xxx
  • + 37
flag jayson-10 (Jan 10, 2010 at 13:05)
 that is the f*ckin stupidest idea...
  • + 0
flag k2dan (Jul 4, 2011 at 16:59)
 rofl
[Reply]
  • + 15
flag Gsnickets (Mar 10, 2010 at 19:03)
 I love how almost no one who commented on this picture knows the difference between "break" and "brake" just flat out sad.
[Reply]
  • + 5
flag Cyclist-Abuse (Jan 12, 2010 at 19:00)
 Why not just use regular caliper brakes if you want to brake? There has allready been the points of wrecking the rotor and cutting or burning yourself on the rotor. I would also like to point out that if your chain were to break, the rotor would be rendered useless. Why not just mount the brake somewhere else?
  • + 2
flag sean-dh (Jul 5, 2011 at 11:06)
 Fixie riders slow down using the power of their legs right?

I think the idea is to replicate this using a hydraulic brake. maybe for weeds or something?

Also having it placed there would mean people can retrofit it to the typical old racers used for fixies by buying this crankset.

The other points about burning etc. are very valid though
  • + 2
flag Cyclist-Abuse (Jul 7, 2011 at 16:39)
 The retrofiting idea would be a valid point; except for the fact that to mount the caliper to the frame; you can see that there is a mount welded to the frame... it would be much simpler to weld on a set of mounts for a traditional disk setup.
  • + 2
flag sean-dh (Jul 7, 2011 at 17:10)
 oh yeah well spotted
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag thegringo (Feb 20, 2010 at 17:21)
 It's a waste of money is what it is,and time will prove me right,what with industry standards that are already in place and have been for years and compatability issues to overcome.Give in now and save yourself a lot of money and heartache.
Gringo.Frown
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag WAKIdesigns (Mar 15, 2010 at 6:33)
 with all the respect to bike couriers, but... it's just amazing how far can you go, to avoid using freehub...
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag george8 (Jan 11, 2010 at 8:07)
 discs get really hot pretty soon if you do some heavy breaking, it would end up burning your ankle and possibly cutting you as well, put a rim brake on or grow some leg muscles
  • - 1
flag Dickinson (Jan 11, 2010 at 10:52)
 Your not gunna be going that fast on this type of bike !
  • - 2
flag george8 (Jan 11, 2010 at 10:54)
 yes you will, as i said it doesnt take much speed just by using the brakes a handfull of times to stop quickly and you will be burning heat into the disc, but yeah these bikes are a stupid idea tbh :L
  • + 0
flag Dickinson (Jan 11, 2010 at 11:50)
 it probs never get used, Probs just an idea they came up with.
  • + 1
flag richardandhiskona08 (Oct 11, 2011 at 11:19)
 it is plausible if they put a plastic rotor guard over the rotor and then it would be a good idea right up until your chain snaps then try stopping
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag knoxrider (Jan 12, 2010 at 0:11)
 its a nice brake but it should be more compact. it makes sense cuz there is no disk fixie hubs/frame mounts. smart
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag rybizm (Jan 10, 2010 at 13:05)
 wft? whats the point of having a brake on a fixie?
  • + 12
flag dingus (Jan 10, 2010 at 13:06)
 Its for people with weak legs...
  • + 0
flag shortywrenn (Jan 10, 2010 at 13:09)
 how?
  • + 3
flag bxxer-rider (Jan 11, 2010 at 8:43)
 or people who are light, imagine a 8 stone rider trying to stop quickly from flatout. its not going to happen.

its a good idea and well personally id rather know that there was a break there for emergences even if i did not use it that often.
  • + 7
flag rybizm (Jan 12, 2010 at 9:41)
 but that's the whole idea of a fixie if you want brakes buy a road bike, i must admit it's really creative though
  • - 3
flag xpirimint (Jan 15, 2010 at 17:50)
 this is an old idea actually
the freewheel bottombracket was used on way older schwinn bikes

and since the wheel spun with the cassette, you could shift with out pedaling.

