Posted by
mikelevy
Jul 4, 2013

Results Posted:

After poll is taken

Are trails becoming too manicured?

79 Comments

  • + 45
 Most all trails are manicured on the east coast, bush whacking on a bike is no fun. Even if the trail has rocks and roots they are usually not naturally occurring how they are, rocks are dug up moved around and smoothed around with dirt. Trails are usually built for mountain bikes to be rideable but still a challenge, which confuses me as to why people want 29rs and 650bs. You could accomplish the same thing on a 26 by just building the trail smoother. You make it a challenge for a 26" then just cheat with a 29". Now everyone will go to 650b and 29 and we will just add bigger obsticles to balance it out again.
  • + 15
 hahahaha thats a nice view on that.. . tup
  • + 5
 Spot on "Ninja"!
  • + 11
 I think if you build the trail then you can buff it to your own vision and screw whoever says otherwise because they didnt build it. The trails where I am have a very diverse mix of rooty rocky trails and if anything, a lack of buffed trails but then again I do live in the ROCKY mountains. You can still have flow on a rocky shitty line, just look at the Val Di Sol world cup,guys fly through some of those rock gardens and look smooth as can be.

If you want a smoother trail, go find or build one. If you think that trails are too manicured then go and find/build a gnarly one, seems simple enough doesn't it?
  • + 2
 come to ottawa CampFortune is all rocks but fresh jumps
  • + 1
 It seems that the trails that are smoothed over are the ones built for mountain biking, at least around here. There will always be plenty of un-manicured hiking, horse, and other trails for us to play in the mud and rocks.
  • + 1
 Rode a familiar trail this weekend with a new, very fast, very fun trail bike and I have to say that it was a drag. Totally 80's style trail, too narrow, constant hairpins, even at the bottom of sections, low...dumping you into mud and yet another hairpin= dead stop. Bottom line...not sustainable and not fun. Gimme some flow for f@ck's sake...even if only for half of the damn trail #Ravenshoe
  • + 1
 Trails are trails, they reflict ground and mountain, if there is lots of dirt and little roots and rocks go for it, build a smooth and flowy trail. If your building on a steep, rooty, rocky Mountain then the path of least resistance is to build a tec but still flowy trail.
  • + 1
 Go ride Plattekill and tell me how manicured and nice you think the trails are heeeeee. If you want manicured go to the salon or Creek. Plattekill is raw az fuk. East coast got smashed with five different major storm events. Trails are damaged from Ny to Fl.
  • + 2
 I live on the east coast and I don't know what your talking about. The trails around here (Mid-Atlantic and Western NC) are all natural and rocky/rooty as hell. You have to go out of your way to try and find a manicured trail. Ride any of the trails in Pisgah and I guarantee you will break something on a rock or bend something on a root. In fact, it is so common that most of the companies won't warranty your parts if they find out you were riding in Pisgah.
  • + 2
 Ya what are these idiots talking about. The east was more gnarly 5 years ago before the hurricanes. Imagine how rough the trails are now. No dirt, you ride rock to rock.
  • + 1
 Me thinks Ninja took some OTBs to the head...
  • + 17
 Some days I want to ride loose shit, other days I want to ride jump lines. Need both.
  • + 2
 Nailed the essence of owning a DH/FR bike. ^^^
  • + 8
 Timberline WV Bike Park has NO MACHINE BUILT TRAILS! All hand built. Gravity BMX on a DH or Free ride bike is overkill. A machine is not required to build flow or "groomed" trails. The big problem is that Gravity MTB is being dumbed down to a low level so beds can be filled, food sold, and bikes rented.
