Tracey Hannah
Aussie invades Canada
August was a good month for Tracey Hannah, who came to Whistler Crankworx with her sleeves rolled up, ready to do battle with Canada's best gravity racers on their home soil. The Australian has been on a tear this year, moving back up the World Cup ranks, and in a pre-race conversation, Tracey said that she had trained hard for this season, but more importantly, that she has never felt more confident on the bike than she has this year. Hannah had to settle for second place in the Garbanzo DH, two seconds behind Squamish shredder Miranda Miller. The Garbanzo must have been a warm up lap for Hannah, because she then trounced all comers at the Canadian Open, which is that country's most important National contest - sometimes referred to as the "BC DH World Championships." Tracey put ten seconds on second-place Manon Carpenter, and was over 14 seconds up on third-place Vaea Verbeeck, who was the top Canadian. Beginning with Verbeeck, local BC hotshoes filled out the next five spots. With that victory, Hannah nailed down the Crankworx overall DH title as well.
Brett Rheeder
Breaks his Joyride curse.
Brett Rheeder upheld the Whistler Crankworx tradition of winning the Red Bull Joyride in the first round with a single run - a story normally written by his arch rival, Brandon Semenuk. It was clear from the start that Sunday was all Rheeder's. Brimming with confidence, power and grace, the Freestyler from Toronto put in a near flawless run on a track that saw most contestants struggling with wind and wits just to finish with a clean run. His score for his first try was an untouchable 93, and it probably would have been higher if the judges (who reportedly were tipped off that Semenuk was using a custom made Freecoaster rear hub to allow him to execute reverse tricks) had not been anticipating a breakthrough performance from Brandon. That was not to be, however, as Semenuk suffered a rare brain fade and botched both of his runs before he even got rolling. It was a convincing victory for Rheeder - his first Crankworx Joyride win - and one that could only have been sweetened if his frienemy had also been on point that day.
Great Deals on Bikes
Big-brands clear their shelves for 2017 models
New bike buyers who didn't feel pressured to purchase the latest and greatest discovered that some well-known brands were heavily discounting their high-end mountain bikes in August. If you had cash laying around, it was a free-for-all. The cause of the summer fire sale was that most brands over-forecasted their 2016 models - especially at the pricey end of the spectrum. Estimates vary, but insiders report that some noteworthy industry leaders are sitting on 20-percent of their inventory, which
was an unappealing predicament, further worsened by the fact that most 2017 models are visibly improved with rider-forward geometry, 12-speed transmissions and "Metric" shocks. Collectively, the big brands were tight lipped about it, but with no gentlemanly way to dump the overstock, they pushed the big red "Sell" button in early August, advertising discounts up to 35-percent and more. New bikes were popping up everywhere on the trails.
World Cup Downhill Announcers
Show some respect to the Reigning Champ
I thought I was the only viewer who was fed up with Claudio Caluori's and Rob Warner's persistent dismissal of Rachel Atherton's outstanding performances as either "expected" or the logical byproduct of a female riding in the proximity of penis-bearing siblings. Turns out a lot of people are fed up with it, including Rachel, who shrugged it off for most of her career. At least, until Mont Sainte Anne, where she was the second fastest racer - female or male - through the speed trap, and was inspired to post a comment to that effect on her social media page.
Consider Rachel's dominance in a different light: She has worked her way back to the top step from a number of injuries. She has come back to the top step from debilitating illness. She has won on every type of race course, and in every imaginable weather conditions. She has adapted to a number of race-bikes that I know from experience, are worlds apart in their handling departments, and yet she rode each of them to victory. She has reinvented her technique and maintained a winning emotional edge after banking at least a year of her life in rehabilitation or physical therapy.
But, those achievements pale by comparison to her racing skillset. Talent and luck can win you a race or two, but to win consecutive World Cup and World Championship victories, to dominate as she has, requires mechanical and physical preparation, focus, line-choices, back-up strategies, planning, and execution at a level that few, perhaps only a handful of athletes in the game today could comprehend, much less perform consistently. It would not be an exaggeration to state that Rachel Atherton's understanding of what it takes to be a successful professional downhill racer is unmatched by any male or female competitor in the game today. Claudio and Rob, if you can't come up with anything better to describe Rachel's performances, then give us your silence.
