i'm looking for a xcountry / trail bike that I can race in longer endurance races (light and a good climber) but can also handle the technical rocks and roots of New England. I was all set on the Ripley, but i do a lot of lower speed twisty climbs and I heard that the head-tube angle makes the ripley tough to handle at low speeds...just wondering if anyone has any experience with this?
I do not feel a slack head-tube angle is a significant detriment in any situation. Any loss of time on a climb due to struggling with line choice is likely to be compensated many times over by faster descending and/or less energy used by being more relaxed on descents.
i'm looking for a xcountry / trail bike that I can race in longer endurance races (light and a good climber) but can also handle the technical rocks and roots of New England. I was all set on the Ripley, but i do a lot of lower speed twisty climbs and I heard that the head-tube angle makes the ripley tough to handle at low speeds...just wondering if anyone has any experience with this?
Live in north New Jersey, my do it all bike in a v1 transition sentinel . It had a 64 degree head angle before I added a 170mm air shaft. Now it’s around 63.8 ish.... climbs great, the trick in the new bikes is the seat angle and reach numbers. They place the rider over the front of the bike..... but if you don’t like it, just buy an old bike.... there are still a lot out there.