Hutchinson Announces Three 650B Tires

Mar 18, 2013 at 12:13
by Richard Cunningham  
Hutchinson gets serious about 650B with a range of tires that mirrors its most successful XC/trail and all-mountain tread designs. The addition of Hutchinson's tubeless ready treads in the mid-sized format adds further momentum to the accelerating category, which was originally hampered by fears from potential subscribers that they may not have ready access to their chosen tires if they bought into 650B.

Hutchinson Cougar Cobra and Toro tires

Hutchinson will launch three 27.5 treads, including two tires for XC and two for enduro and
All-Mountain: XC - Cougar 2.2 and Cobra 2.25. Enduro AM - Toro 2.35 and Cougar 2.4.


The four tires chosen to lead Hutchinson's plunge into 650B are the XC/trail-specfic Cougar 2.2-inch and the Cobra 2.25 inch models, and the enduro/AM-specific Toro 2.35-inch and Cougar 2.4-inch designs. Additionally, the Hutchinson UR DH team is assisting in the development of a 650B DH tire range. All those models are produced in France at the Montargis factory. They are tubeless ready and include Hutchinson's 'Hardskin' bead-to-bead reinforcement and 'Race Riposte' triple-compound tread and knob-reinforcement strategy.

About Hutchinson and 650B:
"The origins of the 27.5" or 650B wheel size originated in France alongside the Hutchinson brand. Originally this tire size was primarily used for tandem and touring bicycles but has been adopted by the mountain bike industry as the new "optimum" wheel size. The industry chatter circulating confirms that this will be the next big MTB trend."
Visit Hutchinson

Author Info:
RichardCunningham avatar

Member since Mar 23, 2011
974 articles

83 Comments
  • 24 0
 I love cougars! Hehe
  • 7 0
 i prefer teens.
  • 1 1
 i prefer toro ...
  • 8 0
 I don't think you understand the joke..
  • 1 0
 @turqoise haha!
  • 2 0
 i understand, but cougars are plain nasty compared to the rest of the menu. great for super fast one nighters though. Big Grin
  • 1 0
 Not you.. but wizido..
  • 1 0
 ... you guys
  • 18 1
 f*ck this shit I'm going back to 24"
  • 2 1
 Already did!
  • 2 0
 then I can rock this f*ckin awesome tread pattern, just like I did on my bmx when I was 10 years old..... 25 years ago Smile


www.chainreactioncycles.com/Models.aspx?ModelID=11569

Man I wish they did these in 26"
  • 10 0
 26" x 2.5 Is the shit =)
  • 5 1
 Why have these tyres got to have dangerous names like COBRA, COUGAR AND TORO! Why not names like Hamster, Earth Worm or woodlouse for a refreshing change. For those times when you just want to take her easy. Know what I mean. Right ill see you later love, just off for a nice relaxing spin to test out my new rubber The Hutchinson Doormouse.
  • 2 0
 I'd totally love to say "I'm rolling on Panaracer Gerbils..."
  • 9 2
 25.75 is THE optimum wheelsize, just wait a couple of years... ;-)
  • 10 1
 Nah, 28.125!
  • 2 1
 What traditional size do your random numbers relate to? As mentioned hundreds of times, 650b isn't a new size, just a new application to a size that was popular in Europe, but not in North America.
  • 3 0
 Correction, not in the "America" part of North America. 650B was popular in Canada. The 26 x 1 1/2 size is also known as Canadian size for a reason. My girlfriend just inherited her grannies Sterling commuter/city bike and it has 650B tires on it. But Schwinn and Raleigh USA DID do 650B ATB/MTBs in the early 80s that had 650B tires.
  • 1 0
 i'd like 25.5 rear & 26 front ..... just like MotoGP setup 0.5 reduction on rear wheels
they said , its faster then.... LOL
  • 1 0
 cikudh, that's not actualy correct, moto gp run 16.5" front and rear. I think you may be getting confused by the road desmosedici that runs a 17" front and 16" rear. Which is strangly the opposite to my 1996 FireBlade which runs a 16" front and 17" rear.
  • 1 0
 Why does everyone just abuse and Argue on this thing. I don't think troll is very offensive but we all have one thing in common and that is riding. Lets all just get along and compare opinion rather than abuse and argue. Fckers
  • 4 1
 I think we can all wait with baited breath at this world cup season and see how the 650b guys do and then make a decision as to whether its worth running...
  • 4 0
 Well, Gwin just got beat by one, so the trend already looks promising.

