Ask Pinkbike: Handlebar Roll, Which Transition, and Timing With a Stopwatch

Feb 7, 2016 at 17:09
by Pinkbike Staff  
Ask Pinkbike Header

Here at Pinkbike we get inundated with all kinds of questions, ranging from the basic "Can I have stickers" to more in-depth, soul searching types of queries like if you should pop the question or what to name your first child. Ask Pinkbike is an occasional column where we'll be hand picking and answering questions that have been keeping readers up at night, although we'll likely steer clear of those last two and keep it more tech oriented.





What Roll?

Question: Pinkbike user chase1212 asked this question in the Downhill forum: I need your guys' help with my handlebar roll, if that makes sense. As in, how far back it should be, or how far forward the bar should be rolled? I just got the new ENVE DH handlebar and a new ENVE stem, but there are no markings for roll on either. Where should I put them?

bigquotesThe general answer to your question is that it all comes down to personal preference and that some people prefer their handlebar rolled forward more while others like it rolled back. That said, there certainly is a limit that's defined by the sweep of the handlebar: if it's rolled too far back, the ends will actually start to angle down ever so slightly, but too far forward you will lose some of the backwards sweep that's designed to make it feel more natural. There's no trick to figuring this out, but sitting on your seat with your hands on the grips, and with the handlebar clamp just loose enough to rotate the bar slightly, will allow you to tinker with it until it feels right. Watch for the droop at the ends when it's back too far and use the handlebar's logo as a baseline - the company wants this to face forward. I like to use a whiteout pen to make tiny witness marks on the side of the stem and the bar that align with each other, a trick that makes it super easy to get it back exactly where you like it after having to remove your handlebar or stem for any reason. - Mike Levy

ENVE Mountain Stem review test
  The ENVE handlebar and stem lack any sort of alignment markings, but it should only take a few minutes to find a position that you like. Use a whiteout pen to make tiny witness marks on the side of each so you know where you like it.





Which Transition?

Question: Pinkbike user WillJacobson recently asked this question: I am looking for some input on bikes. the two bikes are the Transition Patrol 2 and Scout 2, both similarly priced. In a bike I'm looking for one that will climb with ease but will still handle super well through relatively big jumps and rough terrain, and hopefully not kill my hands. I am racing the Cascadia Dirt Cup and raced a 160mm bike in it last year, and at times felt I suffered through the slower stand up and pedal sections. I see positives to both, and when I rode them they both were awesome bikes, what I need to improve on is handling as well as climbing. I know the bike doesn't make the rider better, but along those lines any input or suggestion would be would greatly appreciated.


bigquotesFor a reliable race bike, the Patrol and Scout are both great choices, and I can see why you're having trouble making a decision. The Scout is a little quicker handling at slower speeds due to its slightly shorter chainstays, and the fact that it has a 67 degree head angle versus the Patrol's slacker 65 degree angle. As far as climbing performance goes, while the shorter travel of the Scout might make it feel slightly more efficient, there's really not much of a weight difference between the two bikes, which means that they feel quite similar when grinding uphill.

My suggestion? Give the Smuggler, Transition's 115mm 29er a try before making a decision. If you've never tried a 29er before, or even if you have, the capabilities of a shorter travel, slack angled big wheeler may surprise you. There will be a much more noticeable difference when climbing - at speed, the bigger wheels will handily roll over just about anything in their path, and despite the reduced amount of travel it's a bike that's well suited for the tracks you'll find in the Cascadia Dirt Cup.
- Mike Kazimer
Transition GiddyUp Bikes Press Release Images
It may only have 115mm of rear travel, but the Smuggler isn't afraid to dive into rowdy terrain.





Training With a Handlebar Mounted Stopwatch

Question: Pinkbike user struc asked this question in the Downhill Forum: Does anyone train with a handlebar mounted stopwatch? If you do, what stopwatch do you use?


bigquotesFor timing runs on a mountain bike, there seem to be three common choices: a DMC Moto Timer, a DRC X-Monitor or a Freelap stopwatch and timing pole system:

The DMC Moto Timer is the smallest and best to 'fit and forget.' It offers basic features like 100 lap memory, fastest/slowest/average times, is waterproof and the fabric strap buttons quickly on and off the handlebar. It should be small enough to squeeze between your brake levers and grips to easily press the single button with your thumb. At $49.99 USD it's not pricey but they do seem difficult to track down nowadays.

