Redraven Speedview Goggle - Tested

Mar 19, 2012 at 12:45
by Mike Levy
 

Redraven Speedview goggles
Redraven's Speedview goggle is the only remotely operated lens cleaning system on the market and is designed to keep your vision clear in the muddiest of conditions.

Redraven's Speedview goggle system is designed to allow you to clear your vison without having the remove a hand from your handlebar to reach for a tear-off. The system works by using a remote button and transmitter attached to your bike, along with a receiver, battery pack, and a small motor attached to the goggle that pulls a clean strip of film across the lens - think of it as a remotely operated Roll-off system. Included in each Speedview kit is the goggle itself, the receiver and its SVRX01 6V battery, receiver pouch, remote button and transmitter, two rolls of film, and a blank spindle. You'll need to install two of your own AAA batteries. The kit retails for £129.99/approx $200 USD (US pricing TBD).

Tear-off and Roll-Off systems have been around for many years, with either one being considered near mandatory when racing in treacherously muddy conditions. Both of those designs have remained basically the same despite the technological leaps forward that other gear has made over the years, requiring the rider to reach up to either pull off a mud splattered tear-off or give the Roll-Off cord a pull. Taking your hand off the bar to clear your vision may not be a big deal during a casual ride where you can slow down to do it safely, but it can lead to disaster if not timed right during a race run. Ask Hill about his crash at the Maribor World Cup in 2010, a big off that could be blamed on going for a tear-off at the wrong moment, likely costing him the win, and you can see where we're going with this.

Redraven Speedview goggle
The Speedview setup looks quite different from a standard goggle thanks to the frame extensions on each side that hold an electric motor and a roll of clear film.

Redraven Speedview goggle details:

- Remotely operated goggle lens cleaning via a bar mounted button
- Dual goggle lens'
- Receiver uses a lithium ion battery, transmitter requires two AAA batteries
- Works on the common 2.4GHz frequency, but each goggle uses unique ID
- Includes two rolls of film, six packs available aftermarket
- Forty clearings per roll
- Weight: 343 grams (goggle, receiver w/ battery, and a roll of film, 106 grams (remote button and transmitter w/ batteries)
- MSRP 129.99 GBP/approx 200 USD (US pricing TBD)


The details

Speedview Goggle: Redraven's Speedview system is based around a goggle frame with the Speedview unit held in place over top with four small phillips screws. A compact electric motor is tucked away inside the Speedview frame on the rider's left, and the opposite side is home to the roll of fresh, clean film, with the motor rotating a blank spindle that pulls the film across the lens to clear your field of view. The frame is shaped so that the film follows a track formed by its upper and lower edges, as well creating a lips on the top and bottom to help keep grime from getting trapped underneath. The goggle strap is home to the receiver unit, with it tucked into a zippered pouch that is located at the very back of your helmet when the goggle is being worn. The wire between the motor and receiver is routed discreetly within the strap and into the frame. While that all may sound a bit complicated, Redraven has executed the design quite nicely. Yes, the Speedview appears bit peculiar when sat next to a standard goggle, but the system looks relatively clean and uncomplicated given how much is going on.

Redraven Speedview goggle
The Speedview goggle with its frame cover removed. A small electric motor (on the right in the above photo) pulls the clear film across the lens when the handlebar mounted button is pushed. A small pad on the motor side scrapes the used film clear of mud before it is rolled up onto the spindle.

Remote: The system employs a bar-mounted remote button that looks to be the very same as used as start or kill switches on many dirt bikes, mounting to the bar via a small phillips screw and a metal band. The red transmitter box is responsible for sending signals to the receiver on the goggle strap, with it being fixed to the bike with two large zip-ties. At 2.5'' x 2" x 1" the transmitter box is big enough that you won't be able to mount it out of sight on your bike, but it isn't large enough to pose a problem with getting in the way. A rubber gasket is used around the battery compartment opening to help keep moisture out, and the system requires two AAA batteries that are not included from Redraven. A burly 23" long cord runs between the remote button and transmitter box that is long enough to easily allow the transmitter to be attached to the forward section of your bike's front triangle. The receiver's power button, located on the rear of the goggle strap, can also be pressed to clear your vision in case you end up separated from your bike and still need to clean the goggle.

Redraven Speedview goggles
The transmitter box is shaped to fit the upper tube of a dirt bike fork, but this means that it should also mate well with most frame tubes.

