Bluegrass Brave Helmet - Review

Jan 30, 2017
by Ralf Hauser  
Bluegrass Brave helmet review

Catering to gravity pilots since 2010, Bluegrass is a relatively young player in the protection category, poised to make an impression with their downhill helmet, the Brave. In terms of quality and technological knowledge, there's nothing to fear with Bluegrass, as none other than helmet giant MET is backing the brand.

Using their own Virtual Impact Data software, the Bluegrass research and development team analyze and test their helmets before building a physical model. World Cup downhill pilot Sam Blenkinsop and Enduro World Series racer Isabeau Courdurier are among the riders who trust and help to develop Bluegrass equipment.

Bluegrass Brave Helmet Details

• V.I.D. composite shell
• D3O inserts
• Neck brace compatible
• Double-d buckle
• MOPOV video support kit
• EJECT bag compatible
• CE EN 1078, ASTM F1952-2032 Certifications
• Sizing: XS, S, M, L, XL (three shell sizes: XS/S, M, L/XL)
• Weight: 1008 g (small)
• MSRP: €249,90
www.bluegrasseagle.com



Bluegrass Brave Helmet - Review
This colorway has been updated for 2017...
Bluegrass helmet
And while there are still several flashy options, there are also more low key colors as well.

Construction

A key advantage over other helmets is the Brave's utilization of D3O inserts within the shell structure, which, according to Bluegrass, enables the helmet to withstand double the number of impacts compared to a regular composite construction. The inserts – made of the soft orange wonder material that hardens under impact to reduce transmitted force – are situated at key areas more prone to touching the ground during a crash.

In combination with an EPS inner shell with an integrated network of air channels and a composite outer shell with 12 venting holes (16, if you count the well ventilated chin guard), the Brave is designed to dissipate the force of an impact by finding the best balance between materials used and structural layout. In other words, it doesn't appear clunky while even passing the ASTM certificate, which includes testing of the chin guard.

The back of the helmet is shaped to accept most neck braces without inhibiting the range of movement. It is also compatible with the EJECT bag system, which can be applied by emergency rescue services to reduce the risk of possible spinal injuries during the removal of the helmet, in case of a serious accident. To make life easier for aspiring movie stars, a MOPOV video kit is included in the package. The adapter can be applied to the side of the helmet with a self-adhesive fitting and is compatible with various camera systems, including GoPro of course.

Although the color scheme of the Brave reviewed here is no longer available, there are still four colors options, ranging from a more mild black and red to a bright yellow and blue version. There are five sizes: XS/52-54 cm, S/54-56 cm, M/56-58 cm, L/58-60 cm and XL/60-62 cm, and three shell sizes (XS/S, M and L/XL).


Bluegrass Brave Helmet - Review
Generous padding, including padding on the D-ring chin strap make the Brave one comfortable helmet.
Bluegrass Brave helmet review
Twelve vents help keep air flowing on those hot summer days.


Performance

It's easy to feel properly protected with the Brave, thanks to its snug fit that doesn't create any pressure points. Compared to most other brands, sizing does run on the small side, though. With helmets, it generally makes a lot of sense to try before you buy anyway, but don't be surprised if you have to step up a number from the helmet size you are used to wearing. While I'm usually sporting a size S or even XS helmet, depending on the brand, I think I would prefer a medium-sized model of the Brave in the long run, due to its overly tight fit. The measurements that Bluegrass is correlating to the shell sizes are misleading by almost two sizes and should be disregarded.

Once you find the size that fits, the liner comfortably hugs your head in a way that neither brutal trail chatter nor hard landings can affect. The double-d ring is generously padded as well, adding to the overall level of comfort.

While I congratulate any idea that adds to the safety of a helmet, I wonder if Bluegrass' claim of being able to withstand double the number of impacts compared to a regular design encourages some riders to run the helmet past its life expectancy. However, since there probably aren't many riders that have the desire (or money) to exchange a helmet after each and every crash that doesn't leave behind massive visual damage, I guess it's a good thing if the Brave can live up to its expectation.

Bluegrass Brave helmet review
Larger goggles can be a tight fit on smaller sizes - it's worth bringing a pair when you go to try the helmet on.

Putting the goggles in place makes you notice that the helmet opening is somewhat constricting in height, at least for the smallest shell that the small and and extra-small sizes share. It can be expected that riders with smaller helmets are also going to favor smaller shaped goggles, but it can't hurt to bring your favorite eyewear model to the fitting process and make sure that the goggles touch your face properly.

Made out of a rather flexible and forgiving material, it appears as if the narrow visor can take a beating in a crash, without immediately breaking into a couple pieces. However, with only a two-point attachment via aluminum bolts on the sides, the visor tends to shift its position during handling. It wasn't uncommon that it sat a bit crooked after brushing it somewhat harder by accident or storing it in its provided soft bag during transport, even with the screws tightened to the max. That said, there is zero movement while riding, so the issue is bearable.

