The Hei Hei has been kicking around Kona’s line-up for just shy of an eternity now. In 2016, however, the company give it a major overhaul—ditching the previous rear suspension design and borrowing a bit from their Process models’ low-slung and capable geometry. In April, Kona leaked this all-carbon, early-release 2017 version. We featured a First Look at the time. In the months since, we’ve been rallying around on the thing. It’s time for the review. Kona Hei Hei DL 29 Details• Intended use: XC/Trail
• Wheel size: 29
• Head angle: 68°
• Carbon front and rear triangles
• Sizes: S, M, L, XL
• Weight (as shown, size L w/o pedals): 27.6 pounds (12.51 kg)
• MSRP: $4.699 USD (€4,999)
•
www.konaworld.com.com /
@konaworld As I noted in that 2017 Kona preview a few weeks back, the Hei Hei line is growing leaps and bounds--from two Hei Hei models in early 2016 to a total of eight models for 2017. Prices run from $2,499 to $7,999. It’s a much more diverse range for 2017 that includes straight-forward XC race bikes, more aggressive 29ers (such as this one), and some 27.5-wheeled, trail-bike Hei Heis boasting an additional 40 millimeters (1.5 inches) of rear suspension travel.Frame DetailsWhen Kona set out to re-design the Hei Hei, they wanted to create a race bike that could tackle more technical courses—a more versatile flavor of cross-country. They were also looking to drop some frame weight. Making a bike more capable in rowdy terrain while cleaving weight from the chassis aren’t always goals that party well together. Kona accomplished it this time around, however, by making, in essence, a lighter, simpler and slightly steeper version of the Process 111. To that end, the new Hei Hei features massive standover clearance, a longer front center, lower bottom bracket and a considerably shorter (15 millimeters) rear end than Hei Hei models of yore.
The frame is a sleek, low-slung affair. Though the images here show both the dropper post and rear brake line running externally along the downtube, there is a port near the head tube that allows you to run the entire dropper-post line internally through the frame.There are no ISCG mounts on the Hei Hei, but given the bike's XC lineage, that's not a huge surprise. The bike comes equipped with a fairly pinned 2.2-inch Maxxis Ikon out back, but there's just enough breathing room in the rear end for some 2.3-inch tires, if you're so inclined. If you're in the market for a cross-country frame, it's worth noting that Kona also sells the carbon Hei Hei 29 frame (along with a Fox Float Performance rear shock) for $2,599.
Suspension DesignThough the new Hei Hei drinks heavily from the Process Kool-Aid, it is certainly not the same bike. The Hei Hei is configured around Kona's new Fuse Independent Suspension system, which has no pivots at the seatstay/chainstay junction. Instead, Fuse relies on a small amount (about 1.5 degrees) of vertical flex in the seat and chainstays. Light, simple, laterally stiff and efficient under pedaling—those were the goals with the new design.
The Fuse design is, in fact, lighter than the 2014-2015 "Beamer" walking-beam design it replaced--240 grams (a half pound) lighter, to be exact. What kind of weight savings did Kona achieve by going to a complete carbon frame? Kona says the carbon Fuse frame is a full 1.5 pounds lighter than the aluminum version that debuted in early 2016. I was skeptical about that claim at first, but sure enough, even with the addition of a dropper post, this bike weighs a solid pound less than the aluminum version I tested in early 2016. Kona claims that going to carbon wasn't merely an exercise in shedding weight, but also a means of stiffening up the chassis. To that end they also moved to Boost 148 for the 2017 models.
Geometry
When I said that the new Hei Hei is something of a simpler, lighter 2014-2016 Process 111, I wasn't exaggerating. Same head and seat tube angle and, same chainstay length. The Process had 13 more millimeters in the top tube (though only five millimeters more in actual reach since the Hei Hei sports a longer stem). The Process 111's longer top tube gave it a longer wheelbase, but otherwise, from a geometry perspective, the bikes are nearly identical.