it was sort of like a transmission
  • + 1
flag RomoStills23 (Jun 28, 2011 at 16:16)
 damn drunk engineers these days
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag tristan1486 (Jan 15, 2010 at 23:21)
 why the hell would you do that? if that thing gets hot when its spinning and you leg touches that your gonna get a nice cut, (personally think its a retarted idea)
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag godzill (Dec 18, 2010 at 11:08)
 To be thinking straight. If You suddenly brake You fly like Sputnik...the problem will be in your legs when You started braking. Good try anyway.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag GustavoMO (Dec 14, 2011 at 10:19)
 If the guy down and hook his leg around, he'll have a nice cut or something else would be!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag SeSSion666 (Jan 10, 2010 at 13:33)
 The bike i for a track, this haven't "freewheel" thats why they hvebrak here.
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag hardtaildh08 (Jan 10, 2010 at 13:05)
 whaa?
  • + 66
flag transition-racer (Jan 10, 2010 at 13:52)
 an easy way to cut your legs, just a stupid idea....
  • + 23
flag hardtaildh08 (Jan 10, 2010 at 14:05)
 so when you try to pull the break and try to pedal you stomach the bars break a few ribs puntchure a lung tear your insides and look like a twat
  • + 33
flag perthandcrieffsfinest (Jan 10, 2010 at 14:43)
 It's because you cant freewheel ross... the brake slows down the movement of both the wheel and the cranks. Most fixie riders just use their leg strength to stop, but this guy obviously needs a brake for something. It makes sense for fast guys who live in a city, or for weak people who cant stop well.
  • + 14
flag freerideluke (Jan 11, 2010 at 13:36)
 think of the burn you might get off it though.
  • + 14
flag dnbmx (Jan 11, 2010 at 13:48)
 Its a fixie, so if the pedals stop so does the bike
  • + 3
flag perthandcrieffsfinest (Jan 11, 2010 at 14:09)
 yeah I guess, that thing would get pretty hot!
  • + 4
flag giantman817 (Jan 11, 2010 at 21:48)
 yeah its a fixed gear, so its basically a new braking system
  • + 2
flag blkmrkt-uk (Jan 11, 2010 at 22:13)
 u could do a steak on one of them after braking Big Grin
  • + 5
flag Lachlan-S (Jan 12, 2010 at 0:54)
 Could this be great using it as a crank stop doing tailwhips and such?
  • + 4
flag perthandcrieffsfinest (Jan 12, 2010 at 11:34)
 yeah until you caught your leg in it when slipping back on...
  • + 6
flag hardtaildh08 (Jan 12, 2010 at 11:39)
 sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssslllllllliiiiiiccccceeeee
  • + 10
flag advorak (Jan 12, 2010 at 18:31)
 It is the engineering equivalent of engine brakes.
  • + 4
flag Lachlan-S (Jan 13, 2010 at 22:03)
 perthandcrieffsfinest... eerr mate you could just put a plastic cover around it.
  • - 2
flag hardtaildh08 (Jan 14, 2010 at 9:40)
 what about the break caliper
  • + 1
flag perthandcrieffsfinest (Jan 14, 2010 at 11:27)
 good plan lachlan - but I still doubt people would use it
  • + 14
flag xpirimint (Jan 15, 2010 at 17:49)
 i think its a poor concept

i may be wrong but the freewheel is in the bottombracket right? so braking wouldn't affect the crankarm from pedaling backwards?

well if u brake, it puts a lot of stopping force on the chain, and that would pull the rear cog and everything between that and the bottombracket. the structure of the frame will win over the chain and the chain will break.

and the rotor looks like a hazard when its that close to your leg. you know how your jeans get caught in the chainring if it doesnt have a bashguard sometimes? imagine that...deli cut calf muscle.
  • + 2
flag ziegele (Jan 16, 2010 at 15:51)
 it works fine guys, so many people do this with ther fixies
  • + 14
flag DirtyDee (Jan 16, 2010 at 17:41)
 Why not just use a regular brake on the rim? Seems like a whole lotta work gone into this when there is an obvious solution already.

