Mountain bikers who follow Supercross racing, and especially fans of three-time 450cc champ Ryan Villopoto, will have likely heard the Atlas name before, with the Canadian company having a strong presence in the sport by offering four different braces designed specifically for motorized use. It's the Crank, their entry level cycling specific option that we take a look at here, which features the same minimalistic design and engineered flex as the rest of their lineup. Atlas offers two versions of the Crank, a carbon fiber model that retails for $529.99 USD, and the $329.99 USD standard version tested below. All of their braces and a selection of small parts can be purchased directly off of the Atlas website.
Atlas Crank Details
• Intended use: downhill, freeriding
• Adjustable height shoulder padding
• Built-in flex to the brace body
• Reversible and replaceable rear mounts
• Flexible, rotating chest supports
• Emergency Release System
• Weight: 780 grams
• Sizes: small, medium, large
• MSRP: $329.99 USD
ConstructionAtlas' approach to neck brace design is to allow the brace's frame to flex slightly, thereby letting it conform to the rider's body and how he or she moves when on the bike. The flex is far from being an afterthought of the design, though, with Atlas saying that it has been ''
designed with controlled amounts of engineered flexibility'', something that is accomplished by both the shape of the brace's frame and its split design that allows the left and right sides to move independently of each other. The rear section is tied together by a replaceable rubber tether that allows each side of the brace to flex while still offering a positive connection, and it also joins both sides together when the 'Emergency Release System' at the front is employed and the brace is opened up like a clamshell in case of an emergency.
The twin sternum supports (left) can rotate independently of each other, while also offering a bit of flex. Atlas' Emergency Release System (right) depends on a removable pin and threaded aluminum nut, and is much simpler than a hinged latch design.
The same approach to flexibility and comfort can be found at the front of the Crank brace, where it uses two separate padded sternum supports that feature a wishbone shape. This layout allows them to flex upon impact to have the brace absorb and dissipate the crash energy rather then just feeding it directly into the rider's body. ''
This promotes further rotation of the helmet,'' they explain in the brace's technical write-up, "'
helping to keep the body in motion rather than the head coming to a harsh, abrupt stop on impact.'' Both of the padded sternum supports also rotate so that they can rest on the wearer's chest evenly.
The front of the Crank is also home to Atlas' Emergency Release System, a design that allows the brace to be opened up and removed without having to shift the rider's head or neck should he be on the ground with suspected injuries. The system is simple enough: pull off the large pin that runs through the end of axle and in a slot machined into the anodized red aluminum nut, then unthread the nut off of the axle by hand. You should now be able to pull the brace apart easily.
The Cranks' twin back supports are hinged, and their split design is said to prevent crash loads from being fed directly into the wearer's spine.
The Crank's twin back supports are each mounted on machined aluminum blocks that pivot off the frame, and Atlas offers them in different offsets to allow the brace to be adjusted width-wise to fit thicker or thinner chests. They also say that the mounts can be reversed, making for an even larger range of adjustment should you be at either end of the scale of a particular size. The pads themselves have a much larger footprint than those used on the front of the brace, a fact that no doubt helps to spread impact load over a wider area rather than seeing it more focused, and both the mounts and the supports can be purchased separately if you need replacements for any reason.
One point that should be mentioned is that the rear mounts can be folded down flat into the center section of the brace, something that should make it much easier to travel with compared to some other options on the market. The shape of the rear mount blocks - the aluminum pieces that the supports attach to - keeps the them from rotating outward too far when the brace is put on.
The aluminum rear mounts (the silver pieces that connect the frame and the back supports) are offered in different offsets to allow for fine tuning, and they can also be reversed.
Set Up Just like with a helmet, adjusting the brace for your body is not only going to be key to having it fit comfortably, but also so that it protects you from injury as it was designed to. With the Crank brace being available in three different sizes, it's imperative that you measure your chest circumference just below your armpits to be able to
pinpoint the size that is going to work best for you. Our tester ended up requiring a large sized brace, although we first tried out a medium with the larger aluminum rear mounts fitted in order to be sure. The next step was to adjust the height of the brace on our shoulders via the adjustable padding, and adding more padding will have the brace sitting higher so that it makes contact with your helmet sooner. The amount of padding that you use is going to depend on your body shape and the type of helmet that you're sporting, and lower profile helmets will likely require more padding than a moto style lid that usually features larger external dimensions.
The cycling specific Crank brace can be fitted with additional shoulder padding that allows it to sit higher on the rider's shoulders, meaning that it will work better with mountain bike helmets that are usually lower profile than moto lids.
