lol Photo at lol in Glasgow, Scotland

+ 3

charliewashbrook (Dec 11, 2007 at 10:09)

wow,that is really kewl

+ 87

a-dan (Apr 17, 2008 at 20:38)

more like really useless...

+ 44

jackblack111 (Jun 16, 2008 at 21:42)

all u need is more oil

+ 33

talhaslam (Jun 16, 2008 at 21:44)

what does that do other than add more weight? that sucks

- 82

sd52bad (Jun 20, 2008 at 12:32) (Below Threshold) show comment

You suck.
Dick face.

+ 31

RobbyBriers (Oct 14, 2008 at 12:18)

This is something the A-Team must have built

+ 6

manikboi (Oct 30, 2008 at 21:03)

wow...this guy likes everything nice and thick, the tires, the rims...oh, not the mention the chain.

- 2

djing123 (Nov 9, 2008 at 0:35)

sorry i think thats usless

+ 11

crs-one (Jan 6, 2009 at 17:47)

If you have the parts lying around, why not? I'd get a kick ot of building something like that.

- 3

fread (Jan 7, 2009 at 13:14)

i think its just for fun because we can see the first sproket is broken

+ 10

cotakid (Jan 7, 2009 at 19:44)

just in case one chain breaks Wink

+ 8

JackK (Feb 2, 2009 at 13:43)

and it's also dis-associating himself with the trend whores known as the weight weenies Wink

+ 2

steve3265 (Feb 3, 2009 at 8:35)

britain fights back, well im trying that when i get spare time, keep bikes strong and heavy. Smile

+ 1

jeffrupert (Feb 9, 2009 at 13:42)

actually it takes stress off the single chain making it more resistant to brakage

+ 1

jeffrupert (Feb 9, 2009 at 13:42)

breakage**

+ 1

sd52bad (Feb 9, 2009 at 13:46)

i dunno why your all taking it so seriously..
It was obviously a joke

+ 1

brokenframezcrew (Feb 21, 2009 at 7:27)

hardcore

- 1

jimmymtbking (Feb 22, 2009 at 15:15)

make one with 10 Big Grin

+ 0

happysumo (Apr 2, 2009 at 3:36)

He must be able to squat like a family car

+ 1

kona--kid (Oct 10, 2009 at 14:44)

just cause you can doesnt mean you should...........

+ 1

steve3265 (Oct 11, 2009 at 10:36)

why?

+ 2

daaneel (Oct 24, 2009 at 21:18)

why? because he can..

+ 1

keith24mtb (Nov 1, 2009 at 18:29)

so sick

[Reply]

+ 6

wanat (Dec 11, 2007 at 10:48)

wow!!!!!!

[Reply]

+ 13

konadude101 (Dec 11, 2007 at 11:10)

what does the wheel sproket look like?

+ 13

seraph (Mar 1, 2008 at 2:42)

Probably just a cassette with 3 of the same-sized cog in a row.

+ 10

ich3 (Jun 30, 2008 at 9:22)

woah, but what if they were different sizes...

+ 3

Andrei13Street (Jul 18, 2008 at 13:56)

never thought of that. That'd be awesome!

+ 7

ericpalmer (Aug 23, 2008 at 5:18)

Not really, u'd just snap 2 of 'em real quick & be left with 1

- 11

dbox123 (Sep 6, 2008 at 3:15) (Below Threshold) show comment

I wouldn't matter if they were different sizes would it... Theres not going tobe two rear mechs!!! The ratio's would be the same even if the rear cog's were different sizes as the chain would be longer.

+ 4

mooseman414 (Sep 21, 2008 at 8:41)

HOLY SHIT

+ 5

danielbateson (Aug 4, 2009 at 3:48)

dbox123 you really dont know how gear ratios work do you!!!!!! Razz

+ 2

keith24mtb (Nov 1, 2009 at 18:30)

hahaha too right!

[Reply]

+ 40

poundem (Dec 11, 2007 at 12:26)

Awsome still unnessesary ;D

[Reply]

+ 0

danny-oli (Dec 11, 2007 at 13:59)

:O thats mint a might do that Smile

[Reply]

+ 11

alpine-star (Dec 11, 2007 at 14:04)

Alternatively get a moto chain.

+ 0

mark416 (Feb 23, 2008 at 23:20)

why

+ 9

dirtjumpur (Jun 8, 2008 at 2:30)

just as fat but not 3

[Reply]

- 7

meatman (Dec 11, 2007 at 14:04) (Below Threshold) show comment

hardtail with gazzas and 3 chains......wtf???

