Reynolds to Offer Premium Wheelsets - Black Label Series in 27.5 and 29-inch

Jun 21, 2014 at 12:37
by Richard Cunningham  
Reynolds Black Label Wheels 2015

Reynolds is partnering with the Pivot DH team to develop a new carbon downhill wheelset.



Reynolds anounced two developments in its wheel program at Park City's Press Camp this week. The first was an all/mountain/trail wheelset that features top-drawer spokes and hubs in conjunction with its best carbon rims. The reason stated was to answer the challenge brought forth by the recent spate of high-priced carbon wheels coming into the marketplace. The second announcement was that they are developing a carbon downhill racing rim and wheelset in partnership with the Pivot racing team. The new wheel has not been released for view because it is still in experimental development. Presently, however, the Pivot team is racing on test mules built in Reynolds' existing all-mountain molds. The AM rims are being used to test different carbon materials and layup schedules that, once solidified, will become the basis from which the new, wider DH rim profile prototypes will spring forth from. Reynolds is optimistic that the new DH wheels will be ready for race testing as early as the World Cup finals, but you didn't hear that from us.
Reynolds


Black Label Wheelsets

Reynolds Black label 27.5 wheelset - 2015

Reynolds' new Black label wheelset was produced to compete with the company's uber-priced rivals, at slightly less than uber pricing.



Reynolds took its all-mountain-width MR5 carbon rim and built it up with DT Swiss hubs and bladed, DT Swiss spokes into a premium wheelset that will appear in both 27.5 and 29-inch models. Reynolds tells us that MR5 carbon refers to five types of carbon material that are positioned in the many layered carbon layup used to construct the Black Label rims. This includes the types of resin, as well as the actual carbon fibers which Reynolds has the capacity to have custom made. The blends, says Renolds officials, can be used to give the rim impact protection in the areas which face the rail, and ultimate tensile strength in areas, such as the spoke interfaces.

Black Label 27.5-inch wheels will be sold in two models: XC and AM, while the 29-inch offerings will be sold in XC and Trail versions. The differences are in the rim designs, with the 27.5-inch all-mountain rim measuring 31 millimeters outside and 23 millimeters between the flanges, while the narrower XC version measures 29 inches outside and 21 millimeters inside the flanges. Black Label 29-inch wheels use slighty narrower rim profiles in order to save weight and to minimize rotational inertia. The XC wheel sports a 26-millimeter outside and 19-millimeter inside measurement, while the Trail model rim measures 29-millimeters outside and 21 millimeters inside the flanges.

All four wheelsets, however, share the same build components, with straight-pull DT Swiss 240S hubs and DT Swiss Aerolite bladed spokes. Reynolds says that Black Label wheels will only be spec'ed with Shimano's splined Centerlock brake rotor interface, which seems like a weight-based decision, but six-bolt adapters are readly available should the need arise. The new wheels will arrive with tubeless rim tape and valve stems installed, and the sandard configuration will be with 15-millimeter, through-axle front hubs and 142 by 12-millimeter axle rear hubs. All Black Label wheelsets are priced at $2400 USD. Availablity is stated to be Fall, 2014.

Reynolds Black label wheelset - 2015


27.5 XC:
• MR5 Carbon rims
• Width: 29mm outside, 21mm inside
• Hubs: DT Swiss 240S straight-pull type
• Spokes: DT Swiss Aerolite, black aluminum nipples
• Centerlock brake rotor interface.
• 15mm through axle (F), 142mm X 12mm through axle (R), optional endcaps available.
• Shipped with tubeless tape and valve stem pre-installed.
• Weight: 1435/pair, 622g (F), 733g (R)
• MSRP: $2400 USD


29 XC:
• MR5 Carbon rims
• Width: 26mm outside, 19mm inside
• Hubs: DT Swiss 240S straight-pull type
• Spokes: DT Swiss Aerolite, black aluminum nipples
• Centerlock brake rotor interface.
• 15mm through axle (F), 142mm X 12mm through axle (R), optional endcaps available.
• Shipped with tubeless tape and valve stem pre-installed.
• Weight: 1440/pair, 665g (F), 775g (R)
• MSRP: $2400 USD
27.5 AM:
• MR5 Carbon rims
• Width: 31mm outside, 23mm inside
• Hubs: DT Swiss 240S straight-pull type
• Spokes: DT Swiss Aerolite, black aluminum nipples
• Centerlock brake rotor interface.
• 15mm through axle (F), 142mm X 12mm through axle (R), optional endcaps available.
• Shipped with tubeless tape and valve stem pre-installed.
• Weight: 1528/pair, 710g (F), 818g (R)
• MSRP: $2400 USD


