All new Santa Cruz v10 - pretty clean!
  • + 18
flag bomberboy925 (May 6, 2010 at 14:51)
 i think it looks sick but it looks like they copied the frame design from the Intense 951. the head tube and frame look exactly like the 951 minus the shock placement
  • + 5
flag Charge262 (May 6, 2010 at 14:54)
 thats a massive neg prop fest waiting to happen.
  • + 1
flag RPereira (May 6, 2010 at 15:05)
 Lol. Ugliest thing ever, but should be quite functional.
  • + 2
flag b1k3rjp (May 6, 2010 at 15:11)
 from the Intense 951?!
damn, your brains are too much toasted
  • + 3
flag kevinthelilbiker (May 6, 2010 at 15:19)
 appart from it being a non single pivot dh bike I think the similaritys end there
[Reply]
  • + 12
flag bogdancatana (May 6, 2010 at 13:18)
 they realy did it:O a carbon fiber dh frame?Blank Stare
  • + 23
flag spoiledgoods (May 6, 2010 at 13:19)
 What about the GT Fury?
  • - 1
flag bogdancatana (May 7, 2010 at 4:55)
 yepBig Grin
[Reply]
  • + 6
flag nige-dh (May 6, 2010 at 13:18)
 2010 ones were better tht looks abit poo
[Reply]
  • + 5
flag slyfox (May 6, 2010 at 13:16)
 Looks like shit.
[Reply]
  • + 5
flag simonsilver (May 6, 2010 at 12:59)
 what???????
  • + 17
flag mtb4lfe (May 6, 2010 at 13:04)
 idk, it looks kinda odd?
  • + 5
flag westcostdownhiller (May 6, 2010 at 13:09)
 well..that is not pleasing to the eye
  • + 6
flag jazzeph1 (May 6, 2010 at 13:13)
 For on i think it may look weird do to the large size because it is peatys if i am not mistaken
  • + 14
flag domino0 (May 6, 2010 at 13:19)
 i have to admit, i now WANT a v10, but you cannot deny, santa cruz has gone carbon crazy!
  • + 5
flag leeam (May 6, 2010 at 13:26)
 what! this is the nicest bike i have EVER seen!! a bike that will become very common soon but will still be fookin beautiful!! wow!! shame the prices will jump as always! reckon its gonner be VERY close to 3k Frown
  • + 4
flag Wollis (May 6, 2010 at 14:05)
 @ jazzeph1 - Its Greg Minaar's, you can tell by the chain device, Peaty uses an e13, Minaar runs a Gamut and Ratboy uses an MRP
  • + 1
flag bweger1234 (May 6, 2010 at 14:43)
 Holy SHIT!
  • + 4
flag leb12345 (May 6, 2010 at 16:02)
 Personally i like it, i like the colour with the decals and the "profiled" shape of the tubes.
Great! Big Grin
  • + 3
flag ncrider5 (May 6, 2010 at 20:09)
 weight anyone?
  • + 4
flag duncanp (May 7, 2010 at 13:30)
 clearly someone couldn't keep their hands off the bike..
  • + 1
flag jazzeph1 (May 7, 2010 at 15:27)
 @ Wollis - You sir are right! Hahaha i was ready another article that mentioned peatys my bad
  • + 1
flag Wollis (May 7, 2010 at 15:48)
 No worries dude! Cool
  • - 1
flag afro-99 (May 8, 2010 at 11:00)
 will the fact thats its made of carbon probably affected the way it looks, all it needs now is a Dorado, some alien carbon dh crankest, monkeylight dh bars and itll weigh less
  • + 4
flag stinker (May 8, 2010 at 20:52)
 it looks like its gonna snap witch is cool cuz knowing santa cruz its not gonna snap
  • - 3
flag ritchierich (May 9, 2010 at 19:03)
 you ride a stinky, what the hell do you know about santa cruz?
  • + 4
flag leb12345 (May 10, 2010 at 19:25)
 yeah, I like it when my bike looks like it's gonna snap but it wont. Don't you?
  • + 0
flag stinker (May 11, 2010 at 20:16)
 wow miltondirtjumper obviously its not gonna snap if steave and minnar trust it and i ride a glory now Razz
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag sx-sam (May 6, 2010 at 13:29)
 I spy Minnar's hand!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag tidler (May 6, 2010 at 21:18)
 i wonder if they will come out with a full aluminum version @ a better price point
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag peter16 (Jun 12, 2010 at 8:24)
 looks so nice in real life
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag STINKY-MINTY-1 (May 6, 2010 at 15:20)
 now tha does not look right its too skinny but then again its must be ridiculously light being carbon and all so kinda makes up for it bet its a fortune though
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag simonsilver (May 7, 2010 at 14:17)
 its soo strong