I'm goona see if i can make a handlebar mounted saddle and a seatpost mounted handlebar just to see how it feels...
  • + 1
flag dnbmx (Jan 16, 2010 at 18:40)
 cos the chain would lose tension when you breaked and it basically wouldnt work properly
  • + 0
flag xpirimint (Jan 20, 2010 at 10:37)
 sd53bad
you saying the chain would lose tension with a regular brake system?
  • + 8
flag mongoose-rider (Jan 20, 2010 at 10:39)
 whats wrong with just a brake on the rim :S or disk on the hub
  • + 0
flag hardtaildh08 (Jan 20, 2010 at 11:28)
 well said disk breaks ftw !

on the hub
  • + 2
flag xpirimint (Jan 21, 2010 at 20:38)
 its way more practical to just have a break on the hub or rim

maybe not the rim if you have nice ones and you wanna keep the paint but wtf? on the crank? so many reasons thats a bad idea

can anyone say the advantage of the brake being on the crank?
  • + 2
flag Borgschulze (Jan 29, 2010 at 23:13)
 I believe the whole point of this is to be different.

Obviously and easier way would have been to use a regular disc brake setup on the hub...

But how many people do you see with a disc brake connected to their crank?

A side note... it's kind of a waste, wear out your chain faster.
  • + 2
flag perthandcrieffsfinest (Jan 30, 2010 at 14:21)
 I guess having a wooden leg is "being different"...
  • + 1
flag xpirimint (Jan 30, 2010 at 22:08)
 ya if u wanna argue that its cool to be different go ahead, no one will win that one since its an opinon

but i think that this is impractical if you are talking about safety and braking at the same time...

but i guess i think ppl just like braking being easier for them and not wearing out ur chain so fast but then again, thats an opinion.
  • + 1
flag will-quake (Feb 23, 2010 at 15:26)
 It's like a motorbike brake thingy ken I saw it on American Chopper
  • + 1
flag sam264 (Feb 24, 2010 at 14:31)
 definitely different, so is having disc rotor shaped burns on your leg....
still not sure why anyone would do this over regular disc brakes...
  • + 6
flag cyberhawk Plus (Feb 26, 2010 at 6:05)
 i have never seen so many stupid commments below one picture.. and there is not even a girl in this pic..
half of you dont know how a FIXIE really works.. and the other half is probably riding in the lowest gear if you think you can get a burn of that disc..
your wheel is going much faster than the crank arm rotation.. wheel mounted discs will get hot .. this one will never get close to really get hot..unless you peddal your ass of..
i personally think fixies are stupid bikes and not safe..esp. in traffic.. any brake on the bike is an improvement to me...
  • + 1
flag Lachlan-S (Feb 27, 2010 at 16:02)
 Yeah you guys are missing the point of trying to do something different, that is what moves the sport forward if everyone did the same thing we wouldn't progress. It is only up untill someone who has decided to do something different has actually improved the performance. It may sound stupid but putting a disc on the spindle is an experiment. Obviously if the guy thought it was worse than any other spot he might take it off, but without him there would be no improvement.
  • + 2
flag xpirimint (Feb 27, 2010 at 20:00)
 maybe the disc should be on the same side as the sproket and both of them could have a chainguard covering them and the brake mount could be around the bottom bracket or downtube
that sounds better to me
  • + 0
flag Gsnickets (Mar 10, 2010 at 19:05)
 fr3erid3r.... you really need to think a bit more before you post..... you don't know shit about bikes.
  • + 0
flag xpirimint (Mar 10, 2010 at 22:01)
 you think this is a bright idea?

YOU obviously dont know much about bikes... you think this concept is clever because youve never seen it before?

give me 1 reason why a fixie is even practical in the first place, and then why this brake setup is...
then maybe you know something, and don't give an idiots answer please. or just admit you dont really know what you are talking about
  • + 0
flag Gsnickets (Mar 11, 2010 at 6:20)
 you said, "..... freewheel is in the bottombracket right? so braking wouldn't affect the crankarm from pedaling backwards?" if this were an old schwinn freewheel crank, putting the BRAKE on the side it's on would do absolutely nothing, unless you were pedaling, it then would only apply a resistance to your pedaling and not actually slow the bike down. obviously you didn't think that one through too much. so yes, braking would affect you from pedaling backwards..... or pedaling at all for that matter.
  • + 0
flag xpirimint (Mar 11, 2010 at 17:17)
 i meant "so wouldn't braking affect the crankarm from pedaling backwards?"

