Pinkbike Poll: Re-cycling?

Apr 24, 2015
by Paul Aston  
Being a bit of an eco-warrior at heart (yes, I'm sorry about all the airplane travel) which got me thinking about recycling. Over the last few years, there has been a global push to put your plastic bottles in one bin, paper in another, and glass in another. One great thing about mountain biking, and one of the main reasons I fell for it, was nature. We get to head out into beautiful forests and mountains, exotic locations and mind blowing scenery. But there's a big downside to all of this, which is potentially leading us towards these places not existing in the future.

reduce reuse recycle buy recycled

While riding a bike is one of the cleanest ways to travel through nature. Mountain bike production isn't a clean industry, carbon is dirty, and leaves you with a material that has next to nil options for re-use. Aluminium can be recycled, although getting the ore from the bottom of a big hole and into a bike frame isn't easy. Packaging of shiny products is also wasteful, plastic wrap, cardboard and zip ties, plus the average shop is desperate to get your new grips into a bag with their logo swathed across it before you walk out the door. I can't imagine the number of super tacky rubbers I threw in the trash in my downhill days, I'm guessing well into the hundreds? Car tires are renowned as a big waste issue, but I can count the amount of those I have worn to the the wire on one hand? What about shipping your sled from Taiwan and then getting it to your door? Then we have turning chairlifts and driving machinery to carve new trails into hillsides?

There's plenty more to consider like flying to foreign destinations, driving up and down the country for a two hour spin, and then those that drop energy gel sachets and leave tubes beside the trail.

Generally in my life I try to make conscious decisions about this kind of thing, but when it comes to bikes I'm always blinded by the shiny new stuff and the allure of new locations. Environmental impact is left way, way back in the depths of my mind. Does any of this waste ever cross your mind? Do you take old tires to the local dump for recycling? What about taking old metal components to the local scrap yard? You might even get a few pennies back for the weight? What about handing down parts to younger riders, or various companies and charities that renovate bikes for the under-privileged?



Author Info:
astonmtb avatar

Member since Aug 23, 2009
486 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

144 Comments
  • 257 2
 please don't make new standards that are different from previous one by 2mm every 2 weeks and there will be less parts to recycle ;-)
  • 11 3
 But, there will be more parts to throw at the bike companies when they hit their pms cycle again.
  • 115 8
 lets recycle back to 26.
  • 19 2
 @ chyu I would if I could, but I can't since i still use 26 Big Grin
  • 11 0
 I prefer to hoard all my old parts If anyone needs any stuff from the old standards, I have it
  • 16 28
flag sicsoma (Apr 24, 2015 at 11:20) (Below Threshold)
 i am so, so tired of people bitching about wheel size (especially you 26ers). i really wish that argument would fade into the nether. just ride what you enjoy, nobody is making you ride a 27.5 or a 29 or whatever! just ride and leave my wheel preference alone. thank you, i feel better now Smile
  • 10 4
 @chyu Thats f*cking right ,stick with 26" ... those punks of commerce don't no shit about fysics ...only money !!! Dam'n ! Wink
Ride the bike like it's suposed to be and f*ck my english !!!
  • 12 26
flag TheDeadSailor (Apr 24, 2015 at 11:55) (Below Threshold)
 26ers just mad cuz they haven't switched yet
  • 19 0
 @TheDeadSailor It costs money to switch, and its cheaper to remain with the 26" bikes for a few years. Envirometally friendly 26 ridders here!!!!!
  • 11 3
 Its not a '26er' so please STOP refering to them as that. A 26" bike is and never will be a 26er!
  • 7 1
 The fact is the industry is leading us away from 26, not making new bikes with 26'. I can hardly find a fork for my bike and it's a 2011! Four years old! Let alone find new rubber. It's crazy. I guess I'll just have to wait until 2019 or so, when they start to bring back the new whippier, faster cornering, snappier, more fun 26er
  • 3 0
 Can you say eeee-bike to the top of ur favorite dh trail or even to ur riding area lowering your environmental footprint period.
  • 2 0
 Vote the OP to the top of PB. Vote him to the top of the industry! VOTE HIM TO THE TOP OF THE FVCKING WORLD!
  • 10 0
 What I don't like about the wheel size trend is that it seems to have coincided with the trail "dumbing" trend. Hell even MTBR is posting articles from a proud trail "dumb downer". If your wheel is too big to get around a corner, f---off and walk it. Don't make the corner wider just so you and your wagon wheelers can "ride the trail". Leave the trail as gnarly as nature intended or go home!
  • 150 1
 Tear offs Fucking tearoffs!! NO BODY is too pro to go pick up your tear offs. In a race situ organisers have people take the tape down an pick up litter But When you're having a practice day or freeriding PICK UP YO SHIT
  • 92 1
 Same goes for energy gel wrappers.... Half the joy of mountain biking is getting out in the bush and away from everything and I always assume everyone else is the same. Pisses me off that I have clear up after some selfish prick every other ride.
  • 5 0
 Yeah! Those too. We know the riders dropping them should know better!
  • 47 0
 You're talking tear-off pants, right?
  • 15 0
 I think he means those zip-off pants->shorts they had in the 90s... I have a whole drawer of just the tops because I never went back for the bottoms
  • 17 0
 I'm always amazed when I see the amount of gel packages lining a course following amateur XC races. Do you think your Nino Schurter because you're racing Expert Class and can't waste your energy putting that used package into your pocket? That's always disgusted me, there's no excuse in my mind. Mountain bikers are in many case trying to gain acceptance from hikers and other types of pre-existing recreators and that really turns people off.
  • 28 1
 Oh man. At my local trails theres one kid that uses tear offs regularly for no reason...no races no crowds to look cool in front of no rain and muck. I see them skattered in his regular stopping spots. When i catch him im gonna stuff them down his little douchy throat.
  • 16 0
 When you do it, please film it and post it on pb. We'll all prop it so it gets vod!
  • 1 5
flag jimo746 (Apr 24, 2015 at 12:11) (Below Threshold)
 cthorpe... is this you?????

