Trek session 88 problems

PB Forum :: Downhill
Trek session 88 problems
Author Message
Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:04 Quote
whats a socom got to do with anything?

O+
Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:05 Quote
stryke wrote:
photo
https://ep1.pinkbike.org/photo/2868/pbpic2868665.jpg

nobody remembers this photo?


That still looks like a de-tensioned wheel issue. I can see equal amounts of swingarm and linkage on either side of the tobe tube, seat tube line

O+
Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:05 Quote
iambike4lyf wrote:
whats a socom got to do with anything?


LOL! Man this thread is getting weak, I think I am going to unsubscribe soon!!!!

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:06 Quote
iambike4lyf wrote:
whats a socom got to do with anything?

the tire is just about touching the inside of the swingarm

and its flex so it seems to have alot to do with it

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:07 Quote
stryke wrote:
iambike4lyf wrote:
whats a socom got to do with anything?

the tire is just about touching the inside of the swingarm

and its flex so it seems to have alot to do with it

k, well that flex is purely wheel based
you can see the chainstays are str8

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:07 Quote
maestroforlife wrote:
stryke wrote:
photo
https://ep1.pinkbike.org/photo/2868/pbpic2868665.jpg

nobody remembers this photo?


That still looks like a de-tensioned wheel issue. I can see equal amounts of swingarm and linkage on either side of the tobe tube, seat tube line

look the left link

https://www.pinkbike.com/photo/2868665/ theres a link on here to an mtbr thread where the rider talks about it and what the problem was

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:07 Quote
iambike4lyf wrote:
k, so your saying it would flex that much AND flex back?
i know all materials flex a certain amount, but to flex that much and flex back is pretty amazing

Yes, it would flex back.
Youngs modulus shows that a materiel will flex, and return back to its original shape as long as it has not gone past its "yield point", or the point of permanent transformation.
Unsecure image, only https images allowed: http://www.tpub.com/doematerialsci/material%20science_files/image067.jpg
If you consider how long the whole swing arm that is flexing is, the amount of flex per inch of material would be relatively small.

O+
Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:08 Quote
stryke wrote:
iambike4lyf wrote:
whats a socom got to do with anything?

the tire is just about touching the inside of the swingarm

and its flex so it seems to have alot to do with it


If you think that that is a swing arm flexing, then A: you have never rode a Rocky Mountain RM6 or any of the thrust link DH bikes, and B: you need to step away from the computer and ride your bike and just stop comming here. This is rediculous

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:08 Quote
adrenalinejunkie11 wrote:
iambike4lyf wrote:
k, so your saying it would flex that much AND flex back?
i know all materials flex a certain amount, but to flex that much and flex back is pretty amazing

Yes, it would flex back.
Youngs modulus shows that a materiel will flex, and return back to its original shape as long as it has not gone past its "yield point", or the point of permanent transformation.
Unsecure image, only https images allowed: http://www.tpub.com/doematerialsci/material%20science_files/image067.jpg
If you consider how long the whole swing arm that is flexing is, the amount of flex per inch of material would be relatively small.

i know that, but to the extent that stryks talkign about seems stupid, over half an inch and back? and with aluminiun that knows to be stiff as f*ck

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:10 Quote
maestroforlife wrote:
stryke wrote:
iambike4lyf wrote:
whats a socom got to do with anything?

the tire is just about touching the inside of the swingarm

and its flex so it seems to have alot to do with it


If you think that that is a swing arm flexing, then A: you have never rode a Rocky Mountain RM6 or any of the thrust link DH bikes, and B: you need to step away from the computer and ride your bike and just stop comming here. This is rediculous

lol those rocky mountain bikes were fun..

it was even cooler when rocky mountain said its to help you rail corners

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:11 Quote
iambike4lyf wrote:
adrenalinejunkie11 wrote:
iambike4lyf wrote:
k, so your saying it would flex that much AND flex back?
i know all materials flex a certain amount, but to flex that much and flex back is pretty amazing

Yes, it would flex back.
Youngs modulus shows that a materiel will flex, and return back to its original shape as long as it has not gone past its "yield point", or the point of permanent transformation.
Unsecure image, only https images allowed: http://www.tpub.com/doematerialsci/material%20science_files/image067.jpg
If you consider how long the whole swing arm that is flexing is, the amount of flex per inch of material would be relatively small.

i know that, but to the extent that stryks talkign about seems stupid, over half an inch and back? and with aluminiun that knows to be stiff as f*ck

I agree that it is very likely a badly tensioned wheel, or just as shitty wheel, im just saying that i think it could be possible within the materials capabilities to do what he is saying....maybe not though...

O+
Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:11 Quote
stryke wrote:
maestroforlife wrote:
stryke wrote:


the tire is just about touching the inside of the swingarm

and its flex so it seems to have alot to do with it


If you think that that is a swing arm flexing, then A: you have never rode a Rocky Mountain RM6 or any of the thrust link DH bikes, and B: you need to step away from the computer and ride your bike and just stop comming here. This is rediculous

lol those rocky mountain bikes were fun..

it was even cooler when rocky mountain said its to help you rail corners

Yes the RM12...6" of vertical travel nad 6" of lateral flex...the rear wheel actually stay upright in corners when the rest of the bike was tipped over...not really swingarm flex more like main swingarm yoke flex.

O+
Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:13 Quote
Okay, well I know one thing forsure...the new Giant Glory doesn't flex as much as a commencal. FLAME ON! I am out of here.


Hahahaha!!! Useless thread.

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:13 Quote
you have your new giant?

Posted: Sep 13, 2009 at 16:17 Quote
stryke wrote:
photo
https://ep1.pinkbike.org/photo/2868/pbpic2868665.jpg

nobody remembers this photo?


people lived in denial due to the intense sticker.Facepalm


wathed a few videos of dh racers and its mostly single pivot swingarms that flex,and always at the axle.

honda had the right idea apart from they run a regular 12mm thru axle,should of gone for a 20mm thru axle rear.


 


Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.011856
Mobile Version of Website