that was a typo
  • + 0
flag Gsnickets (Mar 12, 2010 at 0:27)
 "YOU obviously dont know much about bikes... you think this concept is clever because youve never seen it before?" you also implied that I thought this was a clever concept.... which I still cannot see where that can be inferred anywhere in my post. I personally think that putting a brake on a fixie is about the gayest thing you can do. If you're going to run a brake on a fix geared bike.... ride a single speed. Even if your post was a typo, it still shows how little you know about bikes..... if it's a fixie, and you're applying the brake, what the hell does it matter if you can't pedal backwards? using that braking setup or using a rim brake will give the same affect to your pedaling ability while braking.....
  • + 0
flag cyberhawk Plus (Mar 12, 2010 at 0:39)
 it goes on and on..
using that braking setup or using a rim brake will give the same affect
no it doesnt !
they skid.. its used for that.. so its instant blocking of the wheel .. this is a more clean setup (i suppose) and this will block more effective..
  • + 0
flag Gsnickets (Mar 12, 2010 at 1:11)
 if you actually stop and think about it.... a rim brake is just a really big disk brake to begin with. if the cranks and the rear wheel are locked into rotation, it doesn't matter if the braking system is on the cranks, or the wheel.... it'll lock the damn thing up, which is the absolute most power you can have.
  • + 0
flag xpirimint (Mar 12, 2010 at 14:56)
 but this stops the crank, not the wheel
the reason the wheel stops is because of the chain, right? thats the main reason why i think its stupid
  • + 1
flag Gsnickets (Mar 13, 2010 at 8:55)
 it's the same as if the rider were to use his legs to slow down, maybe even less stress on the drive train
  • + 0
flag xpirimint (Mar 13, 2010 at 17:59)
 well a disc brake would have more stopping power than a person... so I'd say a lot more stress on the drive train
  • + 0
flag Gsnickets (Mar 13, 2010 at 20:52)
 a good rider can lock the wheel up instantaneously, just the same as a disc brake....

"but this stops the crank, not the wheel" ----- this is showing how little you really think before you type.

"the reason the wheel stops is because of the chain, right? thats the main reason why i think its stupid" -------- wtf does a real rider use to stop the wheel? his hand on the tire?
  • + 1
flag xpirimint (Mar 13, 2010 at 23:58)
 god you are annoying, and so is your name... but anyway

ya this whole system is stupid because it locks the crank, then all the stopping power relies on the chain being able to withstand the force, its pretty unreliable since your chain could snap. people pedal hard enough and the chain will snap, a brake will definitely be stronger than that.

what would be simpler and less destructive to the bike would be a brake on the back, like a normal one. but you obviously think this is a good idea and thats enough for me to stop talking to you, total waste of my time to try and get through to someone that thinks this is intuitive...
  • + 0
flag Gsnickets (Mar 14, 2010 at 0:16)
 never once have I said that I thought this was a good idea... you keep making up absolute bullshit. as I've stated, i think a brake on a fixie is quite possibly the dumbest thing around. the main point of you're argument is a false statement.

when someone is riding a fixie they stop the crank by applying a backwards force to the pedals, what the f*ck do you think transfers that power to the wheel? I don't know why you can't understand that if a rider can lock the rear wheel up on a fixie instantly, that force is the absolute maximum transfered through the system, no matter how infinitely hard a hydro caliper may apply force to the rotor. you might be the dullest person on here.
  • + 0
flag xpirimint (Mar 14, 2010 at 4:59)
 that depends on ur weight too, i think fixies are just pointless bikes, maybe we can agree on that

