78 Comments
photo
3914698
- + 4
gfisher270
(Aug 24, 2009 at 14:56)
how did you manage to do that?
All forks break, he could have gone head first into a tree going very fast.. they arent designed to withstand that.
What happened?
I just meant that people would see this and think 'oh all the new boxxers break!' etc. The usual.
I just meant that people would see this and think 'oh all the new boxxers break!' etc. The usual.
yeah most of the time its BS what they say.., but i've seen to many boxxers break at exactly that point of the arch to say it's all the riders foult.
Ever thought of it as there are ten times the ammount of boxxers out there than any other dh fork, thus you see more broken boxxers.
There are more Sram owned components (Rockshox, Sram, Truvativ, Avid) then any other. That said, I have had more problems with Sram then any other product, so I simply won't buy there stuff, even if I can drop a few pounds by doing so, its just not worth it.
That said Holzfeller cranks are nice, but I still hate Truvative BB's.... not tapered to my knowledge.
i mean srams a great company, i wouldnt do anything to put them down. but i fork shouldnt do you dirty like that
No they are a good company, but myself I choose to avoid them where possible, cause they are one of the few company's I've ever really had troubles with. But thats just my experience. Not saying they don't know what they are doing, they try to hard to keep cost down i think.
tbh i think its best that people see these forks are breaking, saves us all trips to the hospital and it saves the old bank account
the manufacturing process isn't perfect in any company. high end forks snap, ferraris break down. So far this is the first 2010 boxxer snap i've seen on here (maybe second) and for the amount of people buying them, that's not bad at all. plus, he's getting warranty, so what's the problem?
emmm the problem is his fork broke and thats bad shit. So if u bought a ferrari and it broke down in the first year youd just say ahh its cool i mean the manufacturing wasnt perfect. dont think so
that's not my point. Things break it's a fact of life. Yeah it would be irritating if it happened but it's covered by the warranty. do a quick search on here and you'll find broken 888's etc too, does that make them all crap?
how do you know? EVERY manufacturing process has faults, marzocchi and fox included. Probably about one in 1000 boxxers break like this, you're an idiot.
im sorry can you read i said MIGHT, and yeah if there is a manufacturing fault then 99% of the time there is a major recall of products,
you still aren't getting this are you? the production line cannot be completely foolproof unless you test EVERY single product or have them custom made by hand. It's not a recurring fault and they don't need recalling. How many broken 2010 boxxers have you seen? you're just another person jumping on the "O LOOK ANOTHER BROKEN BOXXER THEY SUCK LOLOLOLOL" bandwagon, without taking in account the figures. They may have had some dodgy years a few years back where maybe a few too many broke, but barely any of the 2010 ones have broken. If anything marzocchi are having some major quality control issues recently having been bought out by suntour.
here`s the crash - http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v216/swaussie/Picture122.jpg (look at the front axle)
here`s the consequence - http://www.pinkbike.com/video/85633/
:]
here`s the consequence - http://www.pinkbike.com/video/85633/
:]
haha, quality, i don't wanna be the one going "oh i'm so shocked that another fork has broke, they're all shit" but
honestly
they're breaking left right centre, you can even tell from how skinny they are that they wont be able to withstand minor collisions/crashes
most are good
but there aren't thousands of boxxers out there whoever said that
ridiculous; there are tonnes more fox's than anything tbf
honestly
they're breaking left right centre, you can even tell from how skinny they are that they wont be able to withstand minor collisions/crashes
most are good
but there aren't thousands of boxxers out there whoever said that
ridiculous; there are tonnes more fox's than anything tbf
quote alexkona... "haha, quality, i don't wanna be the one going "oh i'm so shocked that another fork has broke, they're all shit" "
well thats pretty much what you've said, just with more writing.
But under the right circumstances more forks will break, for example i know someone who just blow out their fox 40s.
well thats pretty much what you've said, just with more writing.
But under the right circumstances more forks will break, for example i know someone who just blow out their fox 40s.
fair enough then, but there's no denying boxxers are more known to be looking like this than some fox 40's
[Reply]
[Reply]
Thoes boxxers, Old and new Always break in the SAME spot on the Crown, they really have to redesign that shit.
ya. You'd think a state of the art DH fork wouldn't do that, unless someone was doing something stupid on it
Well when you think about it, RS has what seems to have always been weak lowers. I mean come one i've seen more pictures of Snapped boxxers then All other companies combined. The should redesign the Lowers, Namely just the Arch.
[Reply]
anyone ever think that there is such a thing as too light? that goes for all companies out there. as riders demand lighter parts companies are forced to remove a lot of material. sadly resulting in weaker parts in many instances. theres a fine line between practical durability and weight.
People have been asking for lighter products for a long time now. Companies are bringing out products to meet that demand. They break more often, of course (it's 6 pound DC fork for god's sake) but they are selling like hotcakes and that, from the company's standpoint, is basically the only thing that matters.
However, I think every Boxxer that I have seen broken did so in that in that exact spot- either 1) they had a bad production run with air bubbles getting in there somehow, 2) they just need to suck it up and put 100g more material on the arch or 3) do nothing, they are selling like mad and doing a few more warranties is cheaper than redesigning it anyway.
My '10 team has been good so far (not great) but even after some substantial crashes and scrapes on the lowers it is going strong.
However, I think every Boxxer that I have seen broken did so in that in that exact spot- either 1) they had a bad production run with air bubbles getting in there somehow, 2) they just need to suck it up and put 100g more material on the arch or 3) do nothing, they are selling like mad and doing a few more warranties is cheaper than redesigning it anyway.
My '10 team has been good so far (not great) but even after some substantial crashes and scrapes on the lowers it is going strong.
You dont see as many broken 888's or any other fork for that matter as you do with boxxers. They always break on the lowers, be it the arch or the actual lower legs snapping.
I wonder if kona and sram are working together now ?
I wonder if kona and sram are working together now ?
Post A New Comment
Why was a comment deleted?
1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
3613 views | 78 comments | 151 faves
Date: 2009-08-24
Trail: Backyard
Riders: Robert
Description: Haha my hand looks like that too
Add to my Favorites
Make my Pod

RSS