While the Brave is compatible with neck braces, it does come in contact with the spoiler a bit sooner than helmets with a more rounded edge at the point of contact in the back. Tested with a Leatt DBX 5.5 neck brace, peering far down the trail wasn't a problem, though.

In terms of heat buildup underneath the shell, the Brave is running somewhere in the middle of the pack. Even on hot humid days it didn't feel as if you could fry an egg on your head, but naturally, for this style of helmet, you will shed some sweat on a hot summer day.

I can appreciate the solid but slender shape without unnecessary bulk; one of the best features is the Brave's low weight. At only only 1008 grams for a size S, the Brave is one of the lightest full-face lids on the market and can even beat one of the top dogs in that category, the Troy Lee Designs D3 Carbon (1118 g in size S). On a long day in the bike park or during extended enduro rides or races, taking weight off your neck reduces fatigue and might help make up your mind if you should go for that extra lap, or not.



Pinkbike's Take:
bigquotesWith an extensive list of features, snug fit and streamlined looks, the Bluegrass Brave comes at an affordable price with only some minor flaws - the visor mounting could be improved upon to keep it from shifting during transport and it's vital to pick the correct size, which might end up being one size up from what you're accustomed to wearing. Apart from that, the very lightweight Bluegrass Brave can hang with the best downhill helmets on the market while knowing that there's some serious technology with its D3O inserts hidden underneath the shell to protect your head. - Ralf Hauser



Visit the high-res gallery for more images from this review.




Author Info:
ralf-hauser avatar

Member since May 10, 2010
66 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

55 Comments
  • 58 1
 Based on the color scheme, I can see why they named it Brave.
  • 34 0
 "Let's take the promo photo with the peak in Newby position, that'll make it sell"
  • 3 3
 @nojzilla: it looks like a cheap Halfords rep...
  • 3 2
 I believe that's the max they can go.
  • 3 0
 @chyu: it goes a bit higher, check out the website
  • 6 0
 I actually think its very clever. If you now crash off the side of a mountain or into bushes etc people will easily be able to find you. It actually saves lives in more ways than one, bravo Bluegrass
  • 4 2
 In purchasing a helmet, aesthetics seem unimportant until you get butt blasted by McDonald's characters.
  • 4 0
 there´s other colors. and some nicer than that one lol
  • 4 1
 The guy who decided the colors was stoned for sure
  • 10 0
 "Helmets done, what color should we make it?" "ALL THE COLORS"
  • 2 0
 @luis-beri: theres also one thats waaaayyyy worse. my retinas will never recover.
  • 35 0
 I love it when they release ugly color-ways. They end up real cheap and when I'm wearing it I'm the only one who can't see it. Win win.
  • 12 6
 I'll never understand that double D buckle. I was for more than 15 years in boat covers business and I'm sure that double D buckle is the worst buckle you can get. Of course, I used them sometimes. When I had nothing else. It was easy to convince the client that double D made of inox is the best you can get, but it was an obvious lie.
  • 58 2
 I'm rather fond of the double d's....
  • 3 0
 @justincs:
So am i.
It works. And it works all the time. If you can´t make it work, there´s something wrong with you, not the system.
I would even say it´s foolproof but sadly it isn´t, since i often encounter people who open and close the whole thing every time they put on their helmet, so that may be where a lot of the criticism may come from :-D
  • 1 2
 @yerbikesux: Those look like C's, not D's. More silicone please.
  • 2 0
 Sack the silicone, D3O is what you want.
  • 4 0
 From the FAQ of one big moto equipment company:

"Why are all XXXX helmets equipped with the ‘Double D’ ring fastner?

The ‘Double D’ ring is at the moment the safest way to fasten a helmet. A so-called quick fastener may be damaged or the build-up of dirt inside may influence the functioning of the device. Don’t forget that grand prix racers are obliged to use a similar system as the ‘Double D’ ring for racing use!"
  • 4 0
 My daily transportation is a motorcycle. I would choose the D-ring strap over any alternative quick-release or slide in buckle. It isn't really any slower, it lays flat and stays relatively comfortable, in a pinch it can be adjusted on the fly with one gloved hand and will never fully separate, by design it only clamps even tighter when you pull on the straps attached to the shell, and it is mechanically simple therefore has longevity with very little to fail. I don't know if it is scientific fact but I feel it's the safest option. Like @xyrion quoted there is a reason that any motorsports rider/driver choose D-rings. My family and friends that are AMA racers use D-rings. One is even sponsored by a main helmet manufacturer.
  • 6 1
 "It can be expected that riders with smaller helmets are also going to favor smaller shaped goggles, but it can't hurt to bring your favorite eyewear model to the fitting process and make sure that the goggles touch your face properly."

