What my bike looks like lately.

25 Comments

  • + 1
flag PBPphotog (Oct 23, 2009 at 19:11)
That's hawt-some.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag doberdude (Oct 23, 2009 at 19:15)
New paint?
  • + 1
flag SavageMountainAnimal (Oct 23, 2009 at 22:00)
yeap. just a little flair up front and some various sanding.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag windowlicker (Oct 23, 2009 at 19:43)
You coming down tomorrow?
  • + 1
flag SavageMountainAnimal (Oct 23, 2009 at 19:50)
I wish! Can't tho I got stuff going on.
  • + 1
flag windowlicker (Oct 23, 2009 at 19:52)
Lame dude, next time fo sho
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag blkmrkt-uk (Oct 23, 2009 at 19:55)
sickness
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag drtjmper (Oct 23, 2009 at 21:36)
that DJer is so sick, looks really clean light, looks super fun.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag krizz (Oct 24, 2009 at 0:50)
change seat pos ! make it anal Big Grin haha
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag milanboez (Oct 24, 2009 at 3:51)
wow thats really nice
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag nati (Oct 24, 2009 at 4:23)
Thats cool Cool
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag kajtek007 (Oct 24, 2009 at 8:15)
I like it more before but it sill fresh
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag kalla (Oct 24, 2009 at 11:58)
how much is it all
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag unregistered-user (Oct 24, 2009 at 13:35)
ha nice one night thats dope
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag dillonchamberlain (Oct 24, 2009 at 13:54)
rad
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag tac1593 (Oct 24, 2009 at 14:37)
that scattered sanding spots looks soo sick! good ideaSmile
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag brandonf (Oct 25, 2009 at 12:01)
How are you liking that tire combo? I've got a 2.2 racking in front and 2.0 raceking in the rear and its been good
  • + 1
flag SavageMountainAnimal (Oct 25, 2009 at 18:42)
Thats exactly what im switching to, im going to get a 2.0 race kind for the back. Their great tires, super happy with it.
  • + 1
flag brandonf (Oct 25, 2009 at 22:17)
I also have a pinscher and I think that the 2.2 raceking would fit on the rear. I think you should try putting your 2.2 on the rear to check clearance and if it does fit, get a 2.2. I weighed both of them and the 2.0 is 423g and the 2.2 is 479g. The 2.0 is absolutely tiny. It's way narrower than the 1.95 sb8 and for the 56g difference between the 2.0 and 2.2, I would much rather have a 2.2. Just my Opinion.
  • + 1
flag SavageMountainAnimal (Oct 25, 2009 at 22:39)
Thats interesting, i didn't think about about how small it would be but thats true smb 8's are a lot bigger then regular tires so maybe I should just go with another 2.2 i'll have to check and see if it fits then.
  • + 1
flag gary1 (Oct 26, 2009 at 11:24)
Nah man, the 2.0 isnt that skinny. You have to keep in mind that SB8s are really wide for their size though.
  • + 1
flag brandonf (Oct 26, 2009 at 18:53)
I know they are. The 2.0 raceking is alot narrower than the 1.95 sb8 which is what I'm telling him
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag brandonf (Oct 25, 2009 at 22:34)
also what size of disk is that?
  • + 1
flag SavageMountainAnimal (Oct 25, 2009 at 22:39)
5" i think, its cool but not the most functional hahah
  • + 1
flag Pizzaslice (Oct 26, 2009 at 8:54)
Where did u get the disk from
[Reply]

Post A New Comment
Why was a comment deleted?

1. add additional on topic info to the article that other users will find useful
2. add props and support/encouragement for the video/photo/article/product/story
3. add and explain constructive criticism for the video/photo/article/product/story
Bold Italic Link


United States Walnut Creek, California, United States

935 views | 25 comments | 82 faves


Date: 2009-10-23
Trail: Hills?
Riders: none
Description: What my bike looks like lately.
Picture Folder Add to my Favorites
Photo Img Make my Pod

| More