Here we go, the semi-finals are kicking into gear. With more than 255,000 votes cast we are down to the top 4, in the running for their piece of $10,000 in CASH from our sponsor:
SRAM.
Check out the voting page
The 6th annual Pinkbike Photo of the Year Contest voting is now well underway. Below are the Round 3 matchups and who won each after the votes were cast. Once you see whether your favorites made it through,
head on over to the voting page and cast your votes for the next round!
The winner of the contest will join John Wellburn, Toby Cowley, Sterling Lorence, Christoph Laue and Sean Lee in the PB Photo of the Year Hall of Fame and they could walk away with $5,000.
Vote in Round 4
Matchup 1
Matchup 2
Matchup 3
Matchup 4
Go Vote in Round 4
What's at stake? $10,000 Cash •
Winner will receive a check for $5000 • Runner-up will receive a check for $3000
• Other semi-finalists will each receive $1000
Thanks to
SRAM.
Mentions: @SramMedia
Haven't we learned America? - let's go to a popular vote.
PB, may we please all submit a ranking score by each picture? Each round the top half move on.
first round may take a little longer, but once you get to 16, it's much easier. plus, not a bad way to blow off work.
Are you implying that it's America's fault that the pinkbike community which is a global community is following a popular vote system?
The bracket system may be efficient but it’s ridiculous. Judging a photographer’s work...yes work...not someone’s lucky shot...should be difficult. It should take time. Making it easier to choose between two completely different and unrelated shots leaves better shots out of the competition and elevates photos that otherwise wouldn’t have been chosen.
Honestly, what am I missing here? Why can’t there just be a ton of shots and people pick the one they like the best. Most votes gets it. Done. Honest.
Nope. I'm with you 100%. Sadly I thought that photo might win from day 1 simply because it's a roost shot. So many incredible photos to choose from that have come and gone. Not that it's not a well executed photo, but for me, it doesn't portray a side of mountain biking that I care about in the least.
I'm a fan of where the bike can take you, the scenes that unfold in front of you, and the camaraderie that can develop between you, the bike, and your friends as you experience new places, trails, and people. A roost shot doesn't convey any of that. I mean, I'm in South Africa right now. Bikes brought me here! WTF? And before that I was in the Middle East! There's so much more to biking than roost shots, bangers, and nugs.
The aurora is really just too beautiful to have bikes in the foreground - their color of their clothing and bright headlights kinda detracts from what would be an amazing nature shot
Personally, if I was under an aurora in Iceland, I would get off my damn bike and WATCH it!
Basically, the bikes just don't belong in the shot
roost=another name for shit heads destroying berms.
and also while i'm bitching,this one v/s another format is bullshit.
superman gets my vote.