+ 1

jcc1015 (Dec 16, 2007 at 16:48)

whats wrong with a hardtail with gazzas?

- 5

radziuu (Dec 30, 2007 at 13:58) (Below Threshold) show comment

and what's wrong with TWO chains xD ?

- 2

radziuu (Dec 30, 2007 at 14:04)

twu... that's right... 3 chains xD

+ 0

ej2fast (Mar 12, 2009 at 9:32)

what about 1 chain lol

[Reply]

+ 6

ldeere683 (Dec 11, 2007 at 14:08)

thts a well kool idea, at least if you dump one theres 2 more to keep you goin!

[Reply]

+ 29

DAMZ (Dec 11, 2007 at 14:09)

Chainfetish!

[Reply]

- 7

camdenthekid (Dec 11, 2007 at 19:02) (Below Threshold) show comment

why the ...

[Reply]

- 6

falloftroy (Dec 12, 2007 at 8:04) (Below Threshold) show comment

why?

[Reply]

+ 8

morthiaspl (Dec 12, 2007 at 12:12)

I guess, that it's bike of some guy that's riding on the desert... He have really wide rims, and 4.0" tyres. I think he need stronger chain, 'cause riding in sand needs more power in legs, so he dont want to break it Wink

.

[Reply]

- 12

avery25 (Dec 13, 2007 at 17:22) (Below Threshold) show comment

why?

[Reply]

+ 9

heftynorcorider (Dec 13, 2007 at 21:10)

Dude! How big are you legs in order to need that!?

[Reply]

+ 0

lewism (Dec 14, 2007 at 11:04)

what you mean

+ 3

heftynorcorider (Dec 16, 2007 at 14:09)

you must have pretty strong legs to need a set up like that.

[Reply]

+ 2

dirtjump-derek (Dec 16, 2007 at 15:29)

wow!

[Reply]

+ 3

thegroanofwind (Dec 16, 2007 at 16:38)

dude snow bike.

[Reply]

+ 4

lflaatten (Dec 16, 2007 at 16:43)

can u say heavy

[Reply]

- 1

rabbithill (Dec 19, 2007 at 14:43)

thats so ghetto i love it

[Reply]

+ 1

razor0 (Dec 20, 2007 at 13:20)

Awesome dude!!

[Reply]

+ 1

benqboss (Dec 20, 2007 at 13:23)

Nice

[Reply]

+ 1

Dakssside666 (Dec 20, 2007 at 13:26)

SICK Dude !!!
Big Grin

+ 0

LewisTA26 (Apr 2, 2009 at 3:22)

polish end it.

[Reply]

+ 1

bikercc (Dec 22, 2007 at 4:55)

holy shit

[Reply]

+ 0

thomasmerali (Dec 22, 2007 at 9:31)

just get yourself a halflink chain.
your bike must be damn heavy, right?

[Reply]

+ 3

phyco666palmer (Dec 22, 2007 at 9:31)

i love it

[Reply]

- 1

CaiqueDH (Dec 22, 2007 at 12:49)

why man?!?!

[Reply]

+ 2

mechdude (Dec 26, 2007 at 5:45)

Dude thats cool, wonder how the rest of the bike looks like, How is the front end, Double disks????

+ 2

dingus (Feb 21, 2008 at 14:57)

Double disks (hope 6 pots) and a Super monster T, with sun double wides on hope Big 'Un hubs im guessing Smile

[Reply]

- 6

giantman817 (Dec 27, 2007 at 21:03) (Below Threshold) show comment

can you say the biggest waste of time ever

[Reply]

+ 0

totalbikerdude (Dec 30, 2007 at 13:53)

not realy, if one chain breaks you can still ride, i would have just done it with 2 chains, 3 mite be a little much

[Reply]

+ 1

kejor (Dec 30, 2007 at 16:42)

szal we wsi Wink

;D

[Reply]

+ 0

petaypan (Jan 2, 2008 at 8:32)

its a cool idea. bit weird but worth a try

[Reply]

- 4

prozak (Jan 2, 2008 at 8:33) (Below Threshold) show comment

useless weight

[Reply]

+ 7

nikienvo (Jan 7, 2008 at 9:59)

WHAT IS THIS? BUILD FOR FUN! I LIKE THAT!