We used the Crank brace with three different helmets - Troy Lee's D3, Specialized's Dissident, and Bell's Full 9 - and found that some adjustment was necessary to have it function properly with the latter, mainly removing the slim additional pads that we had fitted to each side when wearing the lower profile D3 and Dissident helmets. This is obviously going to come down to body shape as well, and there's a good chance that our tester has a shorter neck than many other people. It's also worth pointing out that Atlas' braces don't open up like Leatt's or Alpinestar's models, meaning that you have to slip it on from above rather than wrap it around. This isn't anything to complain about in our minds, but it does mean that you'll have to put the brace on before donning your helmet, whereas you can install the competition afterwards.
PerformanceThe list of what we look for in a neck brace is pretty simple: it needs to fit properly while not shifting around on our shoulders, it shouldn't restrict any natural movement that we'd make while riding, and it obviously needs to prevent injury to our neck. Most braces on the market check off all of those boxes so long as they are adjusted properly, which leaves the biggest deciding factor: comfort. Much like heads and helmets, certain neck braces will simply fit better than others for some people, and we'd recommend that potential buyers try any brace they're planning on purchasing while wearing the helmet that they will be using. Having said that, Atlas' Crank neck brace is the most comfortable of any that we've ever used, and that list includes all of the major players.
There are a few reasons for the Crank's great fit - the separate front and rear supports simply feel less intrusive than the more traditional support layout found on some other designs. No, it's not invisible by any means, but Atlas' uncoupled rear supports, as well as the hinged and flexible twin sternum supports, make for a relatively natural fit. It also had our testers noting the large contact patch that seems to offer a more positive feel on our backs compared to those that feature a single point of contact.
We ended up preferring to use the Crank with the additional shoulder padding in place so that it came into contact with our Troy Lee D3 and Specialized Dissident helmets before we suspect a neck injury would occur.
The amount of flex built into the Atlas' frame is surely also another factor as to why it felt so comfortable, with the Crank simply having a more natural feel to it than the competition when in the heat of battle. This flex allows the brace to stay in contact with your body more, whereas a design with a more rigid frame will tend to try and lift up off of your shoulders if one is higher than the other. Again, it isn't invisible, but it definitely offers a fit that is more in-tune with how a rider's body moves when on a downhill bike and at speed, and we never once found ourselves restricted in movement by the Crank. Given that neck braces are designed to restrict extreme and unnatural movements of the head, that last point is especially impressive - the Crank works as intended, but doesn't go overboard. Proper setup plays a big part in this, of course, but no amount of tinkering with other designs has seen them offer the same kind of performance.
Like most neck braces, the Crank is best used with the supplied strap setup that helps to hold it down onto your shoulders, with it extending down from the front of the brace, around the chest and just under the armpits, and then run through the two rear supports. This makes for a very secure layout that kept the Crank from shifting, and although we did try running the brace sans straps, we ended up preferring the more secure strap setup.
The split back supports not only spread out the force of an impact and keep it from being focused directly over the spine, they also make for a very comfortable fit.
The Crank brace reviewed here is a 2013 model, and after this review was written Atlas informed us they have released an updated version for 2014 that ''
decreases the weight by 20% down to 750 grams, uses an all new and simplified chest strap system, has more secure and removable X strap clips on the frame, and also features easier adjustment to the overall size of each brace by combining multiple sizes into a reversible rear mount design.'' We'll be getting our paws on the updated model soon, after which you'll be able to find out if Atlas has been able to improve on their already impressive design.
Pinkbike's take: | Neck braces aren't mandatory equipment, and there is still some discussion as to if they can be the cause of other trauma, but the general consensus at this point is that they go a long way to helping prevent serious neck injuries in worst case scenarios. The bottom line is that a neck brace isn't a bad idea if you do a lot of downhilling and can get used to wearing one. The Atlas Crank is the most comfortable, natural feeling neck brace that we've used thus far, meaning that it's not only a great option for those who might have tried and given up on using a brace, but also a rider who is looking for a more inconspicuous option. - Mike Levy |
www.atlasbrace.com
One of the bike mags here in Australia AMB did an article on braces a few years ago.
"The most serious injuries come from a compressive force where you compress the vertebrate, of which it takes as little as 15mm for this to happen" (as stated in the article).
I will go out on a leg and say that yes they do work. Both from personal experience and from other riders stories.
*But* they won't completely safeguard you from all neck injury obviously, so ride safe kids. That's my last two bits.
Lets take the view that they might actually raise the chance of a certain injury. So we increase injuries like collarbones but it may save from a catastrophic injury
For me the small increase of a lesser, none life altering injury vs the reduction of a catastrophic injury is worth it. The chance of having a neck breaking crash might be rare but god forbid if we are in that situation, I sure as hell want to be wearing a neck brace.
You can't go wrong with 100% goggles. Good antifog properties, universal lens fits all goggles from budget to those trick racecraft goggles shown in the pic. I run the accuri (on step down in $$ from the racecraft) and I love them.
