Madison/Saracen Myst Team DH Bike - iceBike* 2015

Feb 25, 2015
by Paul Aston  
Continuing with the theme of winter trade shows, from Frostbike we go to iceBike*, a show where British distribution giant, Madison, showcases its brands to representatives from the UK cycling industry. Situated at the MK Dons stadium in beautiful Milton Keynes, we check out the new colorways from the World Championship winning Madison/Saracen downhill team.

iceBike show 2015
  This is the new bike of reigning World Champion Manon Carpenter, ready to attack Lourdes at the first World Cup downhill in a few week's time. The bikes are the exact same bikes you can buy, with no special geometries or sizing used for the team riders. The mainframe is alloy with a carbon swingarm. It's a single pivot design which uses a link to drive the shock and add stiffness. The 2015 Myst has an updated linkage which offers more progression, as tested by the team throughout last year.

iceBike show 2015
  The Myst runs a full complement of PRO Components, downhill handlebar, direct-mount stem, seat and post.

iceBike show 2015

iceBike show 2015
  Saracen's own brand grips with these laser etched PRO bar plugs are a nice touch.

iceBike show 2015

iceBike show 2015
  Shimano Saint stoppers take care of slowing duties, with ICE rotors sized at 180mm for the rear and 203mm up front.

iceBike show 2015

iceBike show 2015

iceBike show 2015
  Shimano Saint centerlock hubs and 10-speed Saint drivetrain.

iceBike show 2015

iceBike show 2015
  Saint cranks with Shimano's own Modular Chain Device system.

iceBike show 2015
  Fox Suspension front and rear; I'm sure we'll see a titanium spring here come race-day.

iceBike show 2015

iceBike show 2015

iceBike show 2015
  These Continental Kaiser tires are team-issue. These tires are stamped with a number for ease of reference, for riders giving feedback or post-ride analysis at the factory.

iceBike show 2015

A replica of last year's Madison/Saracen rig, the Myst Team is available for £4899.99. The XL frame size piloted by Matt Simmonds and Sam Dale is also now available as a frameset, with a reach of 460mm that should help even the tallest riders feel comfortable. World Championship proven.



MENTIONS: @SaracenBikes, @foxracingshox, @shimano, @ContinentalMTB



Author Info:
astonmtb avatar

Member since Aug 23, 2009
486 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

96 Comments
  • 100 8
 These bikes, for some reason, have never given me bike-rections.
  • 30 1
 I'm definitely with you on that. Something about them has always seemed funny design wise.
  • 24 2
 solid components, but i agree.
  • 11 2
 Was going to say the same thing. They may well be good to ride with the same components as a lot of other bikes but there's just something about them that's unappealing.
  • 21 1
 funny you say that-saracen sounds like a name a pharma company might have chosen for it's latest boner pill.
  • 26 2
 seek medical treatment if your bike-rection lasts more than 4 hours
  • 7 9
 Yeh I can see how you feel about the bike, I mean great component but frame design and colour scheme say a lot about a bike to me
  • 7 3
 Nah if your bike-rection lasts more than 4 hours call a friend and brag about it.
  • 10 4
 10/10 would still ride
  • 6 1
 I don't know, I'd sex all over that thing
  • 3 1
 i know what you mean, the top tube needs a curve
  • 10 1
 Totally boring paint job and lack of flowing lines means its not asthetically pleasing to me. But god i would love to have one!
  • 3 1
 boring bike but the team's results are top notch
  • 3 1
 Coming to an Enduro track near you!
  • 2 1
 Its the bike doesn't have clean lines and looks too "busy"
  • 3 0
 It's a good thing and reassuring that they are focused on function over form unlike other manufacturers. Yeah I know you can have both but often at a price thats not worth it.
  • 1 0
 never made me wanted to buy their bikes
  • 3 0
 Function over form on this one, but clearly that's working well for them. Stacked up against the S-Works Demo, Canfield Jedi, YT Tues, Santa Cruz V10, etc. almost anything is going to look dull.
  • 2 0
 Really? O.o. Mang, you crazy. I'm usually shittin' all over how goofy most DH concraptions look. This here one of the cleanest/nicest rigs I can think of. I'd have a 3-way with it & a V-10. IDK WTF y'alls got wrong wit' y'alls. The straight tubes lacking any goofy unnecessary bends (just a bit in the DT), simple & beefy linkage & mostly black paint. Yeah I dig. Only thing is maybe the TT looks kinda short. Or the seat tube could be slacker. :s Way nicer than the convoluted crap from companies like Knolly & Scott & shit. Word up.
  • 1 0
 bikes like the gt fury , foes tube/mono , banshee legend all have clean lines as the shock in hiding inside the frame or concealed. that is what i mean by clean lines... Even marin not popular but very clean lines would be more appeasing then this. It comes down to personal taste.
  • 41 6
 it would seem full carbon is not needed to win pro races... im happy because ill never own a full carbon frame. ALUMINIUM!!!!!!
  • 12 8
 Why wouldn't you want a carbon bike?

