Orbea Loki 2016: First Look

Jul 29, 2015
by Paul Aston  
Orbea Loki 2016 First Look


Orbea have been pushing hard with new models for 2016. Recently, we've seen the updated carbon Occam trail bikes and a revamped Rallon. This time, we take a look at the new Loki - a hardtail with 27.5 plus sized wheels that takes its name from a shape shifting Norse God. With the Loki, Orbea wanted to add an affordable and simple bike to their range and say something like:

"Loki’s fun-loving personality is perfect for everyone, it's a slack, stompy trail bike that relishes new terrain."

The aluminum framed steed joins the forthcoming wave of 27.5+ tire bikes, but Orbea's 'Double Duty' design means the Loki can also be used in 29" wheel format. There are three builds to choose from, the cheaper two models offer choice of wheel size, and come with the Orbea Digit dropper seatpost. The Flagship Loki H-LTD is only available with 27.5+ wheels and tires and comes in at $2999 USD, with prices filtering down to $2099 USD and $1499 for the H10 and H30 models. Orbea.com

Orbea Loki Details
Orbea Loki Details





Frame Details

Orbea Loki Details
Orbea Loki Details

The Loki frame set is constructed from a hydro-formed alloy tubes using principles learnt from the design of the Occam and Rallon bikes. Features include an integrated headset with a tapered steerer, Boost 148+ rear hub spacing and a 160mm post mount rear brake. Around the bottom bracket area we find 73mm BSA threaded shell, ISCG 05 chain guide mounts, a removable direct mount for a front derailleur and plenty of room for any chainring configuration of 1X, 2X or 3X systems. A 31.6mm seat tube has a cable routing option for stealth dropper posts, all cables can be routed internally through the down tube which also has mounts for one water bottle.

Orbea Loki 2016 First Look
Orbea Loki 2016 First Look





Geometry

Orbea Loki Details
Orbea Loki Details

Orbea asked themselves the question - "Why should hardtail mountain bikes share twitchy geometry with world cup, XC race frames?" I assume the answer was no as they wanted to create a fun bike for the masses, not for the few at the sharp end of the cross country racing circuits. For the Loki, they have headed down the long, low and slack geometry route which is taking hold across the industry to varying degrees. Considering the large wheel diameter and short 35mm stems spec'd on the Loki, the head angle is a slack 67 degrees. Reach on a medium frame is perhaps below average at 412mm, but sizing does extend to an XL frame with a 452mm reach, not huge numbers but stack height is high with the 29" length fork which allows a bit more room in the cockpit. The chainstays are kept tight at 430mm, super short considering the fact a 3" tire will fit easily and even a 29" x 2.4". The bottom bracket is has a -60mm drop to drop your weight well below the axles and give a stable ride.

Orbea Loki 2016 First Look





Specifications

Loki H-Ltd - 2999
Loki H-Ltd - $2999

There are three models of Loki to choose from: The budget H30 comes in at $1499 USD and includes a Digit dropper seat post and has options of 27.5+ or 29" wheels. The H10 offers the same but with an upgraded parts list for $2099. The Loki H-LTD is the top of the line bike at $2999 and only available with 27.5+ wheels, but does boast a Kashima coated FOX Float 34 fork, Rock Shox Reverb and an XT drivetrain. All bikes are delivered with Maxxis rubber, 3.0" Chronicles for the Plus bikes and 2.4" Ardent's on the 29" bikes. Along with all Orbea bikes, the Loki is available through the 'MyO' customisation program. Choose your frame size and basic build kit, then choose from extra options of paint and parts to suit your desires. Orbea then build the bikes in Spain when your order is processed and your bespoke bike will arrive at your local dealer within three weeks.


Loki H10 - 2099
Loki H10 27+ $2099
Loki H30 - 1499
Loki H30 27+ $1499





Riding the Loki

Orbea Loki 2016 First Look
I love the simplicity of a hardtail, set your sag up front...
Orbea Loki 2016 First Look
...and pump 15psi in to the Plus sized tires and your off.


