Redraven's Speedview - wireless roll-offs.
by Tyler Maine
Jun 26, 2009
Source: Redraven
Speedview - The world's most advanced roll-off system: Safety - Vision - Control
Redraven is proud to announce a revolution in roll-off system design. For over twenty years riders have been forced to remove their hands from the handlebars to use pull cord roll-offs and tear-offs to clear their vision. Times have changed!
Speedview - The world's most advanced roll-off system: Safety - Vision - Control
Redraven is proud to announce a revolution in roll-off system design. For over twenty years riders have been forced to remove their hands from the handlebars to use pull cord roll-offs and tear-offs to clear their vision. Times have changed!
Vision clearing systems are a vital part of any rider's kit yet they are the only part of a rider's equipment that hasn't advanced with technology through the years. However, Redraven has now brought the roll-off systems of the past into the 21st century using the most advanced and innovative technology possible.
Redraven have designed Speedview a unique and innovative roll-off system, offering improved vision, performance and safety.
Speedview is fully motorized and wirelessly controlled at the touch of a button.
Simply press the button on your handlebars and your vision is cleared in a split second.
Never again will you have to risk removing your hand from the handlebars to pull a cord or tear off a strip of plastic from your goggles, never will you have to slow down and ease of the throttle and never will you have to lower your head using your peak to block flying roost. Press your button and power through; Speedview does it all using advanced digitally encoded wireless technology.
Speedview offers superior performance with unrivaled safety benefits for all riders whether you're aged 8 to 80, a weekend warrior or a pro level athlete. Speedview helps you ride faster and saves you seconds per lap and all with added safety. Change the way you ride and advance your game!
Speedview comes as a complete kit fully assembled ready to race: - RRP GBP £99.99
• Speedview (SV) system fitted to Redraven Warrior goggle
• SV Receiver unit
• SV protective pouch
• SV Trigger, transmitter unit
• 2 x SV clear speed-rolls
• Protective SV tin case
Speedview color ways
• White
• Black
• Red
• Clear/Red
• Clear/Blue
• Clear/Green
• Clear/Orange
• Clear/Yellow
Check out the Speedview in action:
www.redravenracing.com
Redraven have designed Speedview a unique and innovative roll-off system, offering improved vision, performance and safety.
Speedview is fully motorized and wirelessly controlled at the touch of a button.
Simply press the button on your handlebars and your vision is cleared in a split second.
Never again will you have to risk removing your hand from the handlebars to pull a cord or tear off a strip of plastic from your goggles, never will you have to slow down and ease of the throttle and never will you have to lower your head using your peak to block flying roost. Press your button and power through; Speedview does it all using advanced digitally encoded wireless technology.
Speedview offers superior performance with unrivaled safety benefits for all riders whether you're aged 8 to 80, a weekend warrior or a pro level athlete. Speedview helps you ride faster and saves you seconds per lap and all with added safety. Change the way you ride and advance your game!
Speedview comes as a complete kit fully assembled ready to race: - RRP GBP £99.99
• Speedview (SV) system fitted to Redraven Warrior goggle
• SV Receiver unit
• SV protective pouch
• SV Trigger, transmitter unit
• 2 x SV clear speed-rolls
• Protective SV tin case
Speedview color ways
• White
• Black
• Red
• Clear/Red
• Clear/Blue
• Clear/Green
• Clear/Orange
• Clear/Yellow
Check out the Speedview in action:
www.redravenracing.com
Must Read This Week
- 1. Cam McCaul Bike Check - Trek Ticket 27512 reads
- 2. Spank scented grips! 17134 reads
- 3. Andrew Cho Bike Check - 2010 GT Fury 13683 reads
- 4. Fox Launch Pro Knee Guards - Contest Winners! 13129 reads
- 5. The Hive Chub Hub Review 13082 reads
- 6. The C Files: Calgary Cycle Custom Builds- Santa Cruz Blur LTC 12143 reads
- 7. Tyler McCaul signs with X-Fusion for 2010 11028 reads
- 8. Stund - Episode 3 - Watch NOW! 10514 reads
183 Comments
- + 45
mmmmmm
(Jun 26, 2009 at 0:07)
I'm not sure what to say...
