Posted by
spoiledgoods
Oct 4, 2007 at 15:14
2007-10-04

Location:

Chilliwack, British Columbia, Canada Canada

Views:

24,992

Faves: Add to Favorites

202


More Videos by spoiledgoods


Derek Lahr

You need to upgrade your Flash Player
Click here to install it
well, me and Radek went and had a second chat with Derek. This is what we came up with.
  • + 21
flag ollie-jones (Nov 2, 2007 at 5:54)
 thats pretty damn confusin
  • + 1
flag dh-bitz (Sep 18, 2008 at 3:19)
 the only thing i dont get is how the sump gears wok?
  • + 3
flag banshee-ripper (Jan 11, 2009 at 12:46)
 The easiest way to under stand the sun gears is to think of it like a ratchet wrench. If you only had one wrench, then when you crank the handle forward, you rotate the socket. But then you have to return the wrench to the starting position before you can rotate it again...

put on an additional wrench, and move them in opposite directions, and you get constant rotation(One rotating the socket, as the other is returning to the starting position)

In this explaination, the "Socket" is the equivilent of the out-put drive ring.

Hope this helps you understand it better. tup
  • + 2
flag MUnibiker (May 25, 2009 at 6:42)
 Good explination!
  • + 2
flag banshee-ripper (May 26, 2009 at 8:08)
 Thnx, Glad to help!
[Reply]
  • + 17
flag beerismycopilot (Oct 24, 2007 at 8:27)
 holy shhit that weighs only 8lbs!!!
  • + 11
flag milfhunter (Jan 18, 2008 at 3:12)
 It's light because its a carbon frame, stick it on a regular bike and it'll be heavy as feck. When sh1t like this gets as small or as light as a regular drive train, then we'll buy into it. The whole drive train of bikes is very crude, we need sh1t like this, but it needs to be lighter, smaller and easier to fix and setup, you'll need an F1 team to fix this.
  • + 10
flag sam4412 (Aug 11, 2008 at 4:39)
 He's gona be a verry rich man!
  • + 3
flag davemit (Aug 15, 2008 at 12:57)
 check out the rohloff hubs(finite number of gears but you can change them without pedaling),they are "simple",you can mount them on everyday bikes,it's pretty light(considering that you don't need chain rings nor derailleur) and it was tested pretty good for example Super T uses them(used them all the time) and the Flowriders(at least Dan Cowan 100%) and they give lifetime warranty
  • + 2
flag davemit (Aug 15, 2008 at 13:04)
 forgot to mention nice job anyways!!
[Reply]
  • + 8
flag aldo321 (Nov 2, 2007 at 12:31)
 That's one interesting / innovative design... if people don't do stuff like this you would never get anywhere.

That being said, I'm not so sure as to how practical it is... it seems to me like in order to get rid of the derailleur they are putting in a much more complicated system that will be a lot more expensive, harder to fix, and cause more problems than a derailleur. Only advantages I truly see to this over a derailleur is the possibility of a lower centre of gravity on the bike (because of no chain rings) and possibly the infinite number of gears (although I've never wanted more than 8 gears, 9 speed is way more than enough).
  • + 3
flag reallybigmantis (Nov 16, 2007 at 18:27)
 one of the cool aspects of a gearbox or internal hub is that the chain can't ever skip or grind or get caught between gears. not that you need infinite gears, but its cool to be able to change the ratio smoothly like a volume button. you can shift standing still and not worry about having to pedal out the gear change. i would like to see the technology go into hubs that fit any bike, rather than only one frame, but what a hell of a start for this guy. cheers!
[Reply]
  • + 12
flag welshrider (Nov 12, 2007 at 11:54)
 give this guy a clap everyone
[Reply]
  • + 6
flag aiken (Nov 2, 2007 at 9:06)
 Jeez, that is awesome. Brilliant stuff.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag owock (Dec 3, 2007 at 7:46)
 damn i cant even understand it but it sounds cool...it'll take a good while before it makes more sense do buy one of those instead of like a deraileurs...but you need guys like him to keep goin forward. yeah if he was the one postin the vid id be like props man your the best but yeah
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag slacks (Dec 3, 2007 at 11:09)
 thats amazing, that guys gona be rich

