Atlas Crank Neck Brace - Review

Mar 5, 2014
by Mike Levy  


Mountain bikers who follow Supercross racing, and especially fans of three-time 450cc champ Ryan Villopoto, will have likely heard the Atlas name before, with the Canadian company having a strong presence in the sport by offering four different braces designed specifically for motorized use. It's the Crank, their entry level cycling specific option that we take a look at here, which features the same minimalistic design and engineered flex as the rest of their lineup. Atlas offers two versions of the Crank, a carbon fiber model that retails for $529.99 USD, and the $329.99 USD standard version tested below. All of their braces and a selection of small parts can be purchased directly off of the Atlas website.

Atlas Crank Details

• Intended use: downhill, freeriding
• Adjustable height shoulder padding
• Built-in flex to the brace body
• Reversible and replaceable rear mounts
• Flexible, rotating chest supports
• Emergency Release System
• Weight: 780 grams
• Sizes: small, medium, large
• MSRP: $329.99 USD


Construction

Atlas' approach to neck brace design is to allow the brace's frame to flex slightly, thereby letting it conform to the rider's body and how he or she moves when on the bike. The flex is far from being an afterthought of the design, though, with Atlas saying that it has been ''designed with controlled amounts of engineered flexibility'', something that is accomplished by both the shape of the brace's frame and its split design that allows the left and right sides to move independently of each other. The rear section is tied together by a replaceable rubber tether that allows each side of the brace to flex while still offering a positive connection, and it also joins both sides together when the 'Emergency Release System' at the front is employed and the brace is opened up like a clamshell in case of an emergency.

Atlas brace review test

The twin sternum supports (left) can rotate independently of each other, while also offering a bit of flex. Atlas' Emergency Release System (right) depends on a removable pin and threaded aluminum nut, and is much simpler than a hinged latch design.



The same approach to flexibility and comfort can be found at the front of the Crank brace, where it uses two separate padded sternum supports that feature a wishbone shape. This layout allows them to flex upon impact to have the brace absorb and dissipate the crash energy rather then just feeding it directly into the rider's body. ''This promotes further rotation of the helmet,'' they explain in the brace's technical write-up, "'helping to keep the body in motion rather than the head coming to a harsh, abrupt stop on impact.'' Both of the padded sternum supports also rotate so that they can rest on the wearer's chest evenly.

The front of the Crank is also home to Atlas' Emergency Release System, a design that allows the brace to be opened up and removed without having to shift the rider's head or neck should he be on the ground with suspected injuries. The system is simple enough: pull off the large pin that runs through the end of axle and in a slot machined into the anodized red aluminum nut, then unthread the nut off of the axle by hand. You should now be able to pull the brace apart easily.

Atlas brace review test

The Cranks' twin back supports are hinged, and their split design is said to prevent crash loads from being fed directly into the wearer's spine.



The Crank's twin back supports are each mounted on machined aluminum blocks that pivot off the frame, and Atlas offers them in different offsets to allow the brace to be adjusted width-wise to fit thicker or thinner chests. They also say that the mounts can be reversed, making for an even larger range of adjustment should you be at either end of the scale of a particular size. The pads themselves have a much larger footprint than those used on the front of the brace, a fact that no doubt helps to spread impact load over a wider area rather than seeing it more focused, and both the mounts and the supports can be purchased separately if you need replacements for any reason.

One point that should be mentioned is that the rear mounts can be folded down flat into the center section of the brace, something that should make it much easier to travel with compared to some other options on the market. The shape of the rear mount blocks - the aluminum pieces that the supports attach to - keeps the them from rotating outward too far when the brace is put on.

Atlas brace review test

The aluminum rear mounts (the silver pieces that connect the frame and the back supports) are offered in different offsets to allow for fine tuning, and they can also be reversed.




Set Up

Just like with a helmet, adjusting the brace for your body is not only going to be key to having it fit comfortably, but also so that it protects you from injury as it was designed to. With the Crank brace being available in three different sizes, it's imperative that you measure your chest circumference just below your armpits to be able to pinpoint the size that is going to work best for you. Our tester ended up requiring a large sized brace, although we first tried out a medium with the larger aluminum rear mounts fitted in order to be sure. The next step was to adjust the height of the brace on our shoulders via the adjustable padding, and adding more padding will have the brace sitting higher so that it makes contact with your helmet sooner. The amount of padding that you use is going to depend on your body shape and the type of helmet that you're sporting, and lower profile helmets will likely require more padding than a moto style lid that usually features larger external dimensions.