You cant say neck braces are evil because they will cause injury, cause if you do, why are you in one of the most dangerous sports!?
They help protect a harmful injury, they dont guarentee no injury at all will occur!
They almost work in a way that you might have to give and take. Lets say you fall the exact same way, and fhe first way you dont wear a brace and break your neck. Well now put on the brace, fall the exact same way, and the stress points move to your collorbone or somewhere else.
What would you rather have? Death or paralyzation, or broken bones and life? Just my opinion. Go Atlas!
Excuse me for my lack of knowledge but, what kind of trauma could be caused by wearing a neck brace during a crash ?
15lbs of force but that is concentrated force per square inch. If I put a 45lbs weight plate on it, it wont break. You need to consider the bodies construction and the area the force is dissipated over.
You said " When you crash head first, the helmet pushes the leatt down, into the collarbone"
It only takes as little as 15mm of compression on the neck for it to break or cause damage this is the amount the neck can compress. If you put enough force into your neck that the brace is pushing down into the collar bone hard enough to break it there is a good chance that force would have compressed your neck 15mm. That is the point of the brace. Hence the need for proper set up, these people running loose braces are stupid. The helmet should contact the brace and then dissipate the force into the body to save the neck. that it the entire point of the brace to stop the necks compression before it damages the neck. compression > neck starts compressing >neck reaches critical compression >brace is contacted >force is transferred into the body and prevents the neck compressing to damaging point.
Humanity has been redeemed.
....At least till some Brit reads this.
Or perhaps scary1's comment was a test, what-what?
If you guys would aim those misery barbs at someone else once in a while you might be able to muster up the gumption to invade some countries again!!!
I'll admit, your flag is much cooler looking than ours but you guys need to double fist some Monster energy drinks and ditch that weak ass Tea!
I expect a truly witty retort when I return , Im off to Mc D's for a quick #4 with a diet coke...So.......be funny.
...you created hipsters. There's no way you can be serious with that shit!
Something every EMS would carry with them right?
Cutting the tether is just as safe as removing the ERS clip in front. Also, the EMS on the carbon brace is basically a QR and on the Tyke and Prodigy Braces(for kids) there is a simple button that needs to be pushed to put the brace on and take off for normal use and in an Emergency. So the only brace that might take longer to open would be the Original model, but then again, the tether is another EASY way to remove the brace safely.
No neck brace is perfect, but as you'll see in the review. It ranked higher than the competition for many reasons.
Curious what happens with the Dainese prototype seen last year. This one was actually resting on your shoulder blades leaving plenty of distance to the spine, and space for a spine protector.
What we also have to look at is how many riders have actually had life changing injuries over that last 20 years in this sport due to neck injury compared to teh amount of people who ride/race downhill and freeride etc? I don't see that many being reported. The ones that have been injured would a neck brace have really saved them?
Having said all this I think this brace does look the best compromise and I am so glad to see the the rear of it doesnt sit on your spine and rests on your shoulder blades. If I was going to go back to a brace I would certainly choose this over the competition!
The brace definitely doesn't fit everyone, but there are changes in sizing that can me made to this brace to remedy almost every issue with fit
www.youtube.com/watch?v=THbcZ8Vt8z0
I know there is alot of development cost in making such products but if you look at the basic leatt ride I dowt there's much product cost.
I just think a company would make a killing and help alot of people out with a more affordable product.
I know you can't put a price on productive equipment but that doesn't mean much if you havent got the money in the bank.
Anytime PB throws out a sweet review the first thing people do is cry about the price. Hello, a review is targeted for people in the market to make a purchase, not for the nay-sayers who only point out the cons. Just like that SRAM review from the other day... People are like: "It's gonna cost too much" "I'll just keep my Saint group and mod it into a 7 speed"
Unless you have a mod for me that will turn these 3 sticks, 2 paper clips and 1 roll of duck tape into a neck brace, then I don't wanna hear your Negative Nancy comments.
Oh, and FYI, I make less money than you Stuie
Helmets,shin pads,body armor all have affordable option for beginners, an affordable neck brace is all that's missing, a possible gap in the market.
PS you should replace any helmet "after one good head smack".
PS body armour is for goons -- always the slowest guys on the hill.
Little Stuie, my initial argument was the price point complaint that everyone has. I then went overboard and enticed an argument... My apologies. Neck brace helps prevent wheelchair riding, body armour prevents bumps, bruises and scars.
"Invalided" Umm, didn't your country create the English language....
I am saying that there should be more affordable neck braces like there is helmets and such.
Body armor often has a spine protection and I've seen more broken back thank necks from riding...
If everyone has the price point argument its saying something isn't it? A more affordable option would be welcomed.
Yes, oh no I'm English and I made a mistake in English,call the Queen. I didn't create the language.