Obviously infiltrator is right, you all are so stupid. 130 is the best and let's leave it at that.
I can't tell if you're taking the piss or genuinely an idiot. They all use the same technology and are the same fork, just with more or less stantion and a longer or shorter spring. There is no 'best' of them. It's down to the riding you use the fork for, the bike you're fitting it to and the personal preference of the rider. Putting the 130 on an NS capital would be rediculess because the bottom bracket would be obscenely high and the head angle ridiculously slack. The opposite also applies - putting the 80mm on a DMR bolt for example would be a stupid idea because you would lower the bottom bracket and ruin the geometry of the bike as well as having more rear travel than front, which would make it ride disgustingly - The 130 would be a much better idea for this bike.
Dude, honestly, you're the biggest idiot on this forum. Wtf are you talking about geometry? Who gives a flying f*ck about it, moar travel=better. End of story.
Obviously infiltrator is right, you all are so stupid. 130 is the best and let's leave it at that.
I can't tell if you're taking the piss or genuinely an idiot. They all use the same technology and are the same fork, just with more or less stantion and a longer or shorter spring. There is no 'best' of them. It's down to the riding you use the fork for, the bike you're fitting it to and the personal preference of the rider. Putting the 130 on an NS capital would be rediculess because the bottom bracket would be obscenely high and the head angle ridiculously slack. The opposite also applies - putting the 80mm on a DMR bolt for example would be a stupid idea because you would lower the bottom bracket and ruin the geometry of the bike as well as having more rear travel than front, which would make it ride disgustingly - The 130 would be a much better idea for this bike.
Dude, honestly, you're the biggest idiot on this forum. Wtf are you talking about geometry? Who gives a flying f*ck about it, moar travel=better. End of story.
I used to, but then I started doing some and its great for them. Only reason I didnt like them is because I hurt my toe that I used for footjamming before, so Ive just learned with the other foot Its pretty good actually
the 80s, 100 and 130s are all the same fork, just different stantion lengths. if there was a problem with the 100s it would happen on all of them because they use the same technology.
100 and 80mm are the exact same apart from a travel spacer and thats it, so you are totally right, i have bottomed mine out once or twice and they have survived the 130s would be no differant..
Lol, I must have blown my sela without even realising it's happened then. I must send them back to manitou right away and get some uber, non blowing seals. (sarcasm)
Well on my 130mms the coil gets harder the further they go down. they are near impossible to bottom and i havent yet.
Lol, I must have blown my sela without even realising it's happened then. I must send them back to manitou right away and get some uber, non blowing seals. (sarcasm)
Well on my 130mms the coil gets harder the further they go down. they are near impossible to bottom and i havent yet.
Here's the problem with the 100mm. it's only got 100mm of travel that's not enough to properly lube the seals, but the pressure of bottoming forces oil behind the seal.