Atlas brace review test

The cycling specific Crank brace can be fitted with additional shoulder padding that allows it to sit higher on the rider's shoulders, meaning that it will work better with mountain bike helmets that are usually lower profile than moto lids.



We used the Crank brace with three different helmets - Troy Lee's D3, Specialized's Dissident, and Bell's Full 9 - and found that some adjustment was necessary to have it function properly with the latter, mainly removing the slim additional pads that we had fitted to each side when wearing the lower profile D3 and Dissident helmets. This is obviously going to come down to body shape as well, and there's a good chance that our tester has a shorter neck than many other people. It's also worth pointing out that Atlas' braces don't open up like Leatt's or Alpinestar's models, meaning that you have to slip it on from above rather than wrap it around. This isn't anything to complain about in our minds, but it does mean that you'll have to put the brace on before donning your helmet, whereas you can install the competition afterwards.



Performance

The list of what we look for in a neck brace is pretty simple: it needs to fit properly while not shifting around on our shoulders, it shouldn't restrict any natural movement that we'd make while riding, and it obviously needs to prevent injury to our neck. Most braces on the market check off all of those boxes so long as they are adjusted properly, which leaves the biggest deciding factor: comfort. Much like heads and helmets, certain neck braces will simply fit better than others for some people, and we'd recommend that potential buyers try any brace they're planning on purchasing while wearing the helmet that they will be using. Having said that, Atlas' Crank neck brace is the most comfortable of any that we've ever used, and that list includes all of the major players.

There are a few reasons for the Crank's great fit - the separate front and rear supports simply feel less intrusive than the more traditional support layout found on some other designs. No, it's not invisible by any means, but Atlas' uncoupled rear supports, as well as the hinged and flexible twin sternum supports, make for a relatively natural fit. It also had our testers noting the large contact patch that seems to offer a more positive feel on our backs compared to those that feature a single point of contact.

Atlas brace review test

We ended up preferring to use the Crank with the additional shoulder padding in place so that it came into contact with our Troy Lee D3 and Specialized Dissident helmets before we suspect a neck injury would occur.



The amount of flex built into the Atlas' frame is surely also another factor as to why it felt so comfortable, with the Crank simply having a more natural feel to it than the competition when in the heat of battle. This flex allows the brace to stay in contact with your body more, whereas a design with a more rigid frame will tend to try and lift up off of your shoulders if one is higher than the other. Again, it isn't invisible, but it definitely offers a fit that is more in-tune with how a rider's body moves when on a downhill bike and at speed, and we never once found ourselves restricted in movement by the Crank. Given that neck braces are designed to restrict extreme and unnatural movements of the head, that last point is especially impressive - the Crank works as intended, but doesn't go overboard. Proper setup plays a big part in this, of course, but no amount of tinkering with other designs has seen them offer the same kind of performance.

Like most neck braces, the Crank is best used with the supplied strap setup that helps to hold it down onto your shoulders, with it extending down from the front of the brace, around the chest and just under the armpits, and then run through the two rear supports. This makes for a very secure layout that kept the Crank from shifting, and although we did try running the brace sans straps, we ended up preferring the more secure strap setup.

Atlas brace review test

The split back supports not only spread out the force of an impact and keep it from being focused directly over the spine, they also make for a very comfortable fit.



The Crank brace reviewed here is a 2013 model, and after this review was written Atlas informed us they have released an updated version for 2014 that ''decreases the weight by 20% down to 750 grams, uses an all new and simplified chest strap system, has more secure and removable X strap clips on the frame, and also features easier adjustment to the overall size of each brace by combining multiple sizes into a reversible rear mount design.'' We'll be getting our paws on the updated model soon, after which you'll be able to find out if Atlas has been able to improve on their already impressive design.


Pinkbike's take:
bigquotesNeck braces aren't mandatory equipment, and there is still some discussion as to if they can be the cause of other trauma, but the general consensus at this point is that they go a long way to helping prevent serious neck injuries in worst case scenarios. The bottom line is that a neck brace isn't a bad idea if you do a lot of downhilling and can get used to wearing one. The Atlas Crank is the most comfortable, natural feeling neck brace that we've used thus far, meaning that it's not only a great option for those who might have tried and given up on using a brace, but also a rider who is looking for a more inconspicuous option. - Mike Levy


www.atlasbrace.com

Author Info:
mikelevy avatar

Member since Oct 18, 2005
2,032 articles

105 Comments
  • 23 5
 Great write up. I'm a big fan of the atlas, and it's good to see them getting some publicity. It deserves it - more comfortable than the leatt, as it's lower profile and more flexible, as the review said. Also, the split rear design should hopefully quiet many of the armchair engineers who claim that the leatt will snap your spine due to the back design.
  • 18 11
 Lower profile is not a good thing, the neck in a compressive crash has a very small amount of compression it can handle before it causes damage.