2 1/2 inch thick upper tubes
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag etabs Plus (May 6, 2010 at 13:05)
 new carbon v10Smile
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Freeriderf4rlife (May 8, 2010 at 10:37)
 i dont like it the old ones were way beefeir and way nicer
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag downhillrider08and09 (May 8, 2010 at 12:48)
 dont like it but like the hand
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Bigdave142 (May 9, 2010 at 11:24)
 The best bike just got better!
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag Superflybiker18 (May 6, 2010 at 13:07)
 looks...funky :S
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag santacruzv13 (May 6, 2010 at 19:17)
 its so ugly
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag StuartParker (May 6, 2010 at 13:29)
 tis nice
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag simonsilver (May 6, 2010 at 13:20)
 900 grams less then the regular model
  • + 2
flag kamikazerider (May 6, 2010 at 13:49)
 for an extra...alot of money..to save 900g? i dunno...
  • + 8
flag smike (May 6, 2010 at 13:54)
 900 grams is almost 2 pounds! I'd say that's significant...
  • + 2
flag seraph (May 6, 2010 at 14:46)
 900g is 1.986 lbs. I'd go out on a limb and say it's basically 2 lbs lighter.
  • - 2
flag bigburd (May 7, 2010 at 3:15)
 And probably stronger too , but I never heard of V-10 lacking in the strength department anyway , I hope this carbon is as strong as they say cos that seat post mast is the skinnyest I ever seen:Razz
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag vazpinto (May 6, 2010 at 13:52)
 i will be seing these beautys racing in 2 days
  • + 1
flag b1k3rjp (May 6, 2010 at 15:10)
 lisboa downtown?
  • + 0
flag vazpinto (May 7, 2010 at 14:44)
 ya
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag kevinthelilbiker (May 6, 2010 at 15:18)
 doublepost
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag campfobiker (May 6, 2010 at 20:21)
 World class ownage. almost looks 2 light though.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Manetherin (May 6, 2010 at 20:51)
 bike porn
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Dickinson (May 6, 2010 at 14:43)
 im getting one soon Smile
  • + 0
flag seraph (May 6, 2010 at 14:47)
 No one is getting one "soon."
  • - 3
flag cardronapumpandjumptrack (May 6, 2010 at 15:18)
 owned
  • + 0
flag doconnor (May 6, 2010 at 20:37)
 syndicate already tested them, so that is someone. "soon" is relative anyway...just had to comment on the pointless reply.
  • + 0
flag seraph (May 6, 2010 at 21:33)
 No you didn't.
  • + 1
flag Dickinson (May 7, 2010 at 10:53)
 seraph, Go and put you head down and walk.
  • + 1
flag seraph (May 7, 2010 at 11:26)
 What is that supposed to mean?
  • + 2
flag Dickinson (May 7, 2010 at 11:51)
 just sh.
  • + 0
flag seraph (May 7, 2010 at 12:26)
 I'm not following...
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Luke-99 (May 7, 2010 at 2:16)
 Oh My God Smile
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag pppratte Plus (May 6, 2010 at 17:33)
 that's gonna be a 10 grand ride
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag whatthehellmannn (May 6, 2010 at 13:04)
 is this a piss take?
  • + 2
flag cardronapumpandjumptrack (May 6, 2010 at 15:17)
 no...
  • + 1
flag whatthehellmannn (May 7, 2010 at 4:18)
 it just doesnt look right im sure i'll get used to it then
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag mtbiker1993 (May 6, 2010 at 13:18)
 any ideas on the weight of the frame?
  • + 0
flag xOcommencalOx (May 6, 2010 at 13:41)
 Its 900g lighter than the normal v10.
  • + 0
flag benko (May 6, 2010 at 15:37)
 sooo thats about 2 lbs?
  • + 0
flag xOcommencalOx (May 6, 2010 at 15:47)
 Yupp.
  • + 0
flag stryke Plus (May 6, 2010 at 23:07)
 there is some trickery with the weights theyre saying

theyre saying its 900g lighter then what they raced on last year, and seen as theyre running an air shock this year this will be a large amount, the swingarm is not carbon so i doubt its 900g
  • + 1
flag Jcougarred (May 7, 2010 at 14:23)
 i think the main idea with carbon is the strength first then if its weight saving then its a bonus,especcially with frames, carbon will always be stroner than ally.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag kinkmister (May 6, 2010 at 16:48)
 that is soooooo sshweeet. way cooler then the gt whatever its called
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Larkey1 (May 8, 2010 at 4:35)
 Love it.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag CHADGrenon (May 10, 2010 at 19:50)
 thats dope!!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag pinnr2010 (May 7, 2010 at 10:08)
 estimated cost ....
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Maikon (May 6, 2010 at 21:51)
 Sweet ...
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag SDiogo (May 7, 2010 at 3:11)
 My next bike Big Grin
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag Taylor16 (May 6, 2010 at 20:16)
 how can people think this is ugly. I think it is 10x better looking
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag mrmars Plus (May 6, 2010 at 15:49)
 ---------------- CALLED IT.
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag DHDean (May 9, 2010 at 14:58)
 it looks rather thin for a DH bike lol and its ugly
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag snaka-jack (May 9, 2010 at 13:50)
 thts pretty ugly tbh
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag Rouu (May 6, 2010 at 13:27)
 looks a bit strange
  • + 2
flag StuartParker (May 6, 2010 at 13:30)
 yea cause the old one has the lump at the top but this one doesnt.
Personly i prefer the old one to this but it is still nice.
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag banshee62 (May 6, 2010 at 14:11)
 anyone know how much they weigh?
  • + 0
flag seraph (May 6, 2010 at 14:46)
 Take the current V.10 frame weight, subtract 1.98 lbs.
  • + 0
flag deathsfallen (May 7, 2010 at 16:07)
 its hard to believe thats all they dropped, like yes its alot of weight but you would think more! considering the glories weight drop but hey what do i no Big Grin looks unreal none the less! stoked on it forsure
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag bomberboy925 (May 6, 2010 at 15:52)
 alright i f*cked that one up. the frame looks nothing like it except the size of it. deserved all those negative props
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Superflybiker18 (May 7, 2010 at 12:30)
 actually the more i look at it the more i like it
[Reply]
Below threshold threads are hidden

Post a Comment



You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
Canada Chilliwack, British Columbia, Canada

8736 views | 93 comments | 402 faves


Date:
May 6, 2010 at 12:58
2010-05-06

Trail: none
Riders: none
Description: All new Santa Cruz v10 - pretty clean!

Thumb: 150 x 99
Small: 250 x 164
Medium: 500 x 329
Normal: 800 x 526
Original: 850 x 559 (user controlled)

Add to my Favorites
Make my Pod



Copyright © 2000 - 2012. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.090041