This year only a handful of World Cup DH guys will be on them, though it might increase by the end of the season. I would expect at least 10% of racers to have them next year, then by 2015 the majority of racers will be on 650b and it will much be RIP for 26 within a few years of that, except for short guys and some gals.
  • 2 1
 Definitely going to be an interesting few seasons. I think it depends how 650b goes as to whether the whole industry will switch, but i'd say its looking likely
  • 2 1
 Handful? Well besides the KHS team, the SC Intense team (650B M9s), and a bunch of other teams all of whom will have riders at whatever world cup DH events are closest to their members, I'd say its going to be more than just a handful. Oh and wait till you see what the Athertons are playing with already... Wink
  • 1 1
 for dh, it wouldn't make a difference whether it was 26 or 29 or 27.5.
  • 3 2
 I knew that this all 26" dissing thing came from rather questionable roots: "Originally this tire size was primarily used for tandem and touring bicycles"
TANDEM cycles, thats possibly the most stupid thing ever.
  • 2 0
 not really... Canadian do downhill on 26 tandem
  • 2 1
 Touring bicycles, in French terms of the 1940s and 50s.. involved riding roads that most mountain bikers today would consider technical trail riding nirvana.
  • 1 1
 Is there anything technically challenging in tandem cycling?
  • 2 1
 Yes... for most riders, just learning to pedal the same cadence as their tandem mate is trouble in itself. Stoker's have to get used to trusting the captain to know where to steer, when to break and not to fight leaning into turns and things. For married couples especially, Tandem rides often lead to fights and/or divorces. And that's just on pavement. Add offroad trails to the mix and well... its like a horror movie half the time. Plus you've got more than twice the mass on only TWO tires now and twice the power going into ONE drivetrain. If they allowed them in things like the TdF... you'd see the riders on them outdistancing the regular riders from the start to finish. They are a LOT faster.
  • 2 1
 Tandem cycling is the most unneeded form of cycling I can imagine. It's probably on the same level with unicycling, just more depressive.
You have a point, it might be challenging in leaning and balance front. Only question, why? If you want to make cycling unnecessary hard, tie one leg to 50 pound concrete block, clip in SPDs and pedal just with that leg while trying to draw triangle shapes with other leg in the air. Use your arms to play accordion, while looking backwards. That is challenging as well, but no one does it.
When married couple does tandem bike, I would bet my money it's the wife's idea, that alone gives a sign that there is something wrong in the marriage. No cycling enthusiast and self respecting male would agree on tandem cycling with a women. Just add some long, knitted scarfs, beret and chit-chatting and you're in the worst man's nightmare.
In TdF, it might give some edge over single riders, but so would 1000cc superbike. I believe that cycling is about individual effort. It's sharing the same characters with sports like motocross, F1 (NASCAR for US), martial arts, running and pretty much every other track athletics, where individuals effort is compared to the field. It makes cycling as sport so much more dynamic then team sports. Thats the problem in TdF, the team works so close together that it's often just all about tactics in leading and passing then individual effort as in Enduro, XC, DH, Slopestyle etc.
  • 2 3
 Yeah.... typical narrow minded thinking i'm coming to expect from you reinholds... I'm sure Kris holm and others would take issue with unicycling not being needed.
  • 1 2
 Actually I'm very open minded. Nowadays new standards, new concepts, new ideas come around the corner all the time, and many of them effect our lives is very good way, as people and as cyclist.
But lets take it from practical aspect. What are the benefits of riding tandem?
Despite Kris Holms massive skills, it is still not needed as sport and it is not in any shape or form practical as well. You can't ride with unicycle 200km, as you can do with road bike. Unicycles and tandem cycles are activities with an end in themselves. It's just like Fingerboarding. It might be fun for some, but in the end of the day, it useless.
Look at 3rd development countries. Cycling there is without any umf and bling and 12k carbon bikes. It's plain simple transport, that is the essence of cycling, that grew out in sport. If you google such a image, you won't see any unicycles and tandem cycles there, because it's not practical and it's not evolutionary nor revolutionary for cycling, it's just self oriented effort to switch things up just because "it can be done".
  • 2 1
 Again showing your ignorance... I've personally met unicyclists who have toured extensively thru Vietnam, Cambodia, Tibet, etc... just because you've only got one wheel, doesn't mean it isn't still a practical way to get around, or fun to ride. Same with tandems, for speed, and for touring especially, they rock. Tandem frames are long, and have LOTS of attachment points for loads. Perhaps you should actually try riding either type of bike before opening your yap next time.
  • 2 2
 Wahhhhhhh. You're all a bunch of winers. Get off pinkbike and go ride or clean your bike. Quit plugging up the comments
  • 2 1
 @deeeight, I open my yep when I want, so do you. I have personally met clowns who have joggled 8 pins simultaneously while being on unicycle, I'm no kidding, but so what! How is unicycle practical way of going around? I would really appreciate some real facts. Maybe I can learn today something new about unicycles and tandem cycles.
For speed, triathlon bike and glass smooth tarmac rocks. Why not then tricycle currier, you want to "attach something to lots of points on frame"? You can put there hundreds of kg in cargo. Something like this: lightfootcycles.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/courier_recumbent_tricycle1.jpg