div id="fb-root">/div>script>(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_GB/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.3"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));/script>div class="fb-video" data-allowfullscreen="true" data-href="/WhiteBoy7thst2/videos/vb.185999091427376/925004690860142/?type=1">div class="fb-xfbml-parse-ignore">blockquote cite="/WhiteBoy7thst2/videos/925004690860142/">a href="/WhiteBoy7thst2/videos/925004690860142/">/a>p>Karma./p>Posted by a href="https://www.facebook.com/WhiteBoy7thst2">Whiteboy7thst/a> on Tuesday, 16 September 2014/blockquote>/div>/div>
  • 3 2
 ahh, link no work.
  • 6 0
 Spandex wearing dirt roadies don't have pockets for their used gels but have somewhere to keep their fresh ones.
  • 6 0
 Dirt Roadies you should get that trademarked...
  • 1 0
 There is a level of respect you should show nature when on your bike - if we want Mother nature to keep giving us gnarly trails to ride then we need to be more conscious of where we ride and how we ride it. Pro's aside and the sport aside people in general need to ask themselves these things off the pedals as much as on the pedals. I try to ride locally right out my back down more than any other spot. Otherwise I'm hitting the lifts and making the most of a days ride - only an hours drive to the park for me. Think next time you head out and try to minimize that impact - that's the best we can do.
  • 72 0
 This is where being a hoarder comes into it's own; I use components until they are well and truly destroyed, replace them..... and still keep them anyway.
Then, I either put them on another bike or cannibalize them for parts like "oooh, I bet the jockey wheels from this smashed mech will be useful someday", hence I have a box full of bike parts that are of little to no use, but I keep just in case, rather than throw away.
  • 24 0
 Even things like offcuts of cable inner when fitting a new shifter cable, always keep them; you never know, they might prove useful hanging a picture or garroting an enemy...
  • 11 0
 My best recent use was using an old TV aerial cable to hold my car exhaust on for a week while waiting for replacement parts. People that only ever buy new things and bin them when replaced will never get that sense of achievement!
  • 9 0
 I am currently running a toothpaste tube in my front tyre as a permanent tyre gash repair. There's always something in the garbage that can be put to use!
  • 3 0
 Ahhh toothpaste tube is an awesome idea. Just saved two Minions with rips in the sidewalls that were destined for the skip and was wondering how best to repair them. Toothpaste tube it is. Reminds me of the time I patched up a torn inner tube with a bit of electrical insulating tape and some superglue and kept riding on it for ages
  • 5 0
 I had some old parts around and thought i would never use them, until I smashed my rear rim last week. Now I don't have to go and buy new one, pretty stoked about that! Also decided to build my rim instead of paying someone else to do it, wish me luck guys!
  • 1 0
 Lol im the same way. All 3 of my bikes are built with atleast 90 % used parts. Keep everything. even old tubes. that rubber may be good for something lol. Using old housing, cable and a brake lever on my atv snow plow for the angle adjuster. Built that out of scraps as well.
  • 2 1
 Props to anybody from the UK that has a place to store all that hoarded stuff. Somehow no matter how much storage space you got, it gets wasted being full of hoarded stuff and gets way to disorganized to find anything you need in the end.
  • 1 0
 Everytime I throw out (put in the recycling bin) any bike part I always find I could have used it within a couple of weeks.
  • 55 0
 I need a "I only buy used stuff because I'm broke as hell" option.

