Norco Team DH at the 2010 Norco Bikes Launch.

48 Comments

  • + 7
flag NorthShore-3 (Jul 14, 2009 at 22:14)
that is so nice, and really good new look
  • + 2
flag BigRidah (Jul 15, 2009 at 11:06)
Add a Air Shock, Boxxer World, Thomson Post, Tubeless wheels and tires. Then you get a very very light bike.
  • + 4
flag gustofwind (Jul 15, 2009 at 12:12)
or just keep it the way it is
  • + 2
flag bleakers (Jul 15, 2009 at 12:14)
onyl comment i really have on this beautiful bike is i think they could of done a "cooler" desgin for "norco" on the bike...

i know function first but when you have a nice bike like this something little like that to make it look better i think they coulda done but really beatiful ride
  • + 1
flag TooLegit2Quit (Jul 15, 2009 at 17:48)
BigRidah, did you know that a vivid with a Ti Spring is just as light as a air shock if not lighter?
  • + 1
flag BigRidah (Jul 15, 2009 at 18:58)
I sir, did not know that, thank you for the information. Salute
  • + 0
flag hucker13 (Jul 15, 2009 at 19:08)
You did not know that because it is completely untrue.
  • + 1
flag TooLegit2Quit (Jul 15, 2009 at 19:38)
Well hucker13, i will stick to what the scale says
  • - 2
flag mr-eric (Jul 16, 2009 at 15:53)
why the hell do you guys care about a really light bike, 40 lbs is pretty good, besides y does the weight matter, your going DOWNHILL, my bike weights 44 lbs and im faster than my friend with the 37 lbs bike so it doesnt matter, and personally i prefer the boxxer team because coil just feels nicer, thats y i run a fox 40
  • - 4
flag evilsmx (Jul 21, 2009 at 14:25) (Below Threshold) show comment
looks photo shoped looks at the cards to the left and the white on the bike (boxxer)
  • + 0
flag TooLegit2Quit (Jul 21, 2009 at 15:34)
Wow cool, they're both the same colour.
  • + 2
flag hucker13 (Jul 21, 2009 at 22:49)
@TooLegit2Quit:

A Fox DHX Air (9.5x3.0") weighs approximately 455g.

A Vivid weighs approximately 462g for the shock body alone, plus either ~500-600g for a steel spring or ~250-300g for an Obtanium ti spring (lightest you can buy).

Source: http://www.sicklines.com/weights/rearshocks/

Next time you try to "stick to what the scale says" you should try sticking to the facts instead!
  • + 1
flag TooLegit2Quit (Jul 21, 2009 at 23:42)
Well thanks for clearing that up!
  • + 1
flag hucker13 (Jul 21, 2009 at 23:44)
No worries, if you can't tell I'm a bit of a bike geek Smile
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag nickf (Jul 14, 2009 at 23:18)
pretty retro, kinda rocky mountain(ish) look. sweet
[Reply]
  • - 7
flag ridersplayground1 (Jul 15, 2009 at 0:11) (Below Threshold) show comment
better than the old one but still ugly
[Reply]
  • + 5
flag ilikebike23 (Jul 15, 2009 at 0:15)
thats sick the 09 one looked brutal norco really stepped it up for 2010
  • + 5
flag crazybiker247 (Jul 15, 2009 at 0:20)
yeah, i really like 2010 a lot better than 2009 team dh
  • + 6
flag woody-dh (Jul 15, 2009 at 2:12)
I think everyone does.
  • - 3
flag teamn2 (Jul 16, 2009 at 17:09)
i dont
  • + 0
flag LEVIB (Jul 19, 2009 at 14:06)
i dont
  • + 0
flag doxx (Aug 21, 2009 at 18:42)
i dont
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Azrun (Jul 15, 2009 at 0:37)
this bike looks amazing like a cross between the rockymountain flatline and the commencal supreme in my opinion
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag woody-dh (Jul 15, 2009 at 2:13)
Absolutley love it. Can't wait to see it in action.
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag variiis (Jul 15, 2009 at 2:28)
i know what sgona be my next bike
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag joel-rides-a-bike (Jul 15, 2009 at 2:42)
that is a very good new look