@gustofwind. Man it's still cold over here, but all my bikes are cleaned like 5 times already Big Grin Can't wait to go out and ride some!
  • 1 2
 @deeeight, I'm still waiting for the facts why unicycle is practical way of going around. You've got nada?
  • 2 1
 Go away troll.
  • 1 2
 Technically you came an extra mile to reply to my comment, so I can't go away if I was here, and you came... Just to clear up that situation.
But it's not a big surprise that you haven't got any facts, and by reading your replies to other people comments, I can see that you're an ignorant man, who thinks that because you have been on this earth for longer, you know more about cycling then others. More then two times younger kids ride faster, better and stronger then you ever will. The fact that you can't back up your statement why unicycle is practical way of going around, shows that you're lucking the only thing you might have gained over the years: logical judgment, knowledge and wisdom.
So who's the troll now!
  • 1 2
 Still you.

Fact, you can ride further and faster on a unicycle for less energy used than walking.

Fact, you can take a unicycle places that are not available to other cyclists. Like inside buses and trains/subways. Great things for commuters in inner-city environments. Off-road unicycles can tackle terrain that regular mountain bikes struggle with.

Fact, I may not know more about cycling than everyone, but I do know more about it than a troll like you.
  • 1 1
 1st your fact. Unicycle can't take you further then bicycle. I stated that unicycle is useless form of cycling. For the fact alone that you need to balance all the time on unicycle, you can't go as far, as fast or using as little energy as on bicycle.

2nd your fact. That is what collapsible bicycles are made for. I would like to see you with grocery bags in hand while answering call with other hand on unicycle. What are the off-road terrain that can't be done with mountain bike, but can be done with unicycle?

