Since you like the MM why don't you try the 2.6 version? Although PB tested it and didn't like it as much as the 2.35.
A mate has been very pleased by Good Year Newton/Newton ST in 2.6. Grippy and long lasting. The heavier versions are proper tough too.
Thanks. Instead of going Google i checked every version of mm on my fav bike store and found one 2.6 and one 2.8! I'm sure the front fork is a lot wider than the rear so the 2.8 goes there.
I live in a crazy hilly place where the tracks are all vertical and loose slippy ground with roots everywhere. I went and upgraded my bike and it came with boentrager se4 2.4 and I'm plunging straight down and missing the mm/ts on the old bike.
Glad you found what you were looking for. Let us know how the wider versions ride compared to the 2.35.
thanks. i am in New Zealand and ordered from the UK. it is going to take some time to arrive ... I'll post in the new year.
When riding my son's 2.8 tyres they were very very squirmy, if you try to push them hard, like riding on gummy bear lollies. I expect them to feel the same. But I'm old and scared and I don't go fast. I've given up trying to rail corners so these monster tyres are for going slow but not sliding rather than going fast and winning races.
Oh and i forgot to mention the pedalling inertia - they are not easy to pedal as the inertia on them are pretty high. i don't recommend plus tyres for people who want to go fast. just stick to 2.2-2.4 (never tried 2.5 so i don't know where the limit is)