What are those mythical "smaller shaped googles", because I wear small helmets and never managed to find googles which really fit. From my experience people with smaller head sizes are doomed when it comes to finding googles which do change helmet position when put on.
  • 2 1
 Try 100% strata, they are decently small
  • 2 1
 Try youth version of 100%. I always had problem with adult ones due to my rather small face and either had my nose was squashed or helmet lifted. I'm happy eventually with the 100% youth googles
  • 1 0
 @JohSch: Looks interesting but what price for lenses? 100% you can buy for just few quid.
  • 1 0
 @JohSch: I can see only 2 uvex cycling gogle models, with no sign of different sizing. I have tried a youth version of Fox (don't remember which model) once, and they were too small. 100% Strata are too big, used to have them.
  • 1 0
 @lkubica: The FX Bike black is a small model, I´ve worn it already.

The green bike-spezific Downhill is a normal sized model. There are other Downhill models, made for skiiing, and available in small, just buy a not too dark tinted lense or a variomatic one to avoid problems in the woods.

Other then lense color/darkness wintersport and bikegoggles from uvex are identical. This is no problem from my experience (and Godzieks, Schumanns, Prokops Wink )
  • 1 0
 @Havier: 100% lenses which I´ve seen and used so far are single lenses, so is the fx bike and other cheaper goggles from uvex.

The Downhil and other uvex models use double lenses (+ other features) which are a tad more expensive - from ~25€ for the clear lens to probably 80€ or so for the variomatic + mega funky one
  • 5 0
 I've been using one for a while. Definitely a big step up from the previous generation Bluegrass Brave which it was replacing.
  • 7 2
 That's cool they make it for multiple impacts so you don't have to throw it out after hitting your head once or twice. That's a great feature.
  • 6 1
 You can still crack the shell in one shot
  • 4 2
 @Tr011: yeah but if you don't crack it than you can keep it Smile
  • 3 0
 How will you know when that damage threshold has been met though? If you had a decent crash and there was no obvious damage, would you have complete confidence in the helmet to do its job again?
  • 2 0
 It's multiple impacts in one crash, not multiple crashes.
  • 3 0
 Wasn't D3O proven to be a fairly bad idea for providing protection in that it simply transfers all the impact energy to whatever it's covering?
Putting it in a helmet sounds a bit iffy. Why not use one of the dampening foams that dissipates impact forces
  • 3 0
 Where was that proven?
  • 14 0
 @Blablablup123: In the comments section of pinkbike.
  • 1 0
 "The inserts – made of the soft orange wonder material that hardens under impact to reduce transmitted force "
isn't the helmet there to be sacrificed to save your brain?
  • 1 0
 @bluumax: where scientific theorems are proven or disproven everyday.
  • 3 0
 I got mine in red , gray, black, and white color scheme for 134€ . It was a bargain!! Light and well refined it's definitely on another level than the previous one I had.
  • 1 0
 Do you confirm that the sizing is a bit small ? I might get one of those
  • 1 0
 @Whipperman: I'm in the low numbers of the suggested L size.
At the beginning the fit of the helmet felt a bit small , after a couple of rides of bed in it now feels like a glove. The chin and head ventilation is great . My suggestion is to get a bigger size if your numbers are at the limit on the suggested chart. If you can get it on sale is gona be a good deal.
  • 4 1
 who comes up with these colourways ?

Looks horrendous, everyone buys a helmet based at some level on how it looks
  • 2 0
 What's with all the uglied out helmets comin' on now? You got Fox, TLD, POC or 100% if ya don't wanna look like a total fvckin' doofus goofus boofus, that's it.
  • 5 2
 Neat
  • 5 3
 That thing is an optical migraine
  • 1 4
 I had to click on the article and comment without reading anything about the helmet.
Ugly. Not wearing it. Enjoy trying to sell it. Every feature on earth for $2.99 could be the motto...not spending a dime on it.

Good luck.
  • 7 0
 Well aren't you a ray of sunshine.
  • 1 0
 @Jack-McLovin: Do you like the looks of it?
  • 5 5
 Another ugly overpriced option
  • 5 2
 one of the uglyest helmets I have ever seen in my life, the colors and also the shape of the visor is so 80's I don't understand, last July in Alpe Duez MegaAvalanche there was this Bluegrass Booth and those helmets was so beautifully with that bright colours and another's with more standard colors but also very beautiful... but this new one is ugly as Hell
  • 1 1
 I'm a Joey, and it's my first time here...
  • 4 4
 make it stop!
  • 1 3
 Brave? because you'd have to be brave to wear this monstrosity







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.041639
Mobile Version of Website