That coming from somebody with carbon frame, wheels, seat post, stem, bar, and seat even (for my road bike).
  • 37 4
 meh, real men go with steel
  • 10 9
 Well, my SS road bike is steel. My other two bikes (cross and XC) are carbon. So I guess I'm like, 33% man?
  • 23 1
 well, around 33.333
  • 11 8
 no no trust me i want a carbon frame... sadly metal holds up to crashes a lot better... and i crash a lot Big Grin
  • 11 2
 Do you have any empirical evidence that supports that?
  • 8 1
 I found it odd that the rear triangle is carbon and the main is aluminum. It's usually the opposite.
  • 9 0
 For swingarm you need one mold. For front triangle you need a mold for each size. And stiffness benefits are more notable with the swingarm.
  • 1 0
 melled74-depends on the crash! carbon's better than metal sometimes. i have an old carbon hardtail, and i mean old...10 yrs. been crashed more than a few times. once, into the back a parked car in the snow and ice, at, i'm guessing, 20+ mph. i broke my jaw, frame is fine.
  • 4 2
 I don't know dude... I feel like I'm more of a man than that. Like at least 33.3333%.
  • 10 0
 the main reason I don't have carbon is because I'm broke,
  • 3 0
 Fair enough. But there are budget option. And it all depends how you budget your money. I'm broke too. I'm 17 and work 15hrs/week at Mcd's. I still have 3 nice bikes though.
  • 1 1
 @foghorn1, Yeah, but that Santa Cruz's carbon. This is a carbon crash: www.pinkbike.com/photo/11898153
  • 1 0
 @micahaalders3 read what he says about it. He fixed it completely. If it was aluminum, it would still be damaged, but due to differences in bonds on a molecular level, it will look different. It is still going to break though. And how many welders do you know that like welding aluminum?
  • 1 0
 @micahaalders3
From what i've seen, that specialized frame would have been totalled if it was metal. That dude had the carbon repaired and put over 200 km on the frame with no problems.
  • 2 1
 will aluminium/carboin be the next 26"/29" thing?
  • 2 0
 There is a new technique for making steel-aluminium alloy that out performs titanium.

news.discovery.com/tech/new-steel-alloy-stronger-than-titanium-150204.htm

If this takes of which it will, carbon will go the way of the dodo.
  • 2 2
 But carbon out performs ti, so hows that make sense?
  • 3 2
 Actually it doesn't, titanium is expensive because of the refining process to extract it from the ore and that makes it not a practical metal to use given the price. Carbon is cheaper than titanium.

But if you want some good examples carbon rims and carbon frames, the weight difference in carbon frames to the metal counter part is negligible. Carbon breaks, it doesn't bend or have any give in it at all, which means if something happens to the frame or rims then you have to replace it. With metal small dents don't necessarily reduce the integrity of it.

But with that different process the cost comes down for metal frames, it can then be made thinner with the same strength as they are now and thinner metal means lighter metal. The weight difference between carbon frames and metal is about 1 pound of a difference, thats 453.59 grams. Now look at the price of a metal frame and its carbon counter part.

Read this and you will see about the weight difference between the frames.
www.bikerumor.com/2014/06/26/santa-cruz-pricepoint-carbon-weights-compared-plus-closer-look-at-new-2015-colors

Santa Cruz Bronson Frame Only: £1,749 with Fox Float CTD
Santa Cruz Bronson Carbon Frame Only: £2,799 with Fox Float CTD Adjust Kashima

Regardless of the shock that it has on it the price difference is MASSIVE, with this new technique the price is just the same as the metal frames that are being made just now.
  • 3 0
 Carbon does have some "give" in it. Well laid up carbon actually has quite nice damping properties.

It won't dent this is true, it is elastic right up to its breaking point. However, carbon is far stronger by weight than any metal commonly used in bike production, including ti, meaning you have to hit it a lot harder to cause it to fail than you would its metal counterpart. The advantage of metal frames (apart from the low cost) is that you can still ride them once they have undergone plastic deformation, while carbon has no plastic deformation faze, it is either fine, or broken. The only real disadvantage to carbon is it is easy to damage with sharp objects, but some well placed frame armour will pretty much cure that, leaving you with a frame that is lighter, stronger and (when armoured) more durable than a metal frame. Look at all the denting issues the Trek Session 88 had. The carbon Session 9.9 is much lighter, and so far does not appear to be anywhere near as prone to damage.
  • 1 2
 The trek session 8 & 88 is actually the worst example of metal frames you could give because they were made ridiculously thin, you can bend the metal on the top tube and down tube with your fingers its that thin, in all honesty trek should have got dragged over the coals for that one. The carbon 9.9 is much stronger but it is not a good comparison since the session 8 & 88 was about the weakest DH bike at that time.