bigquotesI spent an afternoon riding the Loki in Ainsa in Spain, the location for the forthcoming Round 7 of the Enduro World Series in September. In the days prior I was riding the Orbea Rallon and Occam models, but throwing a leg over the Loki left me pleasantly surprised. Orbea have nailed the geometry which gives the Loki a comfortable riding position and big stability, combined with the chunky tires makes it a really easy bike to get on and ride. Climbing the loose gravel roads in Ainsa, the grip levels were huge and seemed to make molehills out of mountains, perhaps not the fastest climber of the week but certainly the easiest. Our guide was a local guy, born and bred in these mountains, he was also pretty handy on a bike and rode his personal Rallon all week. I was boggled by the ease of which I kept him in sight compared to the other bikes I had been riding. When a late afternoon storm reared its head and soaked the trails, it was interesting watching him skip and slide around, while I followed on a direct trajectory with little deflection from the line. Considering the semi-slick Chronicle tires which barely have any knobs to speak of and no square edge to bite. Even through super rough sections the Loki floated through, keeping up with ease. Overall a simple, fun machine with surprising capabilities. .- Paul Aston


Find out more at Orbea.com / @orbea

Author Info:
astonmtb avatar

Member since Aug 23, 2009
486 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

63 Comments
  • 42 0
 Paint scheme's aren't too flashy. Actually pretty loki.
  • 45 8
 You can be a lover of 27.5+, Orbea hater of 27.5+, but either way it seems to make more sense overall than those fat bikes. Well done Orbea. Looks like fun.
  • 8 1
 It's good to recycle.
  • 5 4
 Didn't they stop making tires that were like 2.7"+ because they were too slow for downhill/freeride a few years ago? Now they're putting them on trail bikes?
  • 2 1
 For most they make more sense but if you are going to ride in the snow having a 5" tire is a must.
  • 7 1
 @nickTHEBEARcardone For reference, the old Nokian Gazzalodi's were excessively heavy, in either the 24' or 26" sizes and the sidewalls were stiff as all get out, completely changed ride-not in a good way. Tire tech has changed significantly so there are reasonable weights and fun characteristics to plus tires. If I lived outside of a city, I'd look at a plus sized rig to go bike-packing with for sure.
  • 13 1
 I like it. Don't judge me!
  • 10 2
 "...the head angle is a slack 73 degrees." It's actually the seat angle!
Can wait to ride a 27.5+ bike. As a fan of hardtails these bikes sound like the ride will be more comfortable, probably close to a FS but more easy to maintain. Just saying! Smile
  • 2 2
 Looks rad huh. Love hardtails too, how would you get on with the 15(!!!) psi? Scares me to be honest.
  • 6 0
 15psi isn't happening, but if novelty tire sizes are what it takes to get more people to see how fun slack hardtails are, i'm all for them.
  • 4 1
 Love the way they've kept the launch really lo-KI...
  • 7 2
 15psi fat tyres on 650b rims.... Or you could run 40psi normal tyres on 26" rims and drag a dead horse behind your bike
  • 3 3
 ctd07....what are you talking about? at 40 psi you lose traction, not to mention the smaller contact patch of 26" wheels...have you ridden a + tire'd bike? My guess is no. Don't knock it till you've tried it!
  • 3 11
flag ctd07 (Jul 29, 2015 at 23:36) (Below Threshold)
 @bobman7 my point was referring to rolling resistance, and yes I have ridden one and hated it.... I guess everything needs explaining for idiots on the internet though
  • 7 1
 the up to date wisdom on rolling resistance is that less pressure is better... you don't waste energy bouncing the bike upwards over lumps. on a rough surface, a plus sized tyre at those pressures will roll far more efficiently than a 26" at 40psi. while we're explaining things to idiots... even roadies are starting to find this, switching to larger softer tyres on most of the tour bikes this year.
  • 4 11
flag ctd07 (Jul 30, 2015 at 3:25) (Below Threshold)
 @blitz66 or.... Instead of buying into the constant marketing bs thrown at you, you could actually just ride your bike with the pressure high and with it low and see which one goes faster along your local fire trail or single track, obviously going over rough tock gardens etc may have other dynamics involved, but its a simple rule of science - lower psi = more surface area in contact with the ground = more rolling resistance... It can't be refuted and you just have to actually ride your bike to realise it. Riding on tarmac with flat tyres is bloody hard work and a lot slower!

Damn these marketing divisions are good at making people dumb!
  • 3 6
 ...but by all means, run your cars tyres at 15psi if it rolls better and see how good your fuel economy is :-@
  • 2 1
 this bike isn't for tarmac, it's for rough surfaces. a rough fireroad would be faster to ride on a mountain bike (even a rigid one) than a cross bike, because you can allow the tyres to deform on the road. I notice this with my cx bike, which is why i run low pressures (as do most racing or riding cyclocross). second point, a wide tyre will have a volume far higher than a narrow one. the contact patch doesn't go up at the same rate as the pressure (while we're on simple physics facts) so you get the traction advantage of a lower pressure without the disadvantage of the proportionally increased rolling resistance. YES it would have a larger contact patch than a 26" at 40psi. But i know which one i'd ride faster in 90% of situations (the remaining 10% being the road to the trail)
  • 4 1
 @ctd07 Seriously! Try running your roadie tyres at the full 120 psi (runs crap & is uncomfortable) for all of the reasons @Blitz66 has stated, then drop them to 90 - 100 psi and they'll roll sweet as a nut! Same off road, I used to think like you & all of the bouncing just makes your gooch hurt! Lowered pressures off road too and it's much more efficient...