One of the bike mags here in Australia AMB did an article on braces a few years ago.
"The most serious injuries come from a compressive force where you compress the vertebrate, of which it takes as little as 15mm for this to happen" (as stated in the article).
  • 7 2
 I'm neither for nor against neck braces; however the lower profile may help with some of the issues outlined in this article orthopaediciq.org/2012/04/23/why-the-leatt-brace-is-dangerous
  • 5 4
 I'm surprised i got negged for something that is fact. Oh well seems people prefer to run their braces against logic or what professionals suggest. My information is from an article by a professional Skippy1, some good points but the article doesn't provide any evidence so its all just hypothetical at this point. Although the points are interesting and are points that are commonly bought up in previous discussion on the neck brace debate.
  • 4 1
 Well I'm not much for the gritty science stuff, but I can vouch for Neck braces saving my bacon more than once on the hill. I've had many a crash on my head where I could actually feel the brace stopping my head from cranking all the way back or to the side. I already had one similar crash without my brace and I really messed my neck up. I actually thought I broke it at the time. So I'm not sure if I can fully buy into braces being super dangerous, although I can see where they're coming from.
  • 4 0
 Do they work or not? The article Skippy1 posted really does make sense in terms of human evolution to injury avoidance. But there is so many riders who claim the neck brace saved their lives. So many, that PB would have over 100 dead/paralyzed riders since the time neck braces were invented.
  • 4 1
 Eh, for something like Downhill Mountain biking I won't risk riding without some level of protection.
I will go out on a leg and say that yes they do work. Both from personal experience and from other riders stories.
*But* they won't completely safeguard you from all neck injury obviously, so ride safe kids. That's my last two bits.
  • 5 0
 yeah neckbraces are no way a 100% save you item. it just helps limit the chances. I think there are going to be crashes were the brace might stop the body naturally saving its self and there will be crashes where the body is put into a situation where it cant save itself and that's where the braces are going to save you.

Lets take the view that they might actually raise the chance of a certain injury. So we increase injuries like collarbones but it may save from a catastrophic injury

For me the small increase of a lesser, none life altering injury vs the reduction of a catastrophic injury is worth it. The chance of having a neck breaking crash might be rare but god forbid if we are in that situation, I sure as hell want to be wearing a neck brace.
  • 12 0
 Good article, though I think in general neck braces have received only very little attention on pinkbike (asides from that Si Paton article in 2009). Perhaps, considering the number of people who partake in the more 'extreme' sideof if the sport who use this website, they warrant a little more attention.
  • 47 1
 Agreed. You'll see much more DH content in 2014.
  • 5 0
 Any chance of seeing goggle reviews like those 100% ones being worn?
  • 13 0
 More DH content makes me very happy!!
  • 3 0
 @ cretin82

You can't go wrong with 100% goggles. Good antifog properties, universal lens fits all goggles from budget to those trick racecraft goggles shown in the pic. I run the accuri (on step down in $$ from the racecraft) and I love them.
  • 1 0
 Yea I was looking at those and some fox one. Knowing how good my dual pane ones work for boarding I was kinda leaning more towards something like that. My current ones are garbage
  • 7 1
 Some of you guys need to look at the big picture here....What sport are we doing? DH or freeriding. And what can happen in this sport? Major injury!
You cant say neck braces are evil because they will cause injury, cause if you do, why are you in one of the most dangerous sports!?
They help protect a harmful injury, they dont guarentee no injury at all will occur!
They almost work in a way that you might have to give and take. Lets say you fall the exact same way, and fhe first way you dont wear a brace and break your neck. Well now put on the brace, fall the exact same way, and the stress points move to your collorbone or somewhere else.
What would you rather have? Death or paralyzation, or broken bones and life? Just my opinion. Go Atlas!
  • 6 1
 "Neck braces aren't mandatory equipment, and there is still some discussion as to if they can be the cause of other trauma..."