Heckler's Rock
Out of control antics put an end to a tradition
Crankworx Whistler management has been wringing its hands over the shirtless fans who cheer and beer on the infamous Heckler's Rock drop. Behind the scenes, race photographers have been sternly asked to avoid shooting images of the shoulder-to-shoulder pack of boisterous fans who show up hours ahead of the start time to mock and roar at racers as they streak past during the Canadian Open DH. This year, hecklers crossed the line, allegedly throwing beer cans and rocks at chair-lift riders, mocking tourists, and disrobing female hecklers - riotous fun for some, but not the family entertainment that Crankworx promoters were striving for. The party ended with a trip to the hospital for a young man who was struck by a rock - reportedly, a relative to the First Nation Counsel who will determine if Whistler Blackcomb will gain access to tribal lands necessary to complete the corporation's master plan. Crankworx officials say they will re-route the downhill next year to eliminate the "Rock."
MENTIONS: @trek,
@Polygonbikes
Maybe she did speak to them as well?
It would annoy me if I had to put up the same, I'm sure it would you too. Not obnoxious.
At no point was there sexism. No sexism here at all, but we just had to make it a sexist thing because you guys are all the TRUE sexists. (pointing towards all the SJWs and the white knights)
She's also skirting an attitude which has proven the downfall of many an athlete, male or female if she truly believes nothing but her own hard work and initiative got her to where she is now. She had an abundance of advantages when beginning in DH, not least starting with two older siblings. Any of us would probably give a kidney to have training partners like hers. She'd do well to remember those who supported her and show some humility. Not for us, not for show, but for herself and her legacy. There's no denying she is the defining athlete of the current crop of DH talent but that could so easily be lost if she insists on poisoning the sport and herself by believing her issues are bigger and more important than the people who make it so great.
I think Claudio has handled he whole thing exceptionally well. The question is, will Rachel display the kind of grace befitting a true Champion, or will she continue to wallow in deluded self-pity?
This author on the other hand.
Pinkbike should force him to apologize and retract this inflammatory nonsense. He knows what he was doing, this is immature and a harsh accusation in today's pc climate against a guy who was just doing his job and was CORRECT!
Also, she's usually pretty quiet and keeps her frustration to herself, but if you absolutely dominate your sport as she does, I think you're entitled to a pulpit from which to preach...
Re-read what she says about not just her, but all women being recognized as athletes in their own right. Then think about despite being on an entirely different level, she always treats her competitors with grace and acts like a true professional (other than taking shitty chops at Gwin, which bugs me a little, but that's a different issue.) And f*ck this that everyone here thinks they need to shame her.
f*ck you, @RichardCunningham, for thinking that you need to shame Claudio and Rob. Claudio already apologized, a fact perniciously missing from your article. And even though I find no fault in Rachel for being upset, she needs to accept the apology.
She had an opportunity to be a real leader in this debate, instead of siding with the keyboard warriors and armchair feninists on Quora to point out the 'injustice of it all'. She could have accepted the offer to do the course preview, or proposed something which could show this is not a hugely divisive issue but one which just needs a bit mutual consideration to sort out.
Bottom line in my eyes: Claudio saw how he could have offended her and he acted.
Rachel has yet to be so gracious.
But who cares about rationality in this day and age of... no actually, less intelligent people have always been everywhere. They just have a platform to spew their idiocy now, under the wings of "social justice".
Basically useless banter for 1st world citizens so that they don't have to deal with real sexism in the world today... hint: it's not in 1st world countries
Imagine they were talking about Gee Atherton and asked "Well why is he so good?" And Warner or Claudio replied "because he had an older brother who inspired him and rode with him from a young age".
Would Gee be complaining ?
Or would Tracy Hannah be complaining if the same was said about her and her brother Mik?
It's simply a fact , having an older sibling who is fast and brings you on is probably the biggest advantage you can have as a rider . It doesn't mean you don't have to do anything - but it's a great setup to have . They were talking about her influences - it was in no way to detract from her effort and achievements.
It's a bad month for this column in my opinion .