and not too mention insane
[Reply]
  • + 5
flag Treebasher (Jul 15, 2009 at 7:10)
Looks much beefier than last year's swoops but without the curvy toptube, the standover looks really high. Brule, any chance of geo.s being posted?
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag dean (Jul 15, 2009 at 7:18)
looks great, good work norco.
[Reply]
  • - 9
flag giantwhip (Jul 15, 2009 at 9:23) (Below Threshold) show comment
i hate norco's!
  • + 0
flag Jabraham (Jul 15, 2009 at 10:30)
I HATE YOU!!......hha jk i dont even know uBig Grin!
[Reply]
  • - 11
flag krazy-downhiller (Jul 15, 2009 at 10:45) (Below Threshold) show comment
f*ck YOU NORCO YOU SUCK BALLS
  • + 7
flag ninjaty (Jul 15, 2009 at 11:29)
said the guy on KONA...
  • + 5
flag rrad218 (Jul 15, 2009 at 11:36)
Said the guy who rides a bike that hasnt changed for 20 years.
  • + 3
flag kevinthelilbiker (Jul 15, 2009 at 19:09)
thats embarrasing
  • + 5
flag gunot73 (Jul 15, 2009 at 19:58)
said the guy who will be suspended because a mod scrolls this page and sees his comment
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag ajlariviere (Jul 15, 2009 at 11:47)
nice but i thibk it looks like a flat line
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag bulletdodger (Jul 15, 2009 at 11:51)
OK. Just as ridersplayground1 said, nicer than 2009. but still ugly. And I can't shake off the sad feeling of past Norco mistakes. Pulling from sale their previous models cause of snapping headtube definitely made some riders think twice before buying a Norco bike.

And also, I know Norco 'borrowed' Specialized's FSR but somehow Norcos suspension design never made good impression on me. Just to be clear, I'm talking about aesthetics. I've ridden Norcos and their suspension is doing a terrific job but the look of pivot placements just gives me creeps. The pieces of metal connecting the main pivot with the frame, c'mon...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Downhiller-13 (Jul 15, 2009 at 12:05)
i like it
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag greendoor (Jul 15, 2009 at 12:16)
I'm not a hugh fan of the new frame designs this year with all the bent tubes. That said this is the sickest norco I've seen in a long time!! a very long time.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag dodgezilla (Jul 15, 2009 at 13:17)
i knew norco made ugly bikes but this tops them all.
f*ck that things hideous
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag fell321 (Jul 15, 2009 at 15:27)
Absolute batty wagon
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag betterthansx (Jul 15, 2009 at 15:38)
wow...not to bash Norco...but this bike just looks cheap...just like last years bike too...it did grow on me but you need a bike like the V-10 or M6 that u look at and just say...holy f**k i want that...its good that its cheaper now but still a bike that is $5000 still has to be desireable
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag steezo (Jul 15, 2009 at 21:52)
f*ckING GAY AS AIDS.....NORCO WILL ALWAYS SUCK AND REMAIN TO BE SHIT
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag nickis (Jul 15, 2009 at 22:07)
I f*cking hate this bike. So gay!
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag mountainfreeride (Jul 16, 2009 at 12:16)
I'm glad Norco got rid of that curvy design their frames had the past couple of years
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag peltsi (Jul 16, 2009 at 12:28)
I don't ride dh, but god damn! that schaweet!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag brandog (Jul 20, 2009 at 15:30)
f*ckin mint!!! keep givin er boyz.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Noremac55 (Aug 9, 2009 at 5:58)
WOW, really nice, gunna have to mod the Atomik now to make it look bit better.... white and black wheels i think!
[Reply]

Post A New Comment
Why was a comment deleted?

1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
Bold Italic Link


Canada North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

6298 views | 48 comments | 151 faves


Date: 2009-07-14
Trail: 2010 Norco Product Launch
Riders: Riders
Description: Norco Team DH at the 2010 Norco Bikes Launch.
Picture Folder Add to my Favorites
Photo Img Make my Pod

| More