P.S. Am I the only one whose local shop is more than happy to accept people's worn tires for recycling?

P.P.S. All this talk about "recycling" seems very fitting for the "bicycling" community.
  • 15 0
 same!

or rather "I buy used parts because I have kids and kids are f'n expensive!"
  • 9 0
 I have about 30 old dh tires hanging waiting for my commute or rear enduro use. nothing like a slick rear to double the fun at half the speed!!!
  • 2 0
 Burn 'em, they flame up like crazy! Oh, I mean, maybe shoulda kept that to myself. Its a disease though right?...pyromania. People who litter really get under my skin though.
  • 46 1
 Please send all your outdated Chris King hubs that have been replaced by Boost outside my house for... recycling.
  • 21 1
 A high end bike lasts longer than 1 year. I see lots of people exchanging bikes/frames every year. That's not eco at all.

Lots of people review parts for reliability but some of them never actualy service them, they just sell them at the time they need service because they start to feel like crap. Then they come to the internet and say that the new new part is so much better than the previous....

The bike industry is also to blame. So much standards, so many wheel sizes, tire sizes....27+? C'mon, it looks like the front wheel of a motorcycle and these have a motor to make it turn....

I am taking advantage of this situation. I buy more and more less than a year used parts, service them and so I Re-Cycle!! :-D
  • 21 1
 I definitely have double standards when it comes to this sort of thing. Apart from bikes I have quite a minimalist lifestyle and don't have too many possessions, but I certainly become less principled when it comes to bikes!
  • 2 0
 My position as well, though I do try to sell gear I'm not using and usually buy used stuff, but this has more to do with budget than recycling.
  • 19 2
 It's a noble thought to want to minimize our impact when it comes to bikes, but it's really farting into a hurricane. The bigger question is sustainability, and nobody has it. We could design fully biodegradable bikes (well, maybe not) and it wouldn't matter because the tide of seven billion humans pac-manning its way to twelve billion will just gobble up every little incremental sustainability advance we make. Sure, we recycle tires, parts, etc., or just buy less, but that's just gesturing from our high horses when demand keeps spiking up anyhow.

Since I am in a cheerful mood, let me rephrase in an even more obnoxious way: if there were only a billion of us (still a crazy number) then we could drive rocket ships to work and eat steak every day. Mindlessly ratchet that to 12 billion, and we're fighting for toaster crumbs.

Want to make mountain biking sustainable? Stop having kids.
  • 5 6
 Nope. End the resource monopolies and switch to a hemp based economy. Done. The idea that we have to keep using finite materials and hence reduce population is rubbish. And to be honest it's a load of propoganda bullshit.
  • 12 0
 That's an interesting idea, Tobiusmaximum, but it is total baloney. What's a resource monopoly? Think we can grow enough hemp hearts to feed and clothe 12 billion people? And if we can grow enough (we can't), what is going to stop us from cranking up the heat to 15 or 20 billion people? The notion that farmland (for all our hemp) is somehow also not finite is very wrong-headed thinking. Nothing wrong with permaculture, but it's not the panacea for our overpopulation problems.
  • 3 1
 while carrying capacity does have some truths, it's often used as a thin mask for ugly eugenics.

with sustainably designed systems you can close resource loops and make things balance out better. hemp can be an amazing part of that for sure, though thinking just hemp will save our earth is about as naive as thinking not having kids will.

But yeah, it's mostly gesturing from high horses because there's no profit to be made from real good world changing design, and change is hard Frown

Let's start by having everyone here use city bikes instead of cars whenever possible? Without feeling superior and self righteous preferably.
  • 3 2
 Dontcoast, the idea that carrying capacity has anything to do with eugenics is nonsense. Eugenics is bad politics; carrying capacity is a proven biological concept, and pretty much an unbeatable wall for humanity if we insist on running straight at it (which we are). Carrying capacity doesn't have "some truths", it's an inconvenient truth. Are you sure you want to test it?

I'm curious- what is it about reducing our birthrate that rankles both of you so much? What's the end game? 15 billion people, endless fields of hemp, and piles of compost? I don't see the appeal. And if your sustainability calculations are wrong? What then?
  • 2 2
 So people genuinely think there's a problem but there's no solution? Your governments have a solution and it's underway. Unless you think they simply haven't thought about it?
Also, there aren't 12 billion people, not even close. Also, don't know if you'd noticed but hemp is a weed, it'll grow anywhere. Too many people in the world? Rubbish. Go for a bike ride.. where is everyone??. The many are being manipulated in order to benefit the few. We don't have an overpopulation problem. We have an issue of a greedy ruling class. But if you're blinkered to that reality how about.. peoples kids are going to pay the price because they can't be without their $6000 mountain bike... and don't realise it could have been made out of hemp anyway. And it would have been lighter and stronger. And you could've grown the materials in your back yard. Instead of raping Africa. Just saying.