I'd buy one if I could afford to lol
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag wingman303 (May 17, 2008 at 23:24)
 SO much better than the gbox, I am so looking forawrd to the day when derailuers/mechs are a thing of the past and we can finaly hit a narow line through some rocks without hangon a 100 bucks off the side of our bikes to get ruiened on the trail
  • + 0
flag wingman303 (May 17, 2008 at 23:24)
 wow my spelling is horrible
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag p3riderforlife (Nov 2, 2007 at 11:16)
 thats dope but sooo confusing lol all i no is that its light and works?
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag Mingermouse (Dec 4, 2007 at 10:15)
 Maaan, that guy is awsome!! i mean really, coolest guy in the world!!

he's such a genious!, and he managed to draw the plans out in his bedromm which is pretty ace.

Whatta guyBig Grin
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag jf951 (May 28, 2008 at 23:13)
 thats sick, a really great design but like people said its super complicated nd would take narly an F1 team to fix it and at this point it still looks fairly heavy. that being said the idea of it is awesome. thers no chain slip.

now try not to kill be but y not go with the idea that the honda bike had and simply sitck the deraileur into a box in the frame. its been proven to be practical. obvisouly very simple and could provide alot of the same advantages to the frame...lower center of gravity and less unsprung weight to the rear end
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag adamr100 (Nov 20, 2007 at 13:53)
 surely on the bike its on, shits gunna get all inside it? cause on that proto he has there theres no gaurd to stop that?
[Reply]
  • + 4
flag dirtrider14 (Nov 1, 2007 at 20:27)
 thats pretty damn sweet
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag dandriller (Aug 20, 2008 at 15:09)
 I remember when the driveshaft idea came out and the dual drive bikes... This is amazing. I like it better than the gearbox design better than the Honda design, but the frame is ugly!
[Reply]
  • + 3
flag cogan34 (Feb 3, 2008 at 17:58)
 747 WOOOSH over my head lol
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag drumerbumer9 (Apr 28, 2008 at 17:09)
 i saw that and thought the same thing. but i think it would, he couldnt make that big of a desighn flaw.thats a super cool fram and i bet it will cost alottt
  • + 0
flag mat-DHer (May 10, 2008 at 2:50)
 if youve seen the other lahar bikes they have realy thin parts aswell but somehow he seems to make them strong. the bottom chainstay on a lahar M9 is like 5mm thin
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag nishnash (Sep 12, 2008 at 21:39)
 wow, to all you guys bashing, you could not do that at any age, oddly enough i understood all of that but i still dont get algebra, i only hop i can be where he is when i am his age. PROPS
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag vwcabrio82 (Dec 4, 2007 at 13:32)
 more info at this link... very smart guy
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/10/concept_a_camba.html
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag peboiteau (Oct 7, 2010 at 21:07)
 Wow, as a mechanical engineer, I am pretty impress by the device... but what is the efficiency of the thing?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag freeriderider (Jan 4, 2008 at 14:07)
 i want to cheque out the NuVinci CVP transmission it looks dumb i dont now i juste don like it but this transmition is a great idea well its amazing
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag bvfreerider (Jan 1, 2008 at 6:40)
 Not only is that guy smart as hell, he rips too. It's funny/humbling to watch him go up a hill on a kona stinky as fast as he goes down it.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag hawthorn (Feb 24, 2008 at 7:24)
 this idea is pretty genious but compared to the honda g-cross rn-01 design it seems to complicated but this is awesome and i hope it takes off for the guy he will be rich
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag 3lfd3wd (Dec 19, 2007 at 10:23)
 The Ride, by Ellsworth, features the NuVinci CVP transmission in a rear hub, looks a little tidier than this one, and a bit more reliable as well perhaps. Go check it out.
[Reply]
  • + 2