[Reply]

- 1

hotdogprooo (Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23)

wow!!

[Reply]

- 2

kajtek007 (Jan 16, 2008 at 12:26)

I so want to do that

[Reply]

- 2

Phil-rides-a-bike (Jan 16, 2008 at 12:26)

sweet, if one chain snaps you can keep going haha, does it make it harder to pedal?

[Reply]

+ 0

Hombre3000 (Jan 16, 2008 at 14:39)

That's cool!

[Reply]

+ 1

yaybikes (Jan 30, 2008 at 5:02)

.... being a chronic weight ween
I want to die!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Reply]

+ 2

bikesrule20 (Feb 3, 2008 at 15:17)

thats weight for nothing..looks cool thought

[Reply]

- 5

benjamingreen (Feb 6, 2008 at 8:51) (Below Threshold) show comment

ye4ah its a dirt bike chain

[Reply]

+ 0

newbikesoon (Feb 9, 2008 at 15:29)

any idiea on what bike that is???

[Reply]

+ 0

mortal77 (Feb 10, 2008 at 18:54)

i guess you don't have to worry about getting a bash guard

[Reply]

+ 0

riderxbaird (Feb 12, 2008 at 17:45)

its not a dirtbike chain morons. its 3 chains with 3 different sprockets

[Reply]

- 1

p-a-r-t-y (Feb 14, 2008 at 6:32)

chainsaw

[Reply]

- 1

stinkyboymatty (Feb 15, 2008 at 13:55)

im gona try that Razz

[Reply]

- 3

vernhuckdogg (Feb 15, 2008 at 15:40)

Gay.

[Reply]

- 6

giantstpSS (Feb 15, 2008 at 16:07) (Below Threshold) show comment

i wonder what the master link looks like

[Reply]

- 3

Csight (Feb 16, 2008 at 2:07)

still need bushguard :X

[Reply]

+ 1

santacruzer1 (Feb 17, 2008 at 10:23)

wouldent that be hard to pedal if your cain is tight

[Reply]

- 1

dingus (Feb 21, 2008 at 14:58)

How big is ur chain tool?

[Reply]

+ 1

scottboxxer (Feb 22, 2008 at 5:00)

Oooooooh shit!

[Reply]

+ 0

shreded (Feb 23, 2008 at 13:34)

:0

[Reply]

+ 0

staa150 (Feb 23, 2008 at 15:47)

thats fkn awesome

[Reply]

- 1

insanebiker661 (Feb 23, 2008 at 19:15)

jesus big chain much? wtf is that

[Reply]

+ 1

Spcialzd (Mar 1, 2008 at 2:42)

its 3 different chains on 3 different sprockets

[Reply]

+ 0

crazystorm (Mar 3, 2008 at 8:00)

crazy homage this one as of more

[Reply]

+ 0

Derdevii (Mar 9, 2008 at 8:20)

LoooooooooooooooooL xD

[Reply]

+ 0

tydirtbike (Mar 17, 2008 at 19:16)

talk about hevy duty

[Reply]

+ 0

twalms (Mar 22, 2008 at 16:34)

Why??

[Reply]

+ 0

atomikboy (Mar 23, 2008 at 16:43)

some bodys dumb

[Reply]

+ 0

A-Martin (Mar 23, 2008 at 16:46)

weight!!!

[Reply]

+ 0

krizz (Mar 23, 2008 at 16:56)

hahah totaly bombproof set Big Grin

[Reply]

+ 0

geldart (Mar 23, 2008 at 17:01)

3 is SOO overkill. 2 would be a good idea cause theres no way you could snap them and three is just extra weight

[Reply]

+ 0

collin7 (Mar 25, 2008 at 16:50)

haha baller!

[Reply]

+ 0

hodges (Mar 30, 2008 at 6:20)

Um.... FANTASTICALLY DUMB

[Reply]

- 2

mbcbulldog (Mar 30, 2008 at 6:25)

WTF??

[Reply]

- 5

Streetridesteez (Mar 30, 2008 at 12:01) (Below Threshold) show comment

that is so f*cking , gay its just more f*cking weight

[Reply]

+ 0

christianh (Mar 30, 2008 at 12:03)

whats the point of that ?

[Reply]

+ 0

bmx31 (Mar 30, 2008 at 12:03)

not nessisary

[Reply]

+ 0

Unikown1 (Apr 4, 2008 at 10:48)

wow!!

