British Cycling has undertaken a detailed review of MTB Enduro events over the past season, including consulting people within the discipline to better understand the structure, event format, process for delivery and the audience. Following this review, we have decided that we are not in a position to insure MTB Enduro events for the moment.
This is not a decision which has been taken lightly - those involved in MTB Enduro deserve a great deal of credit for the work they have put into an evolving area of the sport which attracts a variety of new and existing participants.
However, the discipline format does present challenges for event organisation and the officials. From a British Cycling perspective, any requirements or regulations that we would need to put in place may have a negative impact on the future sustainability of events and could also impact on resources we devote to other parts of the sport, particularly MTB Downhill as the two disciplines are closely linked.
MTB Downhill and its future development and sustainability is something that we are committed to. It is an area that requires continued and substantial support and through that support we aim to raise standards and in doing that improving the quality of the racing environment for all. We will continue to engage with those involved in MTB Enduro and support them as the discipline develops.
Please be aware that this policy concerns only those events termed “Enduro” in the currently accepted sense - a series of time sections joined by linking stages. Some organisers still use “Enduro” to denote a mass start endurance/marathon style event, and such races are unaffected.
Title Image:
Charles Robertson
Edit - this was meant to be in reply to @bigburd
Hopefully our endless supply of techy local tracks is enough to keep new blood coming through.
In Spring this year BC stated that they would not allow any new Enduro events to appear on the BC calendar under their insurance. Those with a crystal ball would have realised at that exact point that there was 'Trouble at mill'.
No matter how much you dress up Enduro, bottom line is that it's racing a number of timed stages on courses that are predominately downhill. This is exactly what the insurers, lawyers, health and safety and any Judge or Coroner in the land will class the event as, "Downhill". You start at the top and finish at the bottom with a bit of pedalling in the middle. Especially when they find out that a number of tracks used in Enduro events were similar if not the same to those used for downhill races several years ago.
Therefore they will expect all organisers to follow the guidelines laid down by the National governing body that is British Cycling.
BC we can guess would wholly agree with the above paragraph. After all if you are asking BC to insure your event you will have to abide by their rules and regs. If not the insurance would be null and void.
You can only imagine how much BCs insurance has increased in recent years with this sue culture it seems we are adopting.
If they open themselves up to litigation then at some point in time they will be no more.
Please do not think that Downhill and the BDS is getting off lightly.
We are increasingly under the microscope and will have to ensure we go above and beyond the regulations.
I wholly believe Steve Parr and the UKGE team are leading the way for Enduro here in the UK and I wish them every success next year.
In the meantime, please don't blame or attack British Cycling on this decision. They are wholly supportive of all forms of cycling. I guess we just have to understand their hands are tied on this matter for now.
If it doesn't involve lycra; they ain't interested.
So many fantastic athletes get no recognition in xc/downhill/4X and now Enduro its such a shame. for as long as i can remember riders have complained about the "Governing body" but nothing comes about to change things, its a shame a like minded group of riders and organisors cant get together and sort an offroad cycling body to sort this crap out. Just need someone with some balls to get things going.
keep it dynamic youth based
look what uci have done for road bike devepment , don;t let them loose on mtb inovations
good things of course are freedom to do what the organiser wishes for their enduro race. making things much more fun hopefully allowing this niche aspect of bike racing to flower in its own retarded way.....more crazy ass tracks hopefully
www.britishcycling.org.uk/membership/article/memst-Third-Party-Liability-Insurance-0
It is my understanding that this means that as a competitor at an enduro event (because they are not run by any of the recognised organisations) you are not covered by their insurance, and member to member claims are excluded anyway.
I suppose what they are worried about is someone walking on to a course and get seriously hurt/ killed by a racer on a time stage. But that is the very reason why enduro racers need BC's support.
Come on BC have a rethink and support enduro.
Realistically, particularly to the outside eyes of a judge, there is little difference between the timed stages of an enduro race and a DH race. In DH racing we have worked hard to establish safe procedures (and tragedies still occur so we will be seeing much more stringent measures in 2015), if BC accepts liability and the chief commissaire signs off the course then they are going to have a seriously hard time in court explaining why they have not adhered to the established "best practice".
So there's good and bad here for enduro and good and bad here for DH.
www.worldsnowboardtour.com/rankings/ranking-information
General idea is that you have world class events and regional events. They all come under the same governing body but the lower events act as feeders to the world stage.
Hopefully Chris Ball will already be planning his winter around putting in something like this. It'd be a shame to see the UKGE races disappear.
The Isle of Man will host it's first national enduro series next year, but the mainland can't?!
And maybe novices will where proper full faces on the downhill tracks instead of trying to emmulate the pros in all those "enduro" videos where they where open faces.
And perhaps the "novices" you speak of are not novices and are simply riding trails that maybe aren't really as DH as you might think they are?
My local bike park is very much downhill/Freeride as it goes in England, and i know when i see a novice without a fullface, the smart ones invest in a full face.
Of course there will always be natural/techy trails around but the current trend is the opposite.