Hey guys! Didn’t find any post on that point... did someone tried to put 27,5 rear wheel on a sentinel and have a 29/27,5 configuration? Quite scary about bbdrop and crankarm hits...
Hey guys! Didn’t find any post on that point... did someone tried to put 27,5 rear wheel on a sentinel and have a 29/27,5 configuration? Quite scary about bbdrop and crankarm hits...
Yes, I did. Do not recommend. https://forums.mtbr.com/transition-bikes/sentinel-mullet-experiment-1110227.html
Hey guys! Didn’t find any post on that point... did someone tried to put 27,5 rear wheel on a sentinel and have a 29/27,5 configuration? Quite scary about bbdrop and crankarm hits...
Yes, I did. Do not recommend. https://forums.mtbr.com/transition-bikes/sentinel-mullet-experiment-1110227.html
It's highly recommended to use a 27.5 bike as the starting point for a mullet since the point of a mullet is to have the benefits of a shorter, lively 27.5 rear end and the rollover of the 29er up front. That and you would be lowering the Sentinels already low BB even lower if you put a 27.5 wheel on it. A Patrol would be a good bike to Mullet but I'd never mullet a 29er frame.
I currently have a Transition Scout and I love the playfulness of it. It's great for the flow-style trails in my area. However, I find that when I want to ride rougher terrain (quickly), I'm reaching the limits of the front fork. I definitely felt the limits of the front travel when I was riding the Whole Enchilada in Moab while trying to go faster on even the conservative lines.
I'm thinking about adding a Sentinel or Patrol to the stable while also keeping the Scout. Which one of these would offer the greatest contrast to the Scout? I've read Sentinel is great at going fast down the chunky stuff (which sounds appealing) and is a 29er (which I hope brings more variety), but the 140 mm rear makes me concerned that it'll be similar to the rear capabilities of the Scout. Any insights/opinions?
Thinking about getting an MRP Hazzard coil shock for my sentinel. Any opinions, spring rate suggestions, or whether to go for the progressive or non-progressive spring? Thanks!
Thinking about getting an MRP Hazzard coil shock for my sentinel. Any opinions,
I ordered one for my Patrol, I'll report back.
TuckerBikes wrote:
spring rate suggestions,
Well since you didn't give your riding weight I recommend the red ones.
TuckerBikes wrote:
or whether to go for the progressive or non-progressive spring? Thanks!
Transition frames are relatively linear and I like a poppy bike, so I went for a progressive spring, but this is going to be more of a personal preference thing.
Thinking about getting an MRP Hazzard coil shock for my sentinel. Any opinions,
I ordered one for my Patrol, I'll report back.
TuckerBikes wrote:
spring rate suggestions,
Well since you didn't give your riding weight I recommend the red ones.
TuckerBikes wrote:
or whether to go for the progressive or non-progressive spring? Thanks!
Transition frames are relatively linear and I like a poppy bike, so I went for a progressive spring, but this is going to be more of a personal preference thing.
I currently have a Transition Scout and I love the playfulness of it. It's great for the flow-style trails in my area. However, I find that when I want to ride rougher terrain (quickly), I'm reaching the limits of the front fork. I definitely felt the limits of the front travel when I was riding the Whole Enchilada in Moab while trying to go faster on even the conservative lines.
I'm thinking about adding a Sentinel or Patrol to the stable while also keeping the Scout. Which one of these would offer the greatest contrast to the Scout? I've read Sentinel is great at going fast down the chunky stuff (which sounds appealing) and is a 29er (which I hope brings more variety), but the 140 mm rear makes me concerned that it'll be similar to the rear capabilities of the Scout. Any insights/opinions?
Thinking about getting an MRP Hazzard coil shock for my sentinel. Any opinions,
I ordered one for my Patrol, I'll report back.
TuckerBikes wrote:
spring rate suggestions,
Well since you didn't give your riding weight I recommend the red ones.
TuckerBikes wrote:
or whether to go for the progressive or non-progressive spring? Thanks!
Transition frames are relatively linear and I like a poppy bike, so I went for a progressive spring, but this is going to be more of a personal preference thing.
I weigh 175 kitted up, meant to add that.
Hopefully someone chimes in that's closer to your weight and has some actual experience, but online calculators appear to put you on a 400# or 450# spring. Which would make sense - I'm about 20# lighter, and went with a 350# spring. You could also contact MRP directly for a recommendation.
Well since you didn't give your riding weight I recommend the red ones.
Transition frames are relatively linear and I like a poppy bike, so I went for a progressive spring, but this is going to be more of a personal preference thing.
I weigh 175 kitted up, meant to add that.
Hopefully someone chimes in that's closer to your weight and has some actual experience, but online calculators appear to put you on a 400# or 450# spring. Which would make sense - I'm about 20# lighter, and went with a 350# spring. You could also contact MRP directly for a recommendation.
Thanks for the feedback! I talked to mrp, and they recommended a 450 for my riding style, I'll report back on how it feels!