Red Bull 5000 Down - Results!

by Tyler Maine
Sep 12, 2010

Tyler Morland and Lauren Rosser ahead of the pack in mass start downhill mountain bike race in Whistler Blackcomb resort.

- From peak to village, mountain bikers descended over 2,320m and navigated through the elements of challenging trails in hopes of crossing the finish line first -

More details and pics inside,


On September 12th, 2010 the second installment of Red Bull 5000 Down showcased one hundred thirty-one riders sustaining constant physical and mental effort in order to maintain control during the entire descent. Tyler Morland from Whistler, BC and Junior DH World Champ Lauren Rosser from Squamish, BC took the first place in their respective category. International and local elite gathered at the snow peak of Whistler Mountain, in Whistler Blackcomb resort in British Columbia and descended more than 2,320m (12.3km) and a vertical drop of 1,503m (5,020 feet) at an average speed of 76km/h to cross the finish line in the Whistler Village.

Presented by RockShox, Red Bull 5000 Down is a mass start downhill mountain bike race featuring the greatest North American and European riders, including: Stevie Smith, who recently took sliver at the UCI Mountain Bike & Trials World Championships, MX1 National Pro Dusty Klatt, and Chris Kovarik, a multiple Australian national champion and multiple World Cup winner. Over the course of two days, both men and women battled side-by-side, dealing with 14cm of snow at the peak, rain, fatigue, broken bikes and navigating through muddy and dirt trails on the cloud-covered Whistler Mountain.


Qualifying Day
On Saturday, September 11th, qualifiers where held on the lower half of the course, which took place over the famous Garbanzo zone in the Whistler Bike Park. Once the qualifiers were completed, the riders’ destinies were determined based on their results and they were seeded in rows of ten for the mass start on Sunday. Keeping the fastest men and women at the front of the pack was key as the top half of this massive course would see riders reaching speeds of up to 80 km/h. After all the men and women made it down the course, it was Australia’s Chris Kovarik who took the fastest time with 13:14:95 minutes for the male category and Whistler, BC native Brook Baker clocked in at 16:13:93 for the women’s category.


Race Day
Riders uploaded to the Peak of Whistler where they began to take position in 14cm of snow and prepare for the mass start. A shotgun start had the competitors launch a 5,000 feet descent and intense bar-to-bar racing as they battled side-by-side. Proximity wasn’t the only challenge, as riders were also navigating through muddy and dirt trails riddled with jumps, stunts, drops and root-strewn terrain. After a challenging start with four inches of snow on the ground at the start and a descent on the cloudy-covered mountain, Chris Kovarik took the lead and wowed the crowd as he charged into the Garbanzo zone with a huge pack of racers chasing him. Hundreds of spectators cheered Morland as he crossed the finish line in the Whistler Village after 21:49:82 minutes. “I love winning, it’s hard to beat. It’s exciting lining up with your friends on the front line. I wouldn’t miss it for the world.” Curtis Keene (USA) finished second with a time of 22:01:03 minutes and third place finisher Chris Kovarik (Australia) completed the race in 22:13:30 minutes.


In the women’s category, Lauren Rosser from Squamish, BC clocked in at 27:31:59 minutes, followed by Whistler’s Brook Baker with 28:11:29 minutes and Fanny Paquette with 30:06:17 minutes. “I’ve never done anything like this before. When I got to the top I said, “there is two feet of snow – this is even better!” It was different but good, “ said Rosser.


The top racers in each category walked away with not only bragging rights, but also a prize purse:

Men: Women:
1st place: $4,000 1st place: $2,000
2nd place: $2,500 2nd place: $1,000
3rd place: $1,500 3rd place: $500
4th place: $1,000
5th place: $500
Must Read This Week









69 Comments

  • + 15
flag alfapilot (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:24)
 Average of 76 km/h????