With a confusingly similar name, the DRC X-Monitor is a larger unit that can be mounted on your handlebar or stem, it uses a remote thumb button that can be placed close to the grip. The main advantage of the DRC over the DMC is the large display lets you glance at the time while still in braaaap mode, less important for downhill runs but if you are doing laps, or want to check your splits this can be handy. The X-Monitor costs around $75 USD, can record 50 laps and is waterproof.

Finally, the Freelap system is the most expensive and requires a trip to the bottom of the track to place the pole. To get started you need one watch and one pole; place the pole at the finish line and use the ten-second countdown beeps on the watch to start your run. You can add as many poles as you like for a fixed start line and split times, there are a few downhill tracks that feature permanent Freelap poles so you can just take your own watch and start training. Starting from around $150 USD for a watch and $90 for one pole it's not cheap, but if you have feint friends and a pole at the top and bottom then there's no way to cut the run short of the finish line. - Paul Aston

photo
DMC Moto timer is a cheap and useful timing tool.
photo
The Freelap system will hit your wallet the hardest but is great for training with friends.



Have some unresolved tech questions? Jump in the Pinkbike Forum and we'll look to answer it for next time.

Author Info:
pinkbikeaudience avatar

Member since Jul 22, 2013
3,465 articles

116 Comments
  • 383 15
 Enve bar stem combo, but can't set it up...
  • 41 8
 this is brilliant.
  • 139 11
 Dear pinkbike, i wanted to say that i have all the Enve parts anyone can buy, but couldn't make up a single question to let every one know that. Gotta get back to fixing teeth! Thanks!
  • 62 6
 Couldn't understand instructions...

