Norco Shore Two 2009 - Full review

May 5, 2009 at 0:09
May 5, 2009
by Brad Walton  
 
You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login

The Norco Shore series of freeride bikes are built to handle the punishing terrain of Vancouver's infamously technical North Shore, including meaty rock hucks, mind-puzzling stunts, and big boy jumps. These bikes are designed with abuse in mind and after several months of heavy usage, the hearty component spec shows little sign of fatigue. The Shore's compact size feels comfortable and balanced in the air and handles pretty well when the going gets fast. Although it's not claimed to be a great pedaller, some adjustment could get this bike up to being somewhat of a contender for the "one bike", depending largely on the needs of the Shore-style rider.

Complete review and pics inside:

The beginning of 2009 has shown prosperity for the cycling community here in Washington. Generally warm temperatures and overall lack of normal precipitation has put a damper on the local ski industry, but it's worked out well for early season riding and especially for me to be able to put in some hard testing aboard the 2009 Norco Shore Two. Although the North Shore, for which this bike is designed, has been largely covered by a blanket of the fluffy white stuff since December, I've been able to find plenty of riding suitable to the aggressive nature of this steed and let's just say we've gotten to be pretty good friends. Here's the low down:

2009 Norco Shore Two pedalled to the top & ready for some early-season DH trails

2009 Norco Shore Two pedalled to the top & ready for some early-season DH trails


Spec & Ergonomics:
For technical specs and general product information, see my 2009 Norco Shore 2 Preview or visit Norco.com.

Being a completely bone-stock, off-the-shelf, bike-in-a-box, I wanted to give Norco a chance to really prove themselves with their choice of component spec by leaving everything on the bike stock. Having worked as a bike mechanic the majority of my life, I've become pretty picky, so I was very interested to see how the slightly-above-mid-grade-level spec on the Shore Two would perform. Being the big-dog bike company of Canada leaves some room for Norco to get lost in what real riders really want, but with a sponsor list including some of the most profound athletes of our time like Ben Boyko, Jay Hoots, and Ryan Leech, you can rest assured Norco has done their homework.

Shore Two in it's element

Shore Two in it's element


Ergonomics are crucial on today's high-tech bikes as the technical trail maneuvers are getting more and more precise and the human interface parts of the bike (pedals, grips, brake levers, saddle) have to be intuitive for split-second interaction. That being said, I could not bring myself to install the cheap, molded, painted-over-the-pins pedals that just don't match up with the rest of the Shore's spec and hold back it's true capabilities. I consider these to be showroom test-ride pedals and there's nothing wrong with that since pedals are a largely personal choice anyways. But at a retail price of over 3 grand for this bike, Norco should have included their house brand Axiom Road Gap flat pedals, which just so happen to be the fantastic pedals that ended up on my test bike. I was also tempted to remove the thick, rubbery, non-locking grips as well but I figured I'd give them a chance.

I weigh in at 200 lbs and am 6'2" tall, so I'm obviously testing a size Large bike. For initial setup, I gave the Shore Two the parking lot test and decided to unwind preload from the rear 500# spring and add a few clicks of rebound damping to get a plush ride slow enough to control big hits. The 66 fork needed some rebound slowness as well and I quickly noticed the rebound adjustment dial on the underside of the left lower leg had no detent to stop it from spinning, so I added some tape to it and it's held in place ever since, requiring no further adjustment to the rebound damping.

Sitting on the bike felt a bit cramped initially. The geometry is definitely designed to get rider weight over the back wheel for negotiating tight, quick moves like skinny stuntwork and slow speed drops. A 2" rise handlebar adds to the effect bringing body position up and back. From the get-go it's noticeable how extremely easy it is to get the front end up on the Shore Two.

Small fit and feel for quick, agile handling

Small fit and feel for quick, agile handling


First Impressions
The first ride on the Shore was surprising in more ways than one. To be completely fair, I'm a bit old school and actually enjoy climbing for miles on end to reach any sustained downhill, and this bike certainly isn't designed for climbing. Without as many shuttle opportunities south of the border here, I've spent most of my time aboard this bike climbing it to the top. Norco's interrupted seat tube frame design means there isn't a whole lot of room for adjustability of the seatpost, and I am very far away from getting any kind of efficient leg extension for climbing. Again, that's not what this bike is made for, but the 2007 model Shore's were spec'ed with a telescopic seatpost and the entire Shore series of bikes are spec'ed with a front derailleur, so I feel like a fully-adjustable telescopic seatpost should be included. Oh well, I just stand up more often on the climbs.