29 Trail:
• MR5 Carbon rims
• Width: 29mm outside, 21mm inside
• Hubs: DT Swiss 240S straight-pull type
• Spokes: DT Swiss Aerolite, black aluminum nipples
• Centerlock brake rotor interface.
• 15mm through axle (F), 142mm X 12mm through axle (R), optional endcaps available.
• Shipped with tubeless tape and valve stem pre-installed.
• Weight: 1500/pair, 695g (F), 805g (R)
• MSRP: $2400 USD

Reynolds Black Label Wheels 2015


Author Info:
RichardCunningham avatar

Member since Mar 23, 2011
974 articles

106 Comments
  • 30 2
 Just FYI, I had some questions about my Reynolds carbon wheels (Topo C) that my LBS could not answer (maximum tyre width, maximum pressure, tubeless compatibility).

I sent an email to Reynolds' customer service, no reply after a few weeks. Sent it again, no reply, ever.

We are in a sport where after-sales service can be paramount. I won't buy Reynolds again. Not a 'hater', an 'informer'!
  • 5 8
 But that's the whole point of local dealers not the guys at Reynolds...
  • 2 0
 Did you try to call them? I'm sure they have an international number...
  • 2 0
 I lived in California at the time.
  • 3 0
 Just look it up on the freaking internet!
  • 2 0
 So a local dealer should know every technical detail about every product? And even when it was a question he could have answered himself either by asking his LBS or browsing the internet, that doesn't mean they can just ignore it.
  • 14 2
 fellas, these wheels are not for the average Joe, which constitutes ~99 % of the pinkbike population. these are for people like Cunningham or paid riders, who get these because their sponsor was kind enough to supply. and "the best of anything" does not come at a high price, unfortunately
  • 16 1
 Wonder how these do without a tire mounted up?
  • 13 1
 We need tireless wheel reviews now. Gwin invented a new testing method.
  • 2 2
 Probably the only company who has black label, most rim companies come with various colors.
  • 2 3
 don't understand why Reynolds has built a mountain bike wheelset with bladed spokes?

only advantage of bladed spokes is aerodynamics, which are only relevant on a road bike wheel once you are going 35-40kph+

which means you will only see bladed spokes on deeper section aero wheelsets in the road world

you could perhaps argue that a DH MTB being used for a world speed record attempt would benefit from an aero spoke, but the turbulence caused by typical mountain bike knobbly tires would negate any benefit from the spokes

bladed spokes are actually slightly heavier, weaker and more sensitive to wind up during tensioning and truing.
  • 5 2
 Hampstead, a wheel laced with bladed spokes will have a higher torsional rigidity than laced with standard round spokes. Try bending a bladed spoke along its thin side...its tough as hell.
  • 5 1
 Plus the extra process of flattening the spoke work hardens it so the tensile strength is increased.
  • 5 0
 @chester

according to Park's own measurement tools (TM1) and corresponding calculations for deflection and spoke tension, a regular round spoke will take a higher setting torque (kgf) than a bladed spoke with all other elements in the wheel structure being equal? This exhibits as the round spoke requiring substantially more load to cause a deflection

yes the bladed spoke shows resistance to deflection against the thin edge, but a wheel is a three-dimensional structure which withstands complex forces including constant stress cycles as the wheel is loaded and unloaded, the round spoke like a round frame tube exhibits uniform behaviour when loaded in different directions.

bladed spokes cannot accept the torque range of round spokes and also exhibit an uneven reaction to loading in different directions, which means a rounded spoke builds into a stronger, stiffer and more dynamic wheel which is ideally what mountain bikers are interested in.

bladed spokes are also not the ideal choice for any wheel with disc brakes - a spoke like the DT Super Comp is actually rated specifically for disc brakes and DH racing whereas the bladed spokes are not
  • 1 0
 Well there you go
  • 2 0
 Bladed spokes are typically of higher yield strength, and provide improved fatigue life.