DH or Free Ride rigs are the human powered cousin of a Dirt Bike. Woods riding on a Dirt Bike is the model I use to build our park. To me that is the soul and origin of all off road- on a bicycle or a dirt bike.
  • + 6
 Valid points. This is a multifaceted issue that is so specific to each riding area. Land managers, other user groups (dirt bike, hikers, atv, etc), terrain, trail traffic, riding styles all shape trails for better or worse. Sometimes change has to happen, builders can never please or appeal to all riding styles, especially in regards to old trails turned new. There is a significant difference when looking at new trails, when this may not apply as riders has no concept of "what once was". I wouldn't say flow is limited to berms or manicured trails, its in most properly designed or well built trails, if you know your lines. A trail can definitely be built with more "natural" features, address all of the above issues, and still have a shit load of flow, it just takes a really talented, experienced builder to accomplish this.
  • + 3
 Couldn't agree more!! But that experienced trail builder needs some help from his fellow riders so it can be ridden and have difficult and easy spots and lots of alternate lines cause those line help keep trails safe and fun for all riders when it come to rocky and rooty (that should be an ice cream) vs smooth and super fast and flowy
  • + 1
 +1 for the ice cream.
  • + 5
 Learn to ride the mountain, it takes a lot of the adventure out of riding when the trails look like bermy dirt roads. God forbid you should have to actually pedal or lift your wheel over a root or rock, or OMG shift your weight to maintain traction. Luckily I live in an area with tons of backcountry trails, after 20 years I still have to walk some stuff that others can ride and that's OK. I feel sorry for you guys that have to ride mountain bike parks or trail systems built for the modern urban wuss. Participation trophies anyone.
  • + 4
 Pretty much all the trail centres here in the UK are smooth stuff, gets boring after a while but I think it's a liability issue, if a n00b biker injured themselves on a trail then they couldn't sue the FC for not repairing/ preparing the trails properly because they look like bowling alleys. they're fun and fast but I love my rocks and roots, and a bit of mud.
  • + 2
 i think it all depends on the trail (downhill slopestyle dj ) and the trail builder, because if theres a nice dirtjump section im sure hardtails/rigids and bmxers dont want to bounce their way down the trail but if its a downhill trail etc then why not leave the roots and stuff
  • + 2
 I think it's also to do with the trails having to hold up to high traffic of bikers riding them in all conditions, so the have to surface them with material that will withstand the amount of use they will get. It's a bit of a catch 22, the more people get into the sport, the more wear the trails have to hold up to, so then the more manicured the trails will have to be to handle it.
  • + 1
 That's not always true, as rocks and rock gardens hold up to more wear than anything
  • + 1
 any sort of downhill trails in the north of the uk are rarely machined. take hamsterley, built by a group of lads with shovels and spades, only the 4x was machined. innerliethen, the same. if its the forestrys red or black trails then they are groomed too much. but thats why you have the grades of difficulty, so there is something for everyone.
  • + 4
 I think if you want your trails a certain way you should pick up your tools and head to the trail! I would like to see a Poll to see how much time riders actually spend maintaining the trails they ride!
  • + 4
 This. I was helping out a trail builder at my local park not to long ago. My day was over (screwed rear shock) and had planned to ride for a few more hours still so I figured what the hell and started helping build a new section he was working on that day.