i dont even know when im bitching about the brake when i dont like anything about fixies anyway, i just think this made them less practical then i thought possible...
  • + 2
flag sam264 (Mar 16, 2010 at 16:29)
 Gsnickets is right, it won't cause the chain to snap, all it will do is lock up the rear wheel and cause the rear wheel to skid
  • + 0
flag xpirimint (Mar 16, 2010 at 18:17)
 ya if the chain is strong enough right?
i just think this is kinda stupid is all...
  • + 0
flag Gsnickets (Mar 16, 2010 at 18:46)
 your complete lack of knowledge of bikes is absolutely stunning.
  • + 0
flag xpirimint (Mar 16, 2010 at 21:06)
 if the chain wasnt there, would the wheel stop with this brake system? just answer me that
  • + 7
flag cyberhawk Plus (Mar 17, 2010 at 0:45)
 eventually..
  • + 2
flag sam264 (Mar 17, 2010 at 6:14)
 Of course it wouldn't... I think it's stupid too, but you don't seem to understand how it works.
  • + 1
flag Gsnickets (Mar 17, 2010 at 14:48)
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOjx6qI2sIk the f*cking chain is strong enough. watch the video and shut up about the god damn chain breaking.
  • + 1
flag xpirimint (Mar 18, 2010 at 15:31)
 ya cause everyone leans so that most of the weight is on the front wheel

everything about fixies is kinda dumb to me so theres no point in arguing that so im really done with you Gsnickets
whered you get the nerve for a name like that anyhow?
  • + 5
flag frolosophy (Mar 20, 2010 at 2:08)
 if the chain wasn't there, the brake would do nothing. but if the brake could snap the chain, and the brake does exactly the same thing as a rider, by this logic, every time someone riding a fixie decides to stop, they would snap their chain. personally, i don't like the idea of transferring braking power through a chain, but it does work, and anyone who has ever ridden a fixie can tell you that.

by the way, ad hominem attacks do nothing but discredit your own argument, so for future reference, stick to the subject matter and you'll be taken more seriously. if you're going to argue, at least make it productive.
  • + 1
flag xpirimint (Mar 20, 2010 at 11:17)
 ya i think thats kinda stupid

why not just a discbrake on the hub? it would stop quicker and more effectively, and wouldn't put the chain at risk
i think it just makes fixies more ridiculous than they already are
  • + 1
flag sam264 (Mar 20, 2010 at 11:32)
 IT WON'T SNAP THE CHAIN
  • + 1
flag Borgschulze (Mar 20, 2010 at 11:43)
 If this brake setup broke the chain, it would have broke a long time ago from the rider pedaling it.