Scott had this similar idea like 15 years ago.. With a sensor, so you only needed to move your hand to the side of the goglle and the system would tear off.. So, innovative? not really, Scott even stopped making them so its probably unneeded luxury..
i wouldnt say unneed luxury just the fact its so expensive for that it does, i understand theres alot of technology involved but in all fairness id rather save 100 quid and just use tear offs, but its just like wearin a neck brace isnt it! some day you may need it and most you wont
tru, but most racers will go out and spend a couple hundred on a helmet, and then at least fifty or sixty quid on goggles anyways, so 40 quid for something like that, if u do use tearoffs anyway makes sense and if anything is cheaper than i would of expected
i think its an awesome idea and solves a big problem but they should try to make it smaller and better looking
I wonder how many fresh strips you get out a pack? and how much it will cost over all in a weekend to have clear vision
they look retarded but the idea is really cool i but i guess goggle looks don't matter wen you're gambling for the look of your face
'Why didnt someone think of them sooner'-probably did mate, maybe they were just worried about the masses of people who instantly slate something because its new. (many below) everyones a critic haha but what they dont take into account is the risk it takes to make something like this a reality. they may not be perfect but after a couple of developments who knows... could be the next ipod ^^ that was dissed to high hell and back when it was new but now everyones got one.
if you read the article they were obviously mainly designed for motorcross when it says 'saves seconds per lap'
Hey guys what happens when you crash and hit the side of your head? The whole purpose of a helmet is so you can hit your head without dying, this makes it so you have to avoid hitting your head.
great idea, lots of times i want tear off but cant take my hand off the bar. i wonder how fast it rolls off. plus, the design of the frame really inhibits vision, you feel like a storm trooper!
^ lol and you werent trying to avoid hitting your head before???
im sure they put it into consideration that if you fall, they are solid enough to withstand it. but on top of that how much is a new lense?
cool and usefull idea, but completely ugly
im sure they put it into consideration that if you fall, they are solid enough to withstand it. but on top of that how much is a new lense?
cool and usefull idea, but completely ugly
Im confused how does it work? I saw the video and the mud magically disapears, is it air pushing the mud from rght to left?
Haha! Strong enough to withstand it? The damn helmet will crack when you hit your head, some plastic box with wiring in it is not going to hold up.
" combee (6 hours ago) (Below Threshold) show comment
Scott had this similar idea like 15 years ago.. With a sensor, so you only needed to move your hand to the side of the goglle and the system would tear off.. So, innovative? not really, Scott even stopped making them so its probably unneeded luxury.."
so, because scott did something, and stopped, that means there is no market? Sorry but scott means diddly squat in mountain biking. They hold 0 weight here in the US and in canada. Can't even compete. They probably stopped selling it because it was pre mature. Industry needs to be ready for something before it gets released or no one will be interested. Just how it works.
Scott had this similar idea like 15 years ago.. With a sensor, so you only needed to move your hand to the side of the goglle and the system would tear off.. So, innovative? not really, Scott even stopped making them so its probably unneeded luxury.."
so, because scott did something, and stopped, that means there is no market? Sorry but scott means diddly squat in mountain biking. They hold 0 weight here in the US and in canada. Can't even compete. They probably stopped selling it because it was pre mature. Industry needs to be ready for something before it gets released or no one will be interested. Just how it works.
Just a question to combee's point. What if the sensor gets muddy how
would a motion sensor work then?
would a motion sensor work then?
The lenses look really small and the boxes on the sides look like they imapre your peripheral vision. Its a excellent idea but it looks like they could only get it to pull a straight strip of cover not a whole lense shape. There can be some improvemetns for the next model but this is pretty injunuiative
these would be so good, i did a race last weekend and everyone that finished had there goggles around their neck cause they couldnt see. These would be very helpful and would take visibility out of the equation when it comes to racing
really nice 2 things though
if you fall surely it will break instantly??
and i must weigh a fair bit and me personally i dont want a massive thing weighing my googles down and making them slant??
its a good idea but it can use some improvement: smaller and out of the way for crashes and lighter.
if you fall surely it will break instantly??
and i must weigh a fair bit and me personally i dont want a massive thing weighing my googles down and making them slant??
its a good idea but it can use some improvement: smaller and out of the way for crashes and lighter.
the wire is for the camera that they are wearing?.....
i think its a pretty cool idea, but possibly only of any use on the extremely muddy days, not so much for the weekend warrior, but the pro racer on the really harsh days.
i think its a pretty cool idea, but possibly only of any use on the extremely muddy days, not so much for the weekend warrior, but the pro racer on the really harsh days.
