They might look good, but I wouldn’t part with wedge to ride one. Better bikes available that are cheaper, I’d rather ride a bike that functions over a ‘pretty’ bike
They might look good, but I wouldn’t part with wedge to ride one. Better bikes available that are cheaper, I’d rather ride a bike that functions over a ‘pretty’ bike
No malice , just posing the question
Always viewed them as a bit hipster tbh. The owners are all very similar, middle class desperately trying not to be middle class.
I’ve looked into starling, Cotic and Stanton and each time come away thinking I want something a little more refined. I love how clean and simple my transition sentinel is.
They might look good, but I wouldn’t part with wedge to ride one. Better bikes available that are cheaper, I’d rather ride a bike that functions over a ‘pretty’ bike
No malice , just posing the question
I think it’s the other way around, I’d say my Starling Murmur wasn’t that pretty compared to the super sleek carbon bikes out there. But the question is really whether you can separate what you want from what you need.
That Murmur was all the bike you’d ever need for most riders (bike park shredders excepting) but riding mountain bikes is about more than just what you need. Having a bike you love the look off is part of the equation too.
They might look good, but I wouldn’t part with wedge to ride one. Better bikes available that are cheaper, I’d rather ride a bike that functions over a ‘pretty’ bike
No malice , just posing the question
I think it’s the other way around, I’d say my Starling Murmur wasn’t that pretty compared to the super sleek carbon bikes out there. But the question is really whether you can separate what you want from what you need.
That Murmur was all the bike you’d ever need for most riders (bike park shredders excepting) but riding mountain bikes is about more than just what you need. Having a bike you love the look off is part of the equation too.
Thank you for your response, appreciate your viewpoint as an owner
3 years on a steel fully, 140mm rear travel might not strictly be enduro or is it, yes it's heavy yes it's hipster yes it's fun as hell to ride. Edit: also yeah I guess I'm middle class trying to fight my way up I will be getting a Mondraker not a Yeti though when I make it.
They might look good, but I wouldn’t part with wedge to ride one. Better bikes available that are cheaper, I’d rather ride a bike that functions over a ‘pretty’ bike
No malice , just posing the question
I think it’s the other way around, I’d say my Starling Murmur wasn’t that pretty compared to the super sleek carbon bikes out there. But the question is really whether you can separate what you want from what you need.
That Murmur was all the bike you’d ever need for most riders (bike park shredders excepting) but riding mountain bikes is about more than just what you need. Having a bike you love the look off is part of the equation too.
I love the way my Murmur looks, but I compare to liking the functional aesthetic of a tank or tractor. It's definitely not a swoopy, sleek Ferrari or Ducati.
And yes, I admit I have fairly strong hipster pretensions, though I lack the typical fashion style.