Excuse me for my lack of knowledge but, what kind of trauma could be caused by wearing a neck brace during a crash ?
  • 22 3
 That the helmet hitting into the brace can infact lever your neck upward and separate it. -- not my actual belief, as I wear a neck brace.
  • 18 0
 The common ones you hear about are broken collar bones. Hey my Leatt broke mine with I crashed, I couldn't be happier. A collar bone is a small price to pay in order to save your neck or spine from serious damage!
  • 15 3
 why downvote me for answering the guys question?
  • 8 0
 The most common argument is because neck braces work but dispersing force away from the neck and into the body so as jakeneaves said collar bones are the most common debated injury. The way I look at it. If you are hit with a force that makes the brace break the collarbone then chances are you would have had a broken neck from that crash. While its impossible to prove that, id rather risk a collar bone.
  • 4 1
 Depending on which brace you use, in most cases there is only a small fin as back support which is resting directly on your spine between the shoulder blades. Thus in case of a hard crash the fin can cause severe damage to the spine as the force is forwarded very strictly to this small contact area. This is ultimately the reason why people should not use leatt braces without back protection, such that the force can be spread by the spine protector. Without having proof on hand right now, I think there were several reports of people who became paraplegic for not wearing the spine protector in combination with leatt. In my opinion this is a flawed design. I guess ORTEMA knew that from the beginning and this is why they originally came up with its twin back support design resting on the shoulder blades instead of the spine. It's also the lightest brace on the market. If I decided to go for a neck brace, the Ortema ONB would be my first choice by far. However I tend to roll myself in or turn my head to the side when I crash and I feel like I won't be able to do that wearing a brace, that's why I don't use one yet.
  • 4 0
 Was wearing a Leatt when I broke my collarbone. Hell of a lot better then a broken neck if you ask me. Never riding without a neck brace now.
  • 3 0
 i have raced motocross a whole lot longer than i have been mountain biking. I got a Leatt when they first came out and haven't thought about using anything else. while in some cases they can cause collar bone injuries, they can often prevent them. It is very common in moto for the edge of your helmet to get pushed down and break your collar bone. The Leatt stops the helmet and has a much large area to disperse the force out onto your shoulder
  • 5 3
 I do not think that because the collar bone broke, so would your neck. Your collarbone, just like everyone elses, requires almost no force to be broken. I could punch mine hard enough and it would snap, the lbs of force is something around 15. Just because your collarbone was broken during a crash where you were wearing a neck brace, does not mean it saved your neck. The LEATT for example has padding covering the collarbone. When you crash head first, the helmet pushes the leatt down, into the collarbone. Even if you were not going to sustain a broken neck or some injury like that, you are probably going to break your collarbone because it is one of the weakest bones in your body. I am sorry @slidways, your logic is wrong. Your neck can take a lot more than your collarbone.
  • 3 0
 I wouldn't go as far to say it can take a lot more force, when I was younger some kid dropped a backpack on my head that force caused the discs to compress and cause the fluid sacs that lubricate them to break. I now have two discs fusing together just due to a backpack being dropped no more than a foot, so while I will agree the collar bone is easy to break the neck can be damaged easily too depending on the impact
  • 4 2
 Your logic is also flawed.
15lbs of force but that is concentrated force per square inch. If I put a 45lbs weight plate on it, it wont break. You need to consider the bodies construction and the area the force is dissipated over.

