my retro 1998 yeti lawwill 6

26 Comments

  • + 0
flag Haarlem (Sep 29, 2008 at 13:46)
very retrooo
  • + 2
flag EmteeHayze (Jul 28, 2009 at 9:40)
Sorry can someone explain to me how the frame works, i cant get my head round it :S
  • + 1
flag andy9 (Aug 9, 2009 at 12:24)
pull shock
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag marquis (Sep 30, 2008 at 0:47)
classic old school.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag lel-95 (Oct 6, 2008 at 14:00)
wow do u still use it
  • + 0
flag tom-harrison (Oct 7, 2008 at 2:40)
the girlfriend does. we were at glentress on sunday.
  • + 0
flag lel-95 (Oct 7, 2008 at 7:01)
never been is it good
  • + 1
flag godofRock (May 29, 2009 at 4:59)
glentress is f*cking well good
  • - 2
flag AnDY-KoNa (Aug 3, 2009 at 13:37)
Well good for noobs Rolleyes
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag bikeitallaround (Nov 9, 2008 at 21:25)
Man i wish my retro project was a downhill. nice ride.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag BikerBrown (May 28, 2009 at 13:36)
what travel are the forks and whats the spec please: ??
  • + 1
flag tom-harrison (May 29, 2009 at 8:13)
6 inches front and rear. forks are manitou x-vert carbons with carbon legs and oil bath damping.
it's got loads of retro kit like cook brothers cranks, michelin wildgripper DH's, ringle pedals.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag brad1001 (May 28, 2009 at 15:05)
lol...my pal had one of those.and that was a few years ago!...lol
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag cutthathair (Jun 4, 2009 at 2:22)
a classic mate, very nice!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag feck (Jun 17, 2009 at 16:32)
Check out rotec bikes they use the lawill swingarm design aswell, nice to see the comparisons.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag beefyb (Jun 21, 2009 at 23:23)
would look good next to my dh 9
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag charge-rider (Jul 19, 2009 at 10:58)
I'm confused by the rear sus...
Does it pull it or something?
  • + 1
flag tom-harrison (Jul 19, 2009 at 11:04)
yeah its a rock shox pull shock
  • + 1
flag charge-rider (Jul 19, 2009 at 11:07)
How odd..
Does it work as well as a normal shock?
  • + 1
flag tom-harrison (Jul 19, 2009 at 11:09)
yeah just the same. still has a coil spring and oil damping and loads of adjustment and stuff. it's on ebay just in case you're interested!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag lel-95 (Jul 20, 2009 at 12:17)
is their an advantage with a pull shock, or no diffrence?
  • + 2
flag tom-harrison (Jul 20, 2009 at 13:14)
well this is what ancillotti reckon
"Pull rather than Push a rather simple but important concept.
The starting point is the premise that Pull or Push are not at all the same, indeed, for certain applications it is just not possible to use the Push system.

Just consider that it would be practically impossible to construct a no-Pull parachute
You would be surprised if you saw a car that pushed a trailer or caravan instead of pulling it.

Why do you think all the long modern bridges subjected to strong winds etc, are suspended by cables, that is to say they are Pull, and not based on arches, a Push system?

The weight of the structure and the vehicles that travel on it, centers and equalizes with respect to lateral forces thanks to being suspended by cables, something that would not happen with a Push system arch.

This holds true for the rear swing arm of your motorcycle or bicycle.
In travel, lateral forces that act on the swing arm are already very strong, in addition it also has to bear the charging of the suspension system, this cannot but influence strongly the directional alignment of the rear wheel attached to it.


In the final analysis, the suspension loading system applied to the swing arm translates into a better or worse alignment and directional stability of the rear wheels.

If the force of the suspension system is applied with the Pull System the swing arm will automatically tend to stabilize and self center. Moreover, the size of the pull rod with respect to the rafter can be reduced, with functional benefits for the lesser weight of the mass not suspended.

On the contrary the Push system tends to develop bending and flexing in the lateral parts and needs a heavier push rod to try to counteract these inevitable effects.

Successively, in the following 25 years this Pull Shock system has progressively been adopted by almost all motorcycle manufactures (the Japanese above all.)"
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag jackorbetter (Jul 23, 2009 at 2:41)
Oh Lawwill, I still remember those days Smile
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Patta123 (Aug 1, 2009 at 1:04)
mate u would get more on ebay for this i think because its a merchandise not a bike which should be rode lol :p
  • + 1
flag tom-harrison (Aug 1, 2009 at 12:55)
yeah got £1000 on ebay. not bad!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag hardtaildh08 (Oct 25, 2009 at 13:34)
thats insane i want it
[Reply]

Post A New Comment
Why was a comment deleted?

1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
Bold Italic Link


United Kingdom Sunderland, United Kingdom

1210 views | 26 comments | 30 faves


Date: 2008-09-29
Trail: none
Riders: none
Description: my retro 1998 yeti lawwill 6
Picture Folder Add to my Favorites
Photo Img Make my Pod

| More