I don't know if the writer of this article put it on purpose to increase the number of comments, but is f*cking ridiculous, it should be
bad month: Rachel being a snowflake and getting triggered by a simple comment
Well I cannot speak for your country but if your espousing the whole women make 77 cents on every dollar men make that has been well refuted by many many sources. If you take the raw numbers, your correct they do, but when you correct the statistics based on job title/profession there is no disparity(IE if you actually learn how to make accurate statistics).
www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=www.forbes.com/sites/karinagness/2016/04/12/dont-buy-into-the-gender-pay-gap-myth
time.com/3222543/wage-pay-gap-myth-feminism
dailycaller.com/2016/04/12/equal-pay-day-revisited-why-the-gender-pay-gap-is-still-a-myth
I don't have any connection to them or their plight and suffering but as a third wave cyclist who identifies as a Stan's No-tubes fluid, brand fluid bicycle tyre...
I'M TRIGGERED.
The behaviour on the rock was nothing short of abusive assault - ripping shirts off women? Throwing rocks at people? FFS that behaviour is totally unacceptable, the persecutors should be named, shamed and prosecuted for assault. Have you got a mother/sister/wife/daughter? Let me rip her shirt off and see if that's politically correct. Having a laugh is all well and good but treating other people like pieces of sh*t to get a quick laugh is way, way too far.
As for the commentary, it's about time we stopped dismissing the successes of women as by-products of male influence, and that's exactly what this is. Say what you want about it (and I love Claudio and Rob!) but their comments clearly come from a place of patriarchal misogyny. Rachel is the most professional, committed athlete out there, and she deserves to be recognised for it. Not only that, but she's achieved all this in what remains a very male-dominated sport, which only makes her accomplishments more impressive.
I'm not having a go, we do live in an age where political correctness has gone mad. But, this is not political correctness. This people is behaving like douchebags, and professional commentators degrading women. It's about time we stopped pretending that behaving like this is OK, it's about time we stopped defending their actions and it's about time we call them out on it. If we don't, things will never change. Down vote me into oblivion but it won't change this being right.
BTW, the 1800s called, they want their attitude to other people's personal safety back, and the 1940s are on the other line, they want their attitude to women back.
As you said the actions of that group of ruffians should be condemned. Were they drunk? Yes but that doesn't excuse their behaviour. Noone should ever be treated like they were and noone goes to an event to have beer and rocks thrown at them either.
Yes Rachel could have maybe been less bombastic with her response, but its very hard to put yourself in her shoes so to speak, and know what its like to have this behaviour in every walk of life - this was likely the thing that made her lose her tolerance.
I think Claudio and Rob meant no harm/malice or are even necessarily remotely sexist, but institutionalised sexism comes from a place of lazy default language, behaviours and attitudes, a product of a history of patriarchy, that all need addressing.
I am a feminist (Men and women should be treated with EQUALITY, neither superior) but I am sure I am guilty of institutionalised sexism now and again, because I grew up surrounded by male-centric language during my formative years (TV, Films, the pub etc).
However, I am not a world-stage commentator, so have no role model status or international influence. If I did I would be sure to choose my language carefully, to do justice to athletes regardless of gender.
Imagine a young girl growing up wanting to get into the sport, seeing Rachel and getting motivated, and then hearing that her success is down to her brothers!? Not a great message. Theres no doubt they have all influenced each other, and helped each other, but to attribute her success to only that one element does total injustice to her absolute commitment, and complete dominance in the sport.
Claudio and Rob regularly refer to Minnaar as 'the greatest DH'er of all time', (He's my fav rider personally) but thats just not right. Its Rachel - ~22 or more WC wins, to Gregs ~18. No malice meant I'm sure, but its a product of a patriarchal society. If people think the patriarchy is nonsense, it shows they don't know what it means.
The hecklers rock thing, thats utterly abhorrent.
Everyday sexism sucks, and as you say is the result of lazy default language, often not with any malice intended but it there all the same. Sadly it often takes it being pointed out before most (male) people ever notice.
How many times have you heard people out riding say something like " I'm riding like a girl " to imply that they are slow, bad or generally rubbish?
great writing.