That's awesome. I don't know how often it would be needed for DH but for thos really muddy Moto nationals in Europe I bet it will sell like hot cakes. And price isn't bad either.
personally i wouldnt buy them, id happily buy a set of O frames for 25quid, tearoffs from www.cheaptearoffs.com, and the chance to perfect my technique; rather than 100quid on a google which would no doubt need replacing every weekend whenever your face hits the deck in a particularly rocky section.
i think there more motocross intended but i think it is a good idea ive seen photos of steve peat using a similar system http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/3148048/
The clear part is too small, not enough space to see out of. And the sides are huge and look stupid. I don't like them. But they do look effective, and I guess thats what counts.
Overall those would help so much when you in a races and when it's raining, and lots of mud flying at you. I would buy it.
Sweet for moto, but I never really gets 'that' muddy when it comes down to it. And look chunky as hell!
do you ride? i ride and im going to tell you one race last year it rained 120 mm of rain the they waterd the track. it got so bad!!
if i would have had thes i could have pulled of 3rd but i finished 4 when i stoped to trow my goggles
if i would have had thes i could have pulled of 3rd but i finished 4 when i stoped to trow my goggles
zack8353 what language was that??
as SuperrealA11an said, Sweet for moto... i agree...
but there's still tear-offs and roll-offs... did your mom tell you about those???
as SuperrealA11an said, Sweet for moto... i agree...
but there's still tear-offs and roll-offs... did your mom tell you about those???
The wire is for the motor,(connects battery to motor) there is a remote (wireless) that you can mount on your handlebars i believe that you use to activate the roll. Some people seem confused by this ^
there great not arguing that , but what i am saying is moto can get that bad and thats why i orderd mine yesterday
yeah there great not trying to put anyone down atall but i live in canada we get a shet load of rain and tracks can get that bad
So does it just snap onto any goggles or do you need certain goggles for them? It would be a real turn-off for it if you had to use certain goggles that didn't fit well or were uncomfortable.
Seems like a good idea but will probably cost loads and wireless tearoffs are pretty low on my list of priorities.
[Reply]
[Reply]
i've never had to use roll-offs or tear offs although i have a full kit of Smith roll-offs... maybe a good idea for moto but not for bikes... i don't think it gets that muddy... and most people use a tube above the front wheel to keep some mud out of goggles...
awesome video tho
awesome video tho
yeah, even riding alone downhill you can get mud thrown at your goggles. and its a pain in the ass when a bit pile of crap lands right in the middle of your lens (which happens to me alot).
its a pain in the ass when a bit pile of crap size of your head lands right in the middle of your lens... how often does that happen??? once a run a couple times a year??? there are tear-offs and roll-offs for that man and those are more than enough for bikes... you might need one of these if you're doing a train at Garbanzo in a pouring rain...
Problems with the design
-The curvature of the lens is going to give a super small field of vision compared to what all googles today offer.
-$200 yeah right...top of the line Oakleys aren't even that. Unless you get super stocked custom ones, and still barely that, due to exchange rate.
-Lenses are probably not in the $200 price range tech wize. (Again comparing to Oakley...arguably best sports lenses out there)
-Guessing the rolls are expensive also...versus like $5-$15 for tear offs
-The design is ugly
-Another mechanical piece...mechanical piece = will break/ not work sometime
-The curvature of the lens is going to give a super small field of vision compared to what all googles today offer.
-$200 yeah right...top of the line Oakleys aren't even that. Unless you get super stocked custom ones, and still barely that, due to exchange rate.
-Lenses are probably not in the $200 price range tech wize. (Again comparing to Oakley...arguably best sports lenses out there)
-Guessing the rolls are expensive also...versus like $5-$15 for tear offs
-The design is ugly
-Another mechanical piece...mechanical piece = will break/ not work sometime
try actually comparing it to other vision clearing systems, in which case it gives about 50% larger viewing area that all its competitors and up to 100% more than your 'top of the line oakleys when it gets really muddy.
Oakleys as far as im aware dont clear your vision when it gets muddy, therefore your price comparison is irrelevant, and whats with this $200 tech wise lenses?? (note, wise is spelt with an s not a z) Oakley use plain old polycarbonate sheet just like the rest of the manufacturers.
