Julien Absalon's 29er BMC Team Elite 01 uses an elastomer cushion near the seat stay/seat tube junction that provides 15mm of cushion. In all other aspects, the Elite 01 is a classic 29er hardtail. His XTR one-by crankset is augmented with an upper guide. His tire choice, Continental Race Kings, hints that the course is going to require skills.
Cycle racing is becoming more dependent upon battery power. Everyone is running GPS. Absalon's Fox iCD electrically controlled shock and fork share the same battery and wiring as his Shimano Di2 shifting, which minimizes both weight and complexity.
BMC's "suspension" element is well integrated into the chassis - to the point where only the more observant would notice it. With XC courses becoming more technical, expect to see more softails from other makers as the season progresses.
Absalon's 100mm-travel BMC Fourstroke 29er seems like a monster among the stick-figure hardtails that were the go-to for last year's World Cup pros. The Fourstroke is fully electrified with a Fox iCD fork and shock, a Garmin GPS and of course, Shimano Di2 shifting. Fox says that in side-by-side tests, riders who had electronic suspension controls used them up to three times ore often. Shimano reports similar results, with athletes shifting Di2 far more often than its mechanical options over the same course. One wonders how soon we will see Di2 on the DH side of the sport?
Absalon is on the Shimano Di2 program with a one-by-eleven drivetrain. Lightweight foam grips are popular among XC pros.
Julien Absalon was the first Pro XC racer to get Shimano Di2, so BMC already has internal routing.
Not sure why that got downvoted. I feel the same way. I find their single-purposeness really cool. I would never ride a full-on XC race bike but it's interesting to see the lengths racers will go to fine tune their bikes nail a single situation.
In all but the burliest terrain (lift-served, EWS racing) it seems like the fastest riders are on XC bikes. Here in NorCal, the Strava leaders are all on sub-5" bikes. Despite the majority of crowd being on longer travel bikes.
Argument lost all validity when you spell things like that. Especially ass juice disease...wtf did that come from?
If you are over-biked for the trails (170mm bike on XC trails) then all you have to do is hold on and let the bike do the work. If you are under-biked for the trails (rigid 29er riding XC trails with rock gardens) then your line choice and technique becomes dialed like you wouldn't imagine. I ride my XC bike a lot because as soon as I hop on my enduro bike, I notice I am a lot more comfortable at higher speeds on faster terrain. I guarantee if you rode a rigid 29er for a season then switched back to a bigger bike you would be faster AND smoother.
Most of us can't ride chunk every day so a light XC hardtail is just the thing for midweek rides after work; any suspension except very short travel is overkill and slows you down. I learned how to ride over obstacles on my trail bike, then I learned how to ride them well (sort of) on the hardtail.
At the moment I'm riding with no suspension and sure I'm not fast but i learn a lot, as I'm still young i think i should learn some skills before i get a full sus, only then you can ride it to its full potential
As xc trails become technical expect to see more softails??? They died for a reason...it's called full suspension. I see as more xc wc trails get more technical Nino is going to continue to kick everyone's ass riding a full suspension 19 lbs bike and on cough cough 650b wheels. Like OMG!!!
Seriously. Wrong direction for Absalon, IMO. He finally beat Nino after switching to FS last year, and now the softail? I just don't see that adding much on a race course. Maybe he'll prove us wrong.
Saw that. Holy crap what a race today!!!! Looks like Nino should have run some knobbier tires.... not sure if I ever saw him clean that one techy climb. Not sure if it would have made a difference with Kulhavy's performance though.
I don't see any reason not to use it other than cost. I find the 2x11 with a single shifter option fascinating. If not for the cost, it should murder 1x11
What is the point of an electronical shifter for a 1x11 or 1x10 setup? I thought it was interesting with 2x or 3x setups where it can shift sequentially. Is it lighter? More precise? Or just to showcase high end material for the brand?
I think it slightly overshifts to ensure you always catch a gear then aligns properly. where a indexed shifter could get out of alignment. My best guess wouldbe reliability and there is less to focus on vs making sure your gear catches. or at least thats my take
I would like to see WC trails get just a bit more technical. Absalon is riding Race Kings which is a technical tire by WC standards - which shows how watered down the courses are. Doesn't need to be Rotorua; it would just be cool to see these guys show off a bit more.
This particular course is really technical, far from watered down. Those guys just have to go for compromises between weight and handling, and just use their skill to compensate for such things as undergunned tyres.
They had a di2 demo at crankworx. I was skeptical at first but it had a surprisingly nice feel. I don't think I'd ever get it but still some pretty sweet technology
People are always really down on the Conti tires. Almost every review of a bike that comes stock with them criticizes the tires, but they're obviously good enough for Absalon, even if he is sponsored by Continental.
Why use a GPS on a XC bike? The only thing I imagine is marking some waypoints, ie: start climbing or start descending... And at the end of the race compare speed, distance, etc... Not for mark the trail exactly (all trails are marked on a xc trail!)
Garmins allow you to see things like your heart rate, speed, and power output (if you are using a power meter) all in one place, not just the route. It also allows you to see how far you have ridden. Its probably mainly for post race analysis that the pros use it for, although I know I personally do pay attention to my heart rate during races.
Isn't Shimano embarrassed that their athletes don't trust XTR 1 x 11 to hold the chain? Not exactly the most positive message about XTR and by extension the new XT 1 x 11 is it?
No rings are drop proof. None.
Shimano rings are steel and should last longer and run smoother. 50g for an extra guide if your race depends on it is not a bad idea.
29ers look so bad. I had one and it handled so bad in proper tech. Rolls fast obviously,but it really did suck. Oh and as I suspected I looked like a untc on it. I feel sick just thinking about it tbh. Bad times indeed.
You must have either had a shit designed 29er, or dare I say it, a bit of a lack of bike handling skills. A decent 29er is really not much different at handling then a comparable 650b or 26". Or perhaps your just jumping on the anti 29er band wagon?
Likely for post race analysis. Those aren't just for GPS location, but power output and HR. Also, they can compare data with his teammates on where times were lost and gain over the course.
Argument lost all validity when you spell things like that. Especially ass juice disease...wtf did that come from?
If you are over-biked for the trails (170mm bike on XC trails) then all you have to do is hold on and let the bike do the work. If you are under-biked for the trails (rigid 29er riding XC trails with rock gardens) then your line choice and technique becomes dialed like you wouldn't imagine. I ride my XC bike a lot because as soon as I hop on my enduro bike, I notice I am a lot more comfortable at higher speeds on faster terrain. I guarantee if you rode a rigid 29er for a season then switched back to a bigger bike you would be faster AND smoother.
If someone has experience with it
@K4m1k4z3 where does your info come from?
mtbs.cz/clanek/zavodni-xc-stroje-zahranicnich-hvezd/kategorie/tech-news
Also during the race it gives u a display so you can keep track of what you are doing and how much is left (when u don't know the course).