As to Hecklers Rock @OzMike - I do not agree that it is an issue separate from MTB because it is deeply rooted in gravity part of MTB. Win or loose we're on the booze - do I need to say anything else? The constantly revived image of the one of few sports ever where a "true" athlete wins and then goes party hard. Masters, Warner, Peat, Gracia, Palmer, Kovarik, Rennie - all loved in a particular way for combining racing with drinking. Chainsaws and partying by the course tape. Yea other sports have it too, what happened this year at TDF and even today at Vuelta is insane but I'd say gravity MTB rules in that.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOQ8Z-awfis
drunken fighting in the village,speeding on the sea to die highway, drunken shenannigens pullin' the fire alarm...
they market this shit to people and then are suprised when douchebags feel entitiled to act this way in the village or park?
Look I'm not against Peaty and Stella instead of Peaty and 20 aminaocids in a brown colored beverage. But we can't have one without the other. Champs show off drinkin, fan pigs wreck havoc. The best thing we can have now is a commercial with Cedric saying: "drink responsibly". That would be the fkng end
I'm kidding, hecklers rock always looks so lit, sucks some people ruined it.
I know that I, for one, definitely did. Not buying another bike until all the waves of innovation have settled and some consensus between major manufacturers is reached.
Progress is good...no denying. But just like back in the 2004-ish era it feels like we're in a period of extreme changes and I'm waiting to see what comes out on top before I re-invest in my rig for the next 5-10 years.
The masters boys lol! I hear heaps of commentary about hope they're so fast and winning everything due to riding together...... Ha ha did you just smoke a twenty papery?? I sure hope so
"Just like at the highest level in any other sport...you won't out-train your competitors." And therein lies the truth.
One thing she may have access to, which her competitors may not, is BETTER training thanks to the unique structure of Atherton Racing. Not good or bad, just an observation.
they are paid son, they are paid.
their quality just makes them seem like they are volunteers.
Instead of expressing a 31st opinion on the topic (that Claudio was wrong for a few reasons), I preferred to address another topic, which is that maybe a group of pure males is not the right circle to decide how a woman should feel and what is sexist and what not. We are not the experts.
Just the same a group of only male politicians should not decide on female's birth control.
Interestingly, and is was just shown again in the answers my post received, is that we males just want to defend ourselves by barking something (not well thought through) back instead of reflecting on ourself. And buhu, sexism against men. Yeah right, poor us.
Oh well.
And since there's definitely some of those douche-bros reading PB between laps of clogging up the trails and annoying everyone in sushi village: You guys suck.
double truth ruth.
Last year in Val Di Sole I saw a few widely applauded, stoke generating DH circuit clowns trying to tip the Toi Toi toilet with a girl inside, which resulted with the door being pushed in instead. Right beside me an old Italian man was sitting and staring at it with disbelief, it was the first time in my life that I have seen the genuine "the world is coming to the end" face expression. But to contrast that a renowned photographer who got drunk by a one fkng piss of a beer was looking at it laughing like a caughing pig and taking pics (which never made it anywhere ofc)
I mean... Fk Brahs, Bros, Braws, really... When I hear a dude saying that Gwin never parties, I want to strangle him with a plus tyre...
The commentators simply said that her performance and outright dominance of the women's field might be due to having two siblings that were into the same sport (and earlier into it...) who are men, who also happen to be quite eminent, in a sport that is dominated by men by a wide margin (is it even accurate to say "sport that is dominated by men" as if sports are NOT already generally dominated by men?)
At no point was there sexism. No sexism here at all, but we just had to make it a sexist thing because you guys are all the TRUE sexists. (pointing towards all the SJWs and the white knights)
i'd say over 75 percent of the people on the rock this year were temporary foreign workers, and not canadians.
the aussie invasion wasn't just on the race track.
Aussies. But that is true of any large group of people in Whistler.
Its non mountain bikers that are the problem at hecklers. It's the groups of bro's that are killing time partying between winters that head up to hackers rock because they heard it was a wild party. There are plenty of people, from all over the world (Aus included), that would head to the rock because they wanted to see the worlds best, have a few drinks and heckle the riders in the spirit of a good time. But Heckler's became to appealing to people that aren't involved in mountain biking and that was its downfall.
opinions are like a*sholes. everyone's got one and they all stink.
www.pinkbike.com/news/Action-Cam-by-Sony-presents-Casey-Brown-in-Death-Grip-2013.html
Sure she puts the effort in, quite possibly more so than any of the other riders, and is incredibly talented when it comes to bike control but it's hard to use those things as the entire justification for her dominance when she's so far ahead of the rest of riders, who I'm sure also put a hell of a lot of effort into their training/riding.