[Reply]

+ 0

JimmyLundberg (Apr 5, 2008 at 12:02)

cool but still not Razz

[Reply]

+ 1

banshee-ripper (Apr 7, 2008 at 16:29)

That's phucking sick! At first glimpse of the thumbnail, I thought it was a belt drive!

[Reply]

+ 0

stinkyboymatty (Apr 7, 2008 at 16:39)

im trying that now lol

[Reply]

+ 1

mongoosebmx (Apr 16, 2008 at 10:37)

why

[Reply]

+ 0

Pysio (Apr 16, 2008 at 11:56)

Wow!

[Reply]

- 8

chromag (Apr 16, 2008 at 14:35) (Below Threshold) show comment

wow thats gay it would make ur bike heavyer and it looks dumb

[Reply]

- 7

pS-P-TO-D-Km (Apr 17, 2008 at 17:49) (Below Threshold) show comment

where bender bikes and arnold swartzanegger meet...

[Reply]

- 1

marvelous (Apr 23, 2008 at 4:30)

its cool looking cause nobody did it before but its definatly useless, just adds weight.

[Reply]

- 1

krool (Apr 26, 2008 at 13:40)

hahahahhahahaha lol

[Reply]

+ 0

leesoutham33 (May 1, 2008 at 7:42)

all the people sayaing it adds more weight, think, how much does a chain weigh, i think its cool

+ 0

aiken (Jul 18, 2008 at 13:57)

mate a chain is a pretty heavy part of a bike excluding the main large components.

[Reply]

- 3

transitionboy (May 9, 2008 at 2:51)

thats so f*ckin cool

[Reply]

- 2

laserprosto (May 9, 2008 at 2:53)

omg...

[Reply]

- 2

robyboulianne (May 13, 2008 at 18:53)

ingenius

[Reply]

+ 2

jackbrowc (May 24, 2008 at 5:53)

"all the people sayaing it adds more weight, think, how much does a chain weigh, i think its cool" -leesoutham33

a chain weighs a shitload, you idiot. with 2 EXTRA chains, 2 EXTRA chainrings, and 2 EXTRA sprockets, it's probably an extra 2 lbs.

[Reply]

+ 0

notloc (May 26, 2008 at 16:59)

lol, thats tufff good if you break a link still got two more chains to go haha

[Reply]

+ 0

dylanstone (May 27, 2008 at 16:27)

so gay

[Reply]

+ 0

misfitsbrandon (May 27, 2008 at 16:28)

woah,
but a halflink chain hahahah

[Reply]

+ 0

specializedrules123 (May 27, 2008 at 16:31)

LMFAO 2 pounds jackbrowc. thats nothing. dont be a bitch. are u seriously saying that thats a shitload. anyways it looks cool.

[Reply]

+ 0

matt6793 (May 28, 2008 at 3:33)

good luck snappin that!

[Reply]

+ 0

machin-mtb (May 28, 2008 at 12:56)

WOW !

[Reply]

+ 0

revilosp2 (May 29, 2008 at 3:33)

holy shit

[Reply]

+ 0

bmx31 (Jun 2, 2008 at 15:15)

just a way to gain more weight.

[Reply]

+ 2

Phelix (Jun 17, 2008 at 5:34)

3 chains??????????

[Reply]

+ 0

jackhayward (Jun 17, 2008 at 7:34)

WHY???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

[Reply]

+ 0

MJDDUNNING (Jun 22, 2008 at 19:22)

what gave u the idea for that?

[Reply]

+ 0

loku1 (Jun 23, 2008 at 7:46)

3 chains... why? for what?

is it working? Razz

make photo of rear wheel

[Reply]

+ 0

konastuff13 (Jul 1, 2008 at 12:02)

that will pull well good..

[Reply]

+ 0

GarethC (Jul 17, 2008 at 9:56)

lewis was this POD or sumfin

[Reply]

+ 0

eetu (Jul 23, 2008 at 4:36)

LOL!!!

[Reply]

+ 0

Ben95 (Jul 28, 2008 at 15:03)

That suck hard

[Reply]

+ 0

trunkmonkey12 (Jul 30, 2008 at 10:31)

just think if u break a chain u got 2 more

[Reply]

+ 0

mavster (Aug 14, 2008 at 7:01)

chain growth on the nearest chain sucky

dude get the back end of that up

NOW

[Reply]

+ 0

beliveauDH (Aug 16, 2008 at 6:57)

it would work just like gearing on a mountain bike if you put 3 difrent sized sprokets on the back....in the easy pedalng like up hills the smallest sprockt would catch first but then when you pedal harder it would go to the next sproket

+ 0

ericpalmer (Aug 23, 2008 at 5:26)

not really man, when u pedal it'll catch on the smaller sprocket, turn the wheel & either snap the other 2 or u'll just not go very far... ur wheel cant turn 3 different speeds at the same time, so it wont work unless u mod the crap out of it.