flag DAMZ (Dec 3, 2007 at 7:19)
 yes, can i ride this in mud?
  • + 0
flag k-rider92 (May 2, 2008 at 18:14)
 Im sure you could and im almost in fact certain that that hole box would be water tight and have probably some sort of lubricant in the box its self
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag hewymann (Nov 21, 2007 at 20:10)
 how bout ya turn it auround and put it into the frame?
  • + 1
flag hewymann (Nov 21, 2007 at 20:12)
 oh shit spook to soon
  • + 0
flag hewymann (Nov 21, 2007 at 20:13)
 when can i buy one?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag hendu (Apr 5, 2008 at 16:09)
 look at 262.1 the bottem of the triangle looks really thin and flat will that hold up?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag Flash45 (Jan 12, 2008 at 0:37)
 wonder how it would do in a trials application, infinite engagement points and all?
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag jeffreybentum (Aug 11, 2008 at 15:11)
 it scares me that i understand things that he talks about...that guys a genius
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag stwaven (Dec 20, 2007 at 19:00)
 this would work well, duralers seem to hate me they always break and only on my bike to. none of my friends
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag thegroanofwind (Nov 29, 2007 at 13:59)
 deraileurs work fine for me
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag dubprof (Nov 2, 2007 at 20:38)
 the beginning of the end of the deraileur is here. (mind you....i'd love to have an 8 speed internal gear hub)
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag evancam (Dec 16, 2007 at 1:29)
 Jesus Christ, he might as well be speaking in Sanskrit
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag haze999 (May 14, 2008 at 11:07)
 Its cool but it probably weighs a ton
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag madeincanada (Dec 3, 2007 at 12:54)
 awsome follow up vid to the first one, it explains a lot.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag wanabetrials (May 18, 2008 at 21:39)
 That is amazing, if he puts it into production I'll definately buy one.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag atomik250 (Dec 19, 2008 at 19:54)
 to bad that thing is f*cking massive!
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag oldude (Dec 20, 2008 at 22:05)
 Wow,that kids IQ is propably more than my bank account statement right now.
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag steezemaster (Aug 3, 2008 at 15:34)
 he should work in NASA but im stoked that he chose to work on bikes.
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag eddleston (Nov 6, 2007 at 14:21)
 impressive
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag dwnhl63 (Jan 16, 2008 at 20:51)
 i dont get anything he just said, but it looks sweet
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag justin888 (Mar 4, 2008 at 15:43)
 man this guy is smart lol
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag specializedrider07 (Mar 11, 2008 at 18:04)
 im so confused
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag kolya (Dec 3, 2007 at 13:30)
 its evolution baby
[Reply]
  • + 1
flag kevinthelilbiker (Nov 12, 2007 at 16:47)
 awsome stuff...
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag evantib (Aug 12, 2008 at 12:04)
 what???
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag aflo661 (Nov 12, 2007 at 17:32)
 SWEET JESUS!
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag collykeogh (Nov 6, 2007 at 13:52)
 wat a guy
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag bikenerdy (May 3, 2008 at 12:29)
 nice time machine
[Reply]
  • + 0
flag mkkearney (May 6, 2008 at 17:31)
 thats intense
[Reply]
  • - 3
flag bear93 (Nov 5, 2007 at 17:30)
 sweet
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag giantfaith4567 (Jan 4, 2009 at 19:25)
 he sure is a smart guy
[Reply]
  • - 1
flag Jean-gab (Aug 29, 2008 at 9:46)
 wow man thats sik
[Reply]
  • - 2
flag jordiebighit3 (May 27, 2008 at 5:25)
 that man is a legend fiar play so cleaver
[Reply]
Below threshold threads are hidden

Post a Comment



You must login to Pinkbike.
Don't have an account? Sign up

Join Pinkbike  Login

Copyright © 2000 - 2012. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.064498