Better to look go than to ride good I guess... right?
Both would be great. My knolly was nothing but problems....
Sorry to hear that. What was the problem?
No small bump. Rear end was way tight. Without the rear shock bolted in it was really hard to cycle the travel. Had to run the bushing basically loose to get any decent feel out of it. Knolly said this is how it was suppose to be. I figured I had bent something. Said f*ck it and moved on.
That's interesting because when I rode a Warden Carbon I got the same impression. For as active as the design is supposed to be it didn't seem very plush.
Really dudes? My knolly warden carbon is the plushest bike I've ever ridden, including DH bikes. Bit of a bitch to carry speed on though, seems to suck that up in its plushness too.
Really dudes? My knolly warden carbon is the plushest bike I've ever ridden, including DH bikes. Bit of a bitch to carry speed on though, seems to suck that up in its plushness too.
Different bikes though. Is the bearings and other materials become smaller and lighter more effort is put into trying to make it more stiff, which I suppose could cause some binding within bushings and bearings.
Really dudes? My knolly warden carbon is the plushest bike I've ever ridden, including DH bikes. Bit of a bitch to carry speed on though, seems to suck that up in its plushness too.
You are trying To argue with people that have never ridden theWarden Carbon. They are just hung up on the looks.
I rode a Warden Carbon. I was very "meh" about it. Definitely didn't sell me. The Transition Scout I rode afterwards was pretty fun though noticeably heavier for it's shorter travel.