P.s. dontcoast.. what are you calling 'save our earth'? Because it doesn't really need saving, we do. And I need to understand what you mean, so I can't understand your placement of this idea that not having kids won't save the earth.
  • 1 0
 @dontcoast literally everyone not having kids is a guaranteed saved plant.
  • 3 0
 @TEMPLE has addressed a topic that few care to acknowledge... an article and research to support:

“Many people are unaware of the power of exponential population growth,” Murtaugh said. “Future growth amplifies the consequences of people’s reproductive choices today, the same way that compound interest amplifies a bank balance.”

oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2009/jul/family-planning-major-environmental-emphasis

The Research:

blog.oregonlive.com/environment_impact/2009/07/carbon%20legacy.pdf
  • 4 3
 The best answer?
Start killing rich people.
Take their daughters.
And start the world again.
  • 3 0
 You're getting investigated by the rcnp domestic terrorism division for that last comment.
  • 1 2
 @temple

Quote: And if we can grow enough (we can't), what is going to stop us from cranking up the heat to 15 or 20 billion people?

Pretty sure the answer to your question is in your question. You put it in brackets.
  • 9 0
 Saying that there is no overpopulation is like denying global Warming. It is a fkng fact it is just that governments cannot say that it would be good if we A stop having kids and B do some kill off. Also this belief that you can save the planet by some barely relevant actions like buying a hybrid or sorting garbage is really naive. Belief that speaking about it does something good, constantly admitting how guilty we are is plain stupid. We are going to die, so will our kids and their grand children (if they have them) we just cannot tell when and which generation after us.

Be a good lad/girl , wasteful living and surplus hurts you directly and immediately. Meet pople, visit places, enjoy life, it is too short to spend it working your ass off to buy stuff you don't need and then moan about it how bad it is to do it.
  • 2 1
 xCri: The fact that you ostensibly are a mountain biker and use a computer suggests that you are a rich person compared to most of the world. I guess YOU won't be around to start the world over again. (For that matter, neither will I. Bummer.)
  • 1 0
 Population does not correlate to environmental devastation or the end of the earth. People with money (who buy excessive materialistic stuff) tend not to have that many kids. It's the poor people who live in the dirt, who don't put their kids threw school that see no problem in having 10 of them. That being said, it's left to the people with money (small fraction) to determine how the world will be. But all their governments are ran by lobbyists who are pro cooperate greed (even at the cost of the environment) because they got into power before the environment was a issue. But the educated humans with money now understand this and are trying to change the way things are. And all those poor peoples that are overpopulating the earth with "human dexterous hands" are probably the only way we got to repair the damage we have already done. We just got to stop supporting people with more than a billion dollars and work on ourselves. Want facts, look at how Cuba became a accidental Eden just by not letting the free market billionaires have their way with their land. They have population, but no pollution. I'm all for free-market economy, but I think they should cap the maximum a human can make (say a billion). Maybe that way when they can not keep their disgusting profits of usually non renewable resources they will invest back into the environment.
  • 4 0
 Anyone who says "hemp is a weed - it'll grow anywhere" doesn't know very much about the envrionment beyond their front door. I really wouldn't be taking that advice to save the planet's overpopulation problem.

And "go for a bike ride, where's the people?" Really, that's your basis? It's bullshit arguments like this where people say "it's cold today, so much for global warming!"
  • 1 1
 @dontcoast It's only ugly because rich people usually want poor people to stop breeding. What we need is the reverse.

Here is a rule of thumb: If you find yourself on this site worrying about the footprint of your cycling habit, don't breed. There are entire villages that consume less than you.
  • 2 0
 @TEMPLE
first off, a generally low birth rate is not something I have a problem with, on the contrary it makes sense to me. Education and family planning make sense. Carrying capacity is real.
I was just saying, "stop having kids" is damn close to "stop breeding" which I mostly have heard from eugenicists or others in very privileged positions, ranting about their superiority etc... It's the delivery that rankled me, and I think it will make anyone with kids or who is not a total misanthrope have a reaction.

That being said the whole carrying capacity concept you bring up is very important. I wish our "economics "scientists"" would wrap their heads around the nonsense of infinite growth, because that seems like a bigger leverage point than trying to tell individuals what to do...

@bicibicivelo I don't so much worry about my cycling habit...in fact my cycling habit is directly related to the fact I don't drive, which ~somewhat~ reduces my footprint, and yes, I am fully aware there are still villages that consume less than me.