Left ball now stuck to ice tray :-(
Whyyyyyyyyy
  • 51 18
 Nothing wrong with that. At the very least, he's making an effort instead of taking it to a bike shop. Not that it's a bad thing to support your bike shop, but we can all agree, a bike built by yourself is usually the better one.
  • 29 4
 Don't use a torque wrench either
  • 28 3
 Are you Enveious?
  • 84 18
 Oh hey, it's that guy. You know the one that makes fun of someone for asking a valid question.
  • 33 9
 No need to hate on someone for having money. There's no major performance benefit from a carbon handlebar so why hate on someone for enjoying a light bike? You don't have to earn your product
  • 13 7
 Calm down guys... yes he was asking a valid question, and yes he has money for a light bike... its just ironic given its a top end part.
  • 2 1
 My ENVE DH bars have small white lines/marks on the backside of the bars that you can see while sitting on the saddle, I also have the ENVE stem, the marks are meant for alignment I suppose as they protrude out of the stem just enough to see. I didn't even notice them when I first put my bars on, I just set them to what felt comfortable.
  • 37 2
 I feel like a $300 stem and $200 bar should have marks for adjustment
  • 6 3
 ROASTED.
  • 43 2
 Ha! Classic pinkbike-he has sonething that I can't even imagine affording. Better shit all over him!
  • 22 0
 Handlebar roll simplified 101, ,O.G. BMX knowledge database access. The bar angle should match fork angle, slight alterations accepted.
  • 10 0
 Forgot to tell the guy that he should start with the bar centered in the stem!!
  • 23 0
 Hahaha yes indeed centering is as important as correct angle. I usually clamp the stem about 85% then adjust, then look at angle from 50 diff angles, then drink a beer, then sleep on it and make sure it legit.
  • 8 0
 @fecalmaster, I do the same then go ride and it is still wrong!
  • 7 2
 I'm really picky about this ... I like the bar "inline" with the fork. So that the rise, when viewed from the side, is parallel with the steerer.
  • 2 0
 That thing is actually pretty cool @amrskipro lol
  • 1 0
 The Tune tool is way cool, my eyes are messed up so everything looks crooked. $95 bucks but N/A.
  • 2 0
 @amrskipro or you could do like I did and get a laser pointer and some packing foam. Same thing for about £8.
  • 5 1
 Roll is not the easiest thing to adjust though. I see many people riding with the ends of their bars pointing to upwards, personally, that would kill my wrists. I've found ( through trial and error ) my bar roll is so far back that the handlebar points a little but downward. no much but enough to be able to see it. whatever the reason is, this is the most comfortable position for me. Doesn't the Envy bar have a very pronounced back sweep? The Easton 35 back sweep is the only bar I've been using for the last few years, and seems to work for me. Bio-metrics is not so much a science as much as it a voodoo. I mean, what is the "ideal" tilt back of a saddle for freeride? Can you put the same tilt back on an XC? His question is valid and anyone who would think otherwise has never asked themselves that question, so they are either not curious or ignorant.
  • 3 8
flag defineindecline (Feb 10, 2016 at 12:50) (Below Threshold)
 More money than brains.
  • 81 3
 The last answer that I want to my "which bike between this two" question, is another bike.
  • 28 51
flag JayTucc (Feb 9, 2016 at 15:11) (Below Threshold)
 Not just another bike but a 29er. Eww
  • 7 1
 My thoughts exactly, they didn't really provide any insight to the given question.
  • 9 1
 You want to improve your climbing? Well, those two are pretty much the same. How about this third one?
  • 40 3
 Actually I think he went above and beyond by, first answering the question about the two bikes this person was looking at (geometry/chainstay length) but then he made a suggestion that, due to the racing style and regional topography, he may want to try another option (29er) to make the best decision to suit his riding needs. Cheers Mike K.
  • 10 4
 All nice bikes. But maybe all he needs is a adjustable travel fork?
  • 5 0
 @SteveDekker - Haven't you realized yet that all bike journalists and pros seem to hate adjustable forks? Meanwhile, the unwashed masses all seem to want one because they appear to be a perfect solution. And if a company actually specs one on a bike, they can be sure to be blasted in the reviews.
  • 5 0
 The theory of an adjustable travel fork has always appealed to me, especially if you have one bike to rule them all but it wasn't until I tried a dual position Pike that it actually made sense in reality. It's such a great fork. I feel like there's a hangover from adjustable travel forks of the past that just weren't a match to their non adjustable siblings but on the right bike the DPA Pike is magic.
  • 2 0
 This is a great article that answers why the Smuggler is the best answer to this question: "what I need to improve on is handling as well as climbing"
www.pinkbike.com/u/mikelevy/blog/opinion-cater-to-your-weaknesses.html
  • 59 3
 And I thought enduros always climb like xc hardtails ans descent like downhill rigs
  • 1 0
 Hahah yeah my frist thought too
  • 10 0
 to descend like a downhill rig you need a boosted superenduro. keep up man!
  • 33 2
 You can't destroy KOMS with a damn stopwatch
  • 75 1
 I can't destroy KOMs anyway.
  • 15 6
 less strava more flava
  • 4 0
 SCOTTZG just destroys old canfield frames and other bike parts.
  • 2 0
 @CGalbreath Flava Flav?
  • 6 0
 Can't destroy KOMS on windows phone Frown
  • 19 0
 destroy windows phone instead.
  • 1 0
 windows phone works fine for destroying KOMs. I use the endomondo app on the phone, and it automatically uploads to the endomondo web site. Then I download the gpx file from their site and upload to strava. Now I just have to work on riding faster so I can actually destroy a KOM or two...
  • 1 0
 @multialxndr @Icehawk Use Cycle Tracks GPS. It's the most accurate app I used for tracking and uploads directly to Strava
  • 1 0
 Ty gona try that this weekend
  • 27 0
 Patrol vs. Scout simplified: patrol will exceed your climbing expectations. Scout will exceed your downhilling expectations. Either bike will make you really happy with your decision to choose the more downhilly or more climby option. Both bikes will be immeasurably fun. Your margin for error with this choice is very small.

One more general guideline I might throw in is that taller and/or heavier riders may want to give more consideration to the Patrol and a smaller lighter rider the Scout.

