2.25 FAF for the front, 2.1 folding Revenge in the rear. Feels perfect, my friends aitken plyte feels too big for me.
You have a folding tire? How does it hold up as far as big drops and grind? I'm still hesitant on folding tires.
I know ur asking drew but logically they are fine. They hold the same sidewall and and tread thickness the only difference is the metal hopes that make the bead are now kevlar. So really they would hold up the same as any other tire. With of course exceptions like the khe park and tires like that.
2.25 FAF for the front, 2.1 folding Revenge in the rear. Feels perfect, my friends aitken plyte feels too big for me.
You have a folding tire? How does it hold up as far as big drops and grind? I'm still hesitant on folding tires.
I know ur asking drew but logically they are fine. They hold the same sidewall and and tread thickness the only difference is the metal hopes that make the bead are now kevlar. So really they would hold up the same as any other tire. With of course exceptions like the khe park and tires like that.
I'm not so sure about that. I'm fairly certain that they use different types of rubber as well as thickness of the rubber for folding tires.
[Quoten]The Kevlar beads alone, according to the late, great Sheldon Brown, save roughly 50 grams—two ounces—per tire. Of course he was talking about road and mountain tires, which are larger in diameter. So lets say it's more like three ounces per pair.
But according to the ever-reliable Dan's Comp website, the weight savings are actually more substantial than that. A regular old 2.1 Animal GLH tire weighs in at 26.9 ounces, while the identical size GLH Type R is 21.2 ounces. That's 5.7 ounces per tire, almost 3/4 pound for the pair.
So there's obviously more to this than just Kevlar beads. Thinner sidewalls, lighter casing, different rubber compounds, less rubber overall,[/Quoten]
The GLH R-Compound tire features the same tire design and dimensions as the traditional GLH but has a slightly softer compound and a Kevlar bead to reduce weight. 110psi and available in 1.95" (16.3oz), 2.1" (20.7oz) and 2.25" (23.8oz).
I don't know about you, but Sheldon Brown was a damn smart guy when it comes to bikes and I'll take anything on his site as fact. It's these reasons that make me worried about spending that much money on a tire that will wear out quicker/possible blow the side wall easier.
Well I'll be damned, it's a good thing i used that safety word "logically" eh?
All I know is that folding faf-k's wore down fairly quickly and the rubber has holes all voer the tire, compound is def an issue with these. But theya re holding up quite well for nearing 4 months on them. The front's bald from sliders, but the back has alot of tread on it still. My
Well I'll be damned, it's a good thing i used that safety word "logically" eh?
All I know is that folding faf-k's wore down fairly quickly and the rubber has holes all voer the tire, compound is def an issue with these. But theya re holding up quite well for nearing 4 months on them. The front's bald from sliders, but the back has alot of tread on it still. My
my fit 1.95 lasted for about 2 months, considerign how much a ride i think it did pretty good
i ride a maxxis holltroller 1.95 up front and a maxxis miracle 2.10 in the back. next monday ill have a primo coment 1.95 out back and the 2.10 miracle in front.