What does this mean in practical terms? For a bike that resides in XC and trail bike land, the Hei Hei DL 29 is a rowdy little thing, with geometry that's similar to what you'll find on an Evil Following (set in its
high mode with a 120 fork spearheading it), Pivot Mach 429 Trail or Ibis Ripley LS. The 68 and 74-degree head and seat tube angles (respectively), 1161-millimeter (45.7-inch) wheelbase (size Large), and 430-millimeter (16.9-inch) chainstays would have been at home on an all-mountain bike a few years ago, before everything got enduro-slack.
Specifications
Specifications
|
Release Date
|
July 2016 |
|
Price
|
$4699 |
|
Travel |
120 front, 100 rear |
|
Rear Shock |
Fox Float Performance |
|
Fork |
Fox Float 34 Performance Air 120mm |
|
Headset |
FSA No.57B |
|
Cassette |
Shimano XT 11-42t 11spd |
|
Crankarms |
RaceFace Aeffect cinch 1.x |
|
Bottom Bracket |
Shimano Deore PF92 |
|
Rear Derailleur |
Shimano XT M8000 |
|
Chain |
KMC X11 |
|
Front Derailleur |
None |
|
Shifter Pods |
Shimano XT M8000 |
|
Handlebar |
Kona XC/BC 35 Riser bar |
|
Stem |
Kona XC/Road 35 |
|
Grips |
ODI Ruffian MX |
|
Brakes |
Shimano XT |
|
Wheelset |
WTB KOM i29 TCS w/Joytech hubs |
|
Tires |
Maxxis Ardent 2.25 front/Ikon 2.2 rear |
|
Seat |
WTB Volt |
|
Seatpost |
KS Lev Integra w/Southpaw Lever 31.6mm |
|
| |
Set-UpThe Hei Hei DL 29 comes out of the box wearing a Fox Float Performance rear shock and a 120-millimeter travel Float 34 Performance fork. There aren’t a ton of bells and whistles to twiddle with here on these mid-tier Fox products, so I promptly set the sag at 25 percent. Running any less in my neck of the woods is just a recipe for rattling the fillings from your teeth. Running more on a bike with 100-millimeters of travel usually feels like too much of a good thing—you’re already running out of travel faster than you’d like when that’s all the squish you have at your disposal.
ClimbingThe bike weighs 27.6 pounds and sports a suspension design that’s supposed to lean towards the efficient pedaling side of the spectrum—the Hei Hei DL 29 should climb well. Not a huge surprise, it gains elevation easily. Suspension squat is minimal, even with the Float rear shock run wide open. In fact, traction on loose and rocky singletrack climbs suffers a bit in the firmer “Medium” mode, so I only opted for the extra compression damping when climbing fire roads.
Is the Hei Hei DL 29 an absolute weapon on the climbs? If you are comparing it to the likes of the Process 111, it’s practically a rocket. It’s not simply lighter—it also accelerates like nobody’s business. But let’s get more apples-to-apples here. Compared to some bikes more apiece with the Hei Hei--say the Ibis Ripley LS or Specialized Camber--the Hei Hei DL 29 holds its own in the climbing department, but isn’t top of class. The Hei Hei displays a bit of pedal kickback when you're humping the bike up particularly chunky climbs in low gears. It's the flip side/necessary evil of all the chain growth (and resulting anti-squat) that also makes the bike such an efficient pedaler. I’ve certainly experienced more dramatic tugging on the pedals with other bikes, but the kickback on the Hei Hei DL 29 is noticeable all the same.
Despite the relatively slack geometry, I had no difficulties winding the bike through tight uphill switchbacks. None whatsoever. If you’re coming off of a more traditional cross-country race bike—say, an older Epic or Scalpel—you might find your comfort zone more quickly on the more traditionally spec’d Hei Hei Race 29 model, which bears the same frame, but has a 100-millimeter travel fork up front. That bike might feel more “normal” and if you are that guy who rides around with his suspension always locked out, it might be the better choice. But I’ll be honest here: I think going shorter with the fork travel would be a loss. The longer, burlier Fox 34 fork and the slacker front end geo that comes along for the ride bring something special to this bike.