Deflection of a spoke is of interest in tensile elongation only. And is a factor of its cross section, since the young's modulus for steel is irrespective of its yield value. So thicker spokes build stiffer wheels.

Bladed spokes are a good option for expensive carbon wheels because they allow a lighter weight whilst maintaining tensile capacity (strength) and fatigue life. The wheel stifness comming from the rim means that the overly stiff wheel is afforded a little compliance from the more stretchy spoke....

(IMO)
  • 1 1
 @rob043

good points well made

it would be useful to get an engineer from Sapim or Dt Swiss on here, because neither company rate their flat-bladed spokes as being suitable for disc brake use, due to the behaviour of these spokes during the extreme torque loading that disc brake wheels receive under every application of the brake system - typical figures are quoted at 400-450nm
  • 1 0
 Blah blah blah, too narrow
  • 14 0
 How is 2400 bucks ANY less than uber pricing?!?
  • 2 1
 easy enve wheels are 1000 per rim no tape no nipples and no spokes and an enve wheelset starts at about $3500 usd so its less than uber pricing
  • 3 0
 There are Enve wheel sets less than 3500.
  • 8 2
 affordable?????? no way i just spent 160 per rim on 26 inch 30mm wide rims made in the same facotry as derby rims . and 560 for true precison hubs that are completely silent with arouns 200 points of engagement . theyre going to be just under 1000 for the set and if they dont break theyll probly be better then these. sorry but thats not evan close to affordable . 240 hubs are only "high end " because they are light and have ceramic bearings if im not mistaken . the ones i have are another 90 bucks per hub for ceramic bearings. for the love of god people do some resaerch instead of buying what pinkbike features .... p.s. 650b ones are only another 20 bucks per rim and they also come in 35mm
  • 1 5
flag markunit10 (Jun 21, 2014 at 13:03) (Below Threshold)
 im fairly certain, ceramic bearings are bad for abuse
  • 5 4
 yea but they roll alot faster ceramics have less friction
  • 10 6
 they do not roll alot faster
  • 13 1
 People forget that hand built wheels are hands down way less hype'd and have way more respect from riders. Any chump can buy off the shelf, overpriced, mass marketed bike parts.
  • 3 1
 people want that brag factor
  • 2 0
 the way i see it .. theres no other way to get wheels
  • 7 1
 Can anyone honestly say they've seen a correlation between the price of kit and ability? I guess the answer is no, you get good riders on cheap bikes and poor riders on uber bikes. So if you can afford it and like it, buy it. But don't expect it to make you much better. And don't listen to naysayers who I would imagine can't afford it. And if they can, but say its not worth it.. briefly investigate what they spend their surplus money. You might be surprised.
  • 4 0
 You are mistaken, DT 180s have ceramic bearings, 240s have standard Steel. Just saying
  • 1 4
 oh my bad . i hate dt so i never really looked

@tobiusmaxium it debateable if most people evan notice the difference in high end stuff compared to lower end. alot of people like the bling factor aswell...... more than the great product in the end
  • 7 1
 This guy is on the money. In my over 20 yrs of riding mtbs, the dichotomy of expensive parts on mediocre riders' bikes hasnt changed. If you can afford bling, buy it. If you can't, dont hate. If you can ride hard enough to "deserve" high end bling, chances are you're fast on anything. If you cant hang, dont pretend that these wheels or any high end parts will make you faster. But guaranteed, it will make you very happy Smile
  • 3 4
 i dont need carbon anything, because two reasons. i am not a pro (not good enough), i have other hobbies. some people love have the lightest bike, i say burn a hole
  • 2 0
 you dont like you rbike light ? bro i evan drill speedholes in my headtube! "chuckles"
  • 1 0
 seen people drill stems, seatpost, handlebars, even a bmx frame
  • 1 0
 Reynolds actually develops all of their carbon fiber in California and then sends the pieces to Asia to be constructed. These aren't Light-Bicycle wheels rebranded with a hopped-up price. I bought a used pair of their AM wheels (2013 rims with 2014 rear hub) and I must admit that they are very well constructed and have taken a lot of abuse without incident. Even after repeated hard bottoming-out on some of the nasty (running tubeless/low pressure) no cracks, no dents, nothing. I wish I could say that about my DT Swiss 1600x wheels that developed some rather large dents after the same abuse.
  • 1 0
 The Mavic XM719's which I bought on sale for 40 euros have withstood some pretty serious abuse as well, no need to shell out 2400 dollars for that.
  • 1 0
 arrow racing rims are the best
  • 1 0
 zelvy are pretty good tooo.
  • 11 5
 If I wanted heavy and expensive I'd buy a set of i9s. Why would I not save $700 and get the Roval Control SLs that have a wider rim profile and weigh substantially less? 19mm width on the 29 XC? What is this 1998? I don't really think Reynolds gets it.
  • 6 0
 I think my American classic race wheels are about 100g heavier,wider internal diameter and $1900 cheaper. I think I can take 100g or so off my bike for $1900
  • 5 0
 Wow, these are 2x the price of the ibis rims, and 1/3 skinnier (inner width), for the AM setup, and similar weight. The selling point seems to be the high price.
  • 2 0
 Spot on, how to make something special and desirable? Put it out of the reach of normal people.
  • 5 2
 Everyone is trying to steal enve's thunder now-a-days.

