no one Photo at my computer in Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States

+ 17

jonslater (Jun 4, 2008 at 16:35)

micro!!

- 2

newbikesoon (Apr 15, 2009 at 21:18)

hahaa. ther chainring alomst touches the ground

- 1

B1LL15 (Apr 25, 2009 at 22:37)

that must be a damn insane gear

+ 0

dirtjumping11 (Jun 6, 2009 at 19:38)

i wonder what would happen if i hit a jump with that

+ 8

erik74 (Jun 23, 2009 at 18:47)

you'd end up on the moon at the speed you'd be going.

- 3

tankcomander (Jul 8, 2009 at 17:57)

i bet it fells like theres no chain

+ 3

jonslater (Jul 8, 2009 at 18:55)

you're an idiot, fellow above this.

+ 2

adamsride2 (Aug 10, 2009 at 16:55)

haha you could all it a 3 wheller.. Razz

+ 1

lukeknight (Aug 21, 2009 at 14:36)

tank commander do u know anything about bikes, it wouldnt be slack it would be as stiff as f*ck, f*ck me my m8 runs 9-42 and i thought that was stiff!

+ 0

erik74 (Aug 21, 2009 at 14:47)

9:42 is extremely light.

+ 1

lukeknight (Aug 21, 2009 at 14:50)

no its not normally people run 9:25

+ 1

lukeknight (Aug 21, 2009 at 14:50)

9t driver 25t front

+ 1

erik74 (Aug 21, 2009 at 14:53)

no, normal people run 25:9.

+ 1

lukeknight (Aug 21, 2009 at 14:59)

^^ i corrected myself!

+ 1

erik74 (Aug 21, 2009 at 15:10)

you never said 25:9, you just wrote out what each number was supposed to stand for...

+ 1

lukeknight (Aug 21, 2009 at 15:17)

no i wrote 25t driver (that means rear over here) and 25t front how much more could i say!

+ 1

erik74 (Aug 21, 2009 at 15:35)

k, 25:9 means 25t sprocket, 9t driver, cog, etc. 9:25 is the opposite, 9t sprocket, 25t driver/cog.

+ 1

lukeknight (Aug 21, 2009 at 15:38)

yes i then ai 9t driver 25t front, i corrected myself !

+ 1

erik74 (Aug 21, 2009 at 15:58)

ya, but now you know how to tell people ratios correctly so that doesnt matter.

[Reply]

+ 1

pinet666 (Jun 4, 2008 at 16:38)

Jesus, what a beauty

+ 16

matt-p (Jul 7, 2008 at 12:08)

i bet e13 dont make a bash big enough for this!

+ 5

dray (Jan 2, 2009 at 21:13)

suck to get your pants caught in that

[Reply]

- 26

hotdogprooo (Jun 4, 2008 at 16:41) (Below Threshold) show comment

man that gearing would be sick for trials

+ 11

shredbag (Jun 4, 2008 at 16:44)

hahaha, no but you could go like 60 on flat if you got it going

- 2

Gunnar (Sep 27, 2008 at 12:44)

The worlds fastest fixie skid with this thing.

[Reply]

+ 15

evantib (Jun 4, 2008 at 16:49)

why is the fork is backwards?

- 1

rowerrr (Dec 13, 2008 at 3:56)

to make the bike weird a bit Wink

- 1

spag (Dec 18, 2008 at 20:15)

also the front wheel is smaller then the back

+ 3

bradownie (Feb 2, 2009 at 7:58)

I think the reversed fork would make the bike a little twitchier (more like track geo), and it also raises the front end to provide more clearance for that monster ring. I'm guessing there were clearance issues with a 700c wheel as well, so the 650 makes sense.

[Reply]

- 11

bikemile003 (Jun 7, 2008 at 9:40) (Below Threshold) show comment

maybe because when it is on the right side the fork hit the wheels ...^^^^

+ 3

xt-shreder (Sep 4, 2008 at 18:17)

that wakes no sence

+ 3

xt-shreder (Sep 4, 2008 at 18:17)

nor does that^^ makes**

[Reply]

- 2

enduro32 (Jun 7, 2008 at 11:19)

fajnie komin uciety obrecze maviki siodlo slim widel od krizza opony stretowe hehehe xd

+ 2

dirtjumping11 (Jun 6, 2009 at 19:40)

who what in the what now

+ 1

lukeknight (Aug 21, 2009 at 14:37)

lol

[Reply]

- 9

kazmateusz (Jun 7, 2008 at 13:56) (Below Threshold) show comment

I think good for 4x Big Grin

lol> xD

[Reply]

+ 7

dmrbikerboy (Jun 8, 2008 at 11:10)

the forks backwards for chainring ground clearence.... could get rather close while turning right otherwise...

- 1

NORCO-MAN-won (May 3, 2009 at 13:53)

left

+ 0

DHBANSHEE (Jul 15, 2009 at 11:34)

FAIL! ^^^

+ 2

Mazekwon (Jul 17, 2009 at 7:56)

well maybe they should inflate the front tire that helps too....

+ 0

DHBANSHEE (Jul 17, 2009 at 9:48)

uhhh... ya'll are missing the point... take the damn chainring off... it would be too hard to pedal you couldnt even ride it on flat... you could only ride it on downhill, if you could find a road long enough to even get going on it fast enough to hold your balance... its stupid.