Try actually waiting on the price of each roll being released instead of speculating
Oakleys as far as im aware dont clear your vision when it gets muddy, therefore your price comparison is irrelevant, and whats with this $200 tech wise lenses?? (note, wise is spelt with an s not a z) Oakley use plain old polycarbonate sheet just like the rest of the manufacturers.
Try actually waiting on the price of each roll being released instead of speculating
no the actual lens isn't the same level as Oakley's lens tech (Iridium, Polarized, and others). And vision clearing systems? Like a tear off? Which don't confine you to a tiny "box" like this thing.
But are you really about to tell me that these have as big a field of vision as this? http://oakley.com/custom/crowbar_mx
But are you really about to tell me that these have as big a field of vision as this? http://oakley.com/custom/crowbar_mx
What and oakley dont make clear lenses too? Whats to say they have no plans for a full range of lens? Again you are comparing apples to oranges. the lens you mentioned are all polycarbonate lenses with coatings, which can be easily produced by redraven and any other goggle manufacturer that sees fit to do so, but the fact is that in the photos you have seen there is a clear lens, what of it??
i think your uber high tech oakleys are distorting your vision if you think thats a tiny box. clearly about 90% of the viewing area of the goggle is still accessable with this system, and unlike tearoffs you dont have to take your hand off the bars, which is not always possible.
you really need to consider the facts before identifying "problems with the design"
i think your uber high tech oakleys are distorting your vision if you think thats a tiny box. clearly about 90% of the viewing area of the goggle is still accessable with this system, and unlike tearoffs you dont have to take your hand off the bars, which is not always possible.
you really need to consider the facts before identifying "problems with the design"
Thats a crap load for only a clear lens. And that frame design is NOT EVEN close to %90 of even Oakley o-frames, or any other regular biking googles.
Addressing another thing, you say that I shouldn't assume the price of the rolls...are you really thinking that those will be as cheep considering there will be a smaller number of them, less of a demand, and more time and machinery is needed to produce them. Vs some single sheets of thin polymer die cut and sonic welded together?
Look I'm using Oakley as a benchmark because they are the leader in action vision wear and I'm saying if you are going to be paying that much for these it need to match up with competitors offerings.
Addressing another thing, you say that I shouldn't assume the price of the rolls...are you really thinking that those will be as cheep considering there will be a smaller number of them, less of a demand, and more time and machinery is needed to produce them. Vs some single sheets of thin polymer die cut and sonic welded together?
Look I'm using Oakley as a benchmark because they are the leader in action vision wear and I'm saying if you are going to be paying that much for these it need to match up with competitors offerings.
Looks w**k to say the least and seem as usual as the Ice Cream Glove (youtube it if you want to know what am talking about).
for those that think its a bad idea..... u guys have never bin down whistler on a rainy day....
those goggles are great!
those goggles are great!
do u have to change the tearoffs on em or what? they do seem quite bulky but it will probably loose that look as they develop the idea, it seems good for those wet muddy winter days, not so good in summer! any body know where to get one in the uk?
it uses a roll. which is pretty much a giant thing of film that gets pulled across. once it runs out (which is after 40 uses the article says) you just have to switch the roll.
[Reply]
[Reply]
[Reply]
[Reply]
Wonder how many frequencies there are...
One guy on the start line hits his and everyone else gets distracted by their suddenly whirring goggles... Holeshot!
One guy on the start line hits his and everyone else gets distracted by their suddenly whirring goggles... Holeshot!
i think im missing some think some where im an ex moto x rider and yes you do need roll offs but you just pull them in the air , no time lost ..... i now use them for muddy meetings at dh and again pull them over a jump....
[Reply]
they would b good in a enduro race or realy wet moto x but not for pushbikes!
it takes a lot 2 get googles so clogged up u cnt see on a DH run!
but good idea!
it takes a lot 2 get googles so clogged up u cnt see on a DH run!
but good idea!
Oh, I've got no issues with the ads at the ends of videos or on pages, but 5 bucks says this type of thing is unpayed.