The point that I am trying to make is that frames using that new technique using less metal will be potentially as light or lighter than carbon with the same strength as normal metal frames & since to the MTB community lighter is better then carbon may very well have a limited lifespan. It is strong don't get me wrong but now that metal that can be made to similar strength as carbon but doesn't have any of the negatives of it, that will become the go to material in the future. And it's much cheaper.

If this can change the motor world then it can do the same for MTB.
  • 4 0
 Yep, thats why I used it as an example, It is built bloody light, about as light as possible for an ali frame, and as ali weighs a similar amount to ti by volume, you couldn't make it much lighter out of ti. The carbon version however is noticably lighter, while being noticably stronger too.
  • 1 0
 @Loony0
I've done a little reading about this new magical alloy, and it sounds very expensive to make. Do you have a projected cost on it once it's available, assuming it hits the market?
You seem to be contradicting yourself, on one hand saying metal frames can be made too thin, on the other hand saying with this new process they can be made even thinner! There is a point of thinness where *any* alloy no matter how strong will be easy to dent (or if it's hard enough crack). Part of the advantage of carbon is it's low density which allows it to be thicker than metal, giving it local stiffness that thin metal can never have. I doubt that carbon will be bettered in this or any other respect any time soon.
  • 2 0
 Nope you’ve misread my point about thin metal and the fact that I was referring to the 2 different types of making metal, one 13% less dense than the other but out performs Titanium in strength. If you can make a metal have the same strength of metal frame's on the market now but use less metal because it is stronger then you will get a lighter frame that can take the same punishment. It really is as simple as that. If it has the same strength as metal frames just now it will not be invincible it still can be dented but it can be lighter in weight than normal metal frames. If you wanted to go the other way and make it the same weight as frames now, the frame using the new metal would be massively stronger than metal frames of today.

Lets take carbon for a second, the way it is weaved (there are other creation processes as well) makes a difference to how strong it is, it takes skill to make good quality carbon. So with new techniques why do you think that a thinner metal created in a new way couldn't be as strong?

FYI, I not actually involved in making this metal... but since there is talk of it being used in cars as a substitute for carbon due to price then it is quite logical to take it to the next step for it to be used for other purposes.

Obviously there is teething problems with new discoveries but these will be overcome. They can’t use the same protection layer to protect it while its being made because what is used now reacts with it, but because of it being 13% less dense money is being spent on it to develop it so it can be used. And it being 13% less dense brings it to about the same weight as Carbon.
  • 1 0
 Yes yes I understand that the carbon is literally stronger no doubt. I just mean things like rub, or scratching or deeper gashes. You know what I mean? Where carbon would tear and Frey, the metal would just be scratched or gashed.
  • 21 1
 Love Saint builds.
  • 2 0
 word
  • 1 0
 I want those brakes
  • 14 1
 'Beautiful Milton Keynes' so your there often mate
  • 11 0
 maybe he likes roundabouts.
  • 5 0
 @hairy1976
Having just spent a week driving from Cambridge to Milton Keynes and back every day, your comment made me chortle.

I can now say without a moments hesitation i f****ng hate roundabouts, especially the black cat roundabout. They may as well just re-name it "the black cat traffic jam."
  • 8 0
 This is one of the few times where I honestly can say that a sponsored athlete has done a lot for my perception of the brand or maybe more of put it on the my map. Go Manon!
  • 3 0
 Manon is good, Manon is great, I surrender my will, as of this date!
  • 8 0
 i thought i'd never see the day, that milton keynes and beautiful were in the same sentence.
  • 1 0
 Ha. Glad I wasn't the only one to notice that.
  • 5 0
 I've had mine for 2 months now and its the best DH bike I have ever ridden (and I trialled a lot before committing to this). I wasn't entirely 100% sold on looks but it looks awesome in the flesh. As for the ride, once I changed the shock spring from the 400lbs to a 500lb titanium spring it pedals very well with very little bob and is completely confidence inspiring as it takes every challenge in its stride and has much left over to give.

Not many world cup winning DH bikes for under £5k that are race ready right out of the box.