You said " When you crash head first, the helmet pushes the leatt down, into the collarbone"
It only takes as little as 15mm of compression on the neck for it to break or cause damage this is the amount the neck can compress. If you put enough force into your neck that the brace is pushing down into the collar bone hard enough to break it there is a good chance that force would have compressed your neck 15mm. That is the point of the brace. Hence the need for proper set up, these people running loose braces are stupid. The helmet should contact the brace and then dissipate the force into the body to save the neck. that it the entire point of the brace to stop the necks compression before it damages the neck. compression > neck starts compressing >neck reaches critical compression >brace is contacted >force is transferred into the body and prevents the neck compressing to damaging point.
  • 4 1
 alot of people are also misinformed about the whole leatt spine theoratic plate/back peice. Most people dont know that under enough force the plate is designed to snap off to prevent further damage to your spine. i am a strong supporter of the neckbrace in that i know what it can prevent. My uncle has extreme brain damage and had strokes due to a super bad crash which forced his head to extend so far back that his helmet actually dug into the back of his skull. If he was wearing a neckbrace theirs no doubt in my mind the brace would have stopped this hyperextension and his injuries would be different and quite possibly would still be able to ride.
  • 1 0
 I am saying just because weight is being pressed onto the collarbone does not mean the weight/pressure is on the spinal cord. And yes I did mean 15lbs of force per square inch if whatever is.
  • 1 0
 Thanks you guys for your answers ! I'm considering buying a neck brace since a long time and now that I have these informations, my choice will certainly be less hazardous.
  • 1 0
 I've jarred my neck falling of slow with an XC helmet. I've had 3 big stacks in a full face helmet using an EVS R4. In 1 stack I went end to end twice and separated 4 ribs from my sternum, neck was OK, In another overshot DJ landed on front wheel and smacked head into floor, again neck OK. I would not ride without one. I know the EVS is cheap but it provides the support to prevent compression and bending.
  • 2 1
 Bitching about the price of protection equipment is slightly ridiculous. From someone with two neck injuries under his belt(one was my c6 the other was my c2) these things are invaluable. 300 bones is a small fee to pay to protect ya neck..... WU. I probably would have never stepped back onto a bike if it wasn't for these damn things.
  • 2 1
 I have owned and broken the Leatt and A-Stars braces....and now I own the Atlas. For me, the Atlas is the most comfortable, most durable and simplest neck brace on the market. This is the first brace I have been able to wear without having to wear a strap system to keep it in place. I have had major crashes in all three braces, I broke 2 A-Stars at the hinge and 2 Leatts at the rear break away point. The Atlas has held up to my abuse so far, where I know the others would have broke. I like that you can put the Atlas on over your head and don't need to mess with awkward hinges to open the brace like you do with the others. The profile is better and smaller than the Leatt and similar to the A-Stars brace, but fits me much better. As far as weight...The new 2014 Atlas braces are lighter than the past model and not even noticeable when riding. The price is better than the other 2 braces I mentioned, the Atlas comes with everything you need to adjust/ customize the brace, a light carry bag and 2 strapping systems. In my opinion...this is the best overall brace on the market.
  • 16 0
 You might want to consider throwing some money towards riding lessons?
  • 8 1
 the Atlas brace was cheaper than lessons....HAHAHAHHAHAAA!
  • 8 0
 Smile Thank god you have a sense of humor.
Humanity has been redeemed.
....At least till some Brit reads this.
  • 12 0
 How very dare you! One will find that one has an impeccable sense of joviality. The empire wasn't built on humour old chap, 'twas built on tea and misery.
Wink
  • 2 0
 I always thought that Brits were famous for their good-natured self-deprecating sense of humour, not for lack thereof?

Or perhaps scary1's comment was a test, what-what?
  • 4 0
 See! SEE?!! You can do the whole self deprecating thing all day long, but you can't take the razor sharp , pointy pokes of American sarcasm that overthrew the tyrannical overlords of the British empire!!

If you guys would aim those misery barbs at someone else once in a while you might be able to muster up the gumption to invade some countries again!!!
I'll admit, your flag is much cooler looking than ours but you guys need to double fist some Monster energy drinks and ditch that weak ass Tea!
I expect a truly witty retort when I return , Im off to Mc D's for a quick #4 with a diet coke...So.......be funny.
  • 5 0
 I must bow to your superior humour...


...you created hipsters. There's no way you can be serious with that shit! Wink
  • 2 0
 Well.........crap. I've got nothing for that
  • 3 2
 CAUTION!!! I would be cautious in using this particular brace as we have had some issues with it's removal under emergency situations. The folks at Atlas have stated they are in the process of addressing the issue but as I looked at the pictures I see they have not. The issue is the emergency release system and the difficulty in removing it in a timely manner. Imagine if the cotter pin gets caked in mudd or should the brace flex and twist as it's desinged to causing the removal of the cotter pin extremely difficult requiring the use of needle nose pliers. This becomes a major problem in the event of an airway issue or if you are simply trying to remove the brace without unnecessary movement of the cervical spine. Also we had a rider who in a crash had the rear t-spine mounts somehow move under his brace. EMS should be able to quickly and easily unlock, preferably with one hand, the brace. I don't care how well a companies marketing tells you their brace, helmet, whatever works, if you can not remove it in an EMERGENCY your have problems.
  • 2 0
 Eddie, did you know the brace can also be removed by cutting the tether in the back? The tether is a thin metal cable that can be easily cut with a set of scissors. I just cut one with a pair of crappy scissors I had laying around.

Something every EMS would carry with them right?

Cutting the tether is just as safe as removing the ERS clip in front. Also, the EMS on the carbon brace is basically a QR and on the Tyke and Prodigy Braces(for kids) there is a simple button that needs to be pushed to put the brace on and take off for normal use and in an Emergency. So the only brace that might take longer to open would be the Original model, but then again, the tether is another EASY way to remove the brace safely.
  • 1 0
 Ryan when you cut the tether was rider lying on their back with a helmet on? Also did you cut with the base or the tip of your "crappy" scissors? When I tried getting to the tether to cut it with my scissors it wasn't happening? You see manufacturers do not do REAL WORLD TESTING they simply design something pay riders to wear them and wait for the orders to come in. The other latch mechanism you speak about is only slightly better. It is still very small and you can not remove with one hand.
  • 1 0
 I actually just cut the tether in my office. I have some extra tethers laying around. I just wanted to see how possible it was, that's all. I am not a first responder but I have talked to several who are familiar with this brace. Yes to remove all ERS systems it takes 2 hands, not very difficult to do. I agree that an easier system could be implemented on the Original brace(the only one that uses a cotter pin) This is also the 1st generation of the Atlas brace. Since 2012. Just like any product, updates and changes sometimes need to be made over time.

