuggy (Apr 14, 2011 at 6:32)
 if they sell this for 100$ i know there would be no complaints
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag teeone (Apr 12, 2011 at 1:48)
 ....5 rot....
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag MiChAeLBiKeR (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:16)
 nice price ;/ Frown
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag haljohnson (Apr 12, 2011 at 3:25)
 am with shark555 wtf is up with the extra 6 bucks
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag kevinquillan (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:05)
 why would you even want this, clipping a rock would be tragic.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag seraph (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:39)
 Don't want any stretched cables? Run PowerCordz. Problem solved at a small fraction of the cost of this system.
  • + 1
flag OllyJ (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:26)
 true dat! Lighter than standard cables as well, and harder wearing. And none of the faff of hydraulic, brakes is one thing, but gears, I mean they're only doing it because no-one has yet right? D:
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag thatdude01 (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:05)
 OMFG this is what im taklin about a little out of my price range
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag jesusrendon (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:15)
 good Idea, but 2300 is not a good start, Next!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag davidmtbDH (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:14)
 Smart, but FAR too expensive.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag ipattis Plus (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:14)
 so there are two lines to each derailleur?
  • + 1
flag funkymonkey144 (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:59)
 yup
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag darnell-m (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:06)
 cool
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag ryanthom (Apr 12, 2011 at 16:38)
 I'm curious how it indexes...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag cebelar123 (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:53)
 This price is just loooooooooool
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag rocnriderider (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:54)
 Rember shimano airline...Didn't work for a long time!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag WILLIAM-MILLER (Apr 12, 2011 at 12:38)
 would love to see it in action
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag PlumStick13-Magnus (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:02)
 ive been wondering when this would be invented!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag iChimp (Apr 12, 2011 at 10:45)
 Yeah this is great but a bit pricey!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag goober6801 (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:56)
 so if you only need the rear is $1200. thats still crazy
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag RoverDover (Apr 11, 2011 at 18:30)
 Make a hydraulicly actuated internal rear hub and I will buy it
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag bmxerjosh1 (Apr 11, 2011 at 18:32)
 be good for the CX peeps that can afford it
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag NorthEasternDH (Apr 11, 2011 at 15:03)
 i still want one, and will probably get one when i get older...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag colebighit209 (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:46)
 thats a cool concept but for 2300 its not efficient enough but still cool
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Silverrider (Apr 11, 2011 at 18:26)
 Guess where my $2300 is going!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag jptothetree (Apr 11, 2011 at 15:23)
 great, now i have to bleed my derailleur / shifter too? NEXT!!!
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag kcah (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:29)
 who cares
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag thebiblemen (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:27)
 more shit to bleed
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag takakuwata (Apr 11, 2011 at 17:45)
 Cool idea, but way too expensive!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag sashamtbrider (Apr 11, 2011 at 18:03)
 in my opinion it should cost no more than 500$
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag arquitetodh (Apr 11, 2011 at 10:03)
 2,300?? No way! But this is the future of shifting...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag bigamac (Apr 11, 2011 at 14:07)
 This should of been posted on april 1st, silly idea if you ask me..
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag nickis (Apr 11, 2011 at 21:39)
 I think its very cool to pricey though.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mongoosemaniac (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:34)
 I wanna see a video of it shifting.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag jyemen (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:31)
 good idea, i'll check back in 3 years
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag pokalface (Apr 11, 2011 at 21:24)
 you will not be a pro on this gears...haha its lush!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag SpecializedRiderRob (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:16)
 great idea, if you can afford it
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Rider1995 (Apr 11, 2011 at 13:52)
 later will be harder to come clean the derailleur
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag man0with0stick (Apr 11, 2011 at 20:49)
 Wow.. I quit downhill just in time.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag UncleCliffy (Apr 11, 2011 at 9:32)
 I'll take 2 sets please.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag alkibogdan (Apr 11, 2011 at 12:16)
 if the price is lower, i would buy it
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag MiChAeLBiKeR (Apr 11, 2011 at 11:16)
 nice price ;/ Frown
  • + 3
flag neimbc (Apr 11, 2011 at 16:17)
 Never realized shifting was incredibly hard with cables - waste of money and innovation for a product that's not really needed. How about getting rid of the back derailleur all together - like the rohloff - but refine it, improve it and make it bomb proof and serviceable if ever need be! Then get it on as much OEM as possible to make it affordable! Hmmmm.
  • + 2
flag jcinkits (Apr 11, 2011 at 23:13)
 yep ! what you said.
[Reply]

Post a Comment



Copyright © 2000 - 2013. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv43 0.104171