Oh yeah lets give the guy who’s the most informative, helpful, and knowledgeable guy on this thread a hard time. That’s my official downvote. Thanks your invaluable contributions to this thread Ajax-ripper.
Oh yeah lets give the guy who’s the most informative, helpful, and knowledgeable guy on this thread a hard time. That’s my official downvote. Thanks your invaluable contributions to this thread Ajax-ripper.
Wonder how @ajax-ripper would downvote with his proping convention
Oh yeah lets give the guy who’s the most informative, helpful, and knowledgeable guy on this thread a hard time. That’s my official downvote. Thanks your invaluable contributions to this thread Ajax-ripper.
Wonder how @ajax-ripper would downvote with his proping convention
You remind me of the customers who spend a fortune on a carbon frame, cranks, rims, bar, and stem without wondering if there was a way to save the same amount of weight with more thinking and less spending.
None of the carbon things on my SJ were purchased to save weight. They are all for performance/comfort reasons. And I'm also not a customer, I'm an employee. I haven't had to pay retail for almost 20 years
What kind of sucker pays retail? Seriously! Maybe ones who have "real" jobs and earn more in a week than us industry types save in a year. Suckers.
But anyway, a wheel is only as strong as its weakest side. One side is inherently weaker. There is little to no cost for using stronger spokes on the weak side and lighter spokes on the strong side. So ... why wouldn't you?
If you could use stronger spokes on one side then yes.
But almost all spokes are already 2mm thick at the bend, and that's where 90% of spokes break.
Oh yeah lets give the guy who’s the most informative, helpful, and knowledgeable guy on this thread a hard time. That’s my official downvote. Thanks your invaluable contributions to this thread Ajax-ripper.
Wonder how @ajax-ripper would downvote with his proping convention