Wireless Tech: The wireless setup works on the common 2.4GHz frequency, although each and every Speedview goggle employs a unique ID to keep different systems from interfering with each other - Redraven claims that there can be up to 15 million different ID's. The signal is said to take just 15ms to reach the receiver, and it has a functioning range of over 10m, although how you'd press the button at that distance is a mystery to us. Battery life will vary depending on temperature, conditions, and usage, but Redraven is claiming between three and five years for the transmitter and over 5000 ''clears'' for the receiver battery (they do recommend replacing the battery every six to eight months, though). That sounds like plenty of time to us, but it better be because there is no charger currently available for the lithium ion battery at this point in time.

Redraven Speedview goggles
The Speedview goggle employs a fog fighting dual lens setup, as well as vents on the top, bottom, and side edges of the frame for the same reason, and the addition of the Speedview system doesn't block any of these. On the left you can just spot the well protected receiver wire exiting the frame and entering the the goggle strap.

The Numbers: There is a lot going on with the Speedview system and, as you'd expect, it weighs quite a bit more than what a standard goggle comes in at. The goggle itself weighs 343 grams (including the receiver unit), with the remote button and transmitter box adding another 106 grams. That adds up to a total system weight of 449 grams. Compare that to a Smith Roll-Off equipped setup at 191 grams, or a bare bones, single lens POC goggle at just 94 grams, and it sounds downright heavy. The additional weight shouldn't be of any concern, though, given that the conditions the Speedview goggle is intended to be used in will likely result in a few pounds of mud plastered on your bike anyways. More important than the added weight is the system's field of view. We measured the vertical lens height to be 48mm, while a standard Roll-Off comes in at just 32mm.


Performance

Setup: The Speedview google ships unloaded, meaning that you'll have to install a roll of the clear film before hitting the trails. The task isn't difficult, but you'll want to give the included instructions a proper read through before jumping into it. Popping off the goggle frame's out cover exposes both the roll mounting location - it simply slips into position - and the motor side that receives the empty spindle. The end of the clear film must be attached to the empty spindle via the supplied tape, and both sides should see the film wind and unwind from underneath. Snap the cover back into place and you're done. The transmitter requires two AAA batteries that are installed by removing the box's four small screws, being careful not to damage the unit's rubber sealing gasket when putting it back together.

The remote button mounts to the handlebar with a steel band and a small phillips screw, and the transmitter pack must be attached to the bike with zip-ties in an appropriate location. The 23'' cord between the two is long enough to allow you to find a good position somewhere on either the top or down tube of your bike, and we mounted the button on the left side of the bar up against the grip. The transmitter body has two channels for the zip-ties to follow that keep it from slipping out, and the bottom surface is shaped to fit nicely around dirt bike fork tubes, a design that also facilitates most frame tubes. All said and done, installation takes about ten minutes, although you may have to slide one of your fork's stanchions down in its crowns to pass the transmitter wire through (the button is too large to fit between the frame and stanchion tube). The final step before hitting the trail is to 'pair' the transmitter and receiver units. This is done by simply pressing the remote button immediately after plugging in the receiver battery, and you'll know that it's good to go when you hear the motor spin for over a second.

Redraven Speedview goggles
The receiver unit is housed in a zippered pouch attached to the goggle strap, with the on/off LED button positioned under the clear window. Hold the button down to turn the system on - the button will flash green - or to turn it off - it will flash red.

On The Trail: Our exceptionally wet Winter season will always be the most dreaded time of the year, but with seemingly nonstop rain and mud it is also the ideal period to put the Speedview system to the test. Pressing the remote button results in a gentle buzz from the motor as it pulls a clean section of film over the goggle lens, with the soiled section being rolled up on the spindle on the riders left. The result is clear vision, just as advertised. The entire process takes about a second to complete, only requiring you to quickly press and release the button - not hold it down - to set the system into action. Each press of the button results in a clean strip of film over the entire length of the goggle's lens, and if you feel that you need another go at it you'll have to press the button another time instead of holding it down. We only ever needed to press the button once, though, even in the muddiest of conditions, and this includes us using our hands to manually cover the film with more mud than it would likely ever see during use. A small pileup of sludge could build up on the left side when we plastered the goggle with mud, but not enough to hinder out vision.

Redraven Speedview goggle
The fit with Troy Lee's D3 helmet was much better than with their older D2, a combination that prevents the goggle from sitting on your face cleanly.