Cars on the other hand are different, although an overinflated tyre means no grip & uneven wear etc...

I'm not dissing you - just saying run your own tests and you'll find otherwise as I did! I used to be in your camp but have learnt better!
  • 3 1
 @ctd07 At what tyre pressure do you ride, if you do actually ride bikes?
  • 4 5
 Haha, I run around 20psi, normally go by feel though, yeh at 40psi you have no grip and its bumpy, but that's not the argument, the argument is about rolling resistance, y'all missed the point. A hard tyre rolls quicker, period! The point being a plus size fat tyre at 15psi will be sluggish as hell and 'feel like you're dragging along a dead horse behind ya'. I feel there is much unnecessary rolling resistance with the 650b+ wheels at low pressure, they grip awesome but are very slow and cumbersome, not that fun to ride IMO
  • 1 0
 All depends on the terrain. We are talking about hardtails and they ride faster on flat than FSs. And to finalise - I'm not an Enduro racer, I just ride my bike at the pace i want!
  • 1 1
 ctd07 kinda has a point, as do his opponents. The debate is almost entirely grey area... Until you have a particular trail in question.
What I reckon also affects people's opinions is peers. If, for example, ctd07 rode with people on regular trails who run low pressures, but he's just naturally faster than them already, it may go some way to fog the facts/physics. Hypothetical of course. Same with wheel size, type of bike, stem length, bar width etc etc. He's right about the road or really smooth trails. And as much as it feels nice to pop about on high pressures like you're on a dj bike... It's not going to cut it when it's rough, in a straight line or in corners. Think about a dh bike, the point of it is to keep contact with the ground.. Same with tyres. Too hard and you will bounce off the roots and rocks. And slide around in corners like the Dukes of Hazard Big Grin yeee hah!
  • 3 0
 Ctd07,
There are two types of rolling resistance; contact patch that affects acceleration and deflection that affects momentum. Contact patch has to do with the amount of rubber in contact with the ground when the object is weighted and in contact with the ground. Deflection has to do with the amount your tire absorbs the terrain as as it is coming at you.
The more you increase your tire pressure the less contact patch you have. This is why when you inflate your tires to high pressures the amount of effort it takes to get the wheel rolling is lower because you have less rubber resisting against you.
However, with higher pressures when you hit an object, your tire is more likely to deflect of off the object rather than rolling through the object. This is added resistance as well because it slows you down and takes more effort to keep your momentum up and your tires rolling.
The most correlative would be road cycling. In track, they run 21-22c tires and of 140psi and sometimes 150 or 160psi. They can do this because the surface of the track is extremely smooth, and less rubber contact WILL be faster. Now, for an outdoor race, they tend to run 23-25c tires, with the latter now being more popular, and pressures in the 90-120psi range, depending on conditions. A rider in the Paris-Roubaix will likely run on the lower side of the pressures to smooth out to rough and to prevent him from running off course.
This can all be applied to mountain bikes as well. You tend to find XC folk running smaller tires to decrease contact patch, but usually run pressures in the high-teens to low twenties. This is not only to increase traction, but to smooth out the trail making their effort go further. Also why a large amount of riders now ride tubeless. To increase traction, lessen pinch flats, but most of all create a smoother ride. No longer to you have the added stiffness of a tube AND a tire. Now there is just a tire that falls between the stiffness and thickness of a tire/tube combo. With tubes, I used to have to run my pressure in the mid-thirties to prevent a flat. Now running tubeless I can run in the range of 25-30psi. The few instances I have had to run a tube because of a sliced tire on a tubeless set-up, I immediately noticed to increased effort to keep the tire rolling and tracking straight. This resulted in more fatigue and soreness in my lower back from the increase in strength to keep the bike in line, and from the added jolt through the tires.
triathlete-europe.competitor.com/2011/05/03/facts-figures-myths-optimum-tyre-pressure
  • 4 0
 After spending a winter on one, I think Fat bikes are very niche. Not enough snow and your life sucks. Too much snow, same deal. All the other stuff in between seems better dealt with by a 27+. Rolled around a parking lot on one and it didn't feel like a fat bike at all. Pick up seemed good. That said, I need to climb steep stuff on one to see if the heavier rims etc. would bring on the life hate.
  • 2 0
 Makes A lot more sense to me than a fat bike and what I've been looking for.