No neck brace is perfect, but as you'll see in the review. It ranked higher than the competition for many reasons.
  • 1 0
 I agree no brace is perfect. But the last thing you want to have happen is a neck brace interfering with an injury not assosciated with the neck. I do hope that the folks at Atlas come up with a retrofit for this or at least a trade in discount for a new brace.
  • 3 0
 I have an Atlas Crank and I love it. I never wear my full face without it. I didnt worry too much about price as i believe you cant put a cost on your health.
  • 15 1
 Tell that to America. Big Grin
  • 1 0
 Do you use it with a spine protector? If so, which one do you have closest to the body?
  • 1 0
 No i normally wear mine with my hydration pack it fits fine.
  • 1 0
 Neck braces do protect your neck but tend to injure your spine... Difficult choice to do especially when not having all possible data in hand. This one with its split back plate might be less traumatic. But it still seems difficult to wear a spine protector with it right?
Curious what happens with the Dainese prototype seen last year. This one was actually resting on your shoulder blades leaving plenty of distance to the spine, and space for a spine protector.
  • 6 1
 What body armour is compatible with this neck brace?
  • 2 1
 Good question. Is my 661 safety jacket compatible?
  • 1 0
 That's what I want to know as well, I currently wear a TLD soft shell armor and was wondering the same thing.
  • 1 0
 I run the 5900 series TLD and it works very well. Very little if any modification is needed. I know people that run full flak jackets and it fits well. The TLD soft jacket works good too. Any armor that has removable plates has seemed to work with all of my friends that run the brace.
  • 2 0
 They're coming out with the Atlas Defender this year.
  • 1 0
 Yep. it will be out early summer.
  • 1 0
 I guess that you would have to modify the body armour so the pads would be against the body, which I don't see the point in doing.. Or getting a bigger brace to fit over the armour you wear..
  • 1 0
 Right now I haven't modified my TLD armor. I've run it like this for a long time with no issues. I also run the chest straps that come with the brace. My GF has the same set-up and she does not run the straps. If i was more anal, than yes I might cut my armor. The Atlas defender will be out soon. Also, 7 idp will have armor out by summer. Check them both out online
  • 1 0
 It looks like I can remove some padding from my armor for proper fit, Ryane, what helmet are you and GF running with the brace and is it for moto or DH
  • 1 0
 I run a Nema Carbon for DH and an SE3 for Moto, my GF runs a D3 for DH. I have a few friends that run the same helmet and armor combo.
  • 1 0
 So did you get a bigger brace or did you use the bigger rear mount??
  • 1 0
 I run a carbon medium brace in the larger size setting I'm 5'8, 150. I actually run that set-up with and without armor, no issues with it being to big when I take the armor off. Same goes for my GF. She is 5'6 160 and runs a medium original brace in the larger size setting with and with our armor. Thats why I love the new low profile armor
  • 1 0
 I have this brace and ride with it, its so light I forget I'm wearing it when I ride, the only time Iv felt it is when my head is all the way back. As for protection I can't say anything because I have yet to have a serious crash while wearing it
  • 1 0
 Hi, my boy who is 8 years old is big into DH biking and skiing, he was born with a "weak" vertebrae, reason why I have been thinking about getting him a neck brace. Do you guys know if Atlas makes braces for little ones, and if not, any other suggestion? Thank you
  • 1 0
 Im really not convinced with these at all. I had a leatt and hated the fact the the neck brace protecting your neck was dependand on the rear of it resting on your spine! I also found it extremely distracting when riding which i decided in the end was more dangerous then not wearing one. I know from sponsored riders that certain other big mounatin bike brands have done reaserch into these and have found that a neck brace could actually do more harm than good in certain scenarios so they havent produced their own. It also find worrying that the amount of people on here and in other reports have broken collar bones wearing these and then turn round and say "If i wasnt wearing a neck brace i would have broke my neck"....how do they know that for sure, they may not have broke either!?

What we also have to look at is how many riders have actually had life changing injuries over that last 20 years in this sport due to neck injury compared to teh amount of people who ride/race downhill and freeride etc? I don't see that many being reported. The ones that have been injured would a neck brace have really saved them?

