I'm currently running a 2.25 Ardent (on a 21mm rim) which looks pretty tiny, there's about 10mm of space on both sides of the chain/seat stay and around 15mm in front of the tire. Transition states 2.5" as the maximum size.
I'll probably go for a 2.4 Ardent in the rear and 2.6 Rekon in the front.
I had the chance to ride my Scout on a properly technical trail the other day- rode middle and lower black mountain at Pisgah in NC. I was following a skilled rider on terrain I'd never seen before, and after the first few drops I never doubted the scout. I went full speed ahead with no hesitation and came away incredibly impressed. It climbed well too on the way up, my legs were toast but it sure didn't lack in that department. Over the winter I was worried that I might have gotten the wrong bike (I've been on 29ers for years) but the past few days have definitely shown that I made the right call.
Think this is enough bike for Farlow and Bennett Gap in Pisgah?
Think this is enough bike for Farlow and Bennett Gap in Pisgah?
I can't say for certain since I've never ridden those trails, but I strongly suspect you'd be fine. I've taken my scout on a wide variety of trails and have never once felt like it was holding me back. I've ridden it on all my local trails and haven't come close to reaching its limit. I've also taken it on trails like Coeur de Loup and Angmar in Bromont and felt comfortable with everything. I even followed some locals recently at Vietnam (Three ledges, etc.) who were on burlier rigs (nomad and wfo) and was able to follow most of their lines. I might chicken out on the really big stuff, but it's not at all because of the bike, it's just that there is a limit to the risks I'm willing to take- especially when it's my first time down a trail!
I've pushed myself further on the scout than on any other bike I've owned. I'm not going to hit a 6' drop to flat any time soon, but a stepdown of the same size with a decent landing wouldn't be an issue. The best comparison we have locally to the trails you mentioned is probably the descent off cooper kiln, and for me this would be pretty much the perfect bike for an epic backcountry ride with lots of climbing and technical descents.
It seems like you're most interested in its downhill prowess, but I've gotta say that it's no slouch going the other direction either. Mine is built up with a 36 fork, 2.8 tires, and solid components so it's far from lightweight, but it still climbs really well. I've cleaned a climb twice so far this season that I've only managed once ever before, and I've been riding that trail since we built it 7 or 8 years ago. This is all anecdotal, but it people remark on its climbing ability when they throw a leg over it. It's also super stable through rock gardens and technical features. Skinnies feel easier than they ever have before. Not sure if it's the SBG or what, but the bike is something else. Hope this helps- sorry that this turned in to such a long reply!
Think this is enough bike for Farlow and Bennett Gap in Pisgah?
I can't say for certain since I've never ridden those trails, but I strongly suspect you'd be fine. I've taken my scout on a wide variety of trails and have never once felt like it was holding me back. I've ridden it on all my local trails and haven't come close to reaching its limit. I've also taken it on trails like Coeur de Loup and Angmar in Bromont and felt comfortable with everything. I even followed some locals recently at Vietnam (Three ledges, etc.) who were on burlier rigs (nomad and wfo) and was able to follow most of their lines. I might chicken out on the really big stuff, but it's not at all because of the bike, it's just that there is a limit to the risks I'm willing to take- especially when it's my first time down a trail!
I've pushed myself further on the scout than on any other bike I've owned. I'm not going to hit a 6' drop to flat any time soon, but a stepdown of the same size with a decent landing wouldn't be an issue. The best comparison we have locally to the trails you mentioned is probably the descent off cooper kiln, and for me this would be pretty much the perfect bike for an epic backcountry ride with lots of climbing and technical descents.
It seems like you're most interested in its downhill prowess, but I've gotta say that it's no slouch going the other direction either. Mine is built up with a 36 fork, 2.8 tires, and solid components so it's far from lightweight, but it still climbs really well. I've cleaned a climb twice so far this season that I've only managed once ever before, and I've been riding that trail since we built it 7 or 8 years ago. This is all anecdotal, but it people remark on its climbing ability when they throw a leg over it. It's also super stable through rock gardens and technical features. Skinnies feel easier than they ever have before. Not sure if it's the SBG or what, but the bike is something else. Hope this helps- sorry that this turned in to such a long reply!
Ah thank you! I really appreciate the long reply. I'm pretty much down to either a sentinel or the scout and like you said, am mostly concerned with the downhill performance. I do of course need it to get me to the top so I'm still torn. My riding style is more "monster truck through the chunky stuff" as opposed to stylishly riding trails and popping off features. So that's why I've looked at the sentinel. But I've never owned a 29er so I'm still torn. This definitely helped though!
The really chunky stuff is where I find I'm a little hesitant with the Scout. I find I have to mentally note to lean way back and try to skim over the really big holes/rocks/whatever. Whereas with my Banshee Spitfire, could just steam roll right through everything.
Then again I'm a bit of a hack, so that's just me. And part of the reason why I just picked up Banshee Rune frame.
The really chunky stuff is where I find I'm a little hesitant with the Scout. I find I have to mentally note to lean way back and try to skim over the really big holes/rocks/whatever. Whereas with my Banshee Spitfire, could just steam roll right through everything.
Then again I'm a bit of a hack, so that's just me. And part of the reason why I just picked up Banshee Rune frame.
Bit of a hack? What do you mean?
Thats the mindset that has put me off 29ers for so long. It's more of a challenge to clean the same technical section of trail on a 27.5 than a 29er.
Yes. So far it is great. Much more control when the trail gets choppy. I like that I can load up for big jumps, but the coil isn’t as lively on the smaller bumps and rollers as the air...more dead feeling. Coil adds a higher level of traction under steep/heavy braking episodes, which is where I find the limit of the Scout with my fox Evol air. I find that I need a heavier spring to avoid bottoms, but that sits me a tad bit high at sag. Always a problem with bikes designed for air shocks, but I use offset bushings to set me down some and get the bike balanced. I’m still experimenting however
Yes. So far it is great. Much more control when the trail gets choppy. I like that I can load up for big jumps, but the coil isn’t as lively on the smaller bumps and rollers as the air...more dead feeling. Coil adds a higher level of traction under steep/heavy braking episodes, which is where I find the limit of the Scout with my fox Evol air. I find that I need a heavier spring to avoid bottoms, but that sits me a tad bit high at sag. Always a problem with bikes designed for air shocks, but I use offset bushings to set me down some and get the bike balanced. I’m still experimenting however