-prop me as you will but they dont make much sense for biking only for muddy situations in motocross would you ever need such advanced technology
It's cool but there's not a lot of times where it's gonna be that muddy and that much of a necessity like in MX. Kind of expensive too.
well its a good ideal but,like kqmtb2006 said,theres not lot of time with lots of mud and the lence has to be cheap to go inside that little box.when i say cheap i mean flexible.and its expensive too
Damn, I had a rainy, muddy race a few weeks ago, the mud was horrible, the track was hard. No way you could let off your handlebars to tear the tear-off off. The Goggles went all dirty during the race, I could hardly see anything So I crashed, and f*cked up the race. I wish I had had those that day!
SWeet idea im just worried if you fell and smashed your head how well those things would hold up and the price of replacement rolls vs tear offs. Kind of looks cool but the field of vision looks like it will be a lot smaller
Think of it as a treadmill, a motor pulls the plastic through and re-wraps it on a roll (but doesn't loop around, like a film camera), the slit it slides through pushes the mud away.
uhh....your confused...A treadmill raps around...a roll of film acts like this does...where on side is wrapped around a post (empty) and one side is full and it advances the film or plastic to the empty side.
Well you see, my treadmill is unlike any other treadmill. 
I pulled out the treadmill thing because I doubt donarider567 (who is 15) even knows what a film camera is when I meantioned it because of the film to digital switch that happened a while ago.
I pulled out the treadmill thing because I doubt donarider567 (who is 15) even knows what a film camera is when I meantioned it because of the film to digital switch that happened a while ago.
They have similar systems for video cameras used on racecars and building surveillance (any place where it would be difficult to clean off a lens). But with those it's usually a rotating window with a squeegee or a ring of glass. The way these work is they use a roll of plastic film that fits into the container on the left and then slides over the front of the goggle into a reel on the right. When you push the button the reel (which has a little motor attached to it) winds up the film pulling the dirty film out of view and exposing fresh new film. It's not all that high tech; it's just surprising that nobody's done it before. I think it's not so much a question of if it's a good idea. It's more a question of how durable they will be and if they can get the price down. Nobody wants to spend a ton of money and be the guinea pig for a company’s new product.
really nice 2 things though
if you fall surely it will break instantly??
and i must weigh a fair bit and me personally i dont want a massive thing weighing my googles down and making them slant??
its a good idea but it can use some improvement: smaller and out of the way for crashes and lighter.
if you fall surely it will break instantly??
and i must weigh a fair bit and me personally i dont want a massive thing weighing my googles down and making them slant??
its a good idea but it can use some improvement: smaller and out of the way for crashes and lighter.
[Reply]
that extra air resisance could make the difference between winning#
AND loosing ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !
AND loosing ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !
if i still played tourny paintball i'd buy these and mod them into my proflex (paintball mask)
rich kids will pick this up, and the less fortunate will wait for they're reviews before dumping 2 bills on them. (99pounds is 200 dollars right?)
cool gogs for sure, i pump it.
rich kids will pick this up, and the less fortunate will wait for they're reviews before dumping 2 bills on them. (99pounds is 200 dollars right?)
cool gogs for sure, i pump it.
good luck having that be legal, and have fun getting f*cking bunkered by the guy you wouldn't be able to see off the side.
tru it wouldn't be legal. but i wouldnt be suprised if jt, dye or whoever comes out with something similar in the future.
WHY? that would make whipping blatantly easy, and would just make your mask look like shit and be bigger
The mud would eventually form this massive blob on the right hand side and (hopefully) fall off. If you race in s#it sticky mud these things would be awesome cause you wouldn't have to loose your concentration on racing so you can fiddle with your tear away. My problem is would you want to rely on these things? Tear aways are a pain BUT there's nothing mechanical and they will always work. It'd suck to get half way down a course and have the little motor short out, or to crash and break the thing. That would be game over. I'd buy these things, but I'd probably wait a few years until alot of people had worked the bugs out and the system was bulletproof.
The way i see it is even if it failed worse case scenario you rip off the outer piece and you still have the regular goggles on underneath that would be clean
it looks a little robotic but I thing that probably changes some things in the future a little evolution of this system like the big batteries on the back of the band and the palstic boxes on the sides for example. or I dont know
Ya, this kinda reminds me of other strange but very practical products that came out in the past. I remember in about 1990 shaking my head at the first set of RockShocks I ever saw. I had the same thought's about reliability and the cost, that's history now. If these guys can keep making these things for more than a year or so I wouldn't be surprised if you saw everybody racing DH using them.