Once you've done a 'clear' you should have mud-free vision until you need to hit the button next, although the optics when looking through both the lens and the film are obviously not quite as transparent as just the lens on its own (but still on par with what a Roll-Off or tear-off system offers). While we fully expected the Speedview system to be able to clear copious amounts of mud (it was designed for moto use, after all), we were worried about debris getting stuck under the film. Thankfully this turned out to be a non-issue, with the goggle frame's construction preventing mud from getting behind it. The dual lens setup also resisted fogging much better than what a single lens can offer, preventing moisture buildup during slow speeds.

There is no denying that the Speedview setup is much heavier than both a tear-off or Roll-Off system, but the added heft is completely unnoticeable once it's on your helmet. Ergonomics are decent, at least when speaking about the remote button. Mounting it up against the grip and rotated slightly back seemed to offer the best results, not requiring an awkward reach with your thumb to hit. We'd say that the button is actually much more user friendly than what the majority of dropper posts utilize, although it could be argued that the button's task is far simpler than having to pull a steel cable. And while Redraven does not claim that the system is waterproof, it proved to be resilient against any moisture that you would encounter on the trail. No, you shouldn't hose them off after use, but they are sealed well enough to be considered very water resistant.

Redraven Speedview goggles
The remote button is easy to hit when it's mounted up against the grip (left). We attached the Speedview transmitter box on the underside of our Devinci Wilson's top tube, where it refused to move or shift at all during the test.

Issues
The Speedview goggles will, without a doubt in our minds, give an advantage to riders using it in the worst of possible track positions, but there are one or two points that will keep some riders from using the system. The first, and most notable, is the field of vision, or rather the lack thereof. Redraven states that their system offers 729 cm² of viewing area compared to a Roll-Off equipped goggle's 351cm², and while that may be true, they still restrict your view by a very noticeable amount when compared back to back with a standard goggle. This is, unfortunately, most apparent with the Speedview's confined vertical field of view when looking down the trail. The culprit is the goggles' upper rail that guides the transparent strip, and while we honestly wouldn't say that it blocks your sight, we'd liken it to a helmet visor that is set to a far too low position - there is just enough frame material there to be noticeable in your peripheral vision and we found it annoying enough that we wouldn't use the Redraven system unless the conditions absolutely demanded it.

Potential Speedview users should also be aware that the goggles don't play nice with Troy Lee's D2 helmet, with the frame not mating well with the helmet's shell. This wasn't the case with the newer Troy Lee D3 full face or Giro's Remedy, though, but we'd recommend researching the fit with your helmet before placing an order.


Pinkbike's take:
bigquotesRedraven's Speedview setup is substantially heavier than both a tear-off or Roll-Off equipped system, and we feel that it also hinders vertical field of view - two big negative points against the Speedview system. Having said that, there is certainly an advantage to be had by running the Redraven goggles in the right setting. Would we use them when shuttling with friends? Probably not, likely preferring to just give the lens a quick wipe, but the Speedview system is, without a doubt, more user friendly during race conditions than both a Roll-Off or tear-off setup. Hitting the remote button to clear your vision is much less dangerous than having to take a hand off of the handlebar, and you can still easily have a finger on the brake when reaching for Speedview button with your thumb. The Speedview goggle has a few shortcomings and they are not inexpensive, but they might have a place in your gear bag if you regularly race in muddy conditions.- Mike Levy
Must Read This Week

73 Comments

  • + 56
flag Redravenracing (Mar 28, 2012 at 7:41)
 Hey Pinkbike cheers for the review, and thanks to the readers for all your comments good, bad and indifferent. There was some really good comments and suggestions, and we want Speedview as perfect as possible, so we appreciate all feedback.

We're trying to make a difference in racing by adding real performance and safety benefits, in this day and age it baffles me that riders still have to remove their hands from the handlebars, to clear their vision, don't you think so?!
Traditional roll-off systems give such a small viewing area when in use, in my opinion tear-off's & roll-off's just don't cut it nowadays.

Speedview's was designed to let you guys/girls focus on racing, being a racer myself I found I wasn't always able to rip a tear-off off or pull a roll-off cord whilst racing.

Speedview is perfect for wet/muddy races where tenths of a second mean the difference between first and second. I don't know about you but I never raced to come second, I always wanted to get results I could. Speedview is for riders that want that edge.

