Probably answered to heck here, but I haven't seen anything.
Background: I'm riding a 100mm travel Scott Spark 960. Nothing special, love the bike, but not too flashy. As we all do, I've recently been thinking about upgrading. I have my eye on the Santa Cruz 5010, which has about 130mm. As I ride primarily xc, but want to get more 'all mountain,' is this much travel about appropriate? I would look at the Bronson, but 150mm seems like overkill for xc.
A new bike wont make you more all mountain. (That was supposed to be clever) What do you want from a bike, that your current rig doesn't offer you?
If you're mostly xc riding, i would just throw a 120mm fork on the front of what you have. More travel is mostly only good for plowing through rock gardens and jumping off stuff.
I love the ad for the solo, was really sold until I rode one (on my fab trails). Just couldn't get it adjusted to feel good to me. Was a mean crude bike. I thought the rocky mountain 970 (in contrast) was divine. I settled for a used asr5c and no regrets.
If you're thinking of upgrading, spending all that cash... try and demo bikes til you find one you love. Lots bikes don't live up to the hype - at least for me.
My brother rides a trek fuel with 130mm travel and I ride a lapierre zesty with 150mm travel.
So far We haven't managed to find a situation where his bike is any less capable than mine even with its reduced travel. If we know we are going to be riding more technical terrain and more drops he generally adds a bit more pressure to the suspension to cope a bit better with the hits.
I would go with the 130mm travel you are looking at, a modern good quality bike is far more capable than you would think and it will still tear up any xc trail and climb like a goat.
I wen't from XC to AM bike not because I wanted more travel, but because I wanted to ride gnarlier trails and at the same time being faster and having more fun... a bike with more travel offers you that.
I'd demo several types of bikes and figure out what you like
I wen't from XC to AM bike not because I wanted more travel, but because I wanted to ride gnarlier trails and at the same time being faster and having more fun... a bike with more travel offers you that.
This is mostly what I am thinking. We have a few (not a ton) of pretty gnarly rock gardens where I live, as well as several downhill venues.
New-ish question, what are some of the best 125-135mm travel bikes out there?
And to friendlyfoe who suggested a new fork, I've thought about this, but it more than likely means get a fork with a 9mm qr, or the new thru axle plus wheel/hub.
I was in exactly the same position. Psyched on XC riding, but wanted to get better at more AM riding. I got the SC 5010 and I have been SO PSYCHED. The bottom bracket is low, so I don't feel like I'm gonna topple over. The rear triangle is pretty short, so I never feel like it's too much bike to throw around. These things can obviously, also be a deterrent for some more aggressive trail riding, but I feel like switching to the 5010 gave me the tool I needed to take my skills to a level where I can start thinking about a bigger bike like the Bronson. But unless I end up spending lots more time in the desert riding over lots of big ledges and rocks, instead of my "regular" single track in my home town, I don't really see a need for a change in bikes. The 5010 is just too fun to ride to wanna switch to anything else.