If you think there is no benefit to carbon wheels you're wrong. There is not much difference between alu and carbon 26" wheels, but on a 29er the difference is staggering.
  • 2 0
 Enve set the top price threshold and the competition has seen that people are laying down the cash for Enve wheels so they want some of that action. Reynolds hasn't released anything groundbreaking here.
  • 3 2
 Every time a brand comes up whit a carbon wheelset, the price tag is between 2.000$ to 2....something. Ok, they might be bulletproof etc, so as a carbon frame (a DH frame). Yet, I have never seen an entirely carbon DH bike participating in RedBull ramepage (unless I am mistaken).
So much money just for a bike park ?
  • 3 1
 Cam Zink rode an Evil Undead at the old site, and did a backflip off the Bender Sender on it. And the last two years or so Cam Mcaul and Brandon Semenuk rode Trek Session 9.9 frames at Rampage.
  • 1 0
 When they make carbon super cross bikes then I will trust in carbon
  • 2 0
 That type of riding is nothing like what the vast majority of riders are doing. What they do is fun to watch, but that type of gear is completely irrelevant for most consumers. Besides, it's not just a strength issue. Carbon wheels are light AND incredibly stiff. They track incredibly well. Some think they are too stiff. You should try them before drawing conclusions. Or just ride what you've got and have fun.
  • 1 0
 You should watch the Pink Bike video where they put a Santa Cruz carbon frame up against an AL one.

www.pinkbike.com/video/243228

My favorite part is towards the end when they just start swinging.
  • 1 0
 @Climberdave: woah!!! very enlightening video. Im late to the Carbon game. thank you for the link!!!
  • 1 0
 Thought all the new carbon rims were going with the hookless bead? Just like we steal most of our other "innovations" from motorbikes - if they use it - it's kindof already proven. And sounds like it's a logical modification to rim design for carbon rims - as it increases strength - vs if you still use a hook, it will be weaker - which in the case of carbon means the rim is toast if dinged- vs aluminum it might be possible to bend back. So, funny on this premium wheel it's using a dated design (even aside from how narrow it is relative to other newer carbon rims which are much cheaper - ibis, roval).
  • 3 0
 They were clearly trying to cash in on the high end wheel market, not offer a cheaper alternative ...
  • 2 2
 This pricing is reasonable and I think it goes with the research and technology......i have already 2 pairs of Enve wheel set on my bikes..........wouldn't think of running anything except carbon after using them. And to top it of, I from Asia and if we don't have a problem with the price so why are you westerners complaining?
  • 6 2
 Westerners like to complain lol
  • 2 0
 2 dollars of coffee a day neglected, 3.5 year payment plan, 60 bucks a month. Easy peasy Wink
  • 3 0
 ahahah is that a joke over 2 grand for a wheel set lol
  • 4 1
 Too narrow, try again pls.
  • 5 5
 $2400 - F that. If you cant win that amount through racing, then you dont deserve it. How about some overpriced Canadian real estate so you wont afford the bike either. LOL!
  • 8 4
 mickeydesadist2: The best of anything, usually comes with a high price, There are many very afordable wheels available from Reynolds and its competitors. You can also find real estate quite inexpensive in Canada if you don't mind outhouses ....and the occasional moose.
  • 3 0
 ..or glue sniffers
  • 6 3
 And 26" ?
  • 3 4
 Bladed spokes on MTB bikes?? They do know that bladed has way less lateral rigidity tan round spoked right? Blades are aero time trial spokes. Stiff vertically. Very flimsy laterally
  • 2 0
 What about DT swiss ex1750
  • 4 4
 Why would a spoke need to have lateral rigidity? They work pretty much purely in tension so it doesn't matter about the shape of the spoke.
  • 2 2
 Whilst I don't necessarily agree, as I probably don't know enough about it, I think he's suggesting that mtb wheels take forces from different directions, unlike time trial wheels. But I'm only guessing.
  • 1 1
 Try detensioning your spokes and giving it a go. Then you'll see how unimportant any sort of bending stiffness is in a spoke. Wheels work because the spokes hold tension and do not rely on spokes having high bending stiffness. This tension is what gives a wheel its stiffness. Simple as that.
  • 1 1
 OK, so why has ZERO DH, 4x, riders in the past use blades? Take the same hub & rim combo and build 2 each with different type spokes. You can feel the difference even with tension
  • 1 0
 @bman33, it is simple - bladed spokes are expensive and anything with any real blade shape to it requires slotted spoke holes to build.