Someone has a hard time with math...
Anyways one hell of a race!
  • + 4
flag deannec Mod Plus (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:33)
 Exactly what I was thinking. I'm averaging 33.83 km/h for Morland..... Unless they're talking about the average speed crossing the finish line.
  • + 2
flag dmarsh15 (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:38)
 Yeah something sounds fishy with that speed. The WC racers get to about 59km/h on the flat out sections.
  • + 7
flag Demo-250 (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:51)
 The reason the math was off is probably because of this: "2,320m (12.3km)"

2320m is actually 2.32 km
  • + 4
flag deannec Mod Plus (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:10)
 Well if it was only 2.32km and it took Morland 20 min to get down he was only averaging like 7 or 8 km/h
  • + 1
flag chris-underhill (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:18)
 i quote "at an average speed of 76km/h to cross the finish line in the Whistler Village." i hope that clears things up
  • + 2
flag radek Mod Plus (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:30)
 Maybe one value is the actual vertical and the other is the distance.
Elevation Whistler: 2182 m
Elevation Blackcomb: 2284 m

So the course length is probably the bigger number
  • + 1
flag Hwulex (Sep 13, 2010 at 9:27)
 There was a radar speed-trap at the Chic Pea on Lower Whiskey Jack; speeds were taken from there, it's not an average at all.
  • + 5
flag lilwalters (Sep 13, 2010 at 20:12)
 holy crap, really?? everyone thinks speed is calculated by taking VERTICAL DROP dividing it by time?? that would be VERTICAL VELOCITY children, not speed. Unless the average slope on this course happened to be 90 degrees, that's wrong, which would be amazing that pro riders were able to average 15 km/hr... i wish i could fall that gently and controlled for 22 minutes.

If the average speed is 78 kilometers per hour, and it took Tyler roughly 22 min to get down, then logically, the course is 28.6 kilometers long. basic physics kids. Smile
  • + 1
flag deannec Mod Plus (Sep 13, 2010 at 21:26)
 The course isn't that long though. The 12.3km is probably the correct length. Theres no way in hell racers were averaging 78km/h through the course. Pro's at straight sections are getting around 50-60km... not averaging. The 78km/h is a typo or a bad calculation. Keep in mind the top half of the mountain had 14 inches of snow.
  • + 1
flag Hwulex (Sep 16, 2010 at 11:46)
 Forget the whole average thing, I already said there was a one-place radar speed-gun at Chic Pea. I know, I was there.

It's also funny how every time the snow is mentioned it gets deeper and deeper. There was six inches at most, nothing like fourteen.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag handlebaraddict (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:37)
 there is one every year. and im pretty sure its on a first come first serve basis to register + a registration fee.
standing at the bottom was soo sweet. so many riders had cams on so we should be seening a vid in the near future.
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag mvonhollen (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:20)
 You'd think a big red bull event like this would chip in a bit more for prize money
  • + 4
flag brule Mod Plus (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:34)
 Are you serious? That is better than ANY World Cup race! This is great prize money.
  • + 1
flag dezim (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:38)
 hahaa yeah are you serious 4k is a nuts purse!
  • + 3
flag mvonhollen (Sep 13, 2010 at 16:00)
 Cmon its red bull mang they gotta fork out like 10g eh! hahaha
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mikenimrod (Sep 12, 2010 at 22:45)
 That looks like a gnarly race... Red Bull style. If you are interested in other stellar Red Bull Races check out The Red Bull Final Descent post http://www.pinkbike.com/forum/listcomments/?threadid=107540
[Reply]
  • + 5
flag zergle (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:22)
 so legit
  • + 1
flag reks (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:37)
 Is there a full results list available? I wanna see how Stevie placed!
  • + 1
flag DerGraf (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:54)
 stevie was 5th!
  • + 2
flag cashman33 (Sep 12, 2010 at 22:03)
 he was 6th
  • + 3
flag DerGraf (Sep 12, 2010 at 22:41)
 or so, sorry
  • + 1
flag bansheeair (Sep 13, 2010 at 12:33)
 This page has a breakdown and qualies
http://www.raceheadquarters.com/results/other_2010.htm#sep
  • + 1
flag bxxer-rider (Sep 13, 2010 at 14:53)
 looks dam fun!
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag nakeddave (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:36)
 Best Race I ever did! Can't wait to do it again next year! Thank you Red Bull, I'm off to the GLC to sink some beers!
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag kylemciver (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:30)
 Epic race! So stoked on what Red Bull does for the sport!
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag manuelfrias (Sep 12, 2010 at 23:22)
 this race was so much fun it was insane starting at the top with over 150 people in the snow so many falls and broken bike parts
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag GabrielDugas (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:30)
 "descended more than 2,320m (12.3km) and a vertical drop of 1,503m (5,020 feet) at an average speed of 76km/h" .... really?