Goggle/tear-off/roll-off technology hasn't changed in over twenty years so we thought it was about time we did something no other company in the world could do. This is the first big leap in innovation for clearing your vision and with your support and help we will continue to perfect and improve.

Also with in the next few years tear-off's will be banned globally on all race tracks so you will need to choose a side :-)

Cheers everyone.
Jonathan Knight
CEO
Redraven
  • + 5
flag socalshredder (Mar 28, 2012 at 12:55)
 word.^
  • + 28
flag KennyKillsIt (Mar 28, 2012 at 13:03)
 That last part about banning tear offs; I'm not a big eco nut but when it comes to tear offs it just irritates me to see them strewn about a trail. So much trash Facepalm
  • + 0
flag harrisonschreiner (Mar 28, 2012 at 16:25)
 I wonder if these will catch on for moto...
  • + 4
flag WAKIdesigns (Mar 29, 2012 at 2:12)
 I still love looking at Brendog pulling the tear off while clearing some huge table top - it's an art on it's own
  • + 1
flag IainJohnson (Mar 29, 2012 at 14:08)
 @WAKIdesigns They could make a cheaper one with a button or something on the side, so he can still do it. Wink
[Reply]
  • + 17
flag TheGoose (Mar 28, 2012 at 1:59)
 I've seen pictures in Dirtmag of Justin Leov wearing these at WC races so i'm sure they are a very capable set of goggles. Probably only a race day requirement for incredibly competitive riders though
  • + 2
flag SJA59 (Mar 28, 2012 at 18:00)
 I want a video of this working...
[Reply]
  • + 17
flag B-Red (Mar 28, 2012 at 0:18)
 Nifty, but I don't need it.
  • - 12
flag derpdownthehill (Mar 28, 2012 at 5:41) (Below Threshold) show comment
 Did anybody else think of Halo when they saw the goggles? Or some other video game?
  • - 3
flag taletotell (Mar 28, 2012 at 5:49)
 yeah, innovation is cool but it is rare for most bikers to ride in such sloppy conditions as to coat their goggles before the end of the race.
  • + 8
flag hoolydooly (Mar 28, 2012 at 6:59)
 Well maybe in america. But when you think about the guys in GB and that sort or place, from what i hear they spend a fair bit of time riding in the wet.
  • + 11
flag dougies (Mar 28, 2012 at 7:28)
 its rare to get to a bottom of a run without your goggles being coated over here...
  • + 3
flag liamjumper (Mar 28, 2012 at 8:38)
 The button looks like a killswitch on a dirtbike.
  • + 5
flag Ali-G-H-96 (Mar 28, 2012 at 9:16)
 its almost unheard of to have clean goggles here in the winter
  • + 1
flag bigburd (Mar 28, 2012 at 10:58)
 Yep , most our autumn thru to winter is mud splattered goggle stuff , saying that tho we had a really dry winter , only had to replace my lenses twice
  • + 2
flag taletotell (Mar 28, 2012 at 13:32)
 I stand corrected. I guess I've never hit the park in the sloppy season
  • + 2
flag hoolydooly (Mar 28, 2012 at 21:52)
 Iv been riding the same lens for over a year now haha.
[Reply]
  • + 10
flag socommk23 (Mar 28, 2012 at 1:01)
 HEADS UP DISPLAY ALREADY EXISTS! serch recon instruments. they have a gogle system that uses gps and a small screen under the right eye to feed back info on speed, airtime, max speed, etc..... there leading goggle also has wireless compatability with smart phones for phone calls, music playing etc! far cooler than some tear off system.
  • + 4
flag redrook (Mar 28, 2012 at 4:05)
 "Cooler". Hmm, that's taking fun a little too seriously for me.
  • + 2
flag socommk23 (Mar 28, 2012 at 5:08)
 different folks.......different strokes!!!! im not saying id buy the recon goggles, but they have their uses for sure. jeb corliss uses them as they help with vertical and horizontal speed readouts. and in snow conditions it means you can keep ya gloves on for phone calls and music selection as well as bragging rights in any friendly comps.
  • + 7
flag redrook (Mar 28, 2012 at 6:10)
 Yes, but Jeb Corliss is a professional. And as for making phone calls, I hate people in lift lines and on chairs yelling away on their phones, plus if my friend bought one I'd mock them for wasting that much money.
  • + 3
flag fullbug (Mar 28, 2012 at 7:21)
 ^agreed.
  • + 1
flag cyberhawk Plus (Mar 30, 2012 at 3:47)
 lmfao i'd rather buy the recons.. but than again .. i aint no racer..
[Reply]
  • + 8
flag JustinLeov (Mar 31, 2012 at 13:51)
