27.5?

  • Previous Page
Author Message
Posted: Mar 5, 2008 at 11:15 Quote
for all of you not being able to decide between 26 and 29ers your answer is hereUnsecure image, only https images allowed: http://www.velocitynation.com/slideshow/1796/G9HN6148.jpgits the 27.5er

Posted: Mar 5, 2008 at 11:16 Quote
ratherbeoutriding wrote:
for all of you not being able to decide between 26 and 29ers your answer is hereUnsecure image, only https images allowed: http://www.velocitynation.com/slideshow/1796/G9HN6148.jpgits the 27.5er

Its stupid...

Posted: Mar 5, 2008 at 11:19 Quote
i know like there isnt enough wheel sizes already soon theyll be making 26.5592ers

Posted: Mar 5, 2008 at 11:21 Quote
Dumb. All the bike world needs is 20", 24", 26", and 700c. All this 29", 650b, 25", etc. crap is P O I N T L E S S. We have enough trouble getting manufacturers to come together on standards without changing the most basic standard of all. It's like the Lefty. It may work good but why address a problem that doesn't exist. I like to have lots of choices when I buy bike parts but that's just me.

Posted: Mar 5, 2008 at 11:23 Quote
agreed but that paintjob is fresh dopeness

Posted: Mar 5, 2008 at 11:25 Quote
FlyingFish wrote:
agreed but that paintjob is fresh dopeness

It looks like a dress your weird aunt would wear.

Posted: May 17, 2011 at 21:02 Quote
Unsecure image, only https images allowed: http://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/reviews/2011_reviews/mba_650.jpg
Its alive...

Posted: May 17, 2011 at 21:07 Quote
How come ive never heard of this 27.5er?

Posted: May 17, 2011 at 21:27 Quote
D1rtJumper wrote:
How come ive never heard of this 27.5er?

Because you can't afford one?

Posted: May 17, 2011 at 21:28 Quote
it sounds benificial... to some...but i kinda hope it doesnt catch on....

Posted: May 17, 2011 at 21:38 Quote
DavidMakalaster wrote:
Dumb. All the bike world needs is 20", 24", 26", and 700c. All this 29", 650b, 25", etc. crap is P O I N T L E S S. We have enough trouble getting manufacturers to come together on standards without changing the most basic standard of all. It's like the Lefty. It may work good but why address a problem that doesn't exist. I like to have lots of choices when I buy bike parts but that's just me.
The only current mountain bike standards are 26 and 29. Please don't try to tell me that manufacturers can't do 2 standards, when there are millions of bb standards, 3 different head tube sizes, a few axle widths, tons of different amount of spokes, different width of rotors, etc.

Posted: May 17, 2011 at 21:38 Quote
rlucky82 wrote:
D1rtJumper wrote:
How come ive never heard of this 27.5er?

Because you can't afford one?

So because I haven't heard of a bike that's barely known, you just go straight to insulting my financial issues?

Posted: May 17, 2011 at 21:44 Quote
DavidMakalaster wrote:
Dumb. All the bike world needs is 20", 24", 26", and 700c. All this 29", 650b, 25", etc. crap is P O I N T L E S S. We have enough trouble getting manufacturers to come together on standards without changing the most basic standard of all. It's like the Lefty. It may work good but why address a problem that doesn't exist. I like to have lots of choices when I buy bike parts but that's just me.

You can tell this guy hasn't ridden a 29er...

Also, you might want to educate yourself a bit on wheel sizes. The 700c is a 29" wheel.

Posted: May 17, 2011 at 22:32 Quote
D1rtJumper wrote:
rlucky82 wrote:
D1rtJumper wrote:
How come ive never heard of this 27.5er?

Because you can't afford one?

So because I haven't heard of a bike that's barely known, you just go straight to insulting my financial issues?

confucius say
he who rides a Giant Anthem should not make fun of any ones financial issues

  • Previous Page

 


Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.010459
Mobile Version of Website