3rd even isn't a fact related to unicycling, but ok..
  • 1 2
 That you're idiotic enough to ride a bicycle with grocery bags in hand, or to answer a phone call while riding... basically puts you at a level of moronic behaviour that renders further discussions pointless. I'm done with you.
  • 1 1
 Dude. Don't get rude, if you can't find a good points to back up your opinion, that renders you more childish then you can imagine. Now I know what sort of people ride unicycles and tandem cycles, it's even worse then I thought. Only thing you're done with, is finding good logical arguments. Simple question like: what terrain can't be done on MTB but can be done on unicycle, obviously is too hard for you.
P.S. You don't have a place where to put a bag on unicycle do you? So that is why I asked how would you for example shop? And there is nothing wrong in talking at the phone while peddling down the road at 5 miles per hour. If you can walk and talk, you can ride slow and talk. Please use at least some logic, if you have any left.
  • 2 0
 Cougar looks really promising, familiar tread design. Similar to an Ardent but with more centre to edge support..if you need it.
  • 8 9
 I miss the good old days when mountain bikes were mountain bikes, you just walked into a bike shop and the sold BMXs, Road touring, and mountain bikes. there was no all mountain hardtail dual suspension fatbike Downhill cross country freeride dirtjumping debate no 27.5,29er, 26er decision to be made. it was just a mountain bike with knobby tires and lotsa gears to climb gnarly trails and we loved that shit. fancy bikes dont make mountain biking better, they just make more money for companies! Rant over! have a nice day pinkbikers.
  • 8 1
 Do you still use a rotary phone and pay your bills w/ stamps?
  • 7 0
 Do you drive a model-T, watch black & white tv with rabbit ears and no remote? It's 2013, the whole world is trying to make money.
  • 3 0
 hahahaha i actually do!
  • 3 0
 My LBS is still stuck in them times they only sell ridge bikes. I took my 20mm through axel wheel and asking them to straighten it they said "sorry we don't do mx wheels".
  • 1 0
 pimpedupmonkey spoke keys are like £3. Fill your boots.
  • 1 0
 The last time built a wheel I made it true just a shame it wasn't round the hub was off centre by a mile. I was only 13 at the time but I just don't trust my self
  • 1 0
 it's just practice mate, honest I thought it was like some black magic but I've done a few now.
  • 3 0
 My favorite wheel size is 28.36431
  • 1 2
 Dear 27.5 or 650B, You are only marginally bigger than a 26 inch wheel, therefore no difference can really be felt on the trail. Please stick to wheelchairs or whatever and piss of and die, as you deserve to. Love from, A rider and a small shop owner xxxxx There, said the truth.
  • 3 5
 Dear morons... if not for supply issues, ALL mountain bikes except for kiddie models would have been 650B tired from the get go. The supply issues are now being solved, 26ers are being relegated to cheap bikes, gravity oriented bikes (less than 1% of the market anyway), and kids bikes. Adapt to the times or die.
  • 1 0
 well the problem was resolved, and now 26's have great availability, so why change the industry again? oh wait I forgot... its called marketing. has nothing to do with common sense. there is no need for the in between size. 29 is sufficient enough for people who want big wheels... end of story.
  • 2 1
 You fail to grasp the facts...

650B tires were what had a supply problem when mountain bikes were moving from handbuilt custom bikes to production bikes. 26" tires were chosen simply because they were the last option available. The pioneers of the sport were cyclocross racers and long distance tour riders. They knew what they wanted was 650B or 700C off-road tires and they knew they existed because they'd already built bikes with them. But the only tire manufacturers offering them were in Europe, and couldn't meet the demands of a small time operation in California. The next closest thing was what post-war Schwinn beach cruiser type bikes had, 26" diameter balloon bicycle tire.