I'll be at Revolution Bike Park on her this Sunday if anyone is thinking about one but wants to try it out first!
  • 3 0
 I guess that's true actually.
Only this and the Nukeproof have won a DH race in the last 12 months and cost under £5k.
There are a few others though that are basically the same bike now as when they were ridden to victory like Commencal and GT
  • 1 0
 True, I had a Commencal Supreme DH before this and it wasn't even in the same league as far as i'm concerned. Even the Myst Pro I had before the Team felt more confident on the steep rough stuff. Definitely worth every penny
  • 1 0
 ive had mine for about 2 months aswell and had to upgrade my rear spring to 600lbs but still find my back wheel catching on my seat under harsh landings have you felt this ??? also considering a plus 30mm renthal carbon bars front feels a bit low ... how you finding yours??? they really do eat up everything!!!!
  • 4 0
 The pictures do the frame no justice at all, the bikes are much nicer in the flesh also I think the Pro colours are better than the team colours.
  • 1 0
 ive had mine for about 2 months aswell and had to upgrade my rear spring to 600lbs but still find my back wheel catching on my seat under harsh landings have you felt this ??? also considering a plus 30mm renthal carbon bars front feels a bit low ... how you finding yours??? they really do eat up everything!!!!
  • 10 5
 It might be a problem in my head, but I find the Saracen really ugly...
  • 15 2
 I don't think it's ugly , just not very exciting looking to my eye , would happily own one though.
  • 8 2
 Saracen bikes seem to always look terrible in photos. They look awesome in the flesh.
  • 7 1
 If you wanna see ugly...
  • 4 1
 Yeah, it's not the best looking bike, but it wins races...
  • 2 0
 I had a 2013 Madison Myst. Hands down the best downhill bike I've ridden. Hasn't got as much trail credit as a Demo or a Glory but I've ridden both and it's incomparable.
  • 1 1
 I don't get how / why they charge nearly £5k for the bike and then discount the sh1t out of it to under £3k 6 months later when the next model year comes out.

Shows how much they are ripping people off in the 1st place. I'd be pissed off if I bought one full RRP and less than a year later couldn't sell it for half what I paid.
  • 1 0
 Haha printing torque spec on bar end plugs is a bit over the top. Surely people can be trusted to just nip it up and not have to use a torque wrench for a bar plug.
  • 5 4
 Shimano hubs? I know these mechs build a crazy number of wheels each year, but why make them build even more than they already do?
  • 18 0
 shimano hubs work excellent. when you have a full time mechanic to clean and regrease the bearings before every race they arent a bad choice.
  • 2 0
 How is a shimano hub gonna mean they have to build more wheels?
  • 5 0
 I think he may be referring to the hubs because they're cup n' cone and the maintenance associated with them. It's not actually that bad, I know some guys who can pull it out and repack/clean each wheels in about 5-8 mins easily. Most problems I see with that design is when people actually put to much preload on them.
  • 3 0
 Madison are the UK distributors of Shimano, who also sponsor the team.
  • 2 0
 Cup and cone is better than cartridge bearings from a racers point of view. If you have a good mechanic.... Still has absolutely zero effect on the rims durability tho.
  • 1 0
 Nothing can beat the feeling of a perfectly tensioned axle cone and lubed balls. Wait are we still talking about bikes?
  • 2 0
 I prefer when the pictures have a better range of depth instead of having half the image blurry.
  • 2 1
 The lack of stem spacers between top crown and top cap looks a bit sketchy? Surely half of the top crown is clamping on nothing?
  • 1 0
 Ok so I did not mean to shat on carbon... My bad everyone Big Grin DD I just meant it holds up better to scratches and scuffs I thkufht
  • 4 1
 Bike porn yeee
  • 2 0
 I really love how meaty those Kaisers look.
  • 2 2
 The frame just looks dated to me, I know it proberbly rides awesome but ridding a bike you think is cool gives you more confidants in my experience
  • 1 0
 With another paint I would buy the frame. I think the Frame Works quite well.
  • 2 1
 This sounds like it's pretty heavy. Weight anyone?
  • 1 0
 I have a 2013 model, nothing special spec wise and that just edges in 37lbs
  • 1 0
 I found out last night that my 2013 Myst is about 41 pounds. That was a bit of a shock.
  • 3 2
 Genuine authentic kashima coat.
  • 18 2
 I actually gained 59 seconds per minute with kashima. Oh wait, bloody brainwashing marketing hype, im still as slow as before
  • 2 2
 sounds like a you problem.
  • 2 0
 Needs a black fork.
  • 1 0
 The Pro version has a black fork
www.pinkbike.com/photo/11590095
  • 1 1
 to me it's just an ordinairy single pivot bike (not innovative) with an excellent spec.
  • 3 2
 No Pro Atherton bars?
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.058393
Mobile Version of Website