It was amazing how many people stopped while they were riding through and actually tried to tell the builder what they should be building. He told them if they come out and build they are more than welcome to put in their 2 cents into how the trails are built. "No I don't have time for that" was one of their responses. Then guess what shitbag, you can't complain about a trail you're riding that's volunteer built when you're not lifting a shovel! The nerve of some people amazes me.
  • + 0
 Here's the thing, my favorite trails are rake-and-rides. Very little maintenance required, especially when compared to the dirt sidewalks I see popping up everywhere. Once the trail is in place, the only maintenance needed is the occasional drainage, removal of blowdowns, and kicking big loose rocks off trail. That's it! I don't have to do much trail work to keep my favorites intact, and the trail evolves naturally. I'm not opposed to smooth flowy trails, the problem I have is that in my area, EVERY trail becomes manicured. And then the guys doing trail work get up on their high horse about how much work they did as a means of silencing my opinion. Please, leave a few trails to evolve naturally, and don't work so damn hard.
  • + 3
 Groomers are fun. Jumping and railing berms is great. I rode groomers all day today on my SS park bike in a t-shirt bike shorts and a helmet. No armor, no pads, just flyin' down the mtn in the breeze jumping away trying not to use the brakes. Those who need to use a dangerous activity to pump their 'danger factor' should look into wingsuit flying. If you want bike parks to succeed they need to attract riders of all levels, and you need to make trails that don't require a DH bike. Who really can afford $150 a day for a ticket and DH bike rental? Groom away IMO. Its just more relaxed and fun to ride them. Truly great riders will not ride the groomed stuff anyway, so no worries on the development of great riders, they tend to find themselves off the beaten trail naturally. Groomers are just another choice for the resort customer. Those whose manhood is threatened by them likely bought in to the sport for image anyway. Ride your bike and have fun on any of the trails. MIx it up. Take someone with you who has not ridden gravity trails and share a new experience with them on these type trails. You will feel good.
  • + 2
 I think the type of trails people build are determined by the location and what the land managers allow. We have had many issues in my neck of the woods with the state. They have finally realized that mtb riders are the only ones who actually maintain the trails, very few hikers ever do around here. I noticed if you keep it as natural as possible, you won't piss off as many people. Throwing in a few bypasses leading to a jump or rock drop is a good compromise. In any case, I know it's a lot of work to build a trail, so kudos to those who put the time in.
  • + 3
 Big fan of the super gnar stuff here but hitting jumps and slaying berms every now and then is always fun. I don't like when they smoothen out the rougher trails and neglect the supposedly smooth stuff though...
  • + 2
 The trails I used to ride in Oregon were unnaturally smooth, here in MT you have to ride like a man over loose rock gardens, roots and gnarly rock out-croppings. All the rock picking and manicuring ends up making the trails really wide. I got too used to the groomed trails, they were fun and fast but I will always prefer the tight single track over natural obstacles, with some nice cliffs and skinny drops. I see it like groomed vs. powder runs on a snowboard. This is one of the reasons why I like dirt biking more. You cover more trail in a day, at a consistent speed over entirely natural obstacles in remote locations. You also have the super technical uphill sections that are impossible to ride up on a mtb. I do 40-60 mile loops on average, and never see any hikers or mountain bikers. But, I still ride my mtb at my gnarly local bike park on the daily.
  • + 2
 Timberline WV Bike Park has NO MACHINE BUILT TRAILS! All hand built. Gravity BMX on a DH or Free ride bike is overkill. A machine is not required to build flow or "groomed" trails. The big problem is that Gravity MTB is being dumbed down to a low level so beds can be filled, food sold, and bikes rented.
DH or Free Ride rigs are the human powered cousin of a Dirt Bike. Woods riding on a Dirt Bike is the model I use to build our park. To me that is the soul and origin of all off road- on a bicycle or a dirt bike.
  • + 2
 Just saw the post and had to comment, as this is a very sore subject of mine.

Unfortunately, I have a fairly poor view of “Trail Maintenance” when it is actually applied to mean “Trail Manicuring”. I think that, if there exists a problem with a trail (erosion for example), then it should be addressed with Trail Maintenance, but I have an issue when no problems exist and it is decided that it needs “maintenance” (manicuring actually) just because it is difficult or doesn't flow right.

I have been in various areas where a trail was perfectly fine to ride (provided you were of a certain skill level), only to come back to this same area later to find that it has been manicured to make easier. In particular, there existed this very long rock garden section of one of my local trails that I had spent a significant amount of time working and working (better part of 3 weeks) until I was finally able to ride it flawlessly (I am not an expert rider by any means). As I would expect anyone else, I felt very accomplished because of my hard work. I wanted to use that section as a benchmark to test my skill level for the next year, but unfortunately it never happened, since this section ended up being “manicured” (turned into a stone walkway) before too long.