DescendingMy first thought when I hit the bottom of that first big downhill aboard the Hei Hei?
I’m going to need some fatter tires. Usually bikes that climb this well give up a lot on the downhills. Not this one. This is the kind of bike that has you pushing yourself and the limits of the components—like those skinny XC tires.
I’m not suggesting that the Hei Hei's 100 millimeters of rear suspension somehow feels like 130 millimeters. It feels every bit the short-travel machine that it is—you realize that when you hit a jump or a drop…the kind you might normally not even try on a bike with this little travel.
The Hei Hei DL 29 is a true trail-bike wolf in cross-country sheep clothing. Not terribly surprising, I suppose, when you consider that this Hei Hei is closer (genetically) to the Process line than to its own Hei Hei ancestors. That Fox 34 (and the slacker front geometry that it brings to the table) also deliver in spades. This, frankly, is why I wouldn’t opt for the Race version of the Hei Hei 29 with the skinnier, shorter-travel fork. The Fox 34 is a great match for the frame’s overall geometry.
You
do, however, feel the frame reaching its limits—the Hei Hei doesn’t feel as calm in the truly hectic, high-speed stuff as, for comparison’s sake, its Process 111 sibling. You also realize that while the Hei Hei can do outrageous things that’d have dedicated cross-country rigs running away with their tails between their legs, it doesn’t afford you the same wide margin for error that you’ll get with a bike that possesses more rear suspension.
Component Check• Wheels and Tires: In keeping with the Hei Hei's lineage, the bike's 2.25 and 2.2-inch Maxxis Ardent and Ikon tires are all about reducing rotational weight. That's great and all, but the Hei Hei encourages aggressive, risk taking and you soon outride the limits of those two tires. The 2.4-inch Ardent is a quick-rolling tire and a very different beast than the 2.25--I'd slap that on in a heartbeat. The good news is that Kona equipped the bike with light-yet-wide WTB KOM i29 rims, which will provide plenty of sidewall support for fatter treads.
• Shimano XT/Race Face Aeffect 1x11 drivetrain: Quick, solid shifts....that's what you get here. According to the Kona website, this model comes equipped with a 34-tooth ring. Ours, mercifully, wore a 32. Regardless, if you need to drop down to a 30-tooth (or smaller) ring, Race Face's Cinch system makes chainring swaps as complicated as buttering a slice of bread.
• Fox Float Performance shock/Float 34 Performance for: You don't get Kashima coating on the stanchions nor the 22 clicks of compression-damping adjustability in "Open" mode that you'd find on a Fox Factory Series fork, but the mid-rung Fox Performance Series fork
does feature the excellent FIT4 damper and enough adjustability to keep most riders happy. Both the fork and rear shock are good kit.
Pinkbike's Take: | The Hei Hei DL 29 is a testament to how much more versatile shorter-travel bikes can truly be. Sure, it's a lightweight and efficient pedaling machine, but it's also as competent a descender as some trail bikes boasting more suspension. That said, the Hei Hei doesn't afford you the same safety net for riding blunders that you'd get with a heavier, longer-travel bike. The Hei Hei DL 29 is a crazy-capable switchblade of a bike, but it is still a switchblade, not a bazooka. - Vernon Felton |
Visit the high-res gallery for more images from this review
MENTIONS:
@konaworld /
@vernonfelton
About the ReviewerStats: Age: 44 • Height: 5'11” • Inseam: 32" • Weight: 175lb • Industry affiliations / sponsors: None In 1988 Vernon started riding mountain bikes—mainly to avoid the people throwing cans of Budweiser at him during his road rides. At some point, roughly when Ronald Reagan was president and Hüsker Dü was still a band, he began loving mountain bikes on their own terms. Vernon Felton spends most of his time riding bikes, thinking about bikes, thinking about riding bikes and then riding some more around Bellingham, Washington. If it has a greasy chain and two wheels on it, he’s cool with it. Except for recumbents. Well, okay, maybe those too. Nah, forget it. No recumbents.