+ 2

Mazekwon (Jul 17, 2009 at 10:32)

just stand up and start pumping Wink

+ 0

DHBANSHEE (Jul 17, 2009 at 11:05)

i wish it was that simple...

+ 1

willbikeforbeer (Aug 19, 2009 at 13:54)

I would think that there isn't enough chain wrap on the rear cog so it would slip. I'd guess the bike is more of a gag than anything and was never intended to be ridden

[Reply]

- 9

dhrunner (Jun 17, 2008 at 12:01) (Below Threshold) show comment

Whats the point of going super fast when you can't stop. I dont see any breaks...or maybe its a coaster

[Reply]

+ 1

mrbflow (Jun 22, 2008 at 10:25)

omg you can reach 100mph with that chaindrive

[Reply]

- 1

benjamindoucett (Jun 27, 2008 at 3:42)

Nice fork. It's on backwards haha.

[Reply]

- 1

BIGC93 (Aug 21, 2008 at 19:29)

that chainring is like the size of the front rim :0

[Reply]

- 9

i-bicycle (Aug 26, 2008 at 21:43) (Below Threshold) show comment

fork is backwards

[Reply]

- 5

traildigger15 (Aug 27, 2008 at 16:15) (Below Threshold) show comment

that is the best track bike ever

[Reply]

+ 1

mtbKELSEY (Aug 28, 2008 at 10:11)

haha dhrunner theres no coaster its a fixie, that means theres no brakes or freewheel, im not sure why theyd want to go that fast but riding a regular fixie is really fun

[Reply]

- 2

nickf (Sep 19, 2008 at 17:55)

that bike was specidically made for breaking speed records. the rider stays behind a truck the entire time to reduce most wind drag

[Reply]

+ 2

blubberboy99 (Sep 26, 2008 at 19:09)

front tires flat

[Reply]

- 1

acdcrocks (Nov 18, 2008 at 12:48)

haha its almost tuchin the ground
that things a beast

[Reply]

+ 1

corbinder69 (Dec 19, 2008 at 17:43)

what the shit?

[Reply]

+ 1

mdew (Dec 23, 2008 at 20:46)

wtf? 100-16 gearing? that sprocket is bigger than a bmx wheel!

+ 0

BryanM12 (Jan 11, 2009 at 19:06)

na it looks like a 25t or 23t...im not sure

+ 2

NORCO-MAN-won (Apr 14, 2009 at 6:18)

+ 1

bigslope3 (Aug 13, 2009 at 16:43)

Haha, probably more like a 1000t...

[Reply]

+ 0

NORCO-MAN-won (Apr 15, 2009 at 5:58)

i could make a bigger chainring altho i would need to mod the frame

[Reply]

+ 1

brodie-rider55 (Apr 15, 2009 at 19:54)

its almost the size of the tire!!!

+ 0

brodie-rider55 (Apr 18, 2009 at 23:06)

i made a bike like this on bike cad Razz

[Reply]

+ 2

cinnamonride (Apr 15, 2009 at 21:17)

Make this pod , just for the laughs Razz

[Reply]

+ 4

dirtjumpmat (Apr 29, 2009 at 11:32)

most people are worried about catching the bottom of thier jeans in thier sprocket i would be worried about catching my dick in that

+ 2

Tubux (Apr 30, 2009 at 15:14)

ha ha sick

+ 4

NORCO-MAN-won (May 1, 2009 at 6:30)

what dick? the one u never had?

+ 6

a11222333 (May 18, 2009 at 11:15)

dirtjumpmat you just got powned

[Reply]

+ 1

Maksimbike (May 25, 2009 at 21:02)

what, the, fugh!

[Reply]

+ 2

Stanstanliu (Jun 8, 2009 at 16:09)

The bike is pregnant

[Reply]

+ 2

f0n888 (Jul 1, 2009 at 14:01)

you would grind your god damn legs off

[Reply]

+ 1

killsdeer4fun (Jul 9, 2009 at 21:31)

That thing looks near impossible to pedal unless you start on a hill.

[Reply]

+ 1

paweuek (Aug 1, 2009 at 15:39)

Microdrive xD

[Reply]

+ 2

mRl3309 (Aug 21, 2009 at 6:05)

does any one know if this bike would drop-in straight on a qauterpipe

[Reply]

+ 1

subby (Aug 21, 2009 at 13:52)

if think it needs a chain guard

[Reply]

+ 1

lukeknight (Aug 21, 2009 at 14:38)

imagine that chainring on a bmx, f*ck me it would be grinding like never before Big Grin

[Reply]

+ 1

lukeknight (Aug 21, 2009 at 14:39)

if that chainring was copper youd be as rich as f*ck!

[Reply]

+ 1

mRl3309 (Aug 21, 2009 at 14:49)

that must take 3-4 chains

[Reply]

+ 1

torrent172 (Oct 4, 2009 at 17:14)

thats one kick ass chain ring

[Reply]

+ 1

jam-unam (Oct 4, 2009 at 17:48)

lol

[Reply]

+ 1

domj123 (Oct 16, 2009 at 14:33)

1 PEDAL WULD PROBZ GET U A MILE!

[Reply]

+ 1

scottchad4704 (Oct 16, 2009 at 15:18)

bit over reactin dom

[Reply]

+ 1

Traveens (Oct 24, 2009 at 18:47)

drop in with that. ahah

[Reply]

82 Comments