We're really not worried about aerodynamics in mtbing ... yet. Some top tier XC racers use bladed spokes because they run pretty narrow tires and go fast for long periods of time. Sapim CX-Ray spokes are super common for XC builds and don't require slotted hubs.
  • 1 1
 Agreed on the slotted hubs and blades being expensive. I worked for a high end wheel builder for about 10 years, built a few thousand wheels. Maybe the expense and exotic "sound" may be a seller for the XC type crowd. As far as AM, or any type of Enduro or DH type riding, I wouldn't use them. Will these wheels sell to people wanting super $$ cache? Of course.

**side note: I have been using Sapim spokes for several years and they are super high quality spokes have the same feel as good as mid 90's DT spokes.
  • 1 1
 @bman33, I guess you haven't been paying enough attention to the DH scene at the top level. Many racers have been using bladed spokes for many years (started back in the days of the Kamikaze). The DH guys are in the wind tunnels these days too.

No you can't feel the difference in the lateral stiffness of wheels built with all of the same components except with bladed vs regular spokes (given that the spokes have the same cross sectional area). Again, spokes work mainly in tension and not in bending. Do a little research on wheelbuildibg ASAP.
  • 1 1
 I have been involved with wheels since the Kamikaze and raced it a few times. Tomac & Lopes may have used them for THAT race. I have built wheels for many pros in BMX & DH scenes especially during the mid 90's - early 2000's working for Kovachi Wheels. I still race DH, Enduro in Colorado and build for select people. Also, several friends work currently as mechanics with the likes of the Atherton's n such. 100% positive they don't run blades. I build a few up for Eric Carter during his late BMX & NORBA years as well, bet he doesn't have Gwin running blades. Trust me, I have built more wheels than most. I don't know everything, but I know plenty enough. I will have to disagree kindly. Let's walk the pits at Crankworx this year and you can show me how many people are running bladed spokes on gravity or slalom/4X bikes..
  • 1 1
 As far as "feeling" them flex, yes you can. Will they hold tension? Yes they will. Take a blade and a regular spoke (butted or not) by themselves and feel the difference. Will they both be stiffer in tension? Yes. A great example is an I-beam. Do you see them support a roof laying flat? No, they are vertical. A lateral load on a bladed spoke is the same as laying a beam flat and putting pressure on it. Another example, walk on a 2 x 4 both flat (lateral in our example) and then vertically on the narrow side. You can do the same with a bladed spoke. Put pressure on the flat sides versus the bladed side and feel the difference. Vertically a stiff wheel. Laterally not as stiff as a regular spoke. Again, we can disagree, maybe meet at Whistler and walk the pits..
  • 2 1
 I first had sex over 26 years ago, it doesn't make me a gynecologist, just like having built wheels doesn't make you an engineer. Wheels are tension members, the resistance to bending loads on the side of the wheel not under tension adds very little to the strength of the wheel. In fact a quick napkin calculation would tell you that the resistance to bending loads of all the spokes in compression within a 32 spoke wheel doesn't equal as much as 'one' spoke in tension in terms of contribution of strength. People don't build with bladed spokes because they are costly, not as widely available and as you've proven, poorly understood.
  • 1 1
 ^^^Wow. I completely understand the tension forces. I agree on your statement as far as 32 have more tension than one no matter the profile. However, a quick "napkin calculation" will show you that 32 blades are NOT as stiff as 32 round spokes. Even if I don't build hundreds per month anymore, I STILL build 20 or more sets a year with all the current options. IF you are an engineer (I am not and NEVER claimed I was) you should be able to sort that out. If you can prove to me with good math, calcs whatever, I will kindly eat my words.
  • 1 0
 @bman33, you're missing one key point. Spokes are not fixed at either end so that they can support a bending load. They are fixed so that they can support a tension load. There is a mild amount of bending support from the hub and from crossed spoke bracing but as sq225917 mentioned, it is tiny compared to the load taken by the tension. Again, do some research about how wheels work - there's plenty of info out there.