@tobiusmaximum Ok, i'll rephrase that: "stop damaging our biosphere recklessly and work on meeting our needs responsibily"...now tell me about those resins you'll use to bond the hemp fiber bikes and their production. I am actually quite interested!
  • 1 0
 bibibicivelo - rich want what? The less civilised the culture the more offspring, with main component being emancipation of women and their education. Give woman a book and she will be very likely to not want to have more than 2 kids, she will seek contraception - it is scientifically proven. Generally speaking the dumber the more kids, the more intellectual the less, because career starts to be so fulfilling and absorbing, with closeness of other young people looking up to you, that you simply lose the will to have kids, you lose the procreational drive. God forbid more academics in this world though
  • 1 0
 @WAKIdesigns - Along with that fulfilling career comes a new level of consumption. I'm one of only two kids, but I'm far more effective at accelerating the decline of the earth than an army of third-world subsistence fishermen. My children, if I had any, would surely be even more potent destroyers.
  • 1 0
 Bici - nobody in the western world will get rid of their lifestyle for the sake of the planet, not even environmentalists. I know a few and they live very similar lifestyles to ones of people they criticize. They talk out of their arse and say things that sound as if the "green" solutions and spending cuts would actually improve our lifestyles because we would waste less and live more fulfilling, meaningful lives, while the reality is that all green leftist proposals would dramatically lower standard of our life, we would get to thelevel of Poland or Czecho-Slovakia in 80s at best. Would it harm us? Would it be so hard to live? Probably no - could you openly tell it to people these days and make them agree?: look we got to save the planet, this will be the result - NO you can't. You can show dying species talk out of your arse, drive Prius, become a vegeterian and go on like you do, feeling better about yourself. Not having kids is the only solution
  • 2 0
 That was exactly my proposal a few comments back. If you have the free time and inclination to debate the merits of different mountain bike designs, you should also have the cognitive ability to override your narcissistic instincts, and realize that you don't need a genetic legacy. The same reasoning can be safely applied to all internet forums.
  • 1 0
 Sorry, I misunderstood you Big Grin i lately got this idea from some smart people that there is no balance in nature and each life form goes for maximum expansion and makes the best possible use of circumstances to not only survive, but to thrive. Then there is this observation that there is a pattern in evolution of species that the more intelligent animal species the shorter it lives, while rats and cocorouches are damn tough. tjrn the issue of biodegradation - Plutonium has a quite bad rate, up to 150k years, emmm any scientost must agree that a freaking little time, and if we do fk up the planet turning it into one big pool full of algi for a million of years, then who cares? No alien would care
  • 16 1
 This one is pretty hard, I'm increasingly aware of my impact on the environment - driving my car for example, but where I live it's difficult to get by without one, particularly if you want to go riding.

I work in a bike shop now, and the amount of waste I see is astonishing - we don't do that much servicing, but even so, the amount of old parts, tyres, tubes etc. that go in the bin is shocking, though we do our best to recycle it - take it to the scrappies etc. The bit that really gets me though is all the unnecessary plastic packing on products. It doesn't need to be there. Companies claim they're 'green', but punt out all this plastic crap which is inevitably just going to go to landfill 90% of the time. Does my head in, something really needs to change.
  • 6 0
 I 100% agree, I work in a bike shop and am constantly disgusted by the amount of plastic, cardboard, zip ties and tape that come on bikes in boxes. They could easily use half that amount and be fine, plus it would save them lots of money. At the shop we have 1 full skip bin of rubbish such as plastic and rubber etc and two skip bins of cardboard go out per week....
  • 1 0
 Cardboard isn't so bad, it can be recycled fairly easily, it's more cellophane and small plastic that comes on components that really isn't necessary - you know it's going to go straight in the bin. Over here, cardboard is fairly widely recycled so it's not such an issue. Clothing is really bad for that too, every t-shirt or pair of gloves comes in its own individual cellophane bag. Really winds me up.
  • 9 0
 Everyone has forgotten the Reduce, Reuse part. There is no money in it. But recycling is a multi-million dollar industry.
  • 3 0
 Well said brightbulb. And thus, if someone is making shit loads of cash.. that's the point of it. Not your environment.
  • 1 0
 I think MEC has been excellent in pushing some companies (the smaller ones that they can push) into more environmentally-friendly packaging. The reality is that nice packaging helps sell product, but lots of the Filzer tools are just a tool zip-tied to a recycled&recyclable plastic backer, and the MEC tubes are just heat-shrinked plastic. Compare that with some other companies, who's tools come in 7 layers of packaging.
  • 3 0
 Australia recycles ALL plastics and you don't even have to put it in a separate bins. All recycling goes in one bin collected once a week and is sorted later by hand and separating machines. Recycling does use lots of fossil fuel energy though. I think hemp based bio plastics are the best solution and seeing as Hemp is legal in China I think it is the natural next step for companies to use for packaging.
  • 3 0
 I agree, that or other bio-plastics (PLA for example)
  • 10 0
 Max Commencal to PB in 2013:

Today there is no carbon in the Commencal range, in today's market that seems unusual.

