Why not just use regular caliper brakes if you want to brake? There has allready been the points of wrecking the rotor and cutting or burning yourself on the rotor. I would also like to point out that if your chain were to break, the rotor would be rendered useless. Why not just mount the brake somewhere else?
The retrofiting idea would be a valid point; except for the fact that to mount the caliper to the frame; you can see that there is a mount welded to the frame... it would be much simpler to weld on a set of mounts for a traditional disk setup.
It's a waste of money is what it is,and time will prove me right,what with industry standards that are already in place and have been for years and compatability issues to overcome.Give in now and save yourself a lot of money and heartache. Gringo.
discs get really hot pretty soon if you do some heavy breaking, it would end up burning your ankle and possibly cutting you as well, put a rim brake on or grow some leg muscles
yes you will, as i said it doesnt take much speed just by using the brakes a handfull of times to stop quickly and you will be burning heat into the disc, but yeah these bikes are a stupid idea tbh :L
why the hell would you do that? if that thing gets hot when its spinning and you leg touches that your gonna get a nice cut, (personally think its a retarted idea)
It's because you cant freewheel ross... the brake slows down the movement of both the wheel and the cranks. Most fixie riders just use their leg strength to stop, but this guy obviously needs a brake for something. It makes sense for fast guys who live in a city, or for weak people who cant stop well.
i may be wrong but the freewheel is in the bottombracket right? so braking wouldn't affect the crankarm from pedaling backwards?
well if u brake, it puts a lot of stopping force on the chain, and that would pull the rear cog and everything between that and the bottombracket. the structure of the frame will win over the chain and the chain will break.
and the rotor looks like a hazard when its that close to your leg. you know how your jeans get caught in the chainring if it doesnt have a bashguard sometimes? imagine that...deli cut calf muscle.
i have never seen so many stupid commments below one picture.. and there is not even a girl in this pic.. half of you dont know how a FIXIE really works.. and the other half is probably riding in the lowest gear if you think you can get a burn of that disc.. your wheel is going much faster than the crank arm rotation.. wheel mounted discs will get hot .. this one will never get close to really get hot..unless you peddal your ass of.. i personally think fixies are stupid bikes and not safe..esp. in traffic.. any brake on the bike is an improvement to me...
Yeah you guys are missing the point of trying to do something different, that is what moves the sport forward if everyone did the same thing we wouldn't progress. It is only up untill someone who has decided to do something different has actually improved the performance. It may sound stupid but putting a disc on the spindle is an experiment. Obviously if the guy thought it was worse than any other spot he might take it off, but without him there would be no improvement.
maybe the disc should be on the same side as the sproket and both of them could have a chainguard covering them and the brake mount could be around the bottom bracket or downtube that sounds better to me
YOU obviously dont know much about bikes... you think this concept is clever because youve never seen it before?
give me 1 reason why a fixie is even practical in the first place, and then why this brake setup is... then maybe you know something, and don't give an idiots answer please. or just admit you dont really know what you are talking about
you said, "..... freewheel is in the bottombracket right? so braking wouldn't affect the crankarm from pedaling backwards?" if this were an old schwinn freewheel crank, putting the BRAKE on the side it's on would do absolutely nothing, unless you were pedaling, it then would only apply a resistance to your pedaling and not actually slow the bike down. obviously you didn't think that one through too much. so yes, braking would affect you from pedaling backwards..... or pedaling at all for that matter.
"YOU obviously dont know much about bikes... you think this concept is clever because youve never seen it before?" you also implied that I thought this was a clever concept.... which I still cannot see where that can be inferred anywhere in my post. I personally think that putting a brake on a fixie is about the gayest thing you can do. If you're going to run a brake on a fix geared bike.... ride a single speed. Even if your post was a typo, it still shows how little you know about bikes..... if it's a fixie, and you're applying the brake, what the hell does it matter if you can't pedal backwards? using that braking setup or using a rim brake will give the same affect to your pedaling ability while braking.....
it goes on and on.. using that braking setup or using a rim brake will give the same affect no it doesnt ! they skid.. its used for that.. so its instant blocking of the wheel .. this is a more clean setup (i suppose) and this will block more effective..
if you actually stop and think about it.... a rim brake is just a really big disk brake to begin with. if the cranks and the rear wheel are locked into rotation, it doesn't matter if the braking system is on the cranks, or the wheel.... it'll lock the damn thing up, which is the absolute most power you can have.
a good rider can lock the wheel up instantaneously, just the same as a disc brake....
"but this stops the crank, not the wheel" ----- this is showing how little you really think before you type.
"the reason the wheel stops is because of the chain, right? thats the main reason why i think its stupid" -------- wtf does a real rider use to stop the wheel? his hand on the tire?
god you are annoying, and so is your name... but anyway
ya this whole system is stupid because it locks the crank, then all the stopping power relies on the chain being able to withstand the force, its pretty unreliable since your chain could snap. people pedal hard enough and the chain will snap, a brake will definitely be stronger than that.
what would be simpler and less destructive to the bike would be a brake on the back, like a normal one. but you obviously think this is a good idea and thats enough for me to stop talking to you, total waste of my time to try and get through to someone that thinks this is intuitive...
never once have I said that I thought this was a good idea... you keep making up absolute bullshit. as I've stated, i think a brake on a fixie is quite possibly the dumbest thing around. the main point of you're argument is a false statement.
when someone is riding a fixie they stop the crank by applying a backwards force to the pedals, what the f*ck do you think transfers that power to the wheel? I don't know why you can't understand that if a rider can lock the rear wheel up on a fixie instantly, that force is the absolute maximum transfered through the system, no matter how infinitely hard a hydro caliper may apply force to the rotor. you might be the dullest person on here.
that depends on ur weight too, i think fixies are just pointless bikes, maybe we can agree on that
i dont even know when im bitching about the brake when i dont like anything about fixies anyway, i just think this made them less practical then i thought possible...
ya cause everyone leans so that most of the weight is on the front wheel
everything about fixies is kinda dumb to me so theres no point in arguing that so im really done with you Gsnickets whered you get the nerve for a name like that anyhow?
if the chain wasn't there, the brake would do nothing. but if the brake could snap the chain, and the brake does exactly the same thing as a rider, by this logic, every time someone riding a fixie decides to stop, they would snap their chain. personally, i don't like the idea of transferring braking power through a chain, but it does work, and anyone who has ever ridden a fixie can tell you that.
by the way, ad hominem attacks do nothing but discredit your own argument, so for future reference, stick to the subject matter and you'll be taken more seriously. if you're going to argue, at least make it productive.
why not just a discbrake on the hub? it would stop quicker and more effectively, and wouldn't put the chain at risk i think it just makes fixies more ridiculous than they already are
well its an original idea, without a doubt. But its definitely one of those things that looks better on paper than in real life. and not to mention to safety hazards!
hes probably talking about how it seemed like a good idea till you did it. your risking major burns and cuts by putting it right by your leg. though it is a pretty cool idea.
does your chain ring slice chunks off your ankle? no becuase its not moving relative to your foot soo neither would this, however it is totally retarded.
ive been told that the object of a fixie is to have a simple reliable cheap bike. however none of these reasosn stack up and as far as i can see there isnt a compelling reason for riding a fixie in the 1st place. also hydralic disc brakes are not simple reliable or cheap