still an amazing race!!
  • + 2
flag watchmefly (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:43)
 haha. someones going to get into trouble for a few typo's
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag xtr3m3 (Sep 13, 2010 at 4:57)
 bad for woman

Men: Women:
1st place: $4,000 1st place: $2,000
2nd place: $2,500 2nd place: $1,000
3rd place: $1,500 3rd place: $500
4th place: $1,000
5th place: $500
  • + 3
flag EricBirk (Sep 13, 2010 at 7:28)
 and to quote brule...
"Fully disagree on this statement. If there were 65 women and 65 men, then yes, but when you look at entry numbers and who is paying into the purses, you can't keep it equal. If you want equal purses, you need more women racing and paying entry fees and driving the purses up. Look at the US Open, they paid equal for years and would get less then 20 women competing for 5Gs, they cut the purse in half for women and still get the same 20 girls. If they want more, they need to bring more fellow female racers to the events."
  • + 1
flag cikudh (Sep 13, 2010 at 15:57)
 the same application goes vice versa if 100 women and 50 men competing ... men can't argue
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag gcaprider (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:25)
 I thought.. maybe they made the snow for this. Hard to believe there's already snow up there!! Wild event, I could only dream of competing in this thing.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag jonnyboy (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:33)
 Nice work Tyler Alison and Dylan Wolsky.. two guys who go up just as quick as they go down!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mulchee (Sep 14, 2010 at 15:40)
 here's some more footage from photographer Blake Jorgenson's site: gnarly start!

http://www.blakejorgenson.com/fall-2010/red-bull-5000-down-whistler-bc-0910/
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag shredwhiteandblue (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:47)
 ive always wanted to try somthing like this, just far less gnarly
  • + 1
flag bobtjustice (Sep 13, 2010 at 1:42)
 Here you go man.
Hop on a plane with your bike I'll meet you down there, its on this weekend.! Big Grin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ta0UxzDG4a4
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag Maksimbike (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:44)
 I WANT TO SEE A VIDEO OF THE MASS START!
  • + 5
flag nakeddave (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:37)
  • + 1
flag Maksimbike (Sep 13, 2010 at 15:50)
 ahahahaha,
thanks!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag james1306 (Sep 14, 2010 at 13:07)
 that is so unbelievably sexiest i am surprised they can get away with it having the girls prizes so much lower
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag ashleyren (Sep 15, 2010 at 5:31)
 Fanny Paquette - ha ha
  • + 2
flag mountainmedic (Sep 15, 2010 at 7:40)
 Awesome! Way to go Lauren! Straight out of Squampton! Lauren is definitely a rising force in the Woman's MTB world.