Hope that helps a bit!
  • 4 0
 Nailed it.
  • 2 0
 Or a 27.5 Suppressor? Wink
  • 2 0
 Wow, someone actually answered the question clearly and concisely. Imagine that.
  • 3 0
 @north-shore-bike-shop I'm 6'1" but I already own a dh bike does that change yur suggestion at all
  • 5 0
 Hi Will, a resounding YES! The Patrol steps heavily on the toes of a big bike in your garage. If you love your big bike and frequently ride it for most gravity days, we do recommend the Scout.
  • 1 0
 But between that and the smuggler which one do you guys suggest? @north-shore-bike-shop
  • 5 0
 Scout Smuggler is the same bike, literally. Just choose your wheelsize.
  • 28 4
 Hahaha. So this guy if having trouble picking between 2 bikes? Lets give him a 3rd option to really help him out....prick move yet hilarious
  • 21 1
 scrolled pics, saw wristwatch and tampon tube, had incredible moment of confusion.
  • 6 0
 you know you liked it.
  • 16 2
 No strava?
  • 13 1
 Thought that too, strava is ideal for timing dh runs if you aren't going for fractions of seconds.
  • 17 2
 Not sure I trust myself to start and stop a stopwatch any more accurately than Strava can start and stop a segment.
  • 3 5
 I wonder if the lack of a strava mention was due to commercial / sponsorship deals, or the fact that strava does tend to encourage mayhem behavior. Cut corners and all that?
I use strava to keep track of my times and miles and general data, and have used it to do back to back runs and check my perception against the 'actual' time whilst training.
Strava has been known to have gps drift issues and somewhat inaccurate results (according to the KOM hunters).
  • 4 1
 I use the DRC X Monitor stuck to my top tube with velcro so I can easily get it on and off, and so it can break off in a crash. The reason the button operated stopwatch is better than strava for downhill is that it is accurate to exactly where you press the button, for example when you pass a certain tree or rock. When you're hitting the same section of track repeatedly, for example a 20-second bit to figure out whether to hit the jump or the roots, the difference in time will often be less than a second. Strava isn't great for those very small time differentials.
  • 3 0
 I use the Drc X monitor and strava together. Strava isn't always accurate, quite often it's over 30seconds out on a 3minute track. It's particularly bad around high voltage power lines or in deep valleys.
  • 5 1
 Strava is terrible for repeatability and to-the-second accuracy. Especially over shorter distances or where the course is twisty.
  • 3 0
 Strava isn't consistent enough, in my experience, to time runs particularly well. You also need premium to see live segment results.
  • 1 0
 I thought sports track live was better than strata for motorcycling at least. You can do real time or sped up replay on Google maps, and it tells you may speed, average speed, elevation gain and loss
  • 3 1
 Strava is very inaccurate. Done lots of tracks with a riding buddy in exactly the same time, yet Strava has our times miles apart. Same comparing to stopwatch. Strava is good for seeing your ride on a map, but not an accurate tool for measuring.
  • 2 0
 The inaccuracy usually comes from ill-defined segments, the starting point must be a little inside the track and the end point a bit before the actual finish line, so you always cross them with enough speed, possibly on a straight, easy to interpolate line, instead of wandering around them before and after the descent. Once you do that it's pretty accurate, to the second for my experience.
  • 3 1
 We aren't idiots. Tried that. Doesn't work, it's still not accurate.
  • 2 0
 No idea. Guess the idiot was me then, took me quite a while to see that the reason I was getting inconsistent times on my favourite segment was the segment itself. Recreated it from scratch making it slightly shorter and the fluctuations in the leaderboard were gone. Every single run with the very same time to the second, while I had 20s fluctuations before. Also, I always got consistent timing between strava and the photocell chrono at enduro races, maybe there are less distortions where I ride.
  • 1 0
 SportCount Velo-X - www.sportcount.com/products.php?category_id=1 $44.95
NEW! SportCount Velo-X is the latest addition to the SportCount family. This product is designed to work on a bicycle, dirt bike, or motorcycle. Velo-X includes a specially designed band which allows it to securely attach to any set of handlebars while cushioning the electronics from bumps and vibration.
Recall up to 100 individual lap times
Recall fastest, slowest, average, and total lap times
Display split times and lap numbers
Total number of laps completed & total lap time
Water and shock resistant
  • 2 0
 Just to prove my point a bit more, I have a little segment near home where I had 1:01 sec for at least six months straight, then found where I could push more and got to 57sec, kept it for every single run (at least 30, maybe more) for another six months. So for me it's accurate to the second, has very good repeatability and works pretty fine even in short segments.
  • 15 2
 But Mike I'm too insecure to run a 29-er...
  • 12 0
 Ah yes, the 'reverse monster truck' problem...
  • 1 1
 It's a North Shore Enduro racing series. Not really a great venue for most riders to be looking to field a "short travel 29er". If I asked about two different 27.5 bikes and they suggested a 26er I'd think that was kinda dumb too...