It's... It's complicated. We have produced Metas and hardtail frames in carbon in 2007-2008. I went to China to visit these factories. It was a shock for me, because the conditions were a disaster. The workers were working on frames with only paper masks. Kids, I say kids, but they are not kids because they are 18 or 20, are working there weaving the carbon fibre. It's dangerous. When you speak with their boss, he says, "in my factory you don't stay too long because your life might only be five years." So they work six months and they change. All the suppliers are asking for cheaper and cheaper carbon frames. When I came back, believe me, I was not comfortable. I said, I will lose sales, but I do not want to produce carbon. We produce aluminium frames, strong frames, it's a game and we are not there to... kill... only because we want to save 300g weight. So I said, "No, I don't want to produce carbon." I have produced carbon in Toulouse for Nico Vouilloz and Cedric Gracia, 15 or 20 years ago. But it was made in a room with no air in it, with people wearing protective equipment, and it's very expensive. In China, for me... I do not want to communicate on this, I only talk about this because you asked about it. I don't say that all factories are the same, maybe some are cleaner, but, for the moment... And we are working on some other technologies, you will see next year or the year after... With carbon you cannot repair it, you cannot recycle it. Too many bad things.
  • 12 0
 I need an option that says "I only buy used stuff cause the new stuff is crap."
  • 8 1
 I can't believe that we practice nature-driven sport like mountain biking and still need to discuss how environmental friendly the things should be. 'As much as we can' is my guess. No one mentioned all the oils and fluids that we use, while maintaining our bikes - grease, oils, dot, degreasers. These are all needed and most of them needs to be used regularly, but lets use them only when needed and try to dispose them appropriately. Dear fork/shock manufacturers, extend your service intervals to something more acceptable and try to save my time, my money and our environment. Dear brake manufacturers (especially you, Avid), brake fluid is toxic, so I'd like to bleed brakes as little as possible.
  • 1 0
 agree 100% full suss rigs are not as green as they seem. I keep all my oils and dot. dont know where to dispose them and fork oil is great for the chain and bushings
  • 7 0
 Definitely something that has become more relevant to cycling. Especially with the intro of things like carbon manufacturing, and full suspension. Once upon a time cycling's Dirtiest secret was chain lube, and wheel hub grease. It is simply not longer that simple. And we the cyclist should be getting on the companies who make this worse. Fox would be up a the top of this persons list. With their ever increasing in frequency, maintenance cycle. We should at least force them to consider engineering their product towards using biodegradable Oils and lubricants. Reduce, Reuse...Was the first two parts of the Triangle. Yet all we talk about is recycle.
  • 7 0
 I'm a limousine liberal..i preach about it and expect everyone else to do it via new laws, regs, taxes, but I'm exempt. Vote 4me
  • 1 0
 The best comment by far.
  • 4 0
 Running a busy bicycle workshop I am always shocked at the amount of waste we produce predominantly from assembling new bikes from boxes for customers: - we are talking cardboard boxes, cardboard inserts in the boxes, plastic bags, foam lagging (that protects frame tubes), string, and zip ties.

We retain most of the plastic bags, and if careful cutting the zip ties they can kept; as they are very useful in the future and at least are being re-used rather than heading straight to the refuse dump.

The cardboard is all recycled using a waste contractor.

The shop itself also puts out a lot of packaging waste from incoming deliveries from suppliers, as well as packaging removed from products bought by customers.

Bicycle servicing generally produces a much smaller volume of waste, which would typically be worn parts like brake pads, tires, chain, perhaps a wheel or some chainrings. We have a metal collector who collects this FOC as metal has scrap value in the UK, unlike rubber tires.

No one wants the rubber, it has no value. So it goes in the refuse Frown
  • 2 0
 Thats right, reused the zip-ties that came with the new frame's packaging to guide the cables
  • 1 0
 good idea for zip tie reuse! I'll start saving them!
  • 1 0
 try your local household recycling centre they take tires but you'll have to drive them there yourself?
  • 1 0
 @MAXXCHADD

works for domestic waste but unfortunately for business you can't use a municipal domestic centre
  • 5 1
 If environmental concern is your biggest consideration, you wouldn't buy/do anything.