I feel that this is not a matter of easy, medium, or hard trails (as there is normally ample variety), but I feel as if this is more a matter of people not willing to admit that something is too difficult for them while also being too impatient to put some actual time into riding. I am not sure about everyone else, but I am perfectly willing to push or walk my bike down a section of trail that I am not comfortable riding… I actually like it, because it forces me to realize my weaknesses so that I can improve them in the future.
  • + 5
 Pink bike. Stop notifying me about who votes or comments on a poll... It's getting annoying now
  • + 2
 Just unsubscribe from the thread?
  • + 2
 I realize that manicured trails are a great way to get beginners into the sport, which serves to grow the MTB community. More people means more support and resources for making new trails, and maintaining existing ones. But I think it's important for trail builders to remember that not all of us like to ride bike paths, and we seek out technical challenges and thrilling rides. If they remove challenging trails, riders leave and/or build their own and there are too many of us to stop.

IMBA has great guidelines on building trails that offer a variety of difficulty levels. They keep the experts entertained and challenged, but don't create a hazard or frustrations for beginners. I think this is a good approach to take, because in our niche group it's better to stick together to garner more influence. If we can do this, we'll get to see many more miles of trails and smiles in our future!
  • + 2
 That's the one thing I hated about Queenstown, so many of the trails are overly manicured and like riding a rollercoaster... only all the jumps are badly spaced and different speeds for no apparent reason
  • + 1
 Gotta love it man!! If you don't like manicured trails, why use a trail at all? Any trail whatsoever is considered manicured, just manicured to a particular level. So all this "I hate manicured trail" crap is just that... CRAP!! Go ride straight down an unaltered mountain if you want unaltered, untouched virgin routes and let's see how well your ego does getting splattered all over the hillside and getting thrown around like a pinball against the trees. These new tech bikes are over inflating the heads of their owners who think they are bigger and better then they are. Always somebody better to show you a thing a two, just remember that!!!
  • + 1
 Im okay with some trails being smooth and flowy. Makes them faster and much more fun! REMEMBER: Mountain biking is for everyone not just the badass, hardcore, don't-give-a-fick riders. Now trails that are in US National Forests should be more natural and un-pedicured. Ride on brothers/sisters.
  • + 1
 This is a huge can of worms!

There are a few guys on here telling the older guys to f*ck off back to where we came from that I don't agree with (naturally), everyone's entitled to their own opinion. We're not all of the 'When I was a young lad it was all more extreme' brigade, we’re of the when I was a lad there was no suspension and we were buffeted left, right and centre when we went out riding but it never put us off riding.

The sport has ballooned in a very short period of time. In the same space health and safety has also 'gone mad' as some would put it. The most popular places to ride need to weigh up the pro's and con's of what they offer to get maximum track fall, after all, all you spend when out and about on your bikes goes into their local economies. They also need the longevity of the trails, far more people are riding bikes these days. Although it's still possible sometimes, I would say that it's a long time since you could go out riding all day long and not see another soul out there.
  • + 1
 As also has been said the level of suspension technology at your fingertips today is nothing short of miraculous and it’s a bit pointless in my eyes having a huge downhill bike only for use on manicured zip ways. We all need to be challenged.

So how do you weigh it all up...... "When I was a lad" we ripped down the local woods with aplomb, travelled to Hamsterley and then later Innerleithen and Glentress, at the same time were all racing the length and breadth of the country with the NEMBA, NAMBS and NPS races. When we crashed we crashed hard, we got back up, it was our own fault and no-one else's, dusted ourselves down, or flicked the mud off, got back on our bikes and rode away. Sometimes bones were broken and we ended up in hospital, it's part and parcel of the sport we all do. The majority of the courses back then were largely rough strewn as we were all getting to grips with things, not just the riders but the course builders. The technical nightmares were Innerleithen and Guisecliffe, courses you can happily ride on a more normal full suspension trail bike these days outside of competition.

For the people starting out today there are the more manicured trails to ride, the older lot didn't have this benefit (well we did, they were just called Fire Roads though!) as said, we just got out there and rode our bikes, planned routes on OS maps, got in the saddles and went out there whatever the weather. A lot of people still do this.

