Last time i designed a rear fork concept bike... and now heres one more... with much better technology ;-)... Death proof cycle... now make suicide attempts your hobby..
  • + 8 props
flag deberguknottignham (February 29, 2008 at 13:03) (Below Threshold) show comment
i think its terrible sry
  • + 2 props
flag sam4412 (July 22, 2008 at 15:55) (Below Threshold) show comment
Agreed, One a good setup shock will cost you alot less and do the job alot better! yes i no its a joke, just one my gran would say... and 2 the linkage on your rear end is far to complicated and 3 were as a shock holds on jumps the wieght of that oversized wheel and gravity will put so much strain on th "rear forks" causing the stanctions to probably be forced from the forks!
  • + 13 props
flag briandepro (February 29, 2008 at 13:08) (Below Threshold) show comment
your rear fork concept wont werk it will break your 66. insted of damping when you ride it wil pul the rear fork if you get what i mean :p
  • + 3 props
flag spds (February 29, 2008 at 16:47) (Below Threshold) show comment
indeed $)
  • + 0 props
flag shredbag (September 26, 2008 at 15:45) (Below Threshold) show comment
ya i saw that too
  • + 0 props
flag teddyeddy (September 30, 2008 at 12:28) (Below Threshold) show comment
yer
  • + 0 props
flag vineet (February 29, 2008 at 13:12) (Below Threshold) show comment
Well... The design is intended for sick f*ck suicidal drop .. you know what i mean..... so thats why i had to put so much insanity ;-)
  • - 6 props
flag suckafreedmr (February 29, 2008 at 13:54) (Below Threshold) show comment
yeah not really, you do know that a 66 has only 180mm of trv. why so your bike has very little travel for what its intended for
  • + 2 props
flag kurvarider (May 20, 2008 at 14:54) (Below Threshold) show comment
that wasnt very well thought out lol
  • + 1 props
flag mmmmmmsexualp1 (July 8, 2008 at 13:31) (Below Threshold) show comment
suckafreedmr. how f*cking stupid are you? take a v10 for example, does it have a 10 inch shock? no you numpty! it all depends on the linkages
  • - 4 props
flag wyatt-earp (February 29, 2008 at 13:52) (Below Threshold) show comment
KTM!!!
  • + 4 props
flag alexbman (February 29, 2008 at 13:53) (Below Threshold) show comment
i think its pretty cool actually
  • - 1 props
flag mkirk05 (February 29, 2008 at 16:29) (Below Threshold) show comment
pretty sure it looks like the linkage is going to pull on the fork...not compress it... and plus, that forks wide, so you'd be hitting your legs on it all the time, and its useless extra weight, just use a normal bike like everyone else
  • - 3 props
flag mgolabek1991 (March 1, 2008 at 0:10) (Below Threshold) show comment
o uuu yeah damper id marzocchi 66 RC2x?? POD
  • - 6 props
flag mgolabek1991 (March 1, 2008 at 0:10) (Below Threshold) show comment
sorry its not 66 RC2X ...it`s TOTEM 180 mm
  • + 1 props
flag seraph (March 1, 2008 at 3:16) (Below Threshold) show comment
No, it's a Marzocchi. Try using your eyes next time.
  • + 0 props
flag slivkens (March 1, 2008 at 3:16) (Below Threshold) show comment
i think that will be heavy
  • + 2 props
flag Mingermouse (March 1, 2008 at 8:48) (Below Threshold) show comment
this is actually rubbish, and not very well done either...
  • + 0 props
flag ninjavillian (March 1, 2008 at 14:54) (Below Threshold) show comment
CANT ANYONE TAKE A JOKE?
SERIOUSLY!
  • + 1 props
flag shubhamgupta1990 (March 1, 2008 at 19:05) (Below Threshold) show comment
get a motor bike
  • + 1 props
flag gadmack (March 2, 2008 at 10:43) (Below Threshold) show comment
It's YOUR time you're wasting..
  • + 1 props
flag ziegele (March 5, 2008 at 19:36) (Below Threshold) show comment
hella long
  • + 1 props
flag jaycubb (March 6, 2008 at 12:16) (Below Threshold) show comment
lol 66's vs dhx 5.0 this could make an interesting forum topic
!
  • + 0 props
flag squeak69 (March 10, 2008 at 12:55) (Below Threshold) show comment
f'n wheel base wow
  • + 1 props
flag Mingermouse (March 14, 2008 at 12:13) (Below Threshold) show comment
Stop doin these rubbish photshops of stupid make up 'DEATH PROOF' bikes that look like crap, and are completely unproportional..

PLUS, forksa re designed to be on a wheel, not part of some cruddy, half assed frame..

if you wana do somethin worth while, learn CAD and do that.. then you'll actually make some money, if you stop puttin ridiculuously stupid parts on ur rubbish, ass faced designs
  • + 0 props
flag Mingermouse (March 18, 2008 at 12:29) (Below Threshold) show comment
Might aswell get a motocross than settle for this junk...
  • + 2 props
flag brandon-d (March 30, 2008 at 19:03) (Below Threshold) show comment
Yor pivots make it so it will just pull on the fork.

all aboard the fail boat!
  • - 2 props
flag suicidedownhiller (May 12, 2008 at 20:10) (Below Threshold) show comment
I ride for karpiel, I'm the featured rider on karpiel.com, and they have never heard of your deigns, but nice try.
  • + 0 props
flag hendu (May 27, 2008 at 20:27) (Below Threshold) show comment
ok for the guy above prove it for the pic hte crown will get in the way and instead of like folding triangle thing behind the fork why not directley atttach it to the bottom of the fork?
  • + 0 props
flag ridetolive666 (August 13, 2008 at 14:17) (Below Threshold) show comment
bender?
  • + 0 props
flag kyman09 (August 16, 2008 at 18:52) (Below Threshold) show comment
I think it's sweet man I don't care what all the other people say it's basically a dirt bike without the engine but it's sweet keep up the good work
  • + 0 props
flag eXoT (September 14, 2008 at 8:01) (Below Threshold) show comment
ugly
  • + 1 props
flag pakito (September 17, 2008 at 12:42) (Below Threshold) show comment
sick

Post A New Comment
Bold Italic Link

Chandigarh, India

3120 views | 33 comments | 66 faves


Trail: Suicidal rider
Riders: Karpeil Slurpee
Description: Last time i designed a rear fork concept bike... and now heres one more... with much better technology ;-)... Death proof cycle... now make suicide attempts your hobby..
Add to my Favorites
Make my Pod