 Hey Guys, little bit of background.. Champery last year at Worlds I was using a "normal" set off production roll offs (I won't say the brand, you can figure that out ) Vision was terrible and you had to decide to take a hand off the bar or run with no vision for sections. I crashed near the bottom of the course and that was my race run over. After that event I found this company Redraven and I paid the money and brought a setup to test. I honestly believe for those conditions It would of been a different outcome to my run there. I also think you can't compare these to a regular goggle at all, they are a tool for extreme conditions. The points to consider is that, the weight you really don't notice when riding. Its on your helmet and I've never once thought while riding "wow my goggles feel heavy" You just don't feel that. Vision is clear, you have a wide field of view and because the whole lenses is covered your lenses lasts longer as it can't get scratched (I've been on the same lenses since I got them in November) Look at it this way, I had the option of goggles to use and I brought a set of these. They do work, if you ride in extreme conditions and get sick of dealing with the mud they are something I'd recommend. Racing or riding. Come by the Trek Pits at any race I'm at and I'll show you how they work....
[Reply]
  • + 9
flag patmcc (Mar 28, 2012 at 0:30)
 I have one, its rad
  • + 13
flag cikudh (Mar 28, 2012 at 1:09)
 whoever aiming the WC, World Champ, States Champion glory certainly need this kind of equipment.. coz, you got only one run to put it together Big Grin
[Reply]
  • + 8
flag Laurence-CE Plus (Mar 28, 2012 at 0:11)
 Next thing, heads up displays.
  • + 7
flag Jacko6793 (Mar 28, 2012 at 0:17)
 Air Con??!!
  • - 1
flag Jamieep (Mar 28, 2012 at 0:32)
 The heads up display is already here, not seen the 4iiii?
  • + 1
flag nsbichboy (Mar 28, 2012 at 0:34)
 Heated seat and grips?
  • + 6
flag isaacschmidt Mod Plus (Mar 28, 2012 at 1:15)
 There are heated grips...
  • + 9
flag Orsumness (Mar 28, 2012 at 1:15)
 It's riding your bike not playing COD lads. I ride my bike to get off of the computer and away from the TV and I don't want some goggles to bring it with me. Such a sick idea. Price would be an issue but all in all good job guys
  • + 1
flag spaced (Mar 28, 2012 at 1:23)
 Actually there are HUD googles that give you info about your run. 300-400$ if I remember right.
  • + 2
flag socommk23 (Mar 28, 2012 at 2:53)
 oh and aircon? paintball goggles already have small fan units for demisting. i guess thats as close as youll get to aircon.
  • + 1
flag spaced (Mar 28, 2012 at 4:10)
 Smith also had snowboard fanned googles.
  • + 0
flag JonwithoutaH (Mar 28, 2012 at 10:52)
 Erm Laurence I think I neg propped you by accident , can't touch screen and cold hands -_- Sorry.
  • + 1
flag hankyman (Mar 28, 2012 at 14:08)
 @nsbichboy
there are heated grips out, there was a story on here a while ago about them!
  • + 1
flag nsbichboy (Mar 29, 2012 at 1:55)
 I believe so, as isaacds has informed above tar.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag wilson12359 (Mar 28, 2012 at 2:22)
 I think the whole idea is awesome and for moto riders this would be the best thing ever, But for Downhill i dont think its really all that needed, because tear offs are rarely needed and when they are you dont use many in one run.
  • + 1
flag mic9654 (Mar 28, 2012 at 4:43)
 depends on the conditons at awaba nats i could have done with one of these
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag nojzilla (Mar 29, 2012 at 10:21)
 have you seen that kinda ultimate non stick stuff? i saw it on the big bang tv show here in the U.K. they coated a shirt in the stuff, threw paint at the shirt an it just rolled off!!!
goggle lenses will probably be coated in this stuff in a few years
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag glenndm (Jun 11, 2012 at 9:25)
 What I like is the taller field of vision. If there were a manual system, I 'd be sorely tempted.
I now use smith/scott roll-offs goggles. When the race is very muddy, it often happens that the field of vision is limited to a small 1 inch tall strip. Not very pleasant.
That said, is the redraven system still on sale? The first time I heared about it was back in 2009(?), since then it seemed to have disappeared. the website also seems abandoned.
[Reply]
  • + 5
flag kylecp1 (Mar 28, 2012 at 9:49)
 Pfft...no night vision?
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag bcmillertime (Mar 28, 2012 at 10:08)
 Hmm... heavy, expensive, impairs vision... not to mention it seems like a lot of google to smash into your face if (when) you crash. Back to the drawing board.
  • + 2
flag bcmillertime (Mar 28, 2012 at 10:12)
 goggle Smile