The reality is, your actions will have a negative contribution in some shape or form in MTB, so best make up for it in other ways. Be that, supporting your local environmental agencies, giving to environmental causes or committing to lifestyle changes to reduce your impact.
  • 4 0
 i've thought it would be a great project to collect 100 lbs of aluminum beer cans strewn out in the desert and turn them into a nice new bicycle frame by way of melting them down and creating the raw Al material since Al is 99% recycleable. I did collect nearly $500 worth of cans over a period of 1.5 years collecting off an on when i had time. Yeah you only get about $1.30 per pound so although that sounds like a lot of money it pales in comparison to the time invested. Anyway, i was talking to a recycler owner who said he grosses quite a bit but in the end has to drag his metals to the port. This says to me that the aluminum recycling is probably off shore like china, whereelse. but that would be neat if it could be done here there is certainly no shortage of beers thrown out the window whereever you may be in the usa. and aluminum is such a wonderfully useful material for mankind that i find it a tragedy
  • 3 0
 Its never going to happen, sadly some mtbrs are too self-serving. I work at a trail centre and watch every day riders hitting the trails with packs filled with isotonic drinks and gels which they're happy to carry full, but the moment they've consumed it, they dump it, once it's served its purpose it's no longer their responsibility. So getting these guys to think about the impact their hobby has on the environment, is like pissing in the wind.
  • 5 0
 If you are near MontrĂ©al and and don't know what to do with old components, you can help by giving them to velocaravane.org Wink
  • 8 1
 how about you all stop building with Carcinogenic carbon
  • 3 0
 Living in Boulder, CO we have a really amazing organization called Community Cycles
communitycycles.org/about
Its a non profit which accepts used bike donations and volunteers take these bikes, fix em up and provide an excellent used bikes market. Not so many high end mountain bikes come through the doors but if you need a commuter its the best place to get one. They also have a lot of awesome program where if you volunteer a certain number of hours you can earn a bike, where you'll build your own bike up from donations, christmas bike giveaways for little kids, all kinds of stuff. Can't speak highly enough about it.

That being said back when i lived down in Colorado Springs, we didn't have an organization like that but a few of my buddies from the shop would just go down to the parks where the homeless gathered and fix up their bikes and we collected abandoned bikes from shops and 'recycled' them as working bikes for the homeless. Bikes are absolutely the most reusable objects on the planet. There's absolutely no reason a functional piece of a bike should be sent to a landfill. There's enough people on Pinkbike with the skills that, hey you know what, the next time you see that bike thats been abandoned for the last unpteen months, grab that sucker and give it some love and then give it to someone. Go save the planet and make someone's day.
  • 3 0
 I tend to buy expensive parts like frames, forks, and shocks used. Most everything else I buy new at a discount, or used from here on PB. I always sell my used bits so they are circulated back into the MTB world. I also have bags of old parts that I may need someday. I just can't throw them out. As if an old road derailleur will ever come in handy. I also keep old tires to use on commuter bikes or to give to friends in need
  • 2 0
 When I have old parts or frames that have reached their end they do go in the recycle bin, though I do wonder if those aluminium frames do get melted down with all the cans and foil.

Carbon is making me a little less smug about being a recycler. They always get sold after a season so they are being reused, but should I have chosen aluminium instead?
  • 3 1
 I'm all for recycling but most of the time I'm in such a rush or so jumbled trying to organize the work bench that I lose sight of the concept. I never leave waste behind whether I'm on my bike or out in my jeep, that is big in my book.
  • 3 0
 back in the days, riding meant straight out the door biking. now with f*cking dh I spend more time sitting in the shutling than riding and I hate it! need to get fitter and dh autoshuttling riding back up. mmduro??
  • 5 0
 I regularly re-cycle down the same trails. I'm not one for riding trails once and never returning.
  • 2 0
 Knowing that I am going to pollute, I prefer biking to motocross. Trading for the lesser evil is enough for me. I don't throw away parts almost ever. I rebuild and resell. My shop does consignment so we get people sweet deals on used gear. I think we do pretty well all things considered.
  • 3 1
 Another way to reduce is to reuse! NSMBA host their gear swap this weekend. Drop off your used or unwanted bikes/ components on April 24+25 and watch it turn into money on Sun, April 26.