In the range of motion of a wheel flexing they are almost nearly free to move laterally at the hub and rim. I hoped that you understood that from my previous explanation so hopefully this will cause you to think about it a bit more.

And as I mentioned before, you don't see them often on race bikes that use wide tires. The air behind wide tires is very dirty so using bladed spokes doesn't help except possibly at very high speeds.
  • 1 0
 bogey--agree 100% on the tension loads, how they are dispersed and the relations between the cross patterns & bracing etc.. I have seen most of the info out there as well. You are also 100% correct with the wider tires and dirty air. Additionally, rim technology has progressed tremendously in the last 15 years especially since they don't have to support braking surfaces for example. This has added to the overall reliability of wheels. After all this, my overall point a is not to be a douche, but that the blade are not as stiff and in my experience with BMX, Gravity, etc. not as strong. I have more experience with wheels than many here. Again, not saying I know everything, but sq225917 shows as 20 years old so I am sure he knows more than "most". Cheers to all and go out and ride
  • 2 0
 Ultimately it's the UTS, Young modulus and applied spoke tension that define the stiffness of a wheel (assuming use of the same rim in each case and discounting nipples). If your spokes have less stretch and take a greater tension then you get a stiffer wheel. Cx-rays, as an example, come out pretty well vs most spokes, in fact they have higher UTS but the same weight as Lasers. Only the Super Spoke beats them for strength and weight in the Sapim line up.

I'd agree with you that 'the best' round spoke builds a stiffer wheel than the best bladed spoke, but I think it's down to its tension properties, not its resistance to bending in compression.
  • 2 0
 See, great explanation of UTS (primarily used in destructive testing). And I agree, each spoke has a UST rating no matter the profile. Some better than others. Although high UTS can assist in snapped spokes, lateral "feel" will be different depending on the profile. So looks like we sorted everything and every can go ride and have a beer later. Cheers!

***CX-Rays do smoke most other bladed spokes. Again, I am a big fan of Sapim spokes no matter what type I use
  • 2 0
 To both you guys: I will stand corrected on a point here, just read Jared Graves' bike check for this weekend's Enduro. He says he uses DT Aerolites on EX 1501 rims (solid rim). I still advise against them to most riders. Either way, wanted to show a little humility here....
  • 3 0
 Too narrow.
  • 1 0
 If Reynolds' isn't knocking on your door and giving these to you for free-then you probably don't need and/or deserve them.
  • 2 1
 Choose your budget.. and.. you know the rest.
  • 1 0
 Love my LB Profile Elite wheelset
  • 2 2
 No mention of warranty? Makes you wonder
  • 7 0
 ^^^Reynolds offers a two year warranty and a lifetime crash replancement policy. For $250, they offer a lifetime insurance policy where they will repair your wheels at no cost beyond shipping.
  • 1 0
 That service is well worth $250 if you ask me.
  • 4 0
 I've had great luck with my Roval Control Carbons and they were less than half the price with a lifetime warranty.
  • 4 5
 26" was killed a while back my froggy friend.
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.043904
Mobile Version of Website