I am not surprised, as I saw how much energy this girl has! Lauren and my daughter played on a Squamish soccer team this summer and this girl has way too much energy!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag chris-underhill (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:20)
 how hard is it to enter the race. also are they having one next year?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag jaydawg69 (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:45)
 is there a results link with all the riders ?
  • + 1
flag brule Mod Plus (Sep 12, 2010 at 22:14)
 Have not found it yet Jer, but will add to article if I do.
  • + 1
flag bansheeair (Sep 13, 2010 at 12:27)
 This page has a breakdown and qualies
http://www.raceheadquarters.com/results/other_2010.htm#sep
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag deannec Mod Plus (Sep 13, 2010 at 11:31)
 Full Results?
  • + 1
flag bansheeair (Sep 13, 2010 at 12:27)
 This page has a breakdown and qualies
http://www.raceheadquarters.com/results/other_2010.htm#sep
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag campofchampions Plus (Sep 13, 2010 at 9:19)
 Awesome race.
Ken
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag kbrock (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:38)
 You'd also think that the women should get paid as much as the men do! They work just as hard.
  • + 8
flag brule Mod Plus (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:43)
 Fully disagree on this statement. If there were 65 women and 65 men, then yes, but when you look at entry numbers and who is paying into the purses, you can't keep it equal. If you want equal purses, you need more women racing and paying entry fees and driving the purses up. Look at the US Open, they paid equal for years and would get less then 20 women competing for 5Gs, they cut the purse in half for women and still get the same 20 girls. If they want more, they need to bring more fellow female racers to the events.
  • + 4
flag sngltrkmnd (Sep 12, 2010 at 21:49)
 well-explained, brule... I was wondering the same thing as kbrock. I'm a male racer and haven't seen enough women entering events, but I seems worthwhile to add to an article covering an event like that this that "if more women enter, the purse will get larger." If racers (men and women alike) see these payouts and don't have the valuable information you've provided, they're likely to think the same thing I did - why are 1st place women getting HALF what the men are?
Let's hear it for more ladies tearing up race courses!
  • + 1
flag cikudh (Sep 12, 2010 at 23:35)
 winner seems taking home with an extrass ,, its rockshox judy xc or what ?
  • - 7
flag powpowpow (Sep 13, 2010 at 10:39) (Below Threshold) show comment
 I absolutely don't agree with brule's explanation. This is such a has-been/macho way of thinking. Do you think the woman who takes the win is really responsible for the others not entering the contest? No at all. Maybe there would be more women in the sport if there was more adequate equipment, more progressive trails and equal prize money. (And to clarify I am a man...)
  • + 5
flag nzstormer (Sep 13, 2010 at 12:03)
 And following the same logic powpowpow, do you think the men who enter are responsible to pay for less women entering? Who is responsible for it? I don't know the answer, but I don't think the mens fees should cover it and someone said below (I don't know how true it is) that proportionally to entries women get more.
As with all sports the number of people who compete directly effects the prize money e.g. More people are interested in golf and tennis than in biking, so those athletes make a lot more than a mountain biker. Effort has nothing to do with it, prize money is reflective of the interest generated by participants and value to sponsors. Women can't expect more money just because they try hard, just like Gee Atherton can't expect to make as much as Tiger Woods.
  • + 2
flag dwdw (Sep 13, 2010 at 12:19)
 Here is another line of logic for the sake of argument. If the women were treated as equal, they would race against the men, competing for the same money, rather than having their own category.

I don't think this is appropriate, but arguably, it would be equal.

Definitely a contentious issue. It would be cool to see more females in the sport. Most of the women I see are significant others to male riders.
  • + 2
flag fullbug (Sep 13, 2010 at 13:06)
 the equation is simple as some have pointed out. there's money in numbers. If more choose to do it there's more exposure which usually is rewarded by more revenue for sponsors and to prizes.
that's not about $ex it's about ca$h.
  • + 2
flag giantgl0ryh0le (Sep 13, 2010 at 14:09)
 it's a difficult balance between entry numbers and talent, yes there are less women entry fees to spot the pot, but they are riding the same trails as the men, they work just as hard to get down the mountain, but much less as there is less competition to knock them off the podium, as for more "adequate equipment" for women, what are you talking about, they already have women specific body armour with the little boob cups, and most of the riding chicks i know including my brothers wife who motocrosses prefer to where the same gear as the men, and there are already multiple sizes for most top end bike frames for the shorter men and women
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag bikerboss (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:27)
 Yeah agreed
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag gouty Plus (Sep 12, 2010 at 20:28)
 Atta boy Morland
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag reecewallace Plus (Sep 12, 2010 at 23:08)
 Yeah Tyler!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag scott54 (Sep 13, 2010 at 9:11)
 How did Dusty Klatt do?
  • + 1
flag bansheeair (Sep 13, 2010 at 12:27)
 This page has a breakdown and qualies
http://www.raceheadquarters.com/results/other_2010.htm#sep
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag twingate (Sep 13, 2010 at 3:19)
 Pretty damn politically incorrect to have prize money for women at half of that of the men.
  • + 2
flag bansheeair (Sep 13, 2010 at 9:17)
 For another perspective on the purse. It would be less if it worked on a percentage ratio. The purse for the women (based on registrations) is larger then the mens purse. Some might consider it politically incorrect that the women get MORE money percentage then the men.
[Reply]

Post a Comment



You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
Copyright © 2000 - 2012. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.069560