nsmba.ca/content/2012-03_2015-gear-swap

Happy Earth Day!
  • 1 0
 0ver 3 million inner tubes are produced a day. Over 1 billion a year. Almost all old bike tubes and bike tires are landfilled. Even if you take them to a shop. Even if the shop takes them to a proper facility. They all go in the trash. They are not recycled. That is the bike industry.
  • 1 0
 Working as a shop tech we always recycle everything we can and that includes old parts that are stripped down, aluminium, steel, plastic. Most of this is done in our own time and hardly anything goes to waste. All New bike packaging is also recycled. The metal parts we take to the scrap yard to weigh in and it keeps us in fresh coffee
  • 5 0
 please recycle your old unwanted aluminum frames at my house.
  • 8 2
 fuck Carbon !
  • 4 0
 aloy all da way
  • 1 0
 This is one thing that concerns me about carbon bikes, my next bike could quite possibly be carbon and I think it's a great material up until the part breaks sure it can be recycled by a couple facilities in the world but it can only be recycled a limited number of times then it's off to the land fill it's the main thing that makes me second guess carbon over aluminum
  • 1 0
 Greed is what drives the mass production of consumables. As long as people keep handing over their money they will keep making it despite the environmental consequences. If you want to really make a change in the world then a fundamental change to human thinking needs to take place and since that won't happen then you can rest assured there is NOTHING any one person can do about it, period. If it makes you feel better than more power to you. But it will make no difference because the love of money is what has destroyed the environment.
  • 1 0
 I would have to say, though, that the amount of carbon being used in total in the world is a tiny tiny fraction of all of the industrial uses of carbon/hydrocarbon products. A drop in the bucket. Aluminum and steel are fantastic materials in that they can be recycled continuously. Now I wish the big bike companies would phase out the low grade, shitty parts on their kids bikes. Kids would have more fun and the bike companies would reduce their shipping costs.
  • 1 0
 I mostly buy my own stuff new but also I volunteer 10-20 hours a week in a bike co-op where we make use of the shittiest, nastiest old parts you can imagine. So I really don't feel bad about buying shiny stuff.
  • 4 0
 I use an amazing recycling facility. It's called eBay!
  • 2 0
 This is one of larger reasons why I will never own a carbon bike or rims, etc. I am still waiting on Santa to bring me my Liteville 601....
  • 3 0
 as others have said....overpopulation is the bigger evil that most dont want to admit.
  • 1 0
 I read this, and pondered how I could answer this question as I drank coffee out of a Styrofoam cup.... Well I know where I can begin to make a change, no more Styrofoam cups for me!
  • 1 0
 My lil bro gets all my old parts. When I was a kid I had to walk uphill both ways in the snow to get my parts. Lucky little bastard.
  • 1 0
 There are places in Bath and Bristol that except old bikes and components and then use them to make bikes for those that can't afford them.
  • 3 0
 bikes are fine and all but what about recycling carbon?
  • 3 0
 First sentence in the article is not a sentence.
  • 3 0
 Terrible syntax @paulaston. Does anyone edit this stuff?
  • 1 0
 I only buy used. Only thing I bought new last year was a couple of chains and a new helmet. Sadly, the lube I use for my chain is not biodegradable I believe.
  • 2 0
 2017 Wood frames : eco & vegan friendly
X-Enduro Boost 32.5" Plus
  • 1 0
 Donate to your local bike co-op or any bike organization out there! Pinkbike is great at buying used bike parts!
  • 1 0
 I buy new parts for my main bike and handme down old parts to my other bikes
  • 6 5
 Recycling doesn't really solve the problem. But it does make some people very wealthy.
  • 4 6
 The crooks at the epa come to mind, al Gore, ...scammers!
  • 3 2
 Two true statements.. one neg prop. Welcome to Pinkbike.
  • 2 2
 I take that back then. And well said jrocks. Bunch of crooks pretending to be saviours, soooo 21st century.
  • 4 4
 The greens are the old reds in disguise. They'll pervert all our good 'stewards of the earth' intentions, in order to grab power.
People like this doing illegal deals:
mobile.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?referrer=&_r=0
  • 1 1
 Does the tin foil hat fit under your helmet?
  • 1 1
 Does the blind faith look nice on your mantlepiece?
  • 2 0
 race face has reduced some useless packaging. I appreciate that.
  • 1 0
 Buy and sell your used bike bits on pinkbike! Even (dare I say it) ebay!

Recycle packaging / envelopes too Smile
  • 1 0
 I am too poor for the over price mountain bike market. So i buy used stuff.
  • 1 0
 I love cool used stuff. I got some used Ultegra shifters for like $50!!!!! That would normally be $200. Awesome.
  • 1 0
 I buy used stuff because it is cheap and usually functions just as well. "Recycling" is just a secondary benefit.
  • 1 0
 There should be an option. Only buys used parts because I can afford any new ones.
  • 1 0
 I (almost) only buy used parts but mainly because of the price. Mountain biking can hardly be eco.
  • 1 0
 "Sustainability" not even a word.
  • 1 0
 I have a bin full of tires that I will someday take to the LBS.
  • 3 2
 Is this for a dissertation or something? Really odd.
  • 1 0
 I re-cycle by riding my bike, then doing it again.
  • 3 3
 Way to ruin my day
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.060500
Mobile Version of Website