Back to the debate in hand…. Personally, I’d say keep things in equal moderation, if you get bored with manicured trails, grab an OS map, plot some routes and go exploring. No-one is forcing you to ride trail centres, we’re living in one of the greatest countries of the world for off-road riding despite being such a small island in comparison.

Just get out there and ride.
  • + 1
 when we build stuff as soon as it's safe enough to hit over and over without injury but pushing our skill level then it's done if we kept on building making it perfect it would get boring and not worth it as soon as we get too comfortable with things we dig again to step it up
  • + 4
 Gotta have both of them, they're both sweet as but i can imagine only having one or the other would get a bit boring.
  • + 1
 I rode at Antur Stiniog down in Wales yesterday, it was pretty rough and rocky. Which was amazing, and then as it was getting a bit too rough it had like 3 or so tabletops in a row, all smooth section of trail, then over a little rise and down a rock garden into more rough. My arms were killing at the end of the day, but then again. It is Downhill trails and I am on an All Mountain bike after all. But yeah, I like a good mix, never too rough, never too much smooth stuff, because sometimes you get so used to the smooth the rough gives you a real surprise!
  • + 1
 Smooth trails are awesome, we need more of them to help welcome people to the sport. Rough trails are awesome too, we need more of those. Go build a trail, make it anyway you like. Don't take an existing trail and buff it out, by the time you're done you could have built a totally new trail.
  • + 1
 Is this geeky semantics talk regarding what exactly a groomed and manicured trail is and what exactly a "natural" trail is? Why do I get the impression that it's sort of like asking if you prefer a maintained trail, offering man-made challenges, or trail that's been eroded away and is raw, offering natural challenges?

Personally, I find a nice clean cut swath that is relatively clear of low hanging branches, brush (that would deposit ticks on you, knick up your limbs, and hide dangerous creatures or poison ivy/oak), braking bumps and ugly ruts, etc. with well packed soil is a beautiful sight. I like the look of armored trails too, and love seeing rocks naturally in the trail. I don't mind little cheater steps either, to help get up onto big rock formations and over logs, nor flattened out tops of deadfall, with grippy grooves cut into them, nor clean and smooth entries to drops and jumps.

Erosion, loose and beat up dirt, standing water, poop, sloppy amateur built features, sissy lines, etc. definitely aren't beautiful sights to me (at least the kind caused by human society). Even seeing certain other kinds of trail users, with little room to pass at cruising speed, such as those stopped to check out a line, those fixing flats and whatnot, those going in the opposite direction, those moving at a much slower pace, etc. can be detrimental to the experience.

