2010 Empire SE.

55 Comments

  • + 7
flag lukethorpe (Jul 14, 2009 at 11:30)
Niiiiiiice!
  • + 5
flag erik74 (Jul 14, 2009 at 14:40)
and first i said ew....but thats actually pretty sick colours!
  • + 3
flag williee (Jul 16, 2009 at 18:20)
thats sick if i had the $ i would buy that, its sick!
  • + 4
flag Colin994 (Jul 16, 2009 at 20:31)
still like last years better. the line up didnt change much. neg prop me if you want. but thats my opinion
  • + 2
flag erik74 (Jul 16, 2009 at 20:36)
btw, its a grey frame. go look at the homepage. i thought it was greyish blue, which i didnt like...
  • - 8
flag clarke658 (Jul 16, 2009 at 20:47) (Below Threshold) show comment
finally dh bikes have pivitols. looks so much better i think
  • + 9
flag erik74 (Jul 16, 2009 at 20:48)
its not a DH bike...
  • + 2
flag ride-your-bike (Jul 16, 2009 at 21:24)
its a hell of a nice bike but in my opinion the 2009 empire 5 had way sicker colours
  • - 1
flag variiis (Jul 17, 2009 at 3:35)
wont rear wheel hit saddle when compressed shock?
  • + 1
flag batesy44 (Jul 17, 2009 at 5:24)
thats what i was thinking but obously the linkage says therwise
  • + 0
flag yakobitz (Jul 17, 2009 at 11:12)
this is pretty nice, but last years was so much better looking, this is just not as top notch as last year, i was so stoked to see what they were going to do this year with it, and i got disapointed
  • + 2
flag dirtbikerjackson (Jul 17, 2009 at 14:14)
is this all stock? if so y does it have a kenda in the front and maxxis in the back??
  • + 0
flag oneednewbike123 (Aug 4, 2009 at 18:57)
This looks like a sick bike i perfer this over the empire 5 any day
  • + 1
flag erik74 (Aug 4, 2009 at 19:06)
it is the Empire 5... (SE)
  • + 1
flag oneednewbike123 (Aug 5, 2009 at 22:38)
Well i know i ment the normal empire 5. I should have mentioned that...
[Reply]
  • - 16
flag Brydenscott (Jul 14, 2009 at 15:31) (Below Threshold) show comment
it would be nice if shops that sold norcos were as good as shops that sell konas and giants mhmhcough.cafe!.mhemmcoughspokesucksballscough
  • + 2
flag SkumPeaks (Jul 16, 2009 at 22:21)
how dare you say CAFE and NORCO in the same sentence
  • + 2
flag Brydenscott (Jul 16, 2009 at 23:32)
yeah sorry for my disobedience i shouldve realized
  • + 0
flag oneednewbike123 (Aug 5, 2009 at 22:38)
Ya u should have i mean cafe????
[Reply]
  • + 19
flag kylespringman (Jul 14, 2009 at 16:06)
Kind of odd how it has two different tire companys
  • + 3
flag i-ride-on-dirt (Jul 14, 2009 at 22:20)
norco probly just screwed up, i bet if you bought this bike the tires would be the same
  • + 2
flag KyleG43 (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:50)
they would definatly come with nevigals
  • + 2
flag kev-roberts (Jul 17, 2009 at 2:12)
if prefer it with the maxxis, Pivotal on a FR rig, AT LAST, looks sweet, id have one if i had the cash
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag cjwanner (Jul 14, 2009 at 21:05)
Over priced for the grouppo on this bike. $3800 for juicy threes and x-7 isnt worth it.
  • + 4
flag nyterider (Jul 14, 2009 at 21:41)
i agree wildabeest, but those are elixers not juicy threes.
  • + 1
flag cjwanner (Jul 15, 2009 at 23:53)
Thank you mountain goat, my bad. but still.
  • - 1
flag aflo661 (Jul 16, 2009 at 19:28)
And just the shock alone is worth quite a bit of dough. About $750 i belive. I have one of these and I'll say they didn't skimp much. The only thing that really needs upgrading is the brakes. But I have to mention that this bike rides amazingly. You wont be dissapointed.
  • + 3
flag nyterider (Jul 16, 2009 at 21:43)
brakes? the brakes are decent..... i think you mean, cassette, chain, derailleur shifter
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag maykevin (Jul 14, 2009 at 22:37)
is there gonna be a xxxx for 2010??
  • + 1
flag erik74 (Jul 15, 2009 at 8:11)
most likely. theres several bikes missing. a-line, six, etc...
  • - 2
flag cjwanner (Jul 15, 2009 at 23:53)
I dont think so. I think they are replacing it with the Empire five.
  • - 1
flag erik74 (Jul 16, 2009 at 7:55)
dont you think 5" is a little much for 4x? thats why they had the XXXX (4x). but then again, someone mentioned something about they thought Norco no longer has rights to FSR, which is what the 4x is...