Quit replying to this stupid argument, I'm sick of it showing up on my dashboard.
  • + 0
flag feardabeast (Apr 16, 2010 at 19:33)
 WTF thats the single dumbest idea ever, disk brakes and legs dont mix!
  • + 3
flag xpirimint (Apr 17, 2010 at 15:52)
 ^
ya they do mix, like it would in a blender
  • + 1
flag mcdoogus (Apr 26, 2010 at 12:01)
 new crank stopper?
  • + 1
flag trekriderOWS16 (Jul 22, 2010 at 6:08)
 fixieeeee
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag kev1n (Jan 11, 2010 at 21:48)
 but then again, i just imagined the crazy drifts you could pull with this bike...
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag kev1n (Jan 11, 2010 at 21:47)
 well its an original idea, without a doubt. But its definitely one of those things that looks better on paper than in real life. and not to mention to safety hazards!
  • + 0
flag seraph (Jan 12, 2010 at 18:28)
 Are you kidding? This thing looks amazing in real life. I saw it in person at Interbike a few years ago and it looks mint.
  • + 0
flag odin333 (Jan 29, 2010 at 23:07)
 hes probably talking about how it seemed like a good idea till you did it. your risking major burns and cuts by putting it right by your leg. though it is a pretty cool idea.
  • + 2
flag haighd2 (Mar 15, 2010 at 6:49)
 no its a stupid idea on paper and in real life
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag adammoore (Jun 28, 2011 at 16:13)
 u need to try to put the brake behind the sprocket which would make so u didn't cut or burn your self
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag seb1952 (Apr 18, 2010 at 13:53)
 But also if you have a flipflop hub i dont think you can put a normal brake setup
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag liico13 (Jan 13, 2010 at 20:49)
 O.O
WTF...!
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag dnastybmx (Jan 13, 2010 at 21:12)
 FIXIE!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag reubarbcustard (Feb 4, 2010 at 13:33)
 its for fixed wheel roadies
  • + 1
flag haighd2 (Mar 15, 2010 at 6:52)
 thanks for clearing that up, we were all thinking it was for trials
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag charliebattin (Apr 27, 2010 at 12:27)
 this is SOOOOOOOOO BLOODY STUPID, the chain would just snap, stupid fixies
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag MarioSubsin (Jan 16, 2010 at 11:52)
 WTF?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Hawi (Jan 12, 2010 at 13:13)
 Nice patent 4 fix. But real fixie aint have brakes Big Grin
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag cretin82 (Jul 4, 2011 at 16:58)
 this would be a good idea if your riding a fixe
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag tim-intense (Jan 10, 2010 at 18:24)
 all i can imagine is the disk slicing a chunk off your ankle
  • + 1
flag haighd2 (Mar 15, 2010 at 6:47)
 does your chain ring slice chunks off your ankle? no becuase its not moving relative to your foot soo neither would this, however it is totally retarded.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag Kongy (Jan 13, 2010 at 17:44)
 haha thats legit!!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag tim-intense (Jan 10, 2010 at 13:31)
 defeats the object of a 'fixie'
  • + 1
flag nz-brendan (Jan 10, 2010 at 13:51)
 it does but is still a sick idea
  • + 5
flag seraph (Jan 12, 2010 at 18:26)
 How does it defeat the object of a fixie? It's still fixed.
  • + 1
flag haighd2 (Mar 15, 2010 at 6:45)
 ive been told that the object of a fixie is to have a simple reliable cheap bike. however none of these reasosn stack up and as far as i can see there isnt a compelling reason for riding a fixie in the 1st place. also hydralic disc brakes are not simple reliable or cheap
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag charliebattin (Apr 27, 2010 at 12:30)
 its a good idea but just wouldnt work
  • + 1
flag jooeey-t-nutter (May 10, 2010 at 10:57)
 charlie it does work because its a fixie, iv seen people with these
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag ParkMachine94 (Jan 13, 2010 at 14:14)
 f*ck FIXIES
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag cali-rid-305 (Jan 10, 2010 at 14:12)
 its a brake for a fixie and yes it is retarded
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag abel95 (Mar 29, 2010 at 11:33)
 OMFG.xd
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag nikienvo (Jun 4, 2010 at 7:46)
 Nice work!
That's fun!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag PaTis (Feb 14, 2011 at 10:46)
 hebel w korbie xD
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag diogodavinha (Jan 13, 2010 at 17:47)
 nice!simple and creative!)
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Maksimbike (Jan 13, 2010 at 17:41)
 what the f*ck?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag FraDH (Jan 17, 2010 at 8:19)
 Waste of money and time designing that shit
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag zhayne (Jan 10, 2010 at 14:03)
 shouldnt they put a bashgaurd on it so it doesnt cut the rider?
  • + 1
flag odin333 (Jan 29, 2010 at 23:04)
 a bashguard stops stuff from being bashed, not people being cut. plus you can't put a bashguard on a rotor Wink
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag serosogodfather (Jan 10, 2010 at 13:30)
 breaks on fixies are for the weak, along with coastbreaks and freewheel.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag kasonscott (Jan 10, 2010 at 18:27)
 just stupid
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag RicardoHeidtmann (Jan 12, 2010 at 18:57)
 thats genial
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag drz112 (Mar 27, 2010 at 12:41)
 calling Leg burns
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag marcirider (Mar 25, 2010 at 13:09)
 fixed gear idiots
Big Grin
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag y-aye-japs-eye (Mar 6, 2010 at 11:55)
 mint that is mint
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag mr-goon (Jan 10, 2010 at 14:12)
 That would just cut your legs up, and it would get so dented. Gayy!
  • + 3
flag seraph (Jan 12, 2010 at 18:27)
 How would it get dented? This is a road bike, not a mountain bike.
  • + 0
flag mr-goon (Jan 12, 2010 at 20:10)
 woops! my bad.
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag kasonscott (Jan 10, 2010 at 18:27)
 it would do anythig anyway other then stop the chain from spinning
[Reply]

Post a Comment



You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
Finland Eura, Finland

11903 views | 132 comments | 444 faves


Date:
Jan 10, 2010 at 12:42
2010-01-10

Trail: xxx
Riders: xxx
Description: xxx


Add to my Favorites
Make my Pod



Copyright © 2000 - 2012. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv43 0.075506