Does anyone have any information on the Tomahawk rotor that Redraven say are coming soon? IE, are any racers riding prototypes etc. ?
Cheers, Jay.
Cheers, Jay.
i think that they look ok, kinda chunky and ugly out of the mask, but in the mask its not so bad id buy a pair if i really needed, i dont and dont think i ever will but for the pro WCers i think its great for thows gnarly, slick and muddy days, try going through a greasy rock garden blind, id rather be able to see and look a bit different than fall on my face and look like a idiot and ruin my 'oh so pressious oaklys' i think thier awesome personally.
id buy a pair if i really needed, i dont and dont think i ever will but for the pro WCers i think its great for thows gnarly, slick and muddy days, try going through a greasy rock garden blind, id rather be able to see and look a bit different than fall on my face and look like a idiot and ruin my 'oh so pressious oaklys' i think thier awesome personally.
Watch the vid. With the press of a button the outer lens slides over and the mud is moved out of the way.
already used 10 years ago in the motocross and vn't work ,
u don't need everwhere chips,
more stylish in the air when u pull a tear off or pull roll off
u don't need everwhere chips,
more stylish in the air when u pull a tear off or pull roll off
yeah to bad we don't have 60 foot gaps where we have like 3 seconds to pull a tear-off. good luck trying to fumble with a tear-off or roll-off going down a DH track.
you don't need a 60ft gap idiot. One of the riders for x-fusion did it in a race this year, on film. Don't remember which one but look though the vids you'll find it.
yeah ONE rider, who happens to be a sponsored professional on top of that. last time i checked its not a normal occurrence at my local races.
Question, do they all work on the same wireless frequency? if so how far is the range? do you have to have a secure network to stop some one hacking your roll offs?
hey if someone is stupid enough to want these I bet you could flog the roll off anti virus software they dont need either to them! I am totally in the camp of the simplest ideas are the best.
[Reply]
[Reply]
[Reply]
[Reply]
[Reply]
i think its a good idea, i race motocross and hare scrambles and it really is a pain in the ass to use tear offs and roll offs. Especially in mud races becasue the bike is that much harder to ride. You dont want to be taking your hands off the controls too much.
i think it is a good idea but when i use roll off goggles they clogg up all the mud inside the left holder thing so all the mud justs breaks the goggles i wonder if this will affect the motor and also in motocross just grow some nuts and take a rip off in the air also dont need them as i am in front most of the time joke
joke
[Reply]
Who the hell need such a "toy"? People used normal googles, and they will conntinue to do so. Its not a must have thing, because.. honeslty "who" rides with his bicycle on such a dirt track?
It may be usefull for cross/atv riders.. but not for bicycle riders.
IMO~
It may be usefull for cross/atv riders.. but not for bicycle riders.
IMO~
ye, biggest waste of money ever. no need to waste £100 for something that, as a dher, you don't need. maybe 4 mx it's a gd idea, but 4 everythin else it's a bit pointless. gets my own personal thumbs down.
"Hey guys what happens when you crash and hit the side of your head? The whole purpose of a helmet is so you can hit your head without dying, this makes it so you have to avoid hitting your head."
im not sure about you dude, but most days i dont think "oh ive got a helmet on, ill hit my head" a helmet is there just in case.
im not sure about you dude, but most days i dont think "oh ive got a helmet on, ill hit my head" a helmet is there just in case.
yeah.... about that... this kinda helps you see the track and avoid hitting your head 
Very cool idea but tbh I also have a cross/dirt bike and I could only use it on a muddy dirt track while chasing other bike... at any other moment normal goggles would be enough...
Very cool idea but tbh I also have a cross/dirt bike and I could only use it on a muddy dirt track while chasing other bike... at any other moment normal goggles would be enough...
oh good most racer kids arnt coordinated enough to take a hand off the bar while moving ahahaha but its funny and stuff.
for all the people saying you would rather just use tear offs im not sure were you ride but the places i ride at kinda frown upon people who use tear offs because then they are littered all over the trail and unlike motocross were they pretty much get buried in downhill they get thrown into the woods and onto the trail and im sure could make somebody wash a tire if they hit one just right and then there stuck in the woods until trail maintnence or a kind person picks them up which is a phat chance there. just my to cents on the whole thing hate on me if you want but it makes sense to me
Post A New Comment
Why was a comment deleted?
1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
RSS