Granted there are a couple of Enduro racers that are doing really well on 29ers. But most of the big team riders have their pick of wheel size and travel options/set ups. And though some have definitely given 29ers more than a fair chance. Most just aren't winning on them...? Obviously I'm not trying to win any races. But as long as I aspire to ride like the pro's I'll also be inspired by "what" they ride! Smile
  • 10 0
 The Smuggler will give you a boner its amazing
  • 5 2
 @WillJacobson

I'd go with the patrol personally. I bought the 2015 version, and it is by far the best bike I've ever owned. Great at climbing, killer at descending. Transition says that each bike has the same capabilities, but a different ride characteristic. So you have to decide between an slack bomber, or a quick slopestyle bike. Either bike is going to be great and you are definitely going to love it!

@TransitionBikeCompany
  • 3 0
 I've gotta toss one in for the Scout! It is a brilliant and whip-able bike. It wants to pop off of every thing in the trail. It'd be fun for a day or two a season at the bike park and is just as home on xc trails. If you want pure FUN go with the Scout. It's a plucky little bike!
  • 3 1
 I would also note that the scout has a very low bottom bracket 5mm lower than the patrol. If your worried a about pedal strikes the patrol might be a better choice.
  • 2 0
 Good point! But you adjust quickly.
  • 2 0
 I had an encounter with the low BB on the scout. on my first ride with it a pedal strike going pretty fast sent me flying head first to the ground and I cracked my helmet. I was even running a 150mm fork and 170mm cranks, even so, I wouldn't change it, It's just such a fun bike.
  • 1 0
 Hey guys my idea about going less travel is influenced a lot with already owing a tr500, that's why I'm thinking scout or smuggler.
  • 1 0
 I love my scout, but i'm thinking the smuggler must be a really fun as well, in the end you can't go wrong with either, but I went for the scout because I already had a 27.5" bike with awesome wheels that I wanted to keep using.
  • 1 0
 @darupp 5mm lower, then add sag in and it's negligible.
  • 3 0
 The answer about handlebar roll is lacking, imo. First you need to know how to center it (you can't trust a logo, bc of head angle, etc.) There is a way to look at the bar in comparison to/with other factors on the bike. I wonder if the author even knows what to look for, or at?
  • 3 0
 I agree. It took me a few seasons to actually understand how bar roll and lever roll affected me. Most quality bars have a sweet spot for roll where they transfer less movement into the hands. The best way I could describe it is that too far forward and the bar will give you the impression it's pulling you forward, too far back and the bar pulls you down.
  • 6 1
 It's funny how he says there isn't a method for dialing your bar roll but actually there is. If the outsides of your hands hurt, roll it forward. If the insides of your hands hurt, roll it back.
  • 2 0
 That also applies to bar width, too wide and the base of your thumbs hurt, too narrow and the base of your pinkies hurt.
  • 5 2
 The easiest way to explain where the neutral spot is, is to explain it by using a BMX bar for an example. The rise of the bar should be in-line, or parallel with the fork/headtube (as you look from the side view). It is harder to see where the straight part of a riser bar is, but look close (from the side) and you will see it. Line it up with the fork (parallel) for the centered/neutral position, then one can adjust back, or forward. Does that make sense? Don't put it forward like all those dumb ass Harley riders with those ape hangers!
  • 2 0
 Spot on @adkrider. Good way of describing it. I always line people's brakes and bars up on the same plane as the fork and make small adjustments from there.
  • 2 0
 For some reason I have to ride with the initial rise of my bars set to pretty much vertical. If they aren't vertical, I ride so poorly that it's actually dangerous.
  • 2 1
 Sounds like some other aspect of your bike fit is off @panaphonic
  • 1 0
 Agree with panaphonic. Having your bars vertical or forward slightly allows greater leverage over the front end and weight on the front tire. But I'm tall so whatever works for your body is the critical part. Judging by what some are saying here, if I have a bike with a 63 degree head angle then the initial rise of my bars would be so far rearward as to be unrideable, zero upsweep or backsweep is less than ideal.
  • 2 0
 Lots of riders have much different preferences for bike set-up from beginner to pro. I happen to have the combination of wide shoulders/ribs combined also with a wide arm-span to the point where even 780mm bars don't feel wide enough, which perhaps is why this set up works well for me. I don't really know for sure if this is correct but I know what works best for my riding style.
  • 4 0
 You may as well make 4 rides in one position, 4 rides in a quite different position and then chose for yourself... it is called bracketing and is used everywhere with everything. IF still not happy, you may change handlebar to alter sweep and rise, stem length... Try each setting for a few rides, even if it feels like it sucks right away.

