If you have one fork (for eating) there are multiple prongs on it, it is called a fork not forks. if you have one fork on your like most people do, then it is a FORK. the pants argument does not apply, because then you would have to call each of the two sides of your fork a fork. ITS FORK.
If you have one fork (for eating) there are multiple prongs on it, it is called a fork not forks. if you have one fork on your like most people do, then it is a FORK. the pants argument does not apply, because then you would have to call each of the two sides of your fork a fork. ITS FORK.
there are two fork legs on a bike just as there are pants and almost the same as a eating fork (just minus two) so two legs = forks
So when you come to a split in a trail you can take the left fork or right fork correct? Then there are 2 forks to choose from. Where's the beat a dead horse emoticon when we need it?
So when you come to a split in a trail you can take the left fork or right fork correct? Then there are 2 forks to choose from. Where's the beat a dead horse emoticon when we need it?
No, when you come to a fork in the path/road/trail, you take the right path/road/trail or the left path/road/trail.
So when you come to a split in a trail you can take the left fork or right fork correct? Then there are 2 forks to choose from. Where's the beat a dead horse emoticon when we need it?
No, when you come to a fork in the path/road/trail, you take the right path/road/trail or the left path/road/trail.
Don't eat me alive with a DM rant, please.
But are there not 2 forks to choose from? If one refers to one route or another as a singular fork that they might take then you must assume that together they are plural.
But are there not 2 forks to choose from? If one refers to one route or another as a singular fork that they might take then you must assume that together they are plural.
I actually don't think that each way is a fork. You arrive at a fork. And then there are two (or more) ways to go. Plus, look at all of the companies. They all say fork. Even if it is seemingly grammatically incorrect, one should call it a fork.
But are there not 2 forks to choose from? If one refers to one route or another as a singular fork that they might take then you must assume that together they are plural.
I actually don't think that each way is a fork. You arrive at a fork. And then there are two (or more) ways to go. Plus, look at all of the companies. They all say fork. Even if it is seemingly grammatically incorrect, one should call it a fork.
I'm just f*cking with you man. Unsecure image, only https images allowed: http://www.bloodydecks.com/forums/images/smilies/Beating_A_Dead_Horse.gif