At the end of the day, none of us really know these people. Claudio really could be a sexist knobhead. Rachel could have instantly regretted posting the comment in the heat of the moment. The whole thing seems to have been blown way out of proportion either way.
I do feel like a lot of people are offended too easily and it does look to me like Claudio is taking unnecessary heat for this. But if I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, why not the same for Rachel?
(non uk crew, google him.. )
Do you realize that many of the top 10 WC female racers also have top 25 WC racing brothers? Now add ANOTHER brother into the mix and the entire sibling/childhood dynamics change. To a non-insignificant extent, Rachel's success has some roots in the fact that she rode with her two older, faster siblings and probably rode a lot more than people who had 1 older sibling(brother) that enthusiastically rode bicycles.
Not only that, but racing isn't just about skills and riding time. The way that a racer deals with the stress/mental burden/anxiety/etc is paramount to a competitor's success. I bet having family around all the time helps a great f-ing deal, especially when they know exactly what the younger sibling must be going through minutes before her race run, no?
No one intended to say that her success is ONLY because of her "penis-bearing siblings", Richard. After looking through what Claudio and Rachel both said, it seems that the point in which this became sexist was in this article.
And, by the way, he's dead-on right about Atherton. The sooner the industry outgrows its juvenile misogyny and joins the 21st century, the stronger and healthier our sport will be.
Having your family there for you and know exactly how to help you is REALLY F-ING GREAT I'd bet.
it's cuz she trains hard, even watching the atherton series i felt she trains harder and more focused than her brothers.
training, focus, natural talent is the key to success.
hanging out with fast people for sure makes you faster, but if you dont want to win you arent going to win.
The story is the same for top athletes regardless of their sport- training and will to win alone doesn't make you special. Everyone you're competing with trains just as hard, and wants it just as bad. You need something special- maybe it's certain genetic gifts, maybe it's a technical advantage, and maybe it's 20+ years of experience in chasing someone faster than you every single day.
but I agree with what you are saying; that's why racing is so f*cking fun to watch. generally speaking, the top riders are all pretty close, just that spark of brilliance or superhuman feat of strength/agility that splits the top rider. and that's why we love them for it.
quality time on the bike, individual strength, bmi, heart of a champion, etc. all that goes into making a winner, especially in sprint racing.
it's like that 10,000 hour rule, maybe she has more hours in the gym, more hours on the bike, we dont know really know.
" maybe it's certain genetic gifts, maybe it's a technical advantage, and maybe it's 20+ years of experience in chasing someone faster than you every single day."
That first part about genetic gifts gives the credit to Rachel. You even listed it first. But the first thing that comes to mind when people think of why she is fast, the credit goes to her brothers. I'm not saying there is any ill intent here. We are just conditioned to think that way. Its a way to justify why someone is better than we are at something. If you or I had brothers or sisters in the sport would that automatically make us faster? Nope. That in and of itself isn't going to make us faster. Rachel has the physicality and mental capacity to ride the tracks faster than the other ladies. Racing as a family has certainly helped her training and experience, but when it comes down to it, she is the one that has to lay down the run.
What has made Aaron Gwin so dominant these past few years? According to the comments in this article, we can't say that he trains harder than the other men. We know he's not chasing someone faster.
Another point that came to me as I'm writing this in terms of training. Many are saying that all the women are training just as hard as Rachel and that she's faster because she's chasing her brothers. Well, guess what, chasing her brothers is a form of training. So if we are going to credit chasing her brothers, we can't say that the other women are training just as hard as she is.
What Claudio said was literally a verifiable FACT that could be checked in two simple questions to Rachel. Or is she going to say that riding with her bros DOESN'T help lol? No. His comment was 100% spot on - it "CERTAINLY HELPS" lol. Drop the feminist "treat girls special" rubbish Pinkbike, it's archaic & outdated & an insult to the ability of the rest of the female riders to not generate the same false-victimhood drama that Rachel has tried to stir up. If anyone is owed an apology it's Claudio & Rob for Rachel's childish comments.