  • + 0
flag PigeonLake (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:27)
The empire 5 uses FSR - so does the Team DH - and both those bikes are availible for 2010 so i don't see why the XXXX wouldn't be availible as well...
  • + 0
flag KyleG43 (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:58)
which makes no sense cuz them norco frames look nothin like a specialised frame
  • + 0
flag jarius (Jul 16, 2009 at 18:28)
if you take a look at the rear triangle kyleg43, you'll notice it looks a whole lot like a specialized..
  • + 0
flag erik74 (Jul 16, 2009 at 18:56)
o...didnt realize they were FSR...what is FSR anyway...? maybe google knows...
  • - 2
flag aflo661 (Jul 16, 2009 at 19:31)
Full Suspension Research. Quite a few suspension designs fall under the design that was patented by specialized quite avfew years ago. Its not the frame design that is patented but the linkage design and the way is effects the shock. Unfortunatley for other companies, specializes thinks that they own full suspension even though their recent attempts with their in house shocks and forks (Cross country) were a failure. But their downhill designs are solid.
  • - 1
flag erik74 (Jul 16, 2009 at 19:35)
ok. all i knew was they worked on it with the help of Norco, so Norco has some rights to it as well. thanks for the info though!
  • + 0
flag seraph (Jul 17, 2009 at 12:38)
aflo661, you're misinformed if you think that SBC's recent foray into the front suspension market was misguided. Their single crown forks are on par with anything that Fox makes for the same categories, and they work more efficiently in conjunction with SBC frames than any other suspension fork on the market.
  • + 0
flag oneednewbike123 (Aug 5, 2009 at 22:43)
Such big comment you alk right. Noy reading anyones just giving u neg props... Simple as that!
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag philipstonier (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:28)
thats such a bad paint job, ugly, the 2009 paint looked a lot better my my opinion
  • + 0
flag aflo661 (Jul 16, 2009 at 19:31)
I agree
  • - 1
flag scotty1212 (Jul 16, 2009 at 20:52)
i know it's just opinions. but i think both yours are sour. this bike looks sick!
  • + 1
flag woodygebhardt (Jul 17, 2009 at 6:31)
its just color... id give anything to ride a decent bike
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag adamsride2 (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:39)
09 kona bass, is nicer..
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag mtnbikerbro (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:55)
nice colors and bike
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag weejohn (Jul 16, 2009 at 18:24)
it looks dated...
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag mugredeldiablo (Jul 16, 2009 at 21:01)
sweeeeeeeeeet!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag garrettvasquez (Jul 17, 2009 at 11:11)
damn thats dope
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag seraph (Jul 17, 2009 at 12:39)
As I said before, the normal E5 had better be way worse-specc'd than the SE model to be $1300 CAD less.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag ktmrider5 (Jul 18, 2009 at 4:35)
were can u buy these from cant find anywere that sells them??
  • + 1
flag sam-u-ee-l (Jul 18, 2009 at 13:12)
they dont sell them in the uk
  • + 0
flag lennox25 (Jul 20, 2009 at 14:29)
has the 2010 ones actually come out yet ?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag ktmrider5 (Jul 21, 2009 at 7:08)
how much would it cost to ship one over?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag sam-u-ee-l (Aug 4, 2009 at 10:38)
real nice bike even that the 09 looked betta
[Reply]

Post A New Comment
Why was a comment deleted?

1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
Bold Italic Link


Canada Chilliwack, British Columbia, Canada

6081 views | 55 comments | 143 faves


Date: 2009-07-14
Trail: 2010 Norco Product Launch
Riders: none
Description: 2010 Empire SE.
Picture Folder Add to my Favorites
Photo Img Make my Pod

| More