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag veero (Mar 28, 2012 at 4:34)
 Wireless remote controlled? Pah I wan't a mind controlled one, like in Firefox (the Clint Eastwood film not the web browser) for blowing up your enemies without touching a button! Muhahaha.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag wyattbighit99 (Mar 29, 2012 at 16:52)
 this is kinda like the whole heted grip thing its lame ... lemme just strap this huge batterry on my frame and im good. 1 tearoffs looks cooler and probbably work better .. goodnight!!!Smile
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag madbiker786 (Mar 28, 2012 at 7:47)
 ok i personally thought these wer fucking awesome gogles. imagine dannys time in champery with these things ahaha not having to do a pull off all the time haha!
  • + 0
flag mountguitars (Mar 28, 2012 at 7:59)
 yeah, for some reason, those are the only tear offs ever made on video that i could remember. cool but dangerous. if danny crashed cause he had to do a tear off then i guess everyone would say "he should've worn those speedview goggles". but he didn't so, just saying, LOL!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag dreamsflyinhigh (Mar 28, 2012 at 10:47)
 seems cool but what happens to the dirt that looks to me will get clogged at the other end.... so I'll have mud and scratches on one side.
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag ctd07 (Mar 28, 2012 at 18:54)
 why not just use small windscreen wipers on the lens?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag JStoneMan (Mar 28, 2012 at 7:10)
 look how tiny those goggles are. if you get those you are automatically a gaper. Plus there is something satisfying about ripping off a tear off.
  • + 2
flag y9pema (Mar 28, 2012 at 9:30)
 damn skippy especially while in the air!
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag superbikes (Mar 28, 2012 at 10:05)
 I think the motors should somehow be in the helmet safer like that.I can see if you crashed on the side you getting a face full of this goodish but foolish idear
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag farfednugen (Mar 28, 2012 at 19:32)
 this is just a modified 35mm camera fit onto a set of goggles...i'm pretty sure i could whip up a crude version of these.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag space97 (Mar 28, 2012 at 22:15)
 Fricken awesome ideal, but for the most part the only practical use is very circumstantial
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag gooberx (Mar 28, 2012 at 15:29)
 you GOTTA get rid of that gaper gap I mean c'mon! And it's too busy looking
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag RyanATduthie (Apr 27, 2012 at 7:43)
 i have not replaced my lenses for 6 months i just wipe off the dirt the old fashioned way Smile
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag BLIPDH (Mar 29, 2012 at 19:13)
 so now the only question is....will it blend?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag TYNT (Mar 28, 2012 at 20:12)
 I think I would buy it if wasn't so hefty or such big rolls of film on the sides.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag superbikes (Mar 28, 2012 at 9:59)
 Would be better with a can of beer on each side i think Smile
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag NMarvik (Mar 28, 2012 at 11:55)
 I've got to raise the question... did anyone else notice the fat ass gaper gap that arises from these goggles?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag champskie (Apr 1, 2012 at 12:58)
 im a man, i dont even need goggles.
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag mtbxracing Plus (Mar 28, 2012 at 11:56)
 The canisters on each side look large and I think vision would be a problem. What about wipers with a small center mounted motor and squirter?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag cretin82 (Mar 28, 2012 at 8:54)
 thats so sick. but for the average rider. maybe not the most practical.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag mcraindog (Mar 28, 2012 at 16:40)
 nice gaper gap!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag gooberx (Mar 28, 2012 at 15:30)
 The peripheral vision looks shitty too...
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Enduro27 Plus (Mar 28, 2012 at 10:39)
 cyborg goggle
[Reply]
Below threshold threads are hidden

Post a Comment



You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login
Copyright © 2000 - 2013. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv43 0.041762