COMMON SENSE was already that larger diameter tires and wheels rolled better over roots, rocks, ruts and other things you find on trails and dirt roads better than smaller diameters. This had been known and understood for a century with bicycles. Yet suddenly now in the past few years, its become this foreign concepts to mountain bikers like yourself who refuse to accept the fact that your common sense...is rooted in myth and make believe fantasy land where 26ers are the best.
  • 2 1
 People like you dont realize in what cases the 26 inch wheel becomes practical. I will agree the 29 inch wheel find exceptional usage with trail bikes and xc bikes requiring greater ability to roll over terrain. But what the 29 inch wheel does not offer is the leverage to get the bike airborn. Smaller wheels offer greater leverage allowing your to get bike off the ground with ease. Not to mention the geometry is has greater limitations when we have larger wheels. Such as the essential short chainstay lengths nessary to give a bike better leverage to get greater hop.. This is why you dont see 29er dirt jump bikes or slopestyle bikes. Pop is more important in these applications.also 29 is not very fun when your a small guy like myself. Im 5 ft 4 and throwing around a 26 inch bike is much easier for me then a 29. I see the 26 inch wheel the idea balance for a dh bike where being able to roll over obstacles is important but manouverability is also essential.
  • 2 2
 Yeah people like me who've been mountain biking longer than people like you have been alive... what would people like me know about what is practical and what isn't. Did you not pay attention to the redbull rampage last fall ? Did you fail to notice Logan take third place on a 650B, and throwing down tail whips and back flips on it ?
  • 1 1
 My argument isn't that you can't do back-flips or do DH trails on a 650B. It's just that there isn't a huge difference from a 26 inch wheel. Honestly I can hardly tell the difference when I ride a 17 inch vs 18 inch motorcycle wheel. So seems like marketing, and a way to make life harder for small shops. Many factory insiders have accepted off the record the 650B is pointless but they're scared that they'll lose market share if they don't jump on the new size from the beginning. BTW I have no horse in this race, I'm saving for a new bike this year, so I can go any way I like. Just more likely to by a Specialized Enduro 29er than any 650B nonsense.
  • 2 1
 I mentioned people like you don't realize in what cases where the 26 inch wheel is more practical, simply because you don't ride the disciplines for which you may find a smaller wheel advantageous. in other words from the sounds of it you seem to be a trail rider and you don't ride street, park, dirt jump or free ride. So how could you possibly offer a reasonable opinion to something you are not disciplined in. the fact that someone pulled off 3rd at red bull rampage doesn't validate that the a larger wheel size offers an advantage, it only proves the possibility of the larger wheel. I could easily say that guy in first was on a 26 inch wheel, thus according to your analysis the 26 inch wheel would be advantageous.... your point has no logic behind it. the fact that Logan was on a 650B was purely marketing.
  • 1 1
 I see that its purely marketing cause it is the underdog company "KHS" who did it purely to cause a buzz in the bicycle industry.
  • 2 1
 No....Logan isn't on a 650B for marketing, he's on it because its better. He just beat Aaron Gwin at the 2013 Reaper DH race last weekend, again on 650B. Top Pros with results can pick whatever they want to ride from a brands offerings, they're not forced to do anything for "marketing". Its up to the guys in the marketing department to spin stuff the racers do to sell to consumers, but the top racers themselves are riding what they want to be riding. But fine, be closed minded.

As to KHS being an "underdog"... they've been making mountain bikes again, longer than you've been alive, and have been at the forefront of the 650B movement for four years now. Its everyone else playing catchup with them, not them playing catchup with the industry.

You don't want to listen to a trail rider... fine... whatever. I dirtjumped when I was younger, and I've done riding on stuff that is considered "freeriding" but sure, you know everything already.
  • 1 2
 why was he not on a 29" bike then?
  • 2 1
 maybe because KHS doesn't make anything other than XC 29ers. Have some common sense... are you gonna go freeriding on an XC bike at the biggest event of the year ?
  • 1 1
 why didn't KHS produce a 29 inch freeride bike for him?
  • 2 1
 Ok, now you're just being a troll.
  • 1 1
 actually I'm just showing you that you are very bias....
  • 2 0
 I would be interested in the toro.
  • 2 0
 I got toro's they are awesome! 20psi ust gives you tons of grip
  • 2 0
 Hutchinson's website hasn't been updated in a long time lol.
  • 1 0
 Completely new website coming soon.
  • 1 0
 Cool. Its about time!
  • 1 0
 Finally, some new news today!
  • 2 1
 feniak's tire..!
  • 1 1
 Probably cost more than 26" and 29"
  • 1 1
 Unlikely... Kenda manages to sell all their tire models for the same price points regardless of size (a 29er Nevegal retails for the same as a 26er or 650B) and Vee Rubber markets ALL their foldable bead mountain bike tires to the same retail price ($40US as I recall) regardless of width/diameter. Schwalbe's price points are pretty consistent for any given model regardless of size.
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.032175
Mobile Version of Website