in Drop Zone, United Kingdom - photo by ManiacInBlack

<< Prev
List Page
Next >>

View Who Faved this

24 Comments

Royston (Oct 23, 2011 at 12:58)

personally it seems like his questions are more of the - if a tree falls in the woods with no-one around does it make any sound? - vein. Basically i'm saying that there is no real answers to his questions and/or there is no agreeing or disagreeing with them either. They are merely an opportunity to exercise the mind.

ManiacInBlack (Oct 23, 2011 at 13:12)

I don't think its quite the same as the tree thing.
His questions arise because bad things happen & we are around to witness it.

TheShad (Oct 23, 2011 at 15:00)

he doesn't exist anyway, so the arguments are void.

ManiacInBlack (Oct 23, 2011 at 15:14)

agreed, my points are void, I think Epicurus makes sense though, that was the point I was trying to make

[Reply]

calls-fort-canyon (Oct 29, 2011 at 20:18)

You have the knowledge of a young child compared to the knowledge of God. You do now comprehend all that God has created and do not understand his plan. I myself do not have the answers for all that you said, but i do know that God, and the devil exists, that is why there is good and evil in this world

luke-smith (Jan 21, 2012 at 13:41)

and how exactly again do you know that God exists?

[Reply]

ManiacInBlack (Oct 23, 2011 at 10:34)

Do you agree with Epicurus or not? That's all that matters here.

[Reply]

wcjrush (Nov 10, 2011 at 11:41)

I thought this was a mountain biking website. Can someone tell me what religious website this is? I'm confused

[Reply]

ManiacInBlack (Oct 28, 2011 at 11:13)

What's the point of negative props, nobody knows why you disagree.

[Reply]

hendu (Oct 24, 2011 at 9:41)

Atheism is a religion too.

ManiacInBlack (Oct 24, 2011 at 13:16)

Sorry, I've pondered this for a while & I've still no idea what that mean's, why you said it or what relevance it has to Epicurus's statement.
If you'd like to elaborate by all means do so. Smile

hendu (Oct 24, 2011 at 15:49)

It has nothing to do with anyones statement it's a statement in it's own. and it's pretty self explanatory..

Nashmeyer (Oct 25, 2011 at 9:16)

Yeah ya dumb f*ck

ManiacInBlack (Oct 25, 2011 at 21:07)

Is that directed at me Nashmeyer? Instead of resorting to simplistic insults you could try & say something, preferably something relevant to the quote else its just a random post.

Nashmeyer (Oct 26, 2011 at 13:35)

Nah that was a smart remark towards me trolling Hendu , calm down

luke-smith (Jan 21, 2012 at 13:42)

yeah right... and bald is a haircolor too Smile

[Reply]

Royston (Oct 23, 2011 at 10:22)

Winning what exactly?

bamfbmx (Oct 23, 2011 at 11:19)

i dont see a whole lot of win there

ManiacInBlack (Oct 23, 2011 at 12:34)

So what would your response to Epicurus's statement be?
Please ignore the other bit, I didn't put it on there.

whitezombie93 (Oct 23, 2011 at 13:18)

A monotheist could refute those assertions by stating that god gave us free will

ManiacInBlack (Oct 23, 2011 at 14:00)

Seems to me that that thinking mean's he gave us the capacity to be evil. Why would he give his creation the capacity for evil thus creating a problem that didn't previously exist, he's only going to have to fix it later. If you make something from scratch why would you write bugs into the programme, especially if you could just make it prefect. If nothing existed previously then neither did we, if we're the cause/carriers of evil then evil is gods creation & more over he knew that before he did it. If his deity like attributes are to be believed then it would be silly to think that our existence is an experiment or for entertainment so what is the point, not of life, but of this particular construct.

bamfbmx (Oct 23, 2011 at 16:11)

cool story bro

ManiacInBlack (Oct 23, 2011 at 16:29)

Thanks for your input

luke-smith (Oct 23, 2011 at 18:23)

True. I do agree with you MIB. But just for to LOL's check out the "young earth creationists" tergiversations, twisted excuses and backwards logic to get around actual logic arguments against their position...

[Reply]