Oooor do the internet exercise, listen to what people say that EVERYONE MUST HAVE: buy a 35mm stem with 740+ bars (sweep angles never given by online masters of geometry). Oh... Does your bike have 1300 wheelbase, 500 reach and 90 degree seat angle? Are you running the right number of tokens in your fork? If not, that may be the first problem to solve...
  • 2 0
 @panaphonic...Yes I also have wide shoulders and long arms, was thinking that may have something to do with it. Probably places your weight further back than is optimal I would think?
  • 4 0
 I just moved from a banshee rune to a transition scout and couldn't be happier, it pedals super nice and it's soooo fun, you can pop it off anything and it will fly
  • 2 0
 I find that with my own experience, handlebar roll affects handling in a couple ways. I like to set my handlebar on a hardtail so you could lay a level across the bare handlebars grip surface, and it will contact all of it, ie flat/ parallel to the ground. On a full suspension I try to roll them forward slightly, so that the same will be achieved once sagged in on the rear suspension.
For the handling, this allowed me to not over apply pressure on my inside hand when cornering or climbing out of ruts at high speed. With the handlebar rolled forward, I can manual like a boss, but I will make steering errors and have issues smoothly getting out of ruts and bumpy corners. I call rolled forward, wing tips, and it makes your application of pressure more emphasised on the very end of the bar, whether you are trying or not. With a flatter, rolled back bar, you can move your weight forward without over pressuring the ends. Try it out.
  • 2 0
 Spot on with the info on the Transition Bikes! I must see we love the Smuggler too! Don't let the 29 wheel scare you! This is the most playful 29 you'll ever sit on. We've taken it off jumps and drops most 29ers would not do well in, and the Smuggler wanted more. Climbs like a goat, but yet you can throw it around! Come demo one now, right now and we will give you a beer too! www.facebook.com/206848949345362/photos/a.1009766082386974.1073741907.206848949345362/1034926639870918/?type=3&theater
  • 1 0
 If you roll riser bars forwards it affects your steering the same as putting on a longer stem, if you roll them back it's the same as swapping to a shorter stem. You've got about as much effective stem length adjustment as the bars have rise, before the handlebars end up in too weird a position.
  • 3 0
 what about the pinch and roll when there are no markings on the twig and berries???
  • 2 0
 I can't wait until brake lever positions next month! down, up, horizontal, inward more, further out, Moto style, inboard of shifter(s) outboard?
and on it goes........
  • 2 1
 I used to run my bars flat/level when off the bike, now I run them level when I'm standing on pedals, like when setting sag, huge difference
  • 1 2
 There's some sentiment that for high single pivots there can be an offset benefit in rolling the bars back due to lengthening rear centre under suspension compression and subsequent relative forward movement of rider mass. Ie. keeping rider weight back to stop going over the bars during big hits.
  • 1 0
 Smuggler V phantom V process 111. All short travel, slack angled 29er but which ones best frame for aggressive trail/all mountain riding?
  • 3 0
 smuggler is a beast!
  • 1 1
 Easy answer on the Transition...if you want to race Gravity Enduro buy the Patrol, if you're a little less serious and want a bit more playfulness then go the Scout
  • 2 0
 Spot on advice on the Transition bike questions.
  • 1 0
 Meaning the neutral position. About roll
  • 1 0
 Really? "What Roll?" - and you replied back?
  • 1 2
 The CDC is more like XC then DH!
  • 1 0
 You're forgetting the Dry Hill race.
  • 1 1
 Not on the the series schedule this year.
  • 1 1
 Just noticed that. Bummer. Still a great series tho.







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.038227
Mobile Version of Website