I'd be amused if I see a rider place a medium sized rock back into the middle of a trail where they remember it was, after they noticed that it found a new home off to the side of the trail. Complaining about it is one thing, but actually making a trail rougher... wait, does that sort of blur the line between man-made challenge and natural challenge? In the end, I think there's more to complain about from what man did to the trails that wasn't done with any artistic intent (including just beating the trail up from heavy use), than the trails that have been overly "fixed" up.
  • + 2
 Gonna sit on the fence (as per) and say that I like a bit of both, my own trails are flowy as hell but there's also technical trails around here too. I ride what I feel like at the time.
  • + 1
 I must be lucky, there are no manicured trails aound here. Only hiking trails (at least what i ride) that are still either rocky and/or rooty, some of them very flowy at the same time (think jump enabling root/rock details), while some are complete flow without a builders help - i.e. they were walked and weathered into being that smooth.
  • + 1
 To be honest I prefer technical trails but I still love hitting a jump line every now and then. To me mountain biking is and should always be a mix of the two. That's what keeps it fun.
  • + 1
 Be honest, there is a and place for smooth and the technical trails... the same with 26's and 29rs as long as we are out enjoying the trails and our bikes that's all that counts folks.
  • + 0
 from the looks of it, it sure seems like they are ---- just watching video from random resorts posted here on pinkbike. l think if they were 100% slamma' bamma' ding-dong from top to bottom, people wouldn't frequent them as often simply because not everyone has deep pockets and can't afford to buy new products every time the hit a resort... a course like that is no doubt going to cause a lot of crashes. make it a little more tame, more people will ride it. l like the slamma-bamma riding but it does beat you up and it sure can mess up a bike when you crash.
  • - 1
 Some of my friends and I have started calling our trails Flow-Tech. A combination of fast flow style trails mixed with very technical sections. We have found even technical non-buffed out trails can be fun and fast. And just because a few corners might be smoothed out with a small berm does not mean the trail is ruined. A good trail in my opinion is a fast mix of both that is fun dry or wet.
  • + 1
 I often like having to manage a more random, eroded trail. I think these trails have a lot of character, and they are exciting to ride.
  • + 1
 I love mix of it, some parts have to be smoother because of speed, corners, jumps atc. But there is nothing better than loam with wet roots and rocks sections....
  • + 1
 If anybody goes to Poway, CA, look for downhill trails near Meadowbrook Middle School, and you will be crying for your manicured trails.
  • + 1
 Not much of the manicured stuff here in Australia. Mostly tech with plenty of rocks. Certainly aren't any A-Line style tracks here (would love one though!)
  • + 2
 Flow is not a description of a trail but how you ride it. I've seen A Line ridden without flow and Goats Gully with it.
  • + 3
 Are polls becoming over-saturated?
  • + 1
 Try riding in Nelson NZ, we have scores and scores of techy GNAR and are only just starting to cut berms
  • + 1
 Not in my area. I'd love to ride a super groomed trail (big berms, jumps etc).
  • + 2
 Just ride your bikes and worry less about what's underneath.....
  • + 4
 So the paved path down by the lake would suffice given your comment. Enjoy! Watch out for the rollerbladers and joggers!
  • + 1
 I love to ride my 8" bike over rocks and roots but I need to have some big steep smooth jump lines for my d.j. too.
  • + 1
 theres just one thing; i bike and a place to ride¡¡¡¡ any trial, any place
  • + 1
 Why is there no voting category for liking rough trails? They all want you to like manicured trails
  • + 1
 "Yes! Where did all my roots and rocks go."
  • + 1
 When your trails highest point is 37 feet above sea level it is hard to "mountain bike", so we go with the flow.
  • + 2
 got to attract more tourists
  • + 0
 too many XC riders on pinkbike... WHERE ARE MY ROOTS AND ROCKS!????????!?!?!?!
  • + 1
 The one and only ly reason why I LOVE BAD WILDBAD!
  • + 1
 My local trails at Triscombe Somerset are as wild as they come!!
  • + 0
 I don't even like my nails manicured. The rougher it is the better it rides.







Famous last shag words?
  • + 1
 feckin wakerplated trail centre crap yuk.... show me the gnaarrr.....
  • - 1
 I thought MTB was supposed to be challenging........that is all.
  • + 1
 manicured still is challenging, ever heard of crabapple hits?
  • + 4
 And often times if they over maintain/build techy shit it can become too easy. ever heard of Schleyer? anyway point is flow doesnt mean easy and tech doesnt mean hard. There hard tech and easy tech and theres hard flow and easy flow
  • + 3
 any track can still be challenging, depends how much you push yourself!
  • - 2
 The only reason schleyer has become "easy" is because they have manicured it. It's still seriously fun though. But there is a reason North Americans generally dont do well in DH at world cup level, aside from the obvious exceptions. If there were more gnarly, techy trails then they'd be better at it. Simple. I could never find anyone to ride techy stuff with me in the rain in Whistler.
  • + 3
 That is because most people do not realize how much fun it really is. Many of my friends have this little idea in their mind that anything with rocks or roots is un-ridable when wet. I personally think it adds spirit to the trail and makes it all that much more challenging.





You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login


Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.016251
Mobile Version of Website