AK440

I read an article about the new Dorado and the carbon version went through flex, stress testing for a million cycles and the carbon was fine, it was the clamp bolts that broke. Even though you save a $1,000 for the aluminum Dorado, it will not last as long as the carbon version. Thing is, I have no idea how long an aluminum Dorado would last in the real world as opposed to a carbon version? If 1,000,000 flex cycles equates out to 20 years, who cares how long a carbon version will last? On the other hand, if .4 lbs is the difference to you making the podium when racing or coming in 4th, then $1,000 doesn't matter. I race snowmachines and just because something works for racing, does not mean it is the best thing for the average rider. Heck, consider even the guy who appreciates and can afford the the latest technology. Race quality parts are made for one thing, to win at all costs. Durability and lifespan is sacrificed for performance to win that particular race. I'm thinking there are some other downsides to a carbon fork then they are not mentioning. Carbon has traditionally proven to be brittle or tender when it comes to impacts and scrapes affecting it's durability. In the real world, who cares if the fork can last 20+ years of flexing when a simple wreck that results in a deep scratch takes the fork out of commission? The carbon fork is made to do one thing, win races. It doesn't care about longevity or your pocketbook. It is always about how much do you want to spend to go fast?