Climbing the Shore Two to the top of Blackrock, Oregon has it's rewards

Climbing the Shore Two to the top of Blackrock, Oregon has it's rewards


Standing for the climb will take some getting used to, but it's no issue for typical North Shore style riding where shuttles are common-place and most climbs are too short and technical for being seated anyways. The FSR-link rear suspension digs into the ground with tension on the chain, so climbing traction is no problem. It's a pretty efficient pedaller as well, especially for standing most of the time.

Leaning into it at Blackrock

Leaning into it at Blackrock


Once the descent began, I was instantly and pleasantly surprised by the plushness of the 7" travel Horst-link suspension. Small bumps just plain disappear and bigger hits feel bottomless. The compact geometry is quick to handle tight singletrack in the trees. Body position on the Shore Two is very relaxed with more emphasis on the backseat, which makes it really fun in berms since the bike manuals effortlessly out of corners. I arrived back home after ride #1 a bit more tired than usual, but with a smile on my face nonetheless.

Including a chainstay wrap is mutually beneficial- you prevent chainslap and Norco hides the patent decal

Including a chainstay wrap is mutually beneficial- you prevent chainslap and Norco hides the patent decal

Big air on the Shore Two

Big air on the Shore Two


Where It Shines
The Shore Two is right at home in the most technical of terrain, as long as it doesn't get going too fast. Calling it a downhill bike is kinda like comparing a Subaru WRX to a Lamborghini- while top speed isn't it's forte, it does really well in both the agility and versatility departments. The word "tight" first comes to mind. It's tight in the cockpit, handles tight trees quickly, feels tight to the body when airborn, and negotiates steep, tight rock lines with ease. If you've ever tried to ride the North Shore blind (without looking at a move before hitting it), you're all too familiar with hitting the brakes last-second. With the Shore Two, adjusting your approach quickly before leaving the point of no return is a little easier. Slow wheelie drops are no problem with the easy-to-pull front end of this bike.

Shore Two above the dirt

Shore Two above the dirt


I was able to get in a few shuttles on some downhill trails and got myself into the backseat of the bike a few times. The relatively short, compact feeling cockpit with tall front end isn't the best setup for high-speed downhill runs. There's a fine line between being comfortably rear-weighted and hanging on for dear life. Once the suspension approaches the end of it's travel, the rear end sinks a lot and if rider weight is too far back, you're just along for the ride. The relaxed body positioning on this bike makes an aggressive downhill stance somewhat difficult. Once I got used to the bike after several rides though, the handling became more intuitive. The good thing is, this is a freeride bike that can be downhilled, whereas most downhill bikes aren't designed to accomplish dirt jumping or stunt riding.

Nimble for the balancing act

Nimble for the balancing act


In the Long Run
I've been impressed by the overall functionality of the parts package on the Shore Two. The entire component spec greatly benefits from years of the 'trickle down' effect, where this year's budget base model becomes what was last year's top-shelf premium model. Although all bikes and parts have increased in cost this year, value has also increased.

Keeping the Shore Two balanced has been an easy task for the Marzocchi 66 RVC fork and rear Fox DHX 3.0. The 66 ate most every type of terrain I was able to find, although not quite as softly as the mated DHX 3.0. A little more tuning may have improved balance a bit, but overall the fork handles big hits extremely well, inspiring confidence with the rigidity of the 1.5" steer tube and suppleness of 7" travel. Small bump sensitivity for the big single crown is nearly up to par with longer travel full-on downhill forks. The Fox DHX 3.0 rear shock has proven itself to be a simple, reliable damper for the rear end of the Norco. While lacking the adjustability of the class-leading DHX 5.0, the 3.0 damper performs at the same level. For as well as the suspension on the Shore Two performs, both fork and rear shock have noticeable gushy noise characteristics that are decidedly budget.