Having said all this I think this brace does look the best compromise and I am so glad to see the the rear of it doesnt sit on your spine and rests on your shoulder blades. If I was going to go back to a brace I would certainly choose this over the competition!
  • 2 0
 I've tryed the atlas brace last summer... and i did'nt agree with this review... it's heavy, very uncomfortable, and it reduces a lot the left-right movement of the head...
  • 1 0
 I have an Atlas and have worn it for almost a year. The 2013 model is a bit heavier than most would like but now they have the 2014 model which is 20% lighter, I think thats about a 1/4 pound. The only time I have noticed limited left-right movement is if you have a short neck, stocky build, and or a helmet that has a very low skirt, like most Moto helmets do. I run mine with the stock padding but many people I know with short necks run without the extra padding. That seemed to fix the issue with several of my friends.
The brace definitely doesn't fit everyone, but there are changes in sizing that can me made to this brace to remedy almost every issue with fit
  • 1 0
 I started riding DH last year and quickly got a neck brace. I chose the Atlas because of it's comfort in the shop and that remained true on the trail. Very happy with ease of adjustment and overall comfort.
  • 7 4
 The main issue with neck braces is the price point...
  • 9 3
 ..after paying 3k or more for a bike, 300+ for gear and 20 a day for uplift?
  • 10 2
 Well when you're in the hospital with a broken neck and thousands of dollars in medical bills, at least you'll have the $350 you saved from not buying a neck brace
  • 4 0
 I have 1 but alot of people are put off by the price, my neck brace cost 3 times what my helmet did. I just think if a company came in with a much cheaper option they would take the market hands down.
  • 4 3
 There are alot of things that may seem better when cheaper, but im not gonna sacrifice quality for price in this case
  • 4 5
 So you want free gear and a lift ticket with your bike purchase?.. When you're riding a wheelchair next season rather than a bike, 300+ will seem like a solid investment.
  • 5 0
 Yeah I'm the same i had a pretty bad neck injury 8 years ago before they where really about in Mountain biking and now i wouldn't ride without 1. But none of my mates wear them and they always say its because of the cost.
  • 4 0
 The price really is a struggle for me, i ride an old YT and 300 $ are like 2 months working for me Razz
  • 4 0
 check out the EVS R4. affordable and does the trick.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=THbcZ8Vt8z0
  • 1 0
 as i said i have 1 but on talking to others the price is a major put off
  • 3 1
 I think what some people fail to understand is not everyone out there can afford to drop $400-$500 on a neck brace, neck protection should be for everyone in one form or another not just the chosen few who have the money to splash around. Its fine creating a top notch fully adjustable light comfy brace that costs $500 but why cant someone develop one that meets the same standard as the more expensive ones just has less costly materials i.e. less carbon or a slightly different design(I know the evs one is above but I have worries that is much less effective and I have not really seen anything to say that works well). Take helmets for example you dont just have the troy lee d3's bell full 9's out there costing $400 you have less expensive helmets out some are composite instead of carbon and conform to similar standards with less ventilation they may not be as comfy as a top of the range d3/full 9 etc but they still offer protection to those who cannot afford the more expensive option especially as this is an item you dont want to be picking up used they should continue to make the top of the range stuff just someone needs to make something for the masses.
  • 5 4
 Everybody wants to complain about the price, which is such a bogus excuse. Who truly has 4 grand lying around for a new bike? Not many, yet we still spend the money b'cuz its something we want. You obviously don't want a neck brace, otherwise it would already be purchased.
  • 5 2
 I don't think you really get it Keystone, not everyone has a 4k bike... alot of people ride second hand bikes that cost them £500-600 and thats all they can afford to start with, they walk up the hill and ride back down,no lift passes when there's no lifts and wear a £50 helmet.

I know there is alot of development cost in making such products but if you look at the basic leatt ride I dowt there's much product cost.
I just think a company would make a killing and help alot of people out with a more affordable product.