PS I only upvoted @poozank so the comments wouldn't be lost below the threshold.
Fact of the matter, she was brought up into a bike racing family so it will have helped ar some point - yes its wrong to keep putting her undeniable domination of the sport down to that but it I am sure no disrespect was meant it it is how Rachels path to success began.
Time to put it to bed and move on - Claudio obviously wanted to and invited Rach to do the course video but she 'didnt turn up' - why not go, make light of the subject and be done with it - Obviously the apology from Claudio wasnt enough but we see lots of diva attitudes from the Atherton pits so I am not suprised.
Its not 'sexist' to identify the physiological differences between men and women and realise that they should not compete against each other in most sports.
Rachel, however good she is would not 'Smash' the men - she as nearly 40 seconds back on Danny Harts winning time at the last World Cup - It would have put her almost last in the mens field - Thats right 80th!
The idea that you think it is 'totally sexist and unfair' that there is no open class is hilarious, utter madness.
People need to realise that ignoring differences is worse for society
@yerbikesux great input bro, you managed to write a sentence without actually saying anything.
PS when is the Sports Person of the Year Awards - Rach should be nominated.
We live in a largely sedatory society where we have no requirement of physical attributes for survival - why would women evolve to become physically stronger, it hasnt happend over the last 200,000 years, why on earth would it happen now.
BTW evolution does not occur over hundreds of years, it occurs over thousands as stated, BUT, lets say women get bigger and stronger over the next hundred years..... what do you think will happen to men? human growth trends apply to our species not our sex. But nah, ill just go back being full retard with my buks n lernin.
It's not about how hard you train or how committed you are. It's about how good you are. If you're not the best I'm not interested. I don't care what gender you are. If you're smoking the field you get respect. If you're smoking a watered down field, you get watered down respect.
Look at Theresa May. She's the prime minister of the UK now because she is the best human being for the job. She smoked all the men. She's a world class politician. Do you even know the 80th ranked politician's name? Thought not. Should we have a class of politics for women only? Of course not. Women are awesome at politics in their own right.
Awesomeness is the same in every country regardless of gender.
Did I do it right?
There is not an issue with how women are seen in the sport. Do you not see the hoops the industry jumps through to cater to women despite the fact that they are a sliver of sales. Having worked in a shop I can also tell you that most men actively try to get the women in their life to get into the sport. Claudio made an off handed remark that was read into and got a childish reaction from rach who like her brother gee has an attitude problem. It wasn't an assault of women, there is not an issue with women or how they are viewed in the sport, like I said people jump through hoops to include them. Just because rach is full of hubris and easily offended does not mean sexism is at play.
Sorry, you are not qualified to make reasonable comments on that subject before not having consulted a female because you don't know sexism when it slaps you in the face.
It's the same as all those white people saying there is no more racism.
We have grown up with so much sexism hidden everywere that for us men, many things are normal when they are actually not or still biased and/or unfair to women.
Ask you female friends and you will be surprised how many things are sexist that you are not aware of.
Both my wife and I cringed when we heard the comment from Claudio. And btw, Claudio made sexists comments before (you've probably missed them as well).
To all guys: You are to a certain extent forgive for your sexism as you don't know better as a result from how you grew up. But it does make you look stupid. You chose.
Sorry, you are not qualified to make reasonable comments on that subject before not having consulted a female because you don't know sexism when it slaps you in the face"
1. You just discriminated based on the fact that the poster is male. That is the definition of sexism.
2. You just implied that men are not discriminated based on the fact that they are men... which is in direct contradiction to point #1.
You're a hypocritical, regressive idiot.
I personally am tired of every single TV commercial showing the guy always looking like an idiot and the woman being the one who chooses to use whatever better gadget is being advertised. I don't see anyone making noise about that and it's blatantly obvious in 90% of tv commercials.
The source of an argument is irrelevant- an argument stands or falls entirely on it's own merits.
If you wish to contest the arguments here, then do so by addressing the arguments directly.
Attacking posters purely based on their gender (nice sweeping assumption, and by the way I see at least four different examples of where you're wrong) is spectacularly immature and sexist. Perhaps tumblr would be more to your liking?