My predictions regarding the 'quick-release' axles proved correct. Marzocchi's q/r axle needed tightening about every 4 rides, and the rear Maxle q/r axle came loose after about 20 rides to the point of providing a deafening creak. Fortunately both of these are easily adjustable, but I still have not come up with a great benefit of using q/r axles on big-hit bikes.

Shore Two's suspension getting a workout

Shore Two's suspension getting a workout


Sun's Equalizer rims have held up well to cased landings and repeated downhill abuse, despite their relatively narrow profile. Kenda's Stick-E rubber Nevegals still have plenty of tread remaining, as do Avid's Juicy 5 brake pads. The Juicy Five's have held up to rigorous sustained steeps without pump or fade. The power, modulation, and feel of the Five's are identical to their more popular Juicy Seven brethren. The only difference between the two models is the presence of a pad contact adjustment in the Seven's, which I've been able to live without but it sure is a nice feature to have custom ergonomics.

With the stock main chainring being an extremely versatile 32-tooth, I have not needed to use the front derailleur one single time in several months of thrash-testing the bike. The E-13 DRS guide works great in conjunction with the front derailleur to keep the chain in place, proving no need for any drivetrain modification on the bike. The SRAM X.7 group performed well for the majority of my time aboard the Shore Two. The rear derailleur has taken a beating through bike shuttles and rock scrapage, and has lost it's precision crispness, but I can't say that it's any worse than a comparable test of higher-grade componentry. Reaching for a shifter around the big, rubbery see-thru grips proved to be a task on several occasions. When one of the grips fell off after about 20 rides on the bike, I switched to some Ruffian lock-on grips that not only improved handlebar grip strength but also shift lever reachability. Lock-on grip technology has been around for long enough that I would suggest it to be common spec equipment on pretty much all bikes of this caliber and above.

ummmm...

ummmm...


Overall I've been very enthusiastic about riding the Shore Two. I haven't had any major issues whatsoever, and haven't had to do much of anything other than lube the chain and air up the tires occasionally. It sounds cliche to say it, but Norco did a great job of creating a bike for a specific area, as this bike really may be the perfect "Shore" setup. 7" travel front and rear with a solid component spec offers durability and low-maintenance performance for those looking to spend more time on the bike and less in the shop. While the aesthetics of Norco's design may not appeal to everyone, the frame geometry follows the practical needs of the North Shore style rider. The Shore Two is a bike that can be climbed, with some effort, to the top and hammered hard on the descent. There's no excuse to bypass any stunts or jumps either on this rig; it's one do-all downhiller made to take it.

Shore Two soaking up some rays

Shore Two soaking up some rays


To find a dealer near you, visit Norco.com.

Go here to view all Norco Products.
Must Read This Week









32 Comments

  • + 33
 Hey thanks! I really appreciate your review having just picked up a Shore 3 (budget concerns). I know that the components don't quite measure up to the 2, but your overall impressions on geometry, handling, and the smaller details like seatpost issues and the quick-release axles will certainly help me to keep an eye on things and get the most out of my new ride.

One thing that others have noted about the 3 is that a few riders have managed to knock the rebound knob off the Van R rear shock due to the seat post slipping down on hard hits... apparently not a concern if the stock post is trimmed and checked to be clamped down hard. I don't know if that would be an issue with the 2, but just thought I would mention it in case anyone else has opted for the lower-end 3 as I have.

