crazy bike!!

39 Comments

  • + 0
flag gabees (Feb 8, 2008 at 12:50)
wow..... two break in front Razz
  • + 5
flag LostAndConfused (Mar 7, 2008 at 8:28)
Not to mention the two shocks at the rear.
  • + 5
flag gibson243 (Aug 17, 2008 at 21:13)
Its said that 70% of your braking power comes form your front brake. Maybe that has something to do with it.
  • + 3
flag fr112358 (May 5, 2009 at 16:27)
The front brakes are more effective, because that is your conventional direction of travel. Roll backwards and magically your rear brake is the stronger one.
[Reply]
  • - 6
flag diebel7 (Feb 8, 2008 at 12:50) (Below Threshold) show comment
dual from brake.. you'd never need that
[Reply]
  • - 8
flag jh91 (Feb 8, 2008 at 12:52) (Below Threshold) show comment
well well isn't that the one i have on my profile, sweet bike hey?, were did you find that anyway?
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag spikeybiker (Feb 8, 2008 at 14:23)
richi r beasts
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag eder (Feb 8, 2008 at 14:27)
Remember a Brooklyn, but with gear box. Very good.
P.S.: I don't use my p... for f... bikes, but girls.
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag atomikboy (Feb 8, 2008 at 17:41)
thats a monster
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag atomikboy (Feb 8, 2008 at 17:41)
wtf two front disks
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag konarrider2007 (Feb 8, 2008 at 18:02)
that is sweet
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag streetsbecrazy (Feb 8, 2008 at 22:36)
very similar to old brooklyn machine works design
[Reply]
  • + 5
flag hoshi (Feb 8, 2008 at 23:01)
Yeah Richi... German Engineering
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag stefanJB (Feb 9, 2008 at 12:24)
the reason it has to front discs is because once you reach a high speed downhill your rear brake can be almost useless and it will take more power in the front to help you..but anyways really sweet bike
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag sqrleprle (Feb 12, 2008 at 11:19)
how much would this bike go for, and why is there no guard for the shock since it is so close to the tire. I am sure that it would get nailed like crazy with mud and rocks.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag fantaman (Feb 13, 2008 at 2:32)
The bike cost 12000 euro
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag wowxl00k1tsgr33n (Feb 15, 2008 at 6:50)
the only thing youll need those brakes for is an extreme stoppy
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag ragdoll (Mar 1, 2008 at 17:08)
the head angle looks a little steep, looks like it had a front on crash!!
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag SpeshAllDay (Mar 5, 2008 at 16:59)
The two brakes are becuase the there is not connection between the two legs of the forks. This allows for mor travel but could be flimsy. Having a brake on each side of the wheel prevents asymetrical braking force that would normaly twist the fork.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag StevePrice (Mar 6, 2008 at 13:18)
head are a failed sports company
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag kzuma (Mar 7, 2008 at 8:24)
i wonder what it weighs
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag dowst (Mar 22, 2008 at 7:40)
The bike itself is horribly designed. 8"(+) of travel on a 2.0" stroke shock? It's no wonder why they have to use two shocks to make the bike perform marginally well with a 1:4(+) leverage ratio...

Cool concept, poor execution
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag BIGC93 (Mar 22, 2008 at 10:29)
agreed
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag bawzofsteel (Mar 29, 2008 at 14:13)
that is just gay....nothing else to say
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag djrider2 (Apr 3, 2008 at 15:52)
im in love Razz
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag lucacometti (Apr 14, 2008 at 20:08)
i love pissing people off
[Reply]
  • + 5
flag victor9874 (Apr 14, 2008 at 20:12)
do you??? go and piss off your mama!!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Mr-Stevens (Apr 15, 2008 at 6:32)
I want that bikeRazz
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag rossgirvan (Apr 29, 2008 at 12:38)
Awefull looking and engineered bike if you ask me
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag powderoflavancher (May 3, 2008 at 11:47)
f**** the double rotor Smile
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag he11uvagoodtyme (Aug 17, 2008 at 21:15)
hmm. didn't a certain someone who used to ride for Rocky mountain end up with this company... someone correct me if i'm thinking of someone else. Is this in production or a proto?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag he11uvagoodtyme (Aug 17, 2008 at 21:17)
way off. should have researched first
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag tomazin (Nov 8, 2008 at 13:25)
my opinion...ugly bike
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag terrance (Nov 23, 2008 at 19:45)
would love to own that bike
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag downhillscotty (Dec 16, 2008 at 12:54)
thats relly dume
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag israeldias (Dec 16, 2008 at 13:00)
wow..... two break in front
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag fredydh (Jan 7, 2009 at 3:49)
strange..
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag zachnunes (Nov 2, 2009 at 1:48)
wow this is not beefy compaired to what i hade.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Mitchellg321 (Nov 21, 2009 at 18:07)
that would be as heavy as a whale
[Reply]

Post A New Comment
Why was a comment deleted?

1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
Bold Italic Link


United States Ellicott City, Maryland, United States

3318 views | 39 comments | 123 faves


Date: 2008-02-08
Trail: ....
Riders: .....
Description: crazy bike!!
Picture Folder Add to my Favorites
Photo Img Make my Pod

| More