To be fair with them though, unless you're reviewing a special unicorn, all the bikes in a specific category are probably very similar aside tiny tweaks here and there so you're bound to run out of things to say over the long run, especially after reviewing 100+ of them. It is also worth noting that manufacturers don't seem to send them many (any?) purebred XC rockets so all the trail bikes they get are biased toward the "pedals good, descend even better" side of things, which makes their reviews look even more homogeneous.
Are things better now? Of course. Is it by a big margin and are they worth the ~3k-4k premium? I have my doubts on that one.
Amazing downhiller, rips DH tracks apart, descends like nothing else, but Jesus fricking Christ, rolling on flat is a pain in the butt and climbing it is virtually impossible!!! If you are into lift assisted downhill then this thing will please you time after time again, but if you are into mountain biking, try something with less travel and climbing friendly geometry.
Also I hope that now that the 2.6" wide tyre is slowly becoming a thing, the 2018 Hei Hei models will be able to fit those. Would be a perfect match since it gives you more grip and less rolling resistance.
Don't let marketing tell you otherwise!! More rubber on the ground = more rolling resistance. Lets also not forget about how much more material you're adding with these wider tyres, and adding more weight to a rotating mass is quite noticeable.
If you don't believe me, there have been several experiments and wider tyres ALWAYS ended up being faster (at least on off road).
Here's one for example: www.mtbonline.co.za/downloads/Rolling_Resistance_Eng_illustrated.pdf
Also: www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6TMA2vI8bA
And there have been more test with the same result, just too lazy to look them all up.
So, they do have a bigger contact point in practice.
This is also why more flexible tyres have less rolling resistance, the easier it can deform, the lower the rolling resistance is.
For me the "downside" of big wheels, already in regular 29" form is the necessity of keeping them rolling, I can't afford to stall the bike, because then it really taxes my muscles. In case of plus bikes, stalling on steep climb is a hell of a pain. It is something to get used to, but gets tough at the end of a 3h+ ride, where both power and focus are not there anymore. All in all, I find 29ers quicker (as long as we compare similar geo/travel bikes with different wheel sizes), they just cut through the trail like a knife through butter, in a way that they seem to save every bad decision on worst of rocks or roots. The Stumpy 29 Evo from 2012 was the only longer travel 29er I rode properly and it's been just incredible. I waited 4 years to ride a bike that will top that and it's my 275, 160 bike, but mainly due to amazing suspension, be either by kinematics or by CCDB Coil CS. If I got myself a Fox 36RC2 it would be just pure pornography. I hope SAR springs will make a coil kit for my Lyrik.
Does anyone have the Performance Level Fox 34? Costs a lot less and looks like a good upgrade for my Fox 32. Do these weigh a ton? Fox website didn't have weight info for the lower cost performance line...
You mean carbon?
That Syncline you were riding? As always, thanks for your lucid and entertaining reviews!
"Vodka & Metamucil" - priceless Vernon!
Safe travels, looking forward to reading about your Yukon exploits soon!
Sal
Do we need to begin a "Pink Bike Book Club"?
I think is dumb to have a xc/trail bike with 2.4 tires no matter how rowdy it can get. you are losing so much in the climbs that might a well get on one of the E word bikes.
I'd love to try a 100mm bike with a really long and slack geo like UNNO or Pole. But I'd have a 120 fork in it, and then Maxxis Beaver - like tyres in 2.25-2.35". Maybe combo of Bonty XR3 and XR4.
Can you please PB tell us in your reviews if the new frames adopt the metric shock size, so we can know if it's better to invest in a metric or non metric shock frame. Thanks
alas, they did not. add it to the list of things to complain about we'll all probably collectively forget about in a year or two
You're right. Kona uses a single pivot on all their frames, which I find very strange...
27lbs (without pedals!) for a carbon XC bike is embarrassing.
The only potential issue I see with this bike for it's intended use is rear tire clearance. I'm very curious what will, and what won't fit in there.
I'm sure with a significant amount of $ invested, this Hei Hei would be competitively light. I do wonder what the true weight of a Hei Hei carbon bare frame is.