Anyway, thanks again for your review!
[Reply]
  • + 8
 This has to be one of the best-written and most complete reviews I have ever read on this website (or most magazines, for that matter). Kudos to Brad Walton on an excellent piece of work!
[Reply]
  • + 5
 No doubt Brad.....you're onto something here w/ all the reviews and BADASS pics. If Brad says a bike can hang I wouldn't doubt it for a second. He rides bikes like he stole them. Keep writing bro..... you should be a regular in Bike!!
  • + 4
 Or better yet, a regular here at Pinkbike.com Smile
[Reply]
  • + 5
 great review...as per usual...and sick pictures of some actual riding too, its pretty obvious you put some serious time in on the bike before posting about it.
[Reply]
  • + 2
 I have an old norco shore vps from 2004 and its odd that the newer shore 2 doesn't come with lock-on grips and a telescopic seatpost.
Mine came with ODI ruffians and a telescopic titec...
It's also odd that the shore 2 uses sram 7 drivetrain when I got shimano saint with mine.
How much does this thing cost?
  • + 2
 just found out this costs like 3700 canadian dollars. The shore vps retailed at 4000 which is pretty much the same price bracket.
I got holzfeller pedals and bars, hayes nine brakes and other pretty good parts at this price.
Is the component difference just due to price rises?
  • + 5
 Man, you cant compare a bike that came out 5 years ago with a brand new one. They probably choose those grips to show the design on the bar. The telescopic seat post is probably for the weight. Companies want the lower weight possible for marketing purpose. (Weight wasn’t as a big concern 5 years ago.) Yeah X.7 drive train is good. And this is the shore 2 review not the shores 1 so don’t expect to see top end components all around.
[Reply]
  • + 1
 Thanks a ton for the great review! I picked up an '09 Shore 2 on close-out about a month ago, partially due to this review. I have to say I've loved riding the bike so far. It's super fun to ride, pops well, and feels really plush. I've been able to step up riding after switching to this bike, and have loved every minute of it. FYI, mine weighs about 43.5 lbs and is a Medium, which is definitely on the heavy side and had me a bit concerned. However, when riding the bike the weight is not actually a big deal at all. It still handles quite well when riding downhill and you don't even notice the weight after a bit.
[Reply]
  • + 1
 rode one of these on the weekend, I agree with the statement about hanging on for dear life hahaha I kinda felt like that but it was a small so it felt a little bit better for me (im 5'11). overall im really impressed with both marzocchi and norco, my views on both have greatly changed
[Reply]
  • + 1
 Great review!
Rented the same bike in Moab for a Hazard-Kokopelli Down- UPS/LPS - Porcupine run.
A total blast! Couldn't stop laughing. Ate up everything in sight. Easy to bring the front end up and low center this also railed the berms and singletrack. Versatile. Not used to the weight, but adjusted straight away. Also climbed really really well to my surprise. Point and shoot tracked up anything I could find.
What an awesome ride...
Would lay down the plastic if my local rides back home could justify it.
[Reply]
  • + 3
 great review. this guy should be working for decline. theres so many bad reviews and write ups in that mag- he would be a breath of fresh air. great photos too btw.
  • + 3
 Or keep all that good freshness here at Pinkbike.com. Brad rocks and is 100% professional in all that he does.
  • + 3
 Pinkbike rocks!
  • + 3
 good points. not intended as a slight. just a response to a good write up and a reflection on a large scale magazine in our sport that does a below average job in a lot of its written work. cheers fellas
  • + 2
 Decline is just a cheerleader bike porn mag, I've never read an objective review in there. It's always the latest, greatest thing ever and the review is usually bracketed by ads for the product they are reviewing. Objective, fact based reviews are hard to find out there, but Brad nails it again.
  • + 1
 that's why the only bike magazine i read is Mountain Bike Action. the only one with reviews that come close to this (Y)
[Reply]
  • + 2
 I tested an 09 shore 1 at a demo day at glentress, scotland and it was amazing, just sailed over wallrides and drops Smile . Great bike.
[Reply]
  • + 2
 awesome! I have a 2006 shore 1.. a lot different i know but this series of bikes is a force to be reckoned with
[Reply]
  • + 2
 One of the most comprehensive reviews of a bike I've ever seen. It just shows why pinkbike is superior to mags.
  • + 2
 Thanks! Pinkbike is superior for the simple fact that 'print media' is old news.
[Reply]
  • + 1
 Sick pictures!! and sick bike! i want to ride there so bad!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
 i can't say i read the whole review, but the photography is excellent!
[Reply]
  • + 0
 Lovin This Bike Big Grin Like It Big Grin
[Reply]
  • + 0
 most likely my next bike!
[Reply]
Below threshold threads are hidden

Post a Comment



Copyright © 2000 - 2014. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv14 0.027468
Mobile Version of Website