This is the first well thought through 27+ I've seen....looks proportioned for tall people. Comfortable, but slack and strong enough to hit some lively stuff

I'm looking at this for my main cruising and play around bike... The DH and AM rigs can have a rest
  • 5 0
 I sense a cease and desist coming from Morpheus sometime soon....
  • 6 0
 Ill wait for 26+
  • 4 4
 and you'll be waiting till death...no one's making trails for 26" anymore
  • 4 0
 Your wait is over! Didn't take long: surlybikes.com/parts/wheels/dirt_wizard_26
  • 1 0
 Ha! Trust surly.
26+... Egor.... It's alive!!
  • 1 0
 I like the look of the Surly Instigator 2.0.
  • 5 0
 It's a result.. Take one modern hardcore 150mm 650b hardtail, whack 26+ on it and god damn I think it'd be a right laugh.
  • 1 0
 Nice one alexhyland!
  • 2 0
 What he said ^
  • 1 0
 Wow, lots of opinions! I have found that 14-17 p.s.i in the rear and 12-15 in the front of my ridgid Motobecane 29+ feels much better than the 20 psi I started with after setting up tubeless. So far, no flats or excessive tire wear from the "low pressure". I love the Chronic-le tire, would not call it semi-slick by any means, but haven't seen the 27+ version yet. Thank You Bike industry for giving us options like super wide rims & tires that don't weigh a lot. Looking forward to more tires to choose from to compliment more aggressive riding on these new school steeds. Also, the $1500 price tag should boost their sales. Love the puns, ya'll
  • 1 0
 Let me know when I can actually buy the tires.. the FatBnimble is great as a front, but for anybody converting a 29er, even with awesome clearance, it's too much, & the Trailblazers aren't very good, honestly, & are too skinny to give a true plus sized feel.

All these other tires show up on bikes at launches, but you can't actually BUY the damn things. I put my 29er wheels back on until tires actually are available for us normal plebs.
  • 1 0
 If you haven't ridden a + bike and are skeptical, you should try one at a demo day. It might not be what you think. I think this would be a great single bike for a casual rider, and a great stable addition for serious riders. I haven't ridden my FS bike since I got a 29+, simply because it is so fun to ride. I was skeptical, too, but no more.
  • 1 0
 The more short reviews i read about 27.5+ it seems that it may actually be a good thing. Maybe the introduction of 27.5 was the bad thing. But the time is wrong, theres just to much change and confusion going on now.
  • 1 0
 no time like the present. Awesome bikes are coming out at a ridiculous pace right now. even if each individual style doesn't work out, I love the experimentation.
  • 2 0
 The only problem I see with this bike is the name because it is already in use, there is a morpheus Loki fs trail/am bike that's been around a few years
  • 1 2
 As a person who's pretty tolerant of new bike styles, I must just ask how these bikes are selling in the market. Many have said it before, but it just seems like such an obsolete bike that honestly many people just don't have the extra dough laying around for. That being said, I personally would totally own one IF I had that extra dough, but maybe that's just me?
  • 1 0
 I think these will be one-bikes for casual riders. Reasonable price. Comfortable. Forgiving.
  • 4 2
 I guess 73 degrees is slack for a HT angle now.
  • 12 1
 Almost as slack as the reviewers attention to detail.
  • 2 1
 73 degrees is the Seat. 67 on the HT. Almost as slack as the readers attention to... oh just playing
  • 1 0
 I was just pointing out a typo; they edited it to 67 from 73
  • 1 1
 "pump 15psi in to the Plus sized tires and your off"
What's mine that shall be off?
  • 1 1
 a 4'' tire is where it's at, a 3'' tire sucks in snow a lot of comments by clueless people hahaha
  • 1 3
 I was halfway interested until I read the words "integrated headset". I would never buy a bike with an integrated headset or a press fit bottom bracket.
  • 1 1
 I agree on the press fit BB, horrible "innovation". However, I've never used an integrated headset. What's wrong with them?
  • 1 1
 I hardtail "do it all bike"... for the "everyman".... um, yeah okay....
  • 1 2
 27.5+ and boost hubs.... Nah
  • 2 0
 Um, but that's kind of the whole point
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.043330
Mobile Version of Website