[Reply]

+ 1

devinci-rider1 (Aug 16, 2008 at 23:27)

i for one think thats pretty kik asss y people hating thats pimpin

[Reply]

+ 0

kondon (Oct 19, 2008 at 5:50)

Nice

[Reply]

+ 1

Enjoythisride (Oct 30, 2008 at 17:28)

u s e l e s s

[Reply]

+ 0

joepersson (Nov 4, 2008 at 12:59)

WOW that must make you go at superspeed or something much easier to do backflips aswell good idea

[Reply]

+ 0

Dean-Wilson1 (Nov 25, 2008 at 13:13)

he probly keeps on snapping chains so he has got 3

[Reply]

+ 0

fireball-92 (Dec 6, 2008 at 10:24)

does it actually work ?

[Reply]

+ 0

lewism (Dec 6, 2008 at 10:32)

yeah it does

[Reply]

+ 0

T4neL (Jan 9, 2009 at 13:37)

To save weight you took off the pedals? Big Grin

[Reply]

+ 0

charliewashbrook (Jan 10, 2009 at 12:44)

you guys slag it off but at the end of the day, its a cool mod and fairly origional, and despite there being no real advantage if you wana make something wacko on your bike then why not? its cool.

[Reply]

+ 1

freeride-maverick (Jan 15, 2009 at 12:35)

WTF!!!! thats soo cool Big Grin

looks like a tank!!!

[Reply]

- 1

dwlinkage (Jan 22, 2009 at 14:53)

Wouldn't it be better if you just bought a spare chain incase 1 snaps, this idea is a joke it's so pointless

[Reply]

+ 0

me2menow (Jan 22, 2009 at 17:48)

wut the.....

[Reply]

+ 0

nicolai-helius-freerider (Feb 2, 2009 at 10:43)

:0

[Reply]

+ 2

wethepeople4life (Feb 2, 2009 at 13:37)

benders chain?

[Reply]

+ 0

AOTP (Feb 2, 2009 at 15:18)

thats pointless, add weight and more money

[Reply]

+ 1

daza (Feb 2, 2009 at 15:21)

that chain is ace i wnt 1

[Reply]

+ 0

Sotarn (Feb 2, 2009 at 15:22)

Haha, nice work.. kinda stupid tho... unless you trying to make a Harley..

[Reply]

- 1

sebastian1193 (Feb 8, 2009 at 11:13)

he must have snapped a few chains to think of doing that

[Reply]

+ 0

g-man27 (Feb 17, 2009 at 19:11)

thats gotta be a beefy bike. the tire looks fatter too

[Reply]

+ 0

downhilling (Mar 12, 2009 at 9:28)

whats the point of that?

[Reply]

+ 1

demo9er (Mar 26, 2009 at 13:50)

Im so tired of this F-ING pic! it sooo stupid!

[Reply]

+ 1

Christian-norco (Apr 17, 2009 at 13:26)

those it work good?

[Reply]

+ 1

dirtjumpdan (Jun 16, 2009 at 6:41)

I love how worked up every gets over pictures like this..

f*gs..

[Reply]

+ 1

wildcard1 (Jun 29, 2009 at 19:00)

omg...indestructible!! but heavy and useless lol

[Reply]

+ 1

spox82 (Jul 22, 2009 at 4:58)

Poco trzy napędy? Big Grin

Aby zbędny cieżar nic więcej Smile

Mi wystarczy jeden pożądny Big Grin

[Reply]

+ 1

lewism (Jul 22, 2009 at 5:08)

yes and i no what that mean hhhhjhhhmmmmmmm nat

[Reply]

+ 1

jarrod12 (Aug 6, 2009 at 4:24)

wtf?!?!

[Reply]

+ 1

STINKY-MINTY-1 (Aug 13, 2009 at 11:41)

can i ask what the point in this is

[Reply]

+ 1

Dickinson (Oct 1, 2009 at 14:13)

2 Times As Fast Whooop

[Reply]

173 Comments