I know you can't put a price on productive equipment but that doesn't mean much if you havent got the money in the bank.
  • 3 7
flag geerumm (Mar 5, 2014 at 3:58) (Below Threshold)
 No offense, but why comment (or argue) a topic that doesn't fit your budget? When people start talking politics I shut my mouth. Not only b'cuz I hate the topic, but also b'cuz I have no business commenting. If you have a bike that's worth 500, a helmet that cost 50, and a trail of 100 vertical feet, then I guess you really don't need a neck brace...
  • 8 1
 ugh right I have a neck brace and an alright spec bike, I'm seeing this from another person point of view and the people I often see at trails. You clearly have more expendable income and the inability to see things from another's point of view
  • 2 4
 Nay. I see your point. And I came to the conclusion that neck brace manufacturers aren't targeting the folks in your demographic. I just get bent out of shape when I read the comments that follow a "REVIEW"

Anytime PB throws out a sweet review the first thing people do is cry about the price. Hello, a review is targeted for people in the market to make a purchase, not for the nay-sayers who only point out the cons. Just like that SRAM review from the other day... People are like: "It's gonna cost too much" "I'll just keep my Saint group and mod it into a 7 speed"

Unless you have a mod for me that will turn these 3 sticks, 2 paper clips and 1 roll of duck tape into a neck brace, then I don't wanna hear your Negative Nancy comments.

Oh, and FYI, I make less money than you Stuie
  • 2 1
 All i was trying to get at with my comment is that i wish there was a more affordable option so other are more inclined to invest.
Helmets,shin pads,body armor all have affordable option for beginners, an affordable neck brace is all that's missing, a possible gap in the market.

PS you should replace any helmet "after one good head smack".
  • 3 2
 Keystone I dont get your point you have commented on this post numerous times if you had a problem with this discussion why fuel it further ? & for the record I run a leatt too but I can see the point stuie was trying to make.
  • 3 1
 can't believe people still defending the pricepoint with wheelchair, disability. You don't see other protections selling at fly high prices.
  • 3 1
 Wait... You get his point but not mine?.. I am feuling it, because like I said, the anti-review comments are discrediting the work PB puts in. And furthermore, its a touchy subject for me b'cuz I have the Leatt and Atlas in my "items for sale" and I constantly get questions like: "300 shipped to Canada?" Or... "C'mon man. I have 2 dollars and a cheeseburger"

PS body armour is for goons -- always the slowest guys on the hill.
  • 3 2
 @stuiewarrior, you did not even understand Keystone5's first comment. He is saying, we manage to come up with money for a 4k bike but don't "have" 300 to spend on a neck brace. You should go read his comments agains so you can understand what is going on.
  • 3 2
 You argue that everyone should have a neck brace but then say "body armor is for goons", Don't wanna break your neck but don't mine breaking your spine? you've completely invalided your injury argument right there...
  • 2 5
 stuiewarrior and jonnyhill2011 if you guys can not understand Keystone5, you should just leave, he is talking in english btw.
  • 2 3
 Good stuff Josh. I have a pass and bowl waiting for you should you ever make it to CO!

Little Stuie, my initial argument was the price point complaint that everyone has. I then went overboard and enticed an argument... My apologies. Neck brace helps prevent wheelchair riding, body armour prevents bumps, bruises and scars.

"Invalided" Umm, didn't your country create the English language....
  • 4 0
 That wasn't the point i was making though?

I am saying that there should be more affordable neck braces like there is helmets and such.
Body armor often has a spine protection and I've seen more broken back thank necks from riding...

If everyone has the price point argument its saying something isn't it? A more affordable option would be welcomed.

Yes, oh no I'm English and I made a mistake in English,call the Queen. I didn't create the language.
  • 1 3
 You are correct. I was targeting the comments of bonkywonky, but somehow you stepped in and went to bat for him. Never mind the Queen, she is too old and been at reign for far too long. I have the Princess on speed dial, I'll let her know of your infraction right after I bust on that pregnant belly of hers! Have a good summer Stuie!
  • 2 0
 lol you to man
  • 1 0
 Without carrying this on further i don't think anything said about price of braces has discredited pinkbikes review of the atlas brace . The reviews a good review people will still read it and make a choice of if they want to buy it or not. Pinkbike do not make the brace or plug it to increase sales so I do not see any issue with any of the comments above. I do however feel your pain of selling items on pb being offered half a mars bar and a bmx tire for something of value is always annoying.
  • 1 2
 Neck brace is a must for me every time I've got the full face on. The atlas looks like a decent design but still (in my personal opinion) compare to my Leatt, just looks too minimal to me. And in terms of cost, I just picked up a new Leatt DBX ride for about 150 bucks on pricepoint.com, couldn't be happier with the purchase.
  • 2 0
 When i first glanced past this review my brain registered Raceface
  • 1 0
 Why would they call it the Atlas Crank ? trying to confuse it with Raceface products or what the hell
  • 1 0
 The atlas (C1) is the first cervical vertebra of the spine....
  • 1 0
 wow!!! that D3 is so nice. it's strange they talked about a